Isabel Oakeshott's crash course in Israeli healthcare
The Talk correspondent, partner of Reform deputy leader Richard Tice and resident of Dubai, was in Israel 'to learn more about war