
Eden's Shore by Oisín Fagan review – hilarious, beautiful and very violent
In that dimple of European history between the French Revolution and the coronation of Queen Victoria, there lived a not inconsiderable number of men – usually young, dumb, and full of opium – whose foremost ambition was to set sail for the Americas, and there, in their own parcels of conveniently cheap and plentiful wilderness, found utopian communes where society could be forged anew in accordance with the principles of enlightenment. It certainly didn't hurt that these endeavours would enable – even necessitate – quite a lot of shagging. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and his mates, Roberts Southey and Lovell, laid plans, between blasts of nitrous oxide and versification, for the foundation of a commune on the banks of Pennsylvania's Susquehanna River, chosen for its 'excessive beauty and its security from hostile Indians'. Lack of funds quickly became an issue, and soon our intrepid Romantics had compromised on location, proposing to found their 'Pantisocracy' in rural Wales instead of the New World. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the plan never came off.
Angel Kelly, the hapless protagonist – or perhaps initiator would be a better word – of Oisín Fagan's second novel, Eden's Shore, is one of these Coleridgian dreamers. At the opening, we meet him as a young and feckless law student at the University of Dublin, hanging around Parliament Street with his 'broad-brimmed hat, a cravat and a small book of Montesquieu under his arm, from which he partook of no more than five sentences a day'. Secretly, he believes he will 'one day prove to be a great man'. An inheritance from a beloved aunt allows him to further augment his epicurean lifestyle, but when the pleasures of whoring, drinking and tobacco begin to pall, he resolves to spend the last of his wealth on an expedition to Brazil, with the intention of founding 'the harmonious society' of which he and his friends 'had so often and so manfully spoken': 'a colony that is free from the sins of the old world – a place free from tyranny, discrimination, illegality, religion, persecution, taxation'.
His friends' mirthful reaction to Angel's grandly stated intent precipitates a feeling of disgust, 'gliding through his throat like an internal bruise', and incites him into realisation of his quixotic plans. He takes a ship from Dublin to Liverpool and from there secures passage aboard the Atlas, bound for Santana, Brazil. Due to a week-long bender with a dockside sex worker, he neglects to make thorough inquiries into the ship's business.
Emerging from his cabin some time later, after a viscerally described bout of sea sickness, Angel discovers that the Atlas had, during a stopover in Nouadhibou, North Africa, taken on a human cargo. Our slipshod young revolutionary has now become an unintentional witness to – and, arguably, participant in – the barbarities of the Atlantic slave trade's Middle Passage. The Coleridge comparison is apt beyond the biographical, because the episode that follows as the Atlas is beset by rebellion and mutiny reads like a sort of roided-up Rime of the Ancient Mariner. When Angel and his newfound ally Flores, a Muslim scholar who boarded the ship with the intention of buying his mother's freedom at the far end of the passage, finally reach Brazil, thoroughly battered and bloodied, they find themselves at the centre of a conflict between imperial interests that threatens to swallow them more totally than any ocean.
Angel Kelly's story ends up functioning almost as a prologue to Eden's Shore. This sprawling epic of the late 18th-century Americas examines questions of complicity, violence, the limits of philosophy, and what place love could have – what redemption it might begin to offer – in a world governed by the extractive logics of colonialism. If that sounds like an enormous drag, I assure you, this novel is unexpectedly hilarious and very beautiful. As well as deftly controlling and differentiating a vividly realised ensemble of dreamers, drinkers and mercurial freebooters, Fagan achieves a sultry, skirling prose that captures with equal precision both the beauty of the tropics and the spiritual and physical mutilations practised in their shade-bound midst. A 'dreamish' light lingers in bearded jungle trees; a bloated tick rests in a navel 'like a dolmen on a white plain'; the shoulders of a weeping man vacillate 'rapidly, like the amputated stumps of wings'.
