65 killed in Gaza as Spanish PM calls situation a ‘genocide'
At least 65 people killed in Gaza during fresh airstrikes from Israel.
The director of medical supplies in Gaza's civil defence agency, Mohammad Al-Mughair, told AFP that 65 people had been killed by Israeli forces in the territory on Thursday.
Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal earlier said that several of them were killed while waiting for aid.
The Israeli military said its troops "fired warning shots" in order to prevent "suspects from approaching them" near the Netzarim corridor in central Gaza, where Palestinians gather each night for rations.
Israel says its Gaza offensive is aimed at destroying Hamas and rescuing hostages seized during the October 2023 attack, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Israel's military campaign has killed at least 56,259 people, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza. The United Nations considers its figures reliable.
Genocide
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Thursday became the most prominent European leader to describe the situation in Gaza as a "genocide".
After more than 20 months of devastating conflict, human rights groups say Gaza's population of more than two million face famine-like conditions.
Israel began allowing supplies to trickle in at the end of May following a blockade of more than two months, but distribution has been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on those waiting to collect rations.
Israel meanwhile is pressing its bombardment of the territory, in a military offensive it says is aimed at defeating militant group Hamas -- whose October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the war.
Sanchez said Gaza was in a "catastrophic situation of genocide" and urged the European Union to immediately suspend its cooperation deal with Israel.
The comments represent the strongest condemnation to date by the Spanish premier, an outspoken critic of Israel's offensive who is one of the first European leaders, and the most senior, to use the term "genocide" to describe the situation in Gaza.
Speaking ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, Sanchez mentioned an EU report which found "indications" Israel was breaching its human rights obligations under the cooperation deal, which forms the basis for trade ties.
The text cited Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid for the Palestinian territory, the high number of civilian casualties, attacks on journalists and the massive displacement and destruction caused by the war.
Gaza out of food
"My children have nothing to eat. I haven't had any flour for nearly two months," said Imad al-Attar, a Gaza resident who obtained a bag of flour on Thursday in the southern city of Khan Yunis.
"We just want to eat," said another man, Khaled Rashwan. "We are dying, and no one is paying attention to us. Who can we turn to?"
Gaza's health ministry says that since late May, nearly 550 people have been killed near aid centres while seeking scarce supplies.
The United Nations has condemned the "weaponisation of food" in Gaza, and slammed a US- and Israeli-backed foundation that has largely replaced established humanitarian organisations in the territory.
The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was brought into the territory in late May, but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes, deaths and neutrality concerns.
The GHF denies deadly incidents have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points.
The US State Department said Thursday it had approved its first direct funding -- $30 million -- for the GHF and urged other countries to follow suit.
Israeli restrictions on media in Gaza and difficulties in accessing some areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers and authorities in the territory.
The World Health Organization said Thursday that it had delivered its first medical shipment into Gaza since March 2, adding that the nine truckloads were "a drop in the ocean".
After claiming victory in a 12-day war against Iran that ended with a ceasefire on June 24, Israel said it would refocus on its offensive in Gaza, where Palestinian militants still hold Israeli hostages.
US President Donald Trump told reporters Wednesday: "I think great progress is being made on Gaza" to end the Israel-Hamas war and forecast "very good news" following the ceasefire.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces growing calls from opposition politicians, relatives of hostages being held in Gaza and even members of his ruling coalition to bring an end to the fighting.
Key mediator Qatar said this week it would launch a new push for a ceasefire.
