The Tree Gets Poisoned
The DOJ moved to drop charges against three prominent people on Wednesday: two Trump employees charged in the Mar-a-Lago records case, and ex-Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE).
None of these cases were political prosecutions. The Mar-a-Lago defendants were charged for allegedly helping Trump illegally retain national defense records while out of office; Fortenberry was fighting a 2022 conviction on lying to the FBI and concealing foreign campaign contributions.
The DOJ is set to be run by some of the attorneys who defended Trump in his criminal cases. They include Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, nominated for the number two and three spots.
All this sends an important signal, one that Trump himself made explicit in a Truth Social post: 'I am very proud of our Department of Justice, something I have not been able to say for many years!'
The signal is that Trump has the power to stop (and potentially start) any criminal case. Nobody else in modern American history has really wielded this power in the way that we're likely to see over the coming months and years.
We are beginning to see the fruit of that poison tree. In countries with corrupt prosecution systems, whether or not someone is under indictment does not send a clear signal about them. It may very well be that an indictment, if anything, is positive: evidence of an independence or unwillingness to bow down to an autocrat.
That's no reason to avoid general skepticism of prosecutors, but it's the kind of shift that makes it harder to discern what is real and what is bogus. Take the prosecution of ex-Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), sentenced on Wednesday to 11 years in prison. The saga of Gold Bars Bob was a real public corruption case. We covered it.
But it highlights the issue: ending real cases and bringing fake ones makes it very difficult to tell who is actually a bad actor.
Trump's DOJ Moves To Drop Case Against Mar-a-Lago Records Cronies
Don't Let The Chaos Mask Trump's Lawless Power Grabs
RFK Jr. Did A 'Just Asking Questions' Dance As Democrats Grilled Him On Vaccines, Conspiracy Theories
Trump Sparks Constitutional Crisis, Seizing Budget Authority from Congress
Justice Dept. Is Said to Discuss Dropping Case Against Eric Adams — The New York Times
Meta to Pay $25 Million to Settle 2021 Trump Lawsuit — The Wall Street Journal
Compelling Mass Civil Servant Resignations Will Create Chaos — Can We Still Govern?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
⏳Inter-Inzaghi talks: renewal or exit, Saudi and Juve interest👀
The heavy 5-0 defeat suffered by Paris Saint Germain in the Champions League final has left a deep mark on Inter, but in these hours the club is called to resolve another fundamental issue: the future of Simone Inzaghi. The coach is considering a particularly enticing offer from Al-Hilal, which continues to push to bring him to Saudi Arabia, in addition to the sensational move made by Juventus in recent weeks. Advertisement A decisive meeting is set for today between the coach, President Marotta, Sporting Director Ausilio, and representatives of Oaktree: a summit that will clarify whether the paths between Inzaghi and Inter will separate or continue together. The management has already started to consider alternatives such as De Zerbi and Fabregas, while the American ownership of Oaktree is pushing for the confirmation of the coach who has guaranteed significant revenues. In fifteen days, Inter will be involved in the Club World Cup, making a decision on the future of the Nerazzurri bench unavoidable. 🤑 The future of Inzaghi and the offer from Al-Hilal Coach Simone Inzaghi is at the center of Inter's evaluations, just days after the bitter defeat in the Champions League final. Advertisement In recent days, a very rich offer has arrived from Al-Hilal, which the coach has not closed, suggesting some doubt on his part as well. In Arabia, there is talk of a ready contract with figures ranging between 30 and 50 million euros per year for a couple of seasons. Just in these hours, the appointed intermediary is in Milan to discuss the final details and get a definitive answer. The coach's decision must arrive within the next 24 hours. 💥 Today the decisive summit Today a crucial meeting is set between Inzaghi and the Inter management. In a climate of bitterness and reflection after the European defeat, the parties will try to understand if there are still conditions to continue together. Advertisement Inter does not want to start the new season with a coach expiring on June 30, 2026, and for this reason, the club has already started to evaluate alternatives. However, the American ownership of Oaktree, which has benefited from the revenues generated during the Inzaghi cycle, is pushing for the coach's confirmation. ⚖️ The alternatives: De Zerbi and Fabregas In case of a farewell with Inzaghi, the club is thinking of a young profile. De Zerbi is the favorite of Piero Ausilio, but he has already promised Marseille to stay another year in France. Fabregas, currently at Como, could instead become the first choice, but the Lombard club is not willing to stand by and the Spanish coach still needs to be convinced to accept the potential offer. 