logo
Charlottetown woman charged with murder in death of infant daughter

Charlottetown woman charged with murder in death of infant daughter

Yahoo09-04-2025

A 39-year-old woman from Charlottetown has been charged with first-degree murder in the death of her baby daughter, Charlottetown police say.
The infant died at the IWK Hospital in Halifax three weeks ago "while the infant was being treated for injuries sustained during an incident in Charlottetown on March 16," the city's police force said in a news release late Wednesday.
The news release said that after an investigation, Cassie Acorn was charged with murder contrary to Section 229(a)(ii) and Section 235(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Those sections describe the crime as culpable homicide causing the death of another person while either intending to cause death or intending to cause bodily harm that the accused knows is likely to cause death.
The woman is being held in custody and is scheduled to appear in P.E.I. Supreme Court on Thursday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Napanee man convicted of sexual interference, harassing communications
Napanee man convicted of sexual interference, harassing communications

Hamilton Spectator

time30-05-2025

  • Hamilton Spectator

Napanee man convicted of sexual interference, harassing communications

A Napanee resident has been convicted and sentenced for sexual interference and harassing communications. On Wednesday, May 21, 2025, in the Brockville Ontario Superior Court, David Vine pleaded guilty to the two charges. According to Section 151 of the Criminal Code of Canada (CC), a charge of sexual interference is made against a person who, for a sexual purpose, touches, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, any part of the body of a person under the age of 16 years. According to Section 372(3), 'harassing communications' involve repeatedly communicating with someone using telecommunication without a lawful excuse and with the intent to harass. This can include phone calls, text messages, emails, or other forms of digital communication. After granting a credit equivalent to two years and 14 days of pre-trial custody for the charge of sexual interference, the Judge imposed an 18-month conditional sentence, followed by a three-year probation order for the charge of harassing communications. In Canada, a convicted person may receive credit for time spent in pre-trial custody, often referred to as 'pre-sentence custody' or 'dead time.' A sentencing judge can reduce the final sentence by a certain amount, typically one day for every day spent in pre-trial custody, but can also grant enhanced credit under certain circumstances. Several conditions were mandated for Vine's release. Per Section 109 of the CC, he is subject to a lifetime weapons prohibition. He was also given a mandatory DNA order. Also known as a DNA data bank order, this court order directs an offender to provide a DNA sample for forensic analysis. Vine is also subject to a lifetime Sexual Offender Information Registration Act (SOIRA) order. According to the reference source Criminal Law Notebook , under Section 490, the length of the SOIRA order is based on the election (how the convicted person pleaded) and the maximum penalty. An order made under subsection 490.012(1) or (3) applies for life if 'the court is satisfied that those offences demonstrate, or form part of, a pattern of behaviour showing that the person presents an increased risk of reoffending by committing a crime of a sexual nature.' Vine is further subject to a court order under CC s.161 for 20 years. When an offender is convicted of an offence concerning persons under the age of 16, section 161 of the code permits the court to make an order prohibiting the offender from certain activities that may have them in contact with persons under the age of 16. This order prohibits Vine from having contact or communicating in any way with, working with, volunteering with, or supervising anyone under the age of 16, and from attending a public park or public swimming area where persons under the age of 16 are present or can reasonably be expected to be present, including daycare centres, school grounds, playgrounds, or community centres. As is a standard practice in such cases, a publication ban has been put in place in the case against Vine to prevent the publication of the victim's name and any identifying information. While the dates of the offences Vine has been convicted of are not currently known, the case against him was filed with the Ontario courts in June 2024. It is unknown at this time why Vine was tried in a Brockville court, though the location of the court hearings is often related to the location where the alleged crimes occurred. Kingstonist will provide further coverage of this matter if/when further information becomes available. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

WARMINGTON: Man on bail at Toronto mosque faces accusation of fear of terrorism
WARMINGTON: Man on bail at Toronto mosque faces accusation of fear of terrorism