Israel said efforts to return Israeli hostages in Gaza were ongoing "on the battlefield and via negotiations".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
JI for early completion of IP gas pipeline project
LAHORE: Chief of Jamaat-e-Islami Hafiz Naeem-ur-Rehman has demanded of the government to immediately resume work on the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project and ensure its completion without further delay. Addressing a press conference at Mansoora on Thursday, he highlighted the shifting regional dynamics in the wake of the Iran-Israel war. He noted that India refrained from supporting Tehran, while Pakistan maintained a principled position. 'The time has come for Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Türkiye to form a regional defense alliance,' he urged, adding that this bloc should also include China and Russia to counter unilateral US hegemony and establish a powerful global front. The JI leader called for investigations into massive financial irregularities uncovered in Punjab government's audit reports and criticized the controversial cycle of sugar exports followed by imports. He said Sharif family is launching schemes only for personal publicity at the expense of public tax money. 'The uncle-niece duo continues to deceive the nation in the name of progress,' he said. Rehman demanded reduction in the interest rate this year, with complete elimination next year. He urged that electricity tariffs be rationalized based on actual production costs and called for transparency regarding progress on dismantling exploitative IPP agreements. He stressed that no duties should be imposed on solar panels. 'The rulers have ruined the agricultural sector, and the Punjab government bears the biggest responsibility. While small farmers are suffering, the elite enjoy unjustified privileges,' he stated. He demanded that taxes be lifted from salaried individuals and imposed on feudal. He said the education sector is in shambles, with 29.2 million children out of school, despite tall claims of an education emergency by the Prime Minister. Rehman praised Iran for its firm resistance against Israeli and American aggression and lauded the unity of the Iranian people in defending their sovereignty. 'Despite full U.S. backing, Hamas and Iran have exposed and challenged Israeli power. Like the Iranians, the Pakistanis too have united in the face of external threats,' he said. He recalled how Pakistan humbled India and earned global recognition. 'Now our rulers must abandon the fear of America and start work on IP Gas Project.' He expressed deep regret that neither the government nor opposition parties in Pakistan speak out against the U.S. He strongly condemned the government's recommendation of Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, calling it a betrayal of national dignity. 'This nomination must be withdrawn immediately,' he asserted. Reaffirming JI's position on Kashmir, he said, 'There can be no talks with India - with or without Trump's mediation - without the right to self-determination for Kashmiris.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Public aggression, private restraint
EDITORIAL: Good thing this isn't turning out to be another one of president Trump's tricks. For once, the president's abrupt pivot from war to diplomacy appears to have held — and the Iran-Israel ceasefire, fragile though it may be, has held with it. That's saying something, given how recently he admitted to using negotiations as a ruse to lull Iranian leadership while Israel launched the opening salvos. Then, while dangling a two-week window for talks, he struck again. And just a day before announcing the ceasefire, he was still entertaining talk of regime change in Tehran. It didn't help that both Israel and Iran absorbed far more damage in this brief but blistering episode than they had anticipated. Israel, in particular, was caught off guard by the scale and precision of Iranian strikes. Entire neighbourhoods in Tel Aviv and Haifa were gutted, shattering the long-held illusion that Iran would never retaliate directly or decisively. Iran's ability to sustain such an attack — even under the weight of sanctions and international isolation — shocked not just Israeli planners, but its American backers. And yet the first reliable indicator that something had changed did not come from official channels — it came from the markets. As Iranian missiles were still in the air, oil prices dropped and equities rallied. That told the real story. The strikes were not interpreted as escalation. They were decoded as de-escalation — symbolic retaliation with political cover and strategic signalling, not a trigger for all-out war. Markets, unlike political speechwriters, have no time for theatrics. They responded to what was, not what was said. There's also mounting evidence that the Americans and Iranians coordinated just enough to allow each other a way out. Personnel and key assets were quietly moved out of harm's way before attacks. Trump even publicly thanked Iran for what he called their 'professionalism' in avoiding casualties. It's also being reported that the US gave Tehran advance notice before targeting their airbases — giving both sides political ammunition for domestic audiences, while reducing the actual cost of confrontation. This manufactured choreography — public aggression, private restraint — is telling. It allowed Iran to claim it struck back without inviting a second wave. It gave Israel the opportunity to insist it had delivered deterrence. And it gave Trump the spotlight to play the peacemaker. But if the intent was to defuse tensions, it would have helped