‘Falling short': New oranga tamariki report finds ‘sobering' outcomes for Māori in care
Aroturuki Tamariki – Independent Children's Monitor's new oranga tamariki report, looking at outcomes for Māori in state care, provides damning statistics on the inequalities faced by these rangatahi, and their hopes for the future despite it.
Barriers to housing and employment, higher mortality rates and a 70% likelihood of continuing a generational cycle in state care are faced by Māori who have been through the oranga tamariki system, a new report has found. Aroturuki Tamariki – Independent Children's Monitor released its inaugural report on Wednesday, with findings overwhelmingly pointing to a system that is 'failing to deliver equal outcomes for Māori'.
The report covers the period between July 1, 2023 and June 20, 2024 and the outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori in the 'oranga tamariki system', which includes Oranga Tamariki, police and various ministries including health and social development. Two thirds of all young people in state care and three quarters of those in youth justice custody are Māori. At the same time half the reports of concern made to Oranga Tamariki are regarding Māori children.
The report emphasised that most young Māori – who make up a third of those under 18 in New Zealand, around 333,600 people – have no involvement with Oranga Tamariki. But those who do spend time in state care are far more likely to need further state, mental health and addiction support later in life.
The key findings
Researchers spoke to 1,800 people – including 200 young people, 550 Oranga Tamariki staff and 160 Māori service providers – across Auckland, Taranaki-Manawatū, Canterbury and Upper South for this report.
The report states that the more involved young Māori become in the oranga tamariki system, 'the worse their long-term outcomes'. In 2023/24, 92% of young Māori referred to a youth justice family conference had a previous care and protection report of concern. Meanwhile, 34% of young Māori currently in the oranga tamariki system told researchers they have attempted suicide in the last 12 months – this is more than double the rate of their Māori peers outside of it.
Experience in care continues to affect Māori even when they leave it – to assess outcomes, the report looked at indicators for Māori aged 27-30 in 2022 who had spent time in the oranga tamariki system, compared to Māori of the same age who had not. They are nine times more likely to have been in emergency housing, six times more likely to have been hospitalised for self-harm and are 'much more likely' to be victims of crime than Māori who have never been in state care.
Three quarters of those who have previously been in youth justice custody have spent time in prison or on home detention since turning 18. And 70% of Māori parents who have lived in care see their tamariki involved with Oranga Tamariki 'in some way', while one in eight have had one or more children in care at some point.
What do Māori in state care say?
Despite a survey revealing those currently in state care feel less safe, hopeful and loved by their community than those outside of it, anonymous quotes from young Māori included in the report paint a picture of rangatahi with big dreams for the future. They want to get NCEA and university qualifications; one shared ambitions of becoming a technician; one hopes to be a marine biologist; and another wants to be a youth worker, to show rangatahi 'someone with life experience'. Another dreams of 'grow[ing] up successful' to 'give my kids what I couldn't have'.
'I feel I'm going to be successful for myself. It's a feeling I've got. When I leave school, I'll become a waiter, save money, travel the world, make some more money and then start a business,' said one respondent. 'To become a businesswomen, be a rich mum. I feel like my dreams will come true even if they take a while'.
What's not working?
Aroturuki Tamariki chief executive Arran Jones said the findings were a 'story of consequence' and of needs not being addressed by a system that can't always put the right support in place at the right time. The report was 'sobering', he said. 'The data paints a stark picture of the consequence of the oranga tamariki system not doing more to help.'
The report acknowledges that police and Oranga Tamariki both have strategies in place to better support young Māori, but there are significant barriers to progress. Oranga Tamariki has 'competing policies, a low trust culture, layers of decision making and the inability to make the best use of existing tools, such as family group conferences (FGCs) means that social workers are not always able to work in a way that meets the needs of tamariki and rangatahi Māori and their whānau'.
Too little too late
The agency also has a high threshold for investigating reports of concern made about tamariki and rangatahi, with half of these reports resulting in a decision to take no further action. The report notes that failing to take action at the earliest intervention can leave these young people at risk, with the potential of greater involvement within the oranga tamariki system down the line.
More holistic youth justice options would be helpful for tamariki and whānau, but the report states that curbing offending altogether by having agencies work together when reports of concern are made will lead to more improved outcomes for young Māori. Despite efforts, inequalities in the oranga tamariki system against Māori aren't reducing.
Is anything working?