Yahoo

time16-05-2025

  • Yahoo

WARMINGTON: Man on bail at Toronto mosque faces accusation of fear of terrorism

Days before the RCMP picked up a Kitchener man believed to be planning to travel abroad to join an international terror organization, he was arrested at Pearson International Airport for allegedly making death threats to police officers, the Toronto Sun has learned. Husam Taha Ali Al-Sewaiee, who has lived in Canada for a number of years but is originally from Yemen, was charged on April 15 after allegedly uttering threats toward officers and released on an undertaking to appear at a later date in court for that allegation. A Peel Regional Police spokesperson confirmed 'the information we have is the individual was arrested by PRP on April 15th for uttering threats' and was charged. These charges have yet to be tested in court. A court date on the uttering threats charge has not yet been set. No weapons were seized and no one was hurt in the incident at the airport. It's unclear if Taha Ali Al-Sewaiee was at Pearson as part of his alleged plan to leave Canada. But what is clear is 'red flags went off' when he was detained there after a confrontation where 'utterances' were allegedly made and that information was shared with federal authorities. WARMINGTON: While it was not a terror attack at a Toronto university, students say they felt terrorized WARMINGTON: Like the Middle East, Toronto's 'Little Gaza' is separated by fence This incident occurred nine days before the deadly police shooting of a man at Pearson – something now being probed by the province's Special Investigations Unit. Needless to say, it has been a difficult year at the airport for police. 'Our officers were not physically harmed, acted very professionally and arranged for the man to be taken to hospital for a mental health assessment,' Peel Regional Police Association President Adrian Woolley said. 'At this point, this is a matter in the hands of investigators.' Four days after Taha Ali Al-Sewaiee was arrested at Pearson, on April 19, he was before a Brampton court facing what court documents say is an application for a peace bond under Section Number 810.01ccc, of the Criminal Code of Canada which is granted for a 'fear of terrorism offence' where 'a person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person may commit a terrorism offence may, with the Attorney General's consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge.' Al-Sewaiee is not facing any terrorism charges. His case has also not been tested in court and police say this is an open file that remains under investigation. But court documents show the 32-year-old, who has told people he was soon to become a Canadian citizen and who has been seen at pro-Gaza protests in Toronto since the Oct. 7th slaughter in Israel, has been held over in a special arrangement approved by the court to reside under bail conditions at a North Toronto mosque after an approved surety posted a $1,000 bond. The conditions state he can only leave the mosque 'when you are in the company of your surety' or with 'written permission' for specific purposes including going to court or for medical reasons. He also can't be 'within 300 metres of any airport or Candian border' and he had to 'surrender' his 'passport or travel documents.' B'nai Brith Canada declined to comment on the court proceedings in this matter. But on the overall concern of potential danger to Canadians, they have expressed deep concern. 'Our federal government must address the dangerous weaknesses plaguing Canada's immigration and national security systems,' B'nai Brith Director of Research and Advocacy Richard Robertson said. 'Those who demonstrate signs of, or appear to have a predisposition towards, radicalization should never be permitted to enter our country let alone to obtain citizenship. Urgent action is needed to stop the spread of radicalization.' Meir Weinstein, of Israel Now, also declined comment on the bail arrangement but did say, 'I recognize him from pro-Palestine protests' but 'have no recollection of having any issues or problems with him.' 'We are reviewing our photographs and videos and will work with law enforcement if they need any help,' he added. Ontario's office of the Attorney General has not so far commented on this move by the court. But in light of alleged threats against police, as well as fear of terrorism, it would be good to know from Attorney General Doug Downey if the accused man's bail conditions can be reviewed in the interest of ensuring public safety. This seems like uncharted legal and justice waters. It's unknown if a person before the courts on the fear or terrorism, or any serious criminal allegation, has ever been released on bail to a place of worship before. Is this the appropriate place to house somebody before the courts on such serious matters? Sources say it was felt this was the best option available for the court since it did not want to have him under house arrest at a previous Kitchener address. Several police officers told the Sun there is curiosity if this move to send a person before the courts to reside at a mosque sets a precedent that could see this being requested in future cases. This mosque is not a stand-alone structure but in a complex with other businesses and appears to have both a prayer hall and an apartment as part of it. Calls to the mosque for comment were unsuccessful. But, sources say, police bail compliance professionals will do compliance reviews like they do with anybody released on bail conditions. For now, this is where this man accused of fear of terrorism and uttering threats to police calls home. jwarmington@

Gun-shaped lighters: Councillor seeks ban as they proliferate in Vancouver
Gun-shaped lighters: Councillor seeks ban as they proliferate in Vancouver

Yahoo

time05-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Gun-shaped lighters: Councillor seeks ban as they proliferate in Vancouver

If you think selling lighters that closely resemble a real gun is a terrible idea, at least one Vancouver city councillor has your back. ABC Vancouver Coun. Mike Klassen has introduced a motion aiming to ban the sale of gun-shaped lighters in the city. The motion, which goes before council on Wednesday, says the sale of the questionable lighters has 'proliferated in the City of Vancouver over the past year, with an estimated 50-75 stores selling multiple (gun-shaped lighters), particularly in the Downtown Eastside and downtown core.' Because the lighters look so much like real firearms, they have led to 'public distress and a significant increase in 911 emergency calls.' There were 162 police calls about the lighters last year, more than half of which were classified as 'priority weapons calls' — meaning they led to a response involving several officers armed with Tasers, less-lethal beanbag shotguns and Arwen guns. Klassen's motion notes that the presence of the lighters in public spaces 'has resulted in multiple dangerous encounters where police officers have had to draw their firearms, creating a risk of fatal outcomes should a suspect fail to comply or appear to threaten officers or the public.' They've also been documented as being used in violent crimes and leading to charges for robbery, assault and weapons possession. Calls about gun-shaped lighters were predominantly in the city's core, with 46 per cent happening in the Downtown Eastside and 39 per cent in other parts of downtown Vancouver. The drain on police resources is significant, the motion says: 32 of the calls led to 10 or more police units being dispatched and the average time required to resolve each call was two and a half hours. They may be a bad idea, but gun-shaped lighters are not specifically prohibited for possession or sale under the Criminal Code of Canada. They only become illegal when used in the commission of a crime, leaving law enforcement with little recourse. 'A proactive ban on the sale and distribution (of gun-shaped lighters) in the City of Vancouver through a bylaw or bylaw amendment would serve to enhance public safety and reduce the burden on law enforcement while other legislative measures are being explored,' the motion reads. It asks city staff to come up with recommendations for bylaw amendments that would ban the lighters and set a range of penalties for selling them. It also urges Mayor Ken Sim to write to the provincial government asking for legislative changes that would prohibit the sale, distribution and possession of gun-shaped lighters in B.C. and make it possible for police to seize them. This isn't the first time city council has cracked down on questionable lighters over safety concerns. A year ago, councillors voted to ban the sale of butane lighters that can be locked to produce a continuous flame. The ban was championed by Vancouver Fire Rescue Services, which said they posed a risk of fire, injury and death due to misuse. Continuous-flame lighters were ordered removed from shelves as of June 2024 and retailers who sell them now face a $1,000 fine. jruttle@ Vancouver council seeks to reinstate school meal programs Despite rebuke of ABC Vancouver, towers to rise higher

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store