logo
Trump administration says Israel has accepted its proposal for temporary ceasefire in Gaza

Trump administration says Israel has accepted its proposal for temporary ceasefire in Gaza

The Trump administration said Thursday that Israel has accepted a new U.S. proposal for a temporary ceasefire in Gaza.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump submitted a ceasefire proposal to Hamas that Israel had supported. She said that Hamas has not yet accepted the proposal but talks are continuing.
A Hamas official told Reuters that the group 'is studying the amended Witkoff proposal with a high sense of responsibility, stemming from interest to achieve the interests of our people and ensure an end to the aggression.'
The ceasefire development comes at an intense time in Gaza where people are desperate to obtain food. UN agencies have been warning that people there are at risk of famine. Last Friday, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that 'Palestinians in Gaza are enduring what may be the cruellest phase of this cruel conflict.' He said that after a nearly 80-day blockade, Israel had allowed 'finally, a trickle' of aid to cross over. It wasn't enough.
The World Food Program said Wednesday that 'hordes of hungry people' broke into its warehouse in central Gaza searching for food. The agency said that according to initial reports, two people died and several were injured. However, the Associated Press, citing hospital staff, reported that four people were killed.
'Humanitarian needs have spiralled out of control after 80 days of complete blockade of all food assistance and other aid into Gaza,' the WFP said in a statement. It added that it has warned of 'alarming and deteriorating conditions' in Gaza and the risks imposed by limiting humanitarian aid to hungry people who are desperate for help. The agency called for food assistance to be scaled up, saying it's the only way to reassure people 'that they will not starve.'
Last week, Israel ended its blockade on humanitarian goods and allowed trucks carrying life-saving aid to enter the enclave. This week, a new controversial U.S.-backed private company called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which has the support of Israel, set up aid distribution sites in Gaza. Israel has repeatedly claimed that Hamas steals aid, something aid groups have denied.
International aid organizations have condemned the new system of distributing aid in Gaza, accusing the state of politicizing the process. Jens Laerke, a spokesperson for the UN's aid co-ordination office, has said that Israel is trying to bypass its system run by 15 UN aid organizations and 200 NGOs and partners. He warned before the new aid distribution system was launched that it appeared to be 'a deliberate attempt to weaponize the aid.' He said aid should be provided based on need.
Jonathan Whittall, the head of the UN aid co-ordination office for the Palestinian territories, said Wednesday that in Gaza 'people are being starved and then drip-fed in the most undignified way possible.' He said the new distribution scheme was 'engineered scarcity: four distribution hubs located in central and southern Gaza, secured by private U.S. security contractors, where those Palestinians who can reach them will receive rations.'
Humanitarian aid organizations held a press conference on Parliament Hill Thursday criticizing the new aid distribution method, saying it politicizes an already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Oxfam Canada's director of international programs, Erin Kiley, said the new mechanism gives Israel power over who receives aid, where and from whom, turning relief into a tool of coercion.
'These actions undermine international humanitarian law and set a precedent for occupying powers to dictate the terms of aid based on political agendas and military goals,' she said.
The UN said this week its human-rights office received information that at least 47 people were injured Tuesday while trying to obtain aid. A spokesperson for GHF said the report of injuries is 'completely false' and that GHF 'has had no major injuries or deaths since we started operations on Tuesday.'
GHF said that 'misinformation' is circulating online and sought to clarify that no shots have been fired at Palestinian crowds at their distribution sites, nor have there been casualties.
The company said in a statement that it continued its operations Thursday at three distribution sites and that they have plans to build more across Gaza, including in the north.
Danny Glenwright, president and chief executive officer of Save the Children Canada, said that none of the chaos unfolding in Gaza is necessary. 'This is a crisis that Israel has created because it is bypassing systems that have been in place that work for us, that have worked for us in every conflict setting, in every humanitarian setting in which we've worked for many, many decades,' he said.
Mr. Glenwright said that humanitarian principles exist to ensure that those who need aid the most are able to get it, and aid must be delivered independently.
Jeremy Konyndyk, president of Refugees International, said Israel is trying to alleviate the political pressure it is facing from global allies. 'They want to relieve political pressure, but they don't necessarily want to address the underlying humanitarian crisis,' he said.
He said pressure from the international community needs to continue, and Israel needs to allow experienced humanitarian organizations long established in Gaza to resume their work at scale.
'This is not going to work,' he said of the new aid distribution model. 'This is not how you do famine relief. Famine relief is not about making people walk very, very long distances carrying very heavy boxes of food.'
With reports from Abyssinia Abebe and Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bitcoin's boom challenges anyone who believes the market is an efficient judge of value
Bitcoin's boom challenges anyone who believes the market is an efficient judge of value

