Bill banning hormone therapy for transgender inmates heads to governor's desk
The Utah State Correctional Facility is pictured from a 'free speech zone' set up about two miles from the facility in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2024 as the state prepared to execute death row inmate Taberon Honie just after midnight. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)
The Utah Legislature gave final passage on Thursday to a bill that would restrict certain treatments for transgender inmates in the state's prisons, jails and juvenile detention facilities.
Sponsored by House Majority Whip Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, HB252 passed the Senate Thursday and is headed to the governor's desk. It passed along party lines in both the House and Senate, with Democrats in opposition.
The bill would require all minors in a detention center to be housed in accordance to their sex assigned at birth, while prohibiting the use of puberty blockers. It also prevents sexual relations between staff and people housed in juvenile detention centers (people up to 25 years old are sometimes housed in these centers).
And, the bill prevents the state's county jails and two prisons from administering 'cross-sex hormone treatment' and any kind of gender-affirming surgeries for adult inmates. People who started treatment before incarceration would be allowed to continue it.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Elective and cosmetic surgeries are already unavailable to inmates in the two state prisons, the Utah Department of Corrections confirmed to Utah News Dispatch on Thursday.
According to data from the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees health care in the state's two prisons, there are currently 33 Utah inmates receiving hormone replacement therapy — 29 transitioned from male to female, and the remaining four transitioned from female to male.
Of those 33, seven were receiving hormone replacement therapy at the time of their incarceration. The remaining 26 requested the treatment while in prison. Had Lisonbee's bill been in place prior to their incarceration, they wouldn't have been able to receive treatment. The legislation is not retroactive.
Lisonbee's law is part of a national movement imposing restrictions on transgender inmates. On Jan. 20, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled 'Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government' that, among other things, required federal agencies to house inmates in accordance with their biological sex.
'When we have people in custody, whether that's in adult custody or youth custody, a lot of parts of their lives are under restriction. It's a different environment. They can't drive, they can't decide where they live, they can't leave the premises,' said Sen. Derrin Owens, R-Fountain Green, who sponsored the bill in the Senate. 'It's a highly structured society.'
Bill to restrict transgender students in Utah college dorms heads to Gov. Cox
But opponents to the bill cited safety concerns, specifically around housing.
'Being a teenager is hard enough; being a teenager in secure care is a particularly precarious situation,' said Rep. Grant Miller, a Salt Lake Democrat and public defender. 'I can only imagine the difficulties, for example, of a trans female minor being housed with young males. I think that presents a meaningful safety issue.'
Miller also had concerns that the bill could spur a lawsuit over lack of access to health care.
HB252 is the latest bill passed by lawmakers that deals with transgender Utahns — Cox recently signed HB269, which restricts where transgender college students can and can't live in public universities.
During previous sessions, lawmakers have passed laws banning access to gender-affirming care for minors, dictating what bathrooms transgender people can use in government buildings, and preventing transgender teens from playing girls sports.
'I hope we're about done with bills in this body that target this population,' said Sen. Jen Plumb, D-Salt Lake City, before she voted 'no' on the bill Thursday.
While the state does not allow any kind of cosmetic or elective surgeries for inmates, it does have a policy for them to receive hormone replacement therapy.
Per the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, those inmates undergo a lengthy screening and evaluation from nurses, a mental health therapist, a psychologist, and possibly more health care professionals.
CONTACT US
The review considers the medical, mental health and security risks or benefits to the inmate — prior to the initiation of treatment, the inmate is required to participate in group therapy for at least one year 'in an attempt to effectively treat the symptoms of Gender Dysphoria,' the policy states.
For their first year of treatment, the inmate undergoes a re-evaluation every 90 days. After that, they get a re-evaluation every 180 days. The treatment can also be discontinued, according to department policy, if the individual isn't compliant with recommended mental health treatment, or a health care professional decides they no longer meet the criteria.