💣 The sensational attempt by Juventus Juventus, in recent weeks, has conducted a survey with Inzaghi's agent, Tullio Tinti. Advertisement According to Tuttosport, then director Cristiano Giuntoli had made contacts to evaluate the possibility of a future agreement, but the attempt stalled after the renewal of the Juventus technical area and the automatic confirmation of Igor Tudor until 2026, following qualification in the Champions League. However, the confirmation of Juventus' interest in Inzaghi remains, a sign that the Nerazzurri coach is also appreciated outside of Inter. 🏆 Club World Cup incoming Inter cannot afford further hesitation: in fifteen days the team will be in America to play the Club World Cup. The debut is set for Tuesday, June 17 at 18 local time, when it will be 3 in the morning on June 18 in Italy, at the Rose Bowl Stadium in Los Angeles against the Mexicans of Monterrey. Advertisement This imminent commitment imposes to quickly establish who will lead the team in the next season, whether it will still be Inzaghi or if a new coach will be chosen. So today will be the day of truth, with no possibility of updates or postponements. This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇮🇹 here. 📸 NICOLO CAMPO - AFP or licensors
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Fuels Fears Over Chinese Cargo Ships at US Ports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sunday's Ukrainian drone ambush on a Russian airbase more than 3,000 miles from the front lines has intensified a growing debate among U.S. military analysts over the plausibility of a similar attack launched from Chinese merchant vessels docked at American ports. The scenario has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers and security analysts alike following confirmation that COSCO Shipping—China's state-owned shipping giant—operates across key U.S. ports, despite being designated by the Department of Defense as a Chinese military company. At issue is whether drones or cruise missiles could be hidden in shipping containers aboard these vessels, activated remotely or after offloading, and used in a preemptive strike. "This is a very plausible form of attack in the U.S.," said Bryan Clark, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former U.S. Navy officer. "But the attack would need to overcome several challenges," he told Newsweek. "The drones need to get out of the container, and that's hard to control aboard a ship. A more feasible approach would be to deploy the drones from a container once it's offloaded and moved on a truck." In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. AP Retired Navy commander Thomas Shugart, now a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, has voiced a more urgent warning. "It is becoming borderline-insane that we routinely allow ships owned and operated by DoD-designated Chinese military companies to sit in our ports with thousands of containers onboard and under their control," Shugart said in a conversation with Newsweek. Shugart said the concept isn't speculative—it mirrors Chinese military writings. "Their Science of Campaigns is full of references to 'sudden' and 'surprise' strikes," he said, referring to a core text that Chinese military officers are expected to study. "They explicitly discuss hitting first, especially against what they call the 'powerful entity,' which is clearly a reference to the United States." The concerns are not just theoretical. In January, members of the House Committee on Homeland Security asked the U.S. Coast Guard for a classified briefing, citing COSCO's access to "major U.S. ports" and warning of risks including "espionage, cyber intrusions, sabotage, and supply chain disruptions," according to a letter sent in January. Vulnerabilities Can Be Exploited Zak Kallenborn, a researcher of drone and asymmetric warfare, acknowledged the technical possibility but questioned the timing. "A similar Chinese drone attack is definitely plausible and worth worrying about," he told Newsweek. "However, a Chinese attack is unlikely to come completely out of the blue. If China were to do this, we'd likely already be at war." Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Still, the lessons from Ukraine's recent drone strike on Russian airfields linger heavily in the minds of U.S. analysts and war planners grappling with the warp-speed progress of battlefield technological advancements like drone warfare. The operation on Sunday exposed how even hardened military targets can be neutralized by low-cost drones—deep inside a nuclear-armed adversary's territory where an enemy's conventional air power would be difficult to penetrate. For some of these experts, it raised uncomfortable parallels to U.S. vulnerabilities. Shugart said the U.S. shouldn't assume distance offers safety. "We've hardened some overseas air bases," he said. "But we still park billion-dollar aircraft in the open on our own soil. That's a risk." According to a March report from the Atlantic Council, China has developed and demonstrated containerized missile and drone platforms that can be covertly transported aboard commercial vessels. The report warned these systems could enable Beijing to establish "a covert way to establish anti-access/area denial nodes near major maritime choke points." A Regulatory Blindspot Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb demonstrated how swarms of inexpensive, off-the-shelf drones—slightly modified to carry explosives and smuggled in wooden containers to be deployed remotely—can inflict billions of dollars in damage on strategic military assets, including long-range bombers. The contrast has fueled criticism of more traditional defense approaches, such as President Donald Trump's proposed "Golden Dome" missile shield, which analysts say may be poorly matched to emerging low-cost threats. What if I told you that as I type this there was a vessel, associated with the Chinese PLA, that *could* be equipped with many dozens of anti-ship cruise missiles—and was parked less than 4 miles from the bulk of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet. Well guess what: it's happening—for real. — Tom Shugart (@tshugart3) August 22, 2024 The regulatory environment surrounding drones is also a major factor in the growing risk, experts say. "We don't have a drone transportation and logistics system," military theorist John Robb wrote on X. "The FAA strangled it in the crib a decade ago. If the FCC had regulated the internet the way we've handled drones, we'd still be using AOL." Robb advocates for a national drone framework with built-in security measures: "Monitoring, kill switches, no-fly zones, hardware and software rules, maintenance requirements, and corporate certification." In Congress, lawmakers continue to press the Coast Guard to ensure more stringent vetting of foreign vessels, crew members and cargo. "The vetting process must be consistent and comprehensive across all U.S. ports," the Homeland Security Committee wrote in its January request. The committee also raised concerns about Chinese political officers allegedly embedded aboard COSCO vessels, which it argued underscores direct Chinese Communist Party influence over ostensibly commercial operations. For analysts like Clark, the technology is only part of the equation. The more pressing concern is readiness. "If China believes it can use relatively small drones to cause major damage, and we've done nothing to detect or deter it, that's a vulnerability we can't afford to ignore," he said.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump DOJ investigating Biden-era pardons amid concerns over state of mind
President Donald Trump's Justice Department is reviewing the list of people that were granted pardons by former President Joe Biden, amid new concerns about his use of an AutoPen to automatically sign documents, as well as concerns about his state of mind in his final months in office. Fox News was told Tuesday that Justice Department Pardon Attorney Ed Martin is reviewing a list of Biden-era pardons granted by the president during his final weeks in office. It is unclear what individual pardons are being reviewed by Martin's office, though Reuters reported this week that the office is planning to look at the preemptive pardons that Biden granted to his son, Hunter Biden, as well as more than 35 death row inmates whose sentences were changed to life in prison during Biden's final days in office. DOJ officials did not respond to Fox News's requests for comments on the email or the exact nature of the review Biden Clemency Announcement Gets Mixed Reviews On Capitol Hill: 'Where's The Bar?' Former President Joe Biden used his final weeks as commander-in-chief to grant clemency and pardon more than 1,500 individuals, in what the White House described at the time as the largest single-day act of clemency by a U.S. president. Read On The Fox News App But critics took umbrage at the long list of names, noting that it included persons convicted of defrauding U.S. taxpayers of tens of millions of dollars. Many took aim at his use of preemptive pardons to family members and others in Biden's inner circle. This is a developing news story. Check back for article source: Trump DOJ investigating Biden-era pardons amid concerns over state of mind