Globe and Mail

time4 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Bitcoin's boom challenges anyone who believes the market is an efficient judge of value

If you want more evidence of how politics is infecting markets, consider the amazing resurgence of crypto over the past year. Bitcoin, the granddaddy of the sector, has shot up 50 per cent since last October. Meanwhile, promoters are licking their lips as they contemplate the prospects for a new wave of 'stablecoins' – digital tokens that purport to tie their value to that of an underlying asset, such as the U.S. dollar or gold. What's driving the new crypto frenzy? It's not the discovery of some grand new application for crypto. Nor is it a technological breakthrough. No, it's politics. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and a large bipartisan swath of Congress have suddenly turned into crypto boosters. They're demolishing restrictions on crypto use and pushing forward crypto-related projects. Even if you're not a crypto investor, you should pay attention to this odd outburst of enthusiasm. The bitcoin boom challenges anyone who wants to believe that today's market is an efficient judge of value. It also undercuts those who want to believe regulators are keeping a close eye on potential abuses. In a rational world, the appropriate price for bitcoin – an intangible asset that generates no profits, pays no dividends and has no obvious practical utility – would be close to zero. Instead, it's more than US$100,000. What makes its lofty value even more baffling is crypto's long and growing criminal record. Just over a year ago, Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of the massive FTX crypto exchange, was sentenced to 25 years in jail for fraud. Around the same time, Canada's own Changpeng Zhao, former head of crypto trader Binance, paid US$50-million in fines and spent four months in jail for money laundering. Meanwhile, Do Kwon, the South Korean software guru behind the TerraUSD stablecoin and Luna cryptocurrency, vanished after his creations crashed, wiping out billions of dollars in value. He was eventually apprehended and arrested and still faces court cases in multiple jurisdictions. Opinion: Canada was once a global leader in crypto. It can be one again Strangely, though, these and other lurid crypto mishaps have vanished from Washington's official memory. The U.S. capital's abrupt shift in sentiment demonstrates the amazing moral elasticity of the new administration. Mr. Trump, who once denounced crypto as a 'scam,' is now vowing to make the United States the 'crypto capital of the world.' He has issued his own personal meme coin – the term for a deliberately useless token, often created with a satirical intent – and has raised more than US$300-million from sales of it, according to a Washington Post analysis. The President is shameless in his promotion of his coin as demonstrated by the private dinner he recently held to reward the biggest buyers of his token. Some might ask if such events amount to selling presidential access to the highest bidder. Others might worry that Mr. Trump is opening the door to outright bribes laundered through purchases of his personal meme coin. In the wonderful world of Washington crypto, though, nobody seems too fussed by such ethical questions. Conflicts of interest are the new norm. Consider this week's events. On Tuesday, Mr. Trump's social media company, Trump Media and Technology Group, announced it was raising US$2.5-billion to invest in bitcoin. A day later, the U.S. Department of Labor rescinded its guidance that had previously discouraged retirement plans from offering crypto as a potential investment to their members. This might be a coincidence. Or not. Either way, it looks horrible. So does the extravagantly named GENIUS Act, now advancing rapidly through Congress with bipartisan support. It aims to legitimize stablecoins. These digital tokens attempt to address one common criticism of crypto – the fact that bitcoin and its ilk can fluctuate wildly in value. Stablecoins, as the name suggests, claim they can stabilize the value of their tokens. How? By backing them with reserves of U.S. Treasuries and other low-risk assets. It's an intriguing notion, but it raises loads of questions. Who will ensure stablecoins have the reserves they claim? What happens if a stablecoin develops problems and fails? In many ways, stablecoins look like quasi-banks, but with few of the rules that normally protect bank depositors. Critics say they will increase the fragility of the financial system. Perhaps the fundamental question here is simply, why? Stablecoins solve no obvious problem. Everything they claim to do can be done already through banks and credit cards. It's hard to understand what value can be generated from creating a digital middleman to hold government bonds for you. To be sure, you can make similar points about crypto more generally. More than 15 years after bitcoin first appeared, it is still searching for a practical application. The blockchain concept it relies upon is too clunky and slow for day-to-day use in stores or banks. And the same is true of other digital tokens despite endless tinkering and extravagant claims. Crypto shines in just two areas: enabling criminal activity and offering people a vehicle for pure fact-free speculation. So why is Washington suddenly so enthusiastic about it? Perhaps because the crypto industry accounted for nearly half of all the corporate money that flowed into the U.S. election last year, according to non-profit group Public Citizen. The generous donations appear to have bought the industry a bumper crop of new converts.