if the ceasefire hadn't come less than 24 hours after open talk of regime change. That inconsistency is now the biggest source of instability. No one knows if Trump is negotiating in good faith or simply buying time. If this pattern holds — provoke, pause, provoke again — then the region will remain locked in a cycle of symbolic restraint followed by unpredictable violence. And that will do little to prevent the next miscalculation. In the meantime, diplomacy has been reduced to theatre, and restraint outsourced to financial markets. The real risk is that, next time, the choreography may fail. Trump's current narrative only works if all parties stick to the script. But war, unlike politics, doesn't always respect timing or intention. Already he's fuming and swearing at both parties — more Israel than Iran — for violating the truce. For now, the ceasefire holds. But so does the memory of how it began. And unless Trump proves capable of consistency — something he has shown no talent for — the next strike may not come with the courtesy of advance notice or a convenient off-ramp. That's what should worry everyone. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Lessons from 12-day Israel-Iran war
CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED! Officially, Iran will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 12th Hour, Israel will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 24th Hour, an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World. During each CEASEFIRE, the other side will remain PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL. On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR.' This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't and never will! God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and GOD BLESS THE WORLD—Donald J. Trump, President of United States of America (USA) The world today stands at the precipice of a conflict that nearly unraveled the fragile fabric of international peace. The recent escalation between Israel and Iran has not only reignited age-old hostilities but also exposed the failure of global institutions to both prevent unlawful aggression and uphold tenets of international law. The Israel-Iran crisis has highlighted the dangers of unchecked militarism, the breakdown of diplomatic norms, and the selective application of international legal standards. The confrontation between these two countries, with theatrical and deadly military operations, civilian casualties, and global diplomatic ramifications, demands a comprehensive reckoning. The Israel-led airstrikes on Iranian territory, specifically targeting nuclear sites, represented a blatant violation of the sovereignty of a member state of the United Nations (UN). The Israeli government, long opposed to Iran's nuclear programme, acted unilaterally and outside the confines of international law, invoking the doctrine of preemptive self-defense without credible evidence of imminent threat. The Israeli wanton attacks breached Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits use of force against the territorial integrity of another state. Targeting nuclear infrastructure, particularly without UN approval or oversight by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), constitutes a dangerous precedent in modern warfare. USA's involvement further escalated the situation. Coordinated attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, carried out with logistical and intelligence support from USA forces, have been widely criticized by international legal scholars and diplomats. The strikes bypassed the Security Council and sidestepped global norms governing peaceful use of nuclear technology. The attacks undermined the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which Iran, unlike Israel, is a signatory to, and which guarantees the right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes under strict safeguards. USA's role in supporting Israel's aggression raises serious concerns about the credibility of the so-called rules-based international order. The Iranian retaliation was both swift and symbolic. The barrage of missiles targeting USA's military bases in the Gulf sent shockwaves throughout international diplomatic channels. The attack was calculated to demonstrate Iran's military capability and its unwillingness to tolerate such violations in silence. Similarly, Iranian authorities claimed they had carefully selected non-civilian targets to avoid broader escalation, the attack nonetheless risked igniting a regional war that could have engulfed Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and beyond. This incident highlights the volatile nature of Middle Eastern geopolitics, where one miscalculation can lead to catastrophic consequences. The civilian toll of the conflict has been devastating. The Israeli military operations in Gaza, conducted parallel to the attacks on Iran, have once again resulted in the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians, including women and children. Bombing of residential neighborhoods, hospitals, and refugee camps has been condemned by human rights organizations as potential war crimes. Relentless airstrikes in Syria and Lebanon have also exacerbated the already dire humanitarian conditions. The distinction principle under international humanitarian law, which requires combatants to differentiate between military targets and civilian objects, appears to have been grossly disregarded. The ceasefire brokered by President Donald Trump added a histrionic twist to the unfolding crisis. Acting through backchannel diplomacy, President Trump leveraged his personal ties with