One of the things I appreciated most about this novel was Fagan's attentiveness to the polyglot confusion of Latin colonial life in a place where African freedmen, Chinese street hustlers and French Freemasons all muscle against each other to stake out ideological and literal territory, the complexity of communication in their many native tongues yielding moments of high comedy and intense pathos (often simultaneously). There is the Spanish cook on a slave ship, whose drunken declarations of guilt over the horrors in which he is made complicit are the more haunting for their linguistic derangement. There is the young Parisian revolutionary whose exuberant and ultimately futile idealism bursts the seams of his threadbare English: 'I want to share my learn with all the paysans of the world … we love the revolution so much, the equality, the liberty, the universal thing …'
It perhaps ought to be said that, despite its many pulchritudes, Eden's Shore is a strikingly violent novel (as was Fagan's debut set in medieval Ireland, Nobber). I would argue that it needs to be, but some readers might blanch over the lingering, half-page descriptions of infected wounds and severed ocular nerves. To me, Eden's Shore often felt like a sort of maritime Blood Meridian – Cormac McCarthy's portentous masterpiece of the American west – and it will no doubt divide readers along similar lines. But I'd be hard pressed to think of higher praise.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
AK Blakemore's novel The Glutton is published by Granta. Eden's Shore by Oisín Fagan is published by John Murray (£16.99).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Imperialism still overshadows our intellectual history
Peter Watson begins his survey of the history of ideas in Britain with the assertion that the national mindset (which at that time was the English mindset) changed significantly after the accession of Elizabeth I. His book – a guide to the nature of British intellectual curiosity since the mid-16th century – begins there, just as England had undergone a liberation from a dominant European authority: the shaking off of the influence of the Roman Catholic church and the advent of the Reformation, and the new opportunities that offered for the people. He describes how a culture based largely on poetry and on the court of Elizabeth then redirected the prevailing intellectual forces of the time. This affected not just literature (Marlowe, Shakespeare and Jonson) but also helped develop an interest in science that grew remarkably throughout the next few centuries. The 'imagination' of Watson's title is not merely the creative artistic imagination, but also that of scientists and inventors and, indeed, of people adept at both. The book is, according to its footnotes, based on secondary sources, so those well read in the history of the intellect in Britain since the Reformation will find much that is familiar. There is the odd surprise, such as one that stems from the book's occasional focus on the British empire and the need felt today to discuss its iniquities. Watson writes that the portion of the British economy based on the slave trade (which must not be conflated with empire) was between 1 per cent and 1.4 per cent. He also writes that for much of the era of slavery the British had a non-racial view of it, since their main experience of the odious trade was of white people being captured by Barbary pirates and held to ransom. While this cannot excuse the barbarism endured by Africans shipped by British (and other) slavers across the Atlantic, it lends some perspective to a question in serious danger of losing any vestige of one. Watson does not come down on one side or the other in the empire debate, eschewing the 'balance sheet' approach taken by historians such as Nigel Biggar and Niall Ferguson; but he devotes too much of the last section of his book to the question, when other intellectual currents in the opening decades of the 21st century might have been more profitably explored, not least the continuing viability of democracy. Earlier on, he gives much space to an analysis of Edward Said, and questions such as whether Jane Austen expressed her antipathy to slavery sufficiently clearly in the novel Mansfield Park. But then some of Watson's own analyses of writers and thinkers are not always easily supported. He is better on the 18th century – dealing well with the Scottish enlightenment (giving a perfectly nuanced account of Adam Smith) and writers such as Burke and Gibbon – than he appears to be on the 19th. He gives Carlyle his due, but cites an article in a learned American journal from 40 years ago to justify his claim that Carlyle's 'reputation took a knock' in 1849 with the publication of his Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question. Watson says readers were offended by the use of the term 'Quashee' to describe a black man. They may well, if so, have been unsettled by the still less palatable title that the Discourse was subsequently given, which was The Nigger Question: it appeared thus in a 1853 pamphlet and in the Centenary Edition of Carlyle's works in 1899. That indicates the Discourse did Carlyle's reputation no lasting harm at the time, whatever it may have done since. In seeking to pack so much into fewer than 500 pages of text, Watson does skate over a few crucial figures. Some of his musings on empire might have been sacrificed to make more space for George Orwell, for example. A chapter in whose title his name appears features just one brief paragraph on him, about Homage to Catalonia, and later there is a page or so on Animal Farm, which says nothing new. Of Orwell's extensive and mould-breaking journalism there is nothing – somewhat surprising in a book about the British imagination when dealing with one of its leading exponents of the past century. Watson emphasises scientific discovery and innovation, and the effect on national life and ideas caused by the Industrial Revolution. These are all essential consequences of our intellectual curiosity, and he is right to conclude that the historic significance of Britain in these fields is immense. He includes league tables of Nobel prizewinners by nation in which Britain shows remarkably well. But these prizes are not the only means by which the contribution to civilisation and progress by a people are measured. There are notable omissions. Although Watson talks about the elitist nature of 'high culture' – such as Eliot and The Waste Land – he does not discuss how far the British imagination, and the British contribution to world civilisation, might have advanced had we taken the education of the masses more seriously earlier. We were, until the Butler Education Act of 1944, appalling at developing our human resources, and have not been much better since. It is surprising that there is no discussion of British music, one of the greatest fruits of the imagination of the past 150 years. And there is no analysis of the role of architecture, which, given its impact and its centrality to many people's idea of themselves as British, surely merited examination. The book shows extensive and intelligent reading, but trying to cram so much information and commentary into one volume has not been a complete success, or resulted in something entirely coherent.