Hamas says it is still reviewing a U.S. proposal for a Gaza ceasefire
Hamas says it is still reviewing a U.S. proposal for a Gaza ceasefire

CTV News

time6 hours ago

  • CTV News

Hamas says it is still reviewing a U.S. proposal for a Gaza ceasefire

A Palestinian boy, injured following an Israeli airstrike, is brought for treatment to the Baptist Hospital in Gaza City, Friday, May 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip — Hamas said Friday it was still reviewing a U.S. proposal for a temporary ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, where 27 people were killed in new Israeli airstrikes, according to hospital officials. The ceasefire plan, which has been approved by Israeli officials, won a cool initial reaction Thursday from the militant group. But President Donald Trump said Friday negotiators were nearing a deal. 'They're very close to an agreement on Gaza, and we'll let you know about it during the day or maybe tomorrow,' Trump told reporters in Washington. U.S. negotiators have not publicized the terms of the proposal. But a Hamas official and an Egyptian official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks, said Thursday that it called for a 60-day pause in fighting, guarantees of serious negotiations leading to a long-term truce and assurances that Israel will not resume hostilities after the release of hostages, as it did in March. In a terse statement issued a few hours before Trump spoke, Hamas said it is holding consultations with Palestinian factions over the proposal it had received from U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. A United Nations spokesperson, Stephane Dujarric, urged the parties to 'find the political courage' to secure an agreement. While changes may have been made to the proposal, the version confirmed earlier called for Israeli forces to pull back to the positions they held before it ended the last ceasefire. Hamas would release 10 living hostages and a number of bodies during the 60-day pause in exchange for more than 1,100 Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, including 100 serving long sentences after being convicted of deadly attacks. Each day, hundreds of trucks carrying food and humanitarian aid would be allowed to enter Gaza, where experts say a nearly three-month Israeli blockade - slightly eased in recent days - has pushed the population to the brink of famine. 'Negotiations are ongoing on the current proposal,' Qatar's ambassador to the United Nations, Alya Ahmed Saif Al-Thani said Friday, referring to talks between her country, the United States and Egypt. 'We are very determined to find an ending to this horrific situation in Gaza.' On Thursday, a top Hamas official, Bassem Naim, said the U.S. proposal 'does not respond to any of our people's demands, foremost among which is stopping the war and famine.' The uncertainty over the new proposal came as hospital officials said that 27 people had been killed Friday in separate airstrikes. A strike that hit a tent in the southern city of Khan Younis killed 13, including eight children, hospital officials said. The Israeli military did not immediately comment. Meanwhile, the bodies of 12 people, including three women, were brought to Shifa Hospital on Friday from the nearby Jabaliya refugee camp. The Palestinian Red Crescent Society said the bodies of two others were brought to a hospital in Gaza City. Hospital officials also said Friday that at least 72 had been killed in Gaza during the previous day. That figure does not include some hospitals in the north, which are largely cut off due to the fighting. Since the war began, more than 54,000 Gaza residents, mostly women and children, have been killed according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its tally. The war began when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and taking 250 hostages. Of those taken captive, 58 remain in Gaza, but Israel believes 35 are dead and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said there are 'doubts' about the fate of several others. Some Gaza residents said their hope for a ceasefire is tempered by repeated disappointment over negotiations that failed to deliver a lasting deal. 'This is the war of starvation, death, siege and long lines for food and toilets,' Mohammed Abed told The Associated Press in the central Gaza city of Deir al-Balah. 'This war is the 2025 nightmare, 2024 nightmare and 2023 nightmare.' Abed said he and his family struggle to find food, waiting three hours to get a small amount of rice and eating only one meal daily. 'It's heartbreaking that people are being starved because of politics. Food and water should not be used for political purposes,' he said. Another Gaza resident, Mohammed Mreil, said about the possibility of a truce that: 'We want to live and we want them (Israelis) to live. God did not create us to die.' Article by Abdel Kareem Hana And Bassem Mroue. Mroue reported from Beirut. Aamer Madhani in Washington, and Farnoush Amiri and Edith Lederer at the United Nations, contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store