The report did commend the efforts of iwi partnerships, highlighting Whakapai Hauora (Best Care Charitable Trust) which was delegated statutory youth justice powers and functions from Oranga Tamariki in 2020. Whakapai Hauora provides wraparound support for Māori who have offended, with initiatives that include teaching life skills to wāhine Māori, whānau programmes and encouraging rangatahi to work as a form of reparation.
Since 2020, only one rangatahi referred to Whakapai Hauora has proceeded to a court order. In another instance, one young man who committed theft was later employed by the business he stole from.
'Significant reductions in reoffending' have also been seen by Auckland's Kotahi te Whakaaro, which connects government and non-government organisations and works alongside whānau to prevent young Māori from reoffending. Porirua's Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira offers early intervention initiatives, which have resulted in a 21% drop in reports of concern, the lowest rate in the town in four years.
The response from parliament
Minister for children Karen Chhour said the overrepresentation of Māori in the oranga tamariki system is a 'complex and historical challenge' which will require an all-of-government response working alongside communities. Chhour said previous ministers have failed to support Oranga Tamariki, but she is 'pleased' the report recognises 'the progress and early successes tamariki and rangatahi Māori and their whānau are experiencing as a result of this devolution work'.
Oranga Tamariki has accepted the report's findings and agreed the overrepresentation of and outcomes for Māori need to be improved, but says more scrutiny is needed on the work of other agencies (such as the education and health ministries) 'who share responsibility for improving outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori and their whānau', spokesperson Janet Fletcher told RNZ.
'A key priority for Oranga Tamariki is to decentralise and devolve services to iwi, Māori and communities through our strategic partnerships, and support tamariki and whānau voices to be at the forefront,' said Fletcher.
Labour's children's spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said the report revealed a 'disturbing and urgent problem', while the prime minister had 'overseen dangerous changes to Oranga Tamariki' and 'allowed an Act minister to recklessly erode the services that have been built to support children'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Good food is only right
Food is a human right, but beyond that, is the right to food sovereignty. Hagar Ozri talked to two wāhine Māori to find out what it can look like. Sovereignty is a word we need to contemplate — it means authority or autonomy — in a world where the opposite is the lived reality for the most vulnerable, as skyrocketing food prices make the availability of good food slip away. The right to food is the most basic human right. Food is more than a physical need, it is a cultural and spiritual need too, this complexity reflected in the term "food sovereignty". If we listen to the indigenous knowledge and conversations around the issues, would we have some healing and answers to the most pressing issues of our time? I draw inspiration from women leaders. Vandana Shiva, from India, is a fierce advocate for local farmers and the local economy. She fights against corporate take-over of local farms and calls sustainable agriculture "a gratitude agriculture", gratitude to Mother Earth, a non-violent sacred agriculture. New Zealand's Kay Baxter is doing amazing work at Koanga Institute, teaching permaculture and collecting heritage seed varieties. Their seed catalogue says: "We are the seeds of your ancestors, the seeds that have nourished you forever, the seeds that give you life, the seeds that you pass on down as your responsibility to the next generation". I am not Māori, but I find hope from the knowledge of tangata whenua because they link me to this whenua — this land in which I live. I interviewed two inspirational wāhine here in Ōtepoti — doing good work in the community through kai — helping whānau forging connections to the whenua — for social, mental and physical health and wellbeing. Sue Smith is a co-ordinator of a māra kai project, growing food for the Puketeraki Marae and whānau. Rongowai Papuni is a mental health practitioner who developed a programme for healing through working in the garden, learning to grow food. Both women incorporate Te Hua Parakore knowledge in their work — a decolonising indigenous farming framework, regaining knowledge of farming and growing home gardens based on these pillars: (From Jessica Hutchings' website • Whakapapa (genealogical connections); • Wairua (spirituality) • Mana (authority); • Māramatanga (enlightenment); • Te Ao Tūroa (the natural world); • Mauri (life-force) SUE SMITH Sue Smith was involved in permaculture in Sydney for a number of years and completed the certificate in permaculture design in New Zealand in 2021. "I am a member of the Kati Huirapa rūnaka based in Karitane. I spent a lot of time working in permaculture, just as a hobby, just as a fun thing to do ... you always want other people to connect with what you think is a good thing, but sometimes you just have to do it for yourself, and then things happen anyway, if you're open to sharing and conversing and communicating," she says. I started by asking her about food sovereignty. Q. What does food sovereignty mean to you? A. On the micro level, for me, is to have control over the food that I want to eat and knowing that I'm accessing high-quality nutritious kai, so growing my own at home and