regional leaders to secure a temporary halt to hostilities. While the ceasefire was welcomed as a respite from violence, it also exposed the limitations of current institutional diplomacy. The fact that the President Trump, through unconventional channels, could achieve what the UN Security Council could not, raises profound questions about the efficacy and legitimacy of existing global governance structures. The United Nations, particularly the Security Council, failed to act decisively during the crisis. Despite multiple emergency sessions and calls for de-escalation, the Council remained paralyzed by geopolitical divisions and veto power politics. The inability to pass even a symbolic resolution condemning the attacks has revealed the urgent need for institutional reforms. UN must evolve to meet contemporary security challenges, including the establishment of a robust, rules-based dispute resolution mechanism that does not rely solely on the consensus of five permanent members. The demand for nuclear transparency has never been more pressing. Israel, long suspected of maintaining an undeclared nuclear arsenal, remains outside the framework of NPT and refuses IAEA inspections. This selective non-compliance undermines global non-proliferation efforts and sets dangerous double standards. The international community must insist that Israel sign NPT, open its facilities to IAEA oversight, and commit to the same rules that it expects others, particularly Iran, to follow. Failure to do so not only erodes legal norms but also fuels resentment and justifies nuclear ambitions among other regional states. The humanitarian crisis resulting from Israeli operations in Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon must be confronted with urgency. Deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure, blockade of humanitarian aid, and the use of disproportionate force are violations of the Geneva Conventions. The world must move beyond statements of concern and take concrete action to protect civilian lives. Sanctions on arms transfers, investigations by international courts, and deployment of UN monitoring missions are all tools that can and should be used to hold violators accountable. Iran's role too warrants critical examination. Despite being a victim of aggression in this episode, Iran has long pursued a foreign policy that isolates it regionally. Sharing borders with eight countries, Iran has strained or hostile relations with nearly all of them. Its involvement in regional proxy conflicts, from Lebanon to Yemen, has blown up tensions and undermined trust. However, during this crisis, many neighboring countries, including those with traditionally cool relations, stood in solidarity with Iran and condemned Israeli actions. This presents a rare diplomatic opening. Pakistan's government took a principled stand in support of Iran, voicing the issue in international forums and calling for restraint and justice. Support from such countries signals to Iran that goodwill exists, and it must now reciprocate by revisiting its regional policies. Iran should pursue normalization with its neighbors, including Pakistan, and adopt a non-interventionist approach that prioritizes economic cooperation, energy interdependence, and people-to-people linkages. Time has come for Iran to re-engage with the international community. Lifting of economic sanctions, tied to verifiable commitments on nuclear transparency and non-proliferation, should be a central objective. The country must focus on domestic prosperity, scientific advancement, and regional connectivity. Engaging constructively with the USA, European Union, and international institutions can pave the way for Iran's full economic reintegration. The broader international community must seize this moment to reflect on the failures that led to this crisis. It must push for a world order that is fair, consistent, and grounded in international law. Unequal application of norms, where some states operate with impunity while others are punished for minor misdemeanor, has created a legitimacy crisis that can no longer be ignored. The way forward must be anchored in a shared commitment to peace, justice, and human dignity. United Nations should convene a global summit on conflict resolution, bringing together not only states but also civil society, academics, and technocrats to design a new framework for peace enforcement. Such a mechanism must include early-warning systems, neutral mediation platforms, and binding dispute resolution tools that apply equally to all member states. International focus must not remain confined to the Israel-Iran conflict. Ongoing wars in Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere continue to claim lives and destabilize regions. The world must adopt a holistic approach that prioritizes diplomacy over militarism, development over destruction, and cooperation over confrontation. Humanity's future hinges on our collective ability to learn from these crises and choose a different path. The tools for peace exist; what is required is the will to use them. Let this be a moment when the world awakens to the urgency of conflict resolution, universal legal accountability, and a renewed commitment to protecting all lives equally, regardless of geography, religion, or politics. (Huzaima Bukhari & Dr Ikramul Haq, lawyers and partners of Huzaima & Ikram, are Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), members Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellows of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) and Abdul Rauf Shakoori is a corporate lawyer) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