The National
10 hours ago
- The National
Canadian space firm unveils new Edinburgh office
PCI Geomatics, a leading firm in Earth observation, has opened its new office at the Future's Institute in the Scottish capital as it aims to become a key player in Scotland's space industry. PCI Geomatics, operating under the name Catalyst, gathers and analyses information about Earth's physical, chemical, and biological systems using remote sensing technologies and uses the data it collects to provide climate-related information. The Toronto-headquartered firm has more than 40 years of experience and joins more than 180 other companies that are already contributing to Scotland's satellite design and manufacturing industry. READ MORE: Scottish Government 'short-changed by £1bn' by Rachel Reeves, Finance Secretary says Business Minister Richard Lochhead welcomed the news as he said Scotland's space sector has grown at a 'phenomenal pace'. He said 'Scotland is well on the way to becoming a European leader in the space sector. PCI's arrival adds to Edinburgh's considerable reputation as a 'data capital' and takes us closer to our ambition to capture £4 billion of the global space market. 'The number of space-related organisations based in Scotland rose by 25% within a year, with the sector's total income increasing by 65%, demonstrating the phenomenal pace of growth and scale of opportunity before us. 'This is why the Scottish Government appointed its first ever Space Envoy, Daniel Smith, last year who is boosting Scotland's global standing and helping businesses forge strategic partnerships and identify new opportunities.' PCI said its business aligns 'strongly with Scotland's growing reputation' in space-enabled applications which includes more than 30 companies dedicated to observing and protecting Earth from space. The company is now recruiting for multiple roles in Scotland. PCI has also joined the industry body Space Scotland and participated in a recent Scottish Earth Observation showcase at the British Embassy in Denmark. President and CEO of PCI, June McAlarey, said she is excited to see the business expand into Scotland. She said: 'Scotland's rising profile in the global space economy has been unmistakable. When exploring locations to complement our Canadian headquarters, the UK quickly stood out as a strategic gateway to Europe and the Middle East. 'We now have a growing team across the UK and are excited to expand our Scottish office in the coming weeks.' Dr. Craig Brown, investment director at the UK Space Agency, also welcomed the news as he said Earth observation technology is vital to keeping the world safe. He said: 'Scotland's space sector attracts significant levels of private investment and is playing an important role in unlocking the value of space data for the wider economy. 'We welcome the presence of international companies like PCI as a key driver of innovation, expertise and creation. 'This new development supports our commitment to grow the space economy across the whole of the UK and to advance Earth observation technology, which is a vital tool for protecting our planet.'