growing for whānau. On the macro level, what bothers me is that we're not in touch with our local growers. We don't really know where our food comes from, and the food itself, which is a basic human right, everyone should have access to good quality kai, has been commercialised and is in the hands of people that are only doing it for a profit. So, food shouldn't be a commodity, it's a basic human right ... So I suppose for me, food sovereignty means that you've got control over the food for you and your whānau, that you know you're giving them good quality kai that you can access easily, and access to culturally appropriate food that nourishes and doesn't poison you. Q. What is the work that you do at the māra kai in Karitāne? A. I am involved in a rūnaka-based project called Kete Kai Ora. This project is about getting fresh vegetables and wild venison to our whānau as a way of building connections to our whenua. Colonisation has led to our people being disconnected from our land and our traditional kai sources. Kete Kai Ora is some small way to fill that void. Kind of a contemporary mahika kai approach. We also have a once-a-month harvest where a few of us will go out there and gather as much as we can, get the meat, which is processed by a butcher, Matanaka Meats, and get that to the whānau by a navigator's role, who drives into town, because most of our kaumātua don't live at Karitāne, and drops food from their whenua to their homes. Our people know that it's good quality, nutritious vegetables and that the venison is good organic meat. The other aspect is seedlings — we've just built a seedling grow house. We're going to grow excess seedlings and share those with whānau so they can perhaps build that level of food security or sovereignty in their own backyards without having to spend a lot of money. We make a lot of our own compost, so hopefully we'll have our own seed-raising mix next year so we can ensure that our families are getting good quality seedlings. It is the process of building that level of self-sufficiency and resilience for our whānau who aren't able to come out to the whenua, actually accessing the whenua in a different way. Q. Do you bring other aspects of hua parakore into your work at the māra kai? A Well, yeah, at the moment we've been exploring the hua parakore framework as a whānau or as a small group. Essentially, that guides us how to interact with the soil and how you interact with the plants and the people. It's really about the food that's shared with people, the manaakitanga that sits with food and the mana that sits with being able to provide our people with good quality food if you're the grower or you're the cook. So there's a whole spiritual aspect to growing food that recognises the impact of the environment around you, right down to the microbial lifeforce that sits in the soil, and how that also sits back with the creation story of Hine-ahu-one and Papatūānuku and Tangaroa and Ranginui and all those elements that sit within the soil and the world around you and that goes into your food. So you're actually feeding your soul or your spirit with good high-quality food. I think there's a damaging effect on our psyche when we're eating rubbish. So, then that goes deep and that is, to me, the help that we really need, to bring in all that content and purpose. It is the deeper meaning behind claiming our right to food and sovereignty. RONGOWAI PAPUNI Q. What does food sovereignty mean to you? A. For Māori, food sovereignty, I think it is a massive topic, so it's hard to condense it into a couple of sentences ... It is reclamation, reclaiming whenua, reclaiming space, reclaiming identity, reclaiming processes and tikanga and the knowledge around kai, around mahinga kai, mahika kai. Those practices are all coming back now, which is great, but you can see there were a lot of generations where it was just lost. Q. How do you implement that in your work, in the mental health field? A. When I think about people we're working with, coming together for a purpose, like a māra kai rōpu, we're bringing people into the whare and we have a process, and the process wouldn't be just come and eat some food, it's come and be a part of growing this food. It's hard looking at "how do you take the skills that we're going to learn here in this space and then take them home", so we get the pen and paper out and get people to sketch out their whare, their house, and how much land they have and kind of start from there and look at what kind of things they would want to be eating so that they can grow those things. So, then that's empowerment and sovereignty, taking those kinds of skills home. We grow things also on site, and whatever was produced people can take home some kai. At the end of the growing season we would have kai. Q. So, it's not just the eating of natural food feeding the physical — also the mental, the spiritual, that is the process of decolonising and giving people mana? A. Yeah, absolutely. The connection. Yes, people would get really excited about it and people are humbled by receiving kai. And in terms of community, we'd have people coming from different ages, different stages of life, different iwi, different backgrounds, and some people would be isolated and then come into the space where they would get to have kōrero and waiata and karakia, and after that learn some gardening skills, and then actually go outside and put some of those skills into action. I think that comes alongside that, having skills, your own skills and knowing how to grow your own foods. It is mana enhancing, so you've got a new skill set from, you know, how do you start, use that, it's giving them connection