That policy was the subject of a lawsuit earlier this year, when former President Joe Biden's Department of Justice found the Utah Department of Corrections had 'imposed unnecessary barriers to treatment for gender dysphoria' on an inmate. That lawsuit was dismissed in January, according to court records.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
9 minutes ago
- E&E News
New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's portion of Republicans' party-line bill proposes to sell off certain public lands and repeal billions of dollars for energy programs in Democrats' 2022 climate law. The committee's proposal, unveiled Wednesday evening, contains many of the provisions in the House-passed H.R. 1, the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' — including ones that would target the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office or charge a one-time fee to speed up permitting for some natural gas projects. But there are some significant differences. Most notable is a new section favored by Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) to revive the sale of public lands, reigniting a firestorm of opposition from advocates. The provision goes further than an abandoned proposal in the House, encompassing Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands across 11 Western states. Advertisement ENR's text comes as the Senate is racing to tweak and quickly vote on tax, energy and national security legislation after the House approved its version last month. Republicans are working through the reconciliation process, which will allow them to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass the budget-focused bill with simple majorities.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are pushing for an investigation into top Justice Department official Ed Martin over his stated plans to "shame" political opponents of President Donald Trump who he's unable to charge criminally, as well as a host of other politically charged matters Martin has publicly pledged to pursue in his new position. "I write to express my grave concern about Ed Martin's stated intention to abuse his new roles as lead of the so-called 'Weaponization Working Group' you constituted at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and as DOJ's Pardon Attorney," Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter transmitted to the Justice Department, which was first obtained by ABC News. "Following his disgraceful tenure as Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Martin apparently plans to continue his misconduct in his new roles at DOJ." The DOJ did not immediately respond to an ABC News request for comment on the letter. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons Martin's controversial tenure as the interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., in the opening months of Trump's presidency thrust the office into turmoil and led several Senate Republicans to state publicly they wouldn't support his permanent confirmation in the role. But once the White House announced they were pulling Martin's nomination, Trump said Martin would instead be appointed to several top positions working out of DOJ's main headquarters -- serving as an associate deputy attorney general, the U.S. pardon attorney and director of the so-called "Weaponization Working Group." Martin celebrated the news on his X account, posting 'Eagle Unleashed,' and in various interviews celebrated what he described as a mandate from Trump directly to target the alleged 'weaponization' of the department under the Biden administration. 'It's classic Donald Trump, right? That somebody tries to block him and block his pick, and he decides to double down,' Martin told Breitbart News last month. 'This is probably the greatest job I could ever envision.' MORE: Trump US attorney nominee distances himself from antisemitic Jan. 6 rioter he once praised In a news conference announcing his departure from the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, Martin confirmed he planned to launch a probe of last-minute pardons issued by former President Joe Biden just before he left office -- and suggested that officials he's unable to charge would instead be publicly "shamed." "There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people," Martin said. "And if they can be charged, we'll charge them. But if they can't be charged, we will name them ... And in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are shamed. And that's a fact. That's the way things work. And so that's how I believe the job operates." The approach would directly conflict with longstanding DOJ policy that prohibits prosecutors from naming or disparaging individuals who they don't intend to charge criminally. When asked about that policy by ABC News during the news conference, Martin said he would "have to look at what the provision you're referring to, to see -- we want to square ourselves with doing the things correctly." The letter from Senate Democrats said Martin's statements "are a brazen admission that Mr. Martin plans to systematically violate the Justice Manual's prohibition on extrajudicial statements by shaming uncharged parties for nakedly partisan reasons. Weaponizing DOJ in this manner will further undermine the public's trust in the department in irreparable ways." MORE: Bondi, as new AG, launches 'Weaponization Working Group' to review officials who investigated Trump In his early days as pardon attorney, Martin said he advised the president in his pardon of former Virginia county sheriff Scott Jenkins, who had been sentenced to ten years in prison for a federal bribery conviction. "No MAGA left behind," Martin posted on X in response to the pardon. Durbin's letter further cited reports Martin has "personally advocated" fast-tracking pardons for members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who were convicted of seditious conspiracy stemming from their roles leading up to the attack on the Capitol, after President Trump initially opted to commute their sentences in his sweeping clemency action for the nearly 1600 individuals charged in connection with Jan. 6. Durbin's letter requests Bondi provide a host of records related to Martin's appointment and early days as head of the Weaponization Working Group and Pardon Attorney's Office. It's unclear whether DOJ will ultimately respond to Durbin's demands given Democrats' minority position on the committee. Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ originally appeared on


E&E News
9 minutes ago
- E&E News
Hill Republicans applaud climate rule rollback
Republican lawmakers welcomed the Trump administration's Wednesday proposal to roll back limits on power plant emissions. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled a plan to wipe out power plant pollution limits and carbon storage requirements that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The proposal would leave the power sector without a federal mandate to address fossil fuel emissions. Republicans on Capitol Hill were quick to welcome EPA's actions. They downplayed potential climate impacts, instead pointing to the need to bolster fuel production to power artificial intelligence and lower energy prices. Advertisement 'These regulations promulgated during the Biden-Harris administration threaten American businesses and workers without making a meaningful difference toward addressing pollution,' said Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), chair of the House's Energy and Commerce Committee, at EPA's Wednesday rollout event.