NBC News
10 hours ago
- NBC News
Views of the U.S. under Trump dip sharply in many allied countries
Views of the U.S. and confidence in its leader to handle world affairs have taken a dive in more than a dozen countries over the last year, according to a poll from the Pew Research Center released Wednesday and conducted over the first few months of President Donald Trump's second term. These declines are most pronounced among residents in neighboring Mexico and Canada, which have been at the center of high-profile spats with the administration, as well as a handful of NATO countries (like Sweden, Poland and the Netherlands) amid it Russia's war with Ukraine. Public sentiment about the U.S. has gone up in a few countries over the last year, most notably in Israel. But most of the two-dozen countries surveyed saw public opinion about the U.S. dip as Trump began his second term. Overall, the poll shows an international community full of increased skepticism of Trump and his "America First" foreign policies, from his administration's antagonistic relationship with traditional close allies to its focus on tariffs to its friendly posture toward right-wing, populist movements that have been amassing more power in Europe. Yet while the results in many countries are negative, Trump's marks are broadly higher now in these nations than they were during the beginning of his first term eight years ago. Fifteen countries have seen significant drops in their opinion of America over the last year. In Mexico, 61% of respondents had a favorable opinion of the U.S. in 2024, but just 29% feel that way now. In Sweden, which joined NATO in 2024 following the Russian invasion of Ukraine two years prior, a 47% favorable rating of the U.S. last year plummeted to just 19% now, with 79% of Swedish respondents viewing America unfavorably. And in Canada, a 54% favorability mark in 2024 dropped 20 points in 2025, to 34%, amid Trump's repeated threats to make the country America's newest state. On the other end of the spectrum, the share of people in Turkey, Nigeria and Israel who rated the U.S. favorably increased significantly over the last year. When it comes to Trump specifically, a majority of respondents in five countries of the 24 surveyed said they have a lot or some confidence in the president to do the right thing when it comes to world affairs: Hungary, India, Israel, Nigeria and Kenya. Majorities in nine of the 10 European countries tested have either not too much or no confidence in Trump at all, with at least three-quarters of respondents saying so in the Netherlands, France, Spain, Germany and Sweden. Men, younger people and those who view their country's right-wing populist parties favorably are more likely to have more confidence in Trump. For example, 51% of Japanese people between the ages of 18 and 34 have confidence in Trump, according to the poll, while 31% of Japanese people 50 years or older say the same. In the United Kingdom, 45% of men say they have confidence in Trump, compared with 28% of women. Respondents across 13 nations registered a double-digit decline in confidence in the U.S. president on world affairs between 2024 and 2025. While 63% in both Sweden and Germany had confidence in then-President Joe Biden last year, just 15% and 18%, respectively, said they have confidence in Trump. The survey also tested how well respondents felt several different personal characteristics described Trump. At least 60% of adults across 21 of the 24 countries surveyed said the word "arrogant" described Trump well. Majorities in 20 countries said he's "a strong leader," while majorities in 21 countries called him "dangerous." Majorities in three countries (Nigeria, India and Kenya) said Trump was "honest," and majorities in five countries (Greece, Japan, Indonesia, Hungary and Kenya) called him "diplomatic." Compared with his first term, the share of people across most of the surveyed countries who see Trump as a strong leader and qualified has increased. There has also been a dramatic increase in the share of adults who believe America's president is "dangerous" in countries where Pew also tested Biden's first year in office. On confidence in Trump to tackle global economic problems, Trump is underwater in every European country surveyed, though Hungarians are effectively split. The survey was mostly conducted before Trump announced global tariffs on April 2. In Mexico, where the survey was conducted following weeks of changing tariff policies on the country, 83% lack confidence in Trump's economic policies. In Canada, which has faced similar targeting from Trump, 74% lack confidence, and 57% said they have no confidence at all. Majorities in three countries — Kenya (56%) and Nigeria and Israel (62% each) — have confidence in Trump to handle "the conflict between Israel and its neighbors." His numbers among the countries tested are the lowest in Turkey, where 7% are confident in his handling of the issue. Though a majority of Israelis expressed confidence in Trump's ability to handle the ongoing war, the poll found that confidence in Trump among right-wing Israelis is nearly four times higher, at 83%, compared with the 21% of left-wing Israelis who have confidence in Trump on the issue. Adults in most other countries said they were not confident in Trump's ability to handle the conflict. On Trump's handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, majorities in nearly all of the European countries surveyed, with the exception of Greece and Hungary, expressed little or no confidence in Trump. (Adults in Greece were split, and a narrow majority of Hungarians had at least some confidence in Trump to handle that conflict.) In France, Germany, Spain and Sweden, about three-quarters of adults said they had little or no confidence in Trump to handle the war. Pew polled 28,333 adults across 24 countries mostly over the phone or in person (Australia was the only country where people were polled online). The survey was in the field for various times across different countries between Jan. 8 and April 26. Polling in every country except Indonesia began after Trump's inauguration, but was either concluded or close to done by Trump's April 2 announcement of sweeping international tariffs.