to the whenua. We think about Papatūānuku and connection with atua. We think about Papatūānuku and Tamanuiterā, Ranginui, Tāwhirimātea, so we've got the wind factor. Tāne Mahuta, and te taiao also, our nature, our atua, are all there, so there's connection happening, not only with other people, but our environment too. Q. So when you work with mental health, what is your method? A. The programme that I developed is based over three months, one growing season. We had a bit of funding from Te Pūtahitanga (tēnā koutou — thank you to them) and from then I was, like, OK, what do we need? We need tools, we need soil, it was all from the ground up, and then I need to design a programme. OK, so what method are we going to use in the garden. And we didn't have a lot of space so I just thought we'd go with a crop rotation process. So, we had three garden beds and then we just brought in the soil, we got seeds for whatever we wanted to grow and then we planted the seeds and then we watched them grow over the period of three months and, in between that, we learned about soil quality, soil health, pest management, crop rotation and what that means and how you do it. The sessions would start with karakia, followed by a waiata, then a learning session, we learned about maramataka and then we'd look at what mahi we needed to do, what work needed doing in the maramataka. You have the skills now to take this back to your whānau. You got me thinking about Te Whare Tapa Whā when you talked about pillars and, yes, that's like taha whānau, taha tīnana, taha hinengaro and taha wairua so that's like your community or social spaces, the body, the mental space and the spiritual elements. Gardening, you can incorporate that into food sovereignty and food practices, as it's a health model that's utilised here. If you are well in your thinking, and you're well in your body, and you're well in your social spaces, they all link in and link up, so it just makes sense to me, if you're not feeling well, you need to go outside. And I think also, being Māori, māori means natural, to be natural. Tangata whenua means people of the land, and we don't live those ways any more. So, for me, everything in terms of healing just needs to go back to that ... but our environments today, social ways of being in the world are quite different to that, like, almost quite the opposite. So, it's just taking really small steps ... As small a thing as opening your door, going outside. Ginger, kumara and tofu pie This is inspired by the recipe for ginger crunch kumara cheesecake from Kai Feast, by Christall Lowe — this is a vegan version. Ingredients For the crust 250g (1 packet) gingernuts biscuits ¼ cup / 100g coconut oil For the filling 2 medium-sized kumara — to yield 2 cups, peeled, cooked and mashed — cooled 400g tofu — 1 block of soft natural tofu. I use the locally made tofu (can use silken, but do not use firm). 250g coconut cream 2 Tbsp tapioca flour (or cornflour) ¼-½ cup soft brown sugar (I like it not too sweet so I use ¼ cup) ¼ tsp salt 1 Tbsp orange zest 2 Tbsp freshly squeezed orange juice 2 tsp ground ginger Method To make the crust: • Oil a 22-24cm springform cake tin (line the bottom with baking paper). • Place a third of the biscuits in a food processor at a time and process to crumbs, place in a bowl. • Melt the coconut oil, add to the bowl and mix well into the biscuit crumbs. • Press the crumb mix on to the bottom of pie dish / cake tin. To make the filling • Add all ingredients into the food processor and blend well — start with the tofu and kumara then add the rest. • Place filling into prepared pie dish / tin. • Bake for 45 min at 180°C. • Drizzle with brown rice malt while hot. • Serve when completely cooled.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Experts Warn Regulatory Standards Bill Threatens Future Public Health Laws
Article – RNZ One of the experts said it would have a 'chilling effect' on public health measures. , Reporter Public health experts are worried the government's proposed Regulatory Standards Bill will act as a disincentive for future law-makers to limit harmful industries. A group of scholars in health and policy have worked together on a briefing, titled 'Regulatory Standards Bill threatens the public interest, public health and Māori rights'. It's authors are Jonathan Boston, Michael Baker, Andrew Geddis, Carwyn Jones and Geoffrey Palmer. The Regulatory Standards Bill was introduced to Parliament in May, and is now being considered by the finance and expenditure committee. It would set up a Regulatory Standards Board to consider how legislation measures up to the principles. It was part of ACT's coalition agreement, and in putting the bill forward, party leader David Seymour said: 'In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral – it's a tax on growth. This government is committed to clearing the path of needless regulations by improving how laws are made.' The bill wants politicians to show their workings, he said. 'This bill turns the explanation from politicians' 'because we said so' into 'because here is the justification according to a set of principles'.' But Baker said the bill had prompted a large number of concerns, not least from a public health perspective. He said it was problematic that the bill failed to mention public harm in its ethical framework, which was needed to balance out private benefits. Another issue was the 'takings or impairment principle'. The bill in its current form would allow commercial interests, such as the tobacco or alcohol industries, to seek compensation – paid with public money – if any future legislation caused them to lose money. Baker explained this would have a 'chilling effect' on public health measures. He said it would make it less appealing for governments to create any new legislation aimed at protecting public health which could negatively impact harmful industries, which might then seek compensation. This could include the denicotinisation of cigarettes, alcohol restrictions like sponsorship bans, controls on unhealthy food and drink such as limiting marketing to children, and clean air provisions such as mandating emissions reductions by industry. This bill would mean taxpayers paid to compensate these businesses for the money lost because of moves to protect public health. 'And that's going to make it very difficult for any groups – even governments – promoting new public health laws and regulations, that are intended to protect the public interest.' The briefing notes that, rather than this being a by-product of the legislation's overall goal, it 'appears to be the Bill's intention'. Seymour response Seymour accused Baker of 'alarmism'. 'What the bill actually says is that if a politician or government department wants to pass a regulation that infringes on your private property rights, they'll need to justify why. Inconsistency with the principles does not prevent any new legislation from being passed. All it requires is transparency to the taxpayer. That's not radical, it's democratic accountability. If a policy is justified, it will stand up to scrutiny.' 'The Regulatory Standards Bill will help New Zealand get its mojo back. It requires politicians and officials to ask and answer certain questions before they place restrictions on citizens' freedoms. What problem are we trying to solve?' Seymour asked. 'What are the costs and benefits? Who pays the costs and gets the benefits? What restrictions are being placed on the use and exchange of private property?' 'This Bill turns 'because we said so' into 'because here's the evidence'.'
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Experts Warn Regulatory Standards Bill Threatens Future Public Health Laws
Public health experts are worried the government's proposed Regulatory Standards Bill will act as a disincentive for future law-makers to limit harmful industries. A group of scholars in health and policy have worked together on a briefing, titled "Regulatory Standards Bill threatens the public interest, public health and Māori rights". It's authors are Jonathan Boston, Michael Baker, Andrew Geddis, Carwyn Jones and Geoffrey Palmer. The Regulatory Standards Bill was introduced to Parliament in May, and is now being considered by the finance and expenditure committee. It would set up a Regulatory Standards Board to consider how legislation measures up to the principles. It was part of ACT's coalition agreement, and in putting the bill forward, party leader David Seymour said: "In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral - it's a tax on growth. This government is committed to clearing the path of needless regulations by improving how laws are made." The bill wants politicians to show their workings, he said. "This bill turns the explanation from politicians' 'because we said so' into 'because here is the justification according to a set of principles'." But Baker said the bill had prompted a large number of concerns, not least from a public health perspective. He said it was problematic that the bill failed to mention public harm in its ethical framework, which was needed to balance out private benefits. Another issue was the "takings or impairment principle". The bill in its current form would allow commercial interests, such as the tobacco or alcohol industries, to seek compensation - paid with public money - if any future legislation caused them to lose money. Baker explained this would have a "chilling effect" on public health measures. He said it would make it less appealing for governments to create any new legislation aimed at protecting public health which could negatively impact harmful industries, which might then seek compensation. This could include the denicotinisation of cigarettes, alcohol restrictions like sponsorship bans, controls on unhealthy food and drink such as limiting marketing to children, and clean air provisions such as mandating emissions reductions by industry. This bill would mean taxpayers paid to compensate these businesses for the money lost because of moves to protect public health. "And that's going to make it very difficult for any groups - even governments - promoting new public health laws and regulations, that are intended to protect the public interest." The briefing notes that, rather than this being a by-product of the legislation's overall goal, it "appears to be the Bill's intention". Seymour response Seymour accused Baker of "alarmism". "What the bill actually says is that if a politician or government department wants to pass a regulation that infringes on your private property rights, they'll need to justify why. Inconsistency with the principles does not prevent any new legislation from being passed. All it requires is transparency to the taxpayer. That's not radical, it's democratic accountability. If a policy is justified, it will stand up to scrutiny." "The Regulatory Standards Bill will help New Zealand get its mojo back. It requires politicians and officials to ask and answer certain questions before they place restrictions on citizens' freedoms. What problem are we trying to solve?" Seymour asked. "What are the costs and benefits? Who pays the costs and gets the benefits? What restrictions are being placed on the use and exchange of private property?" "This Bill turns 'because we said so' into 'because here's the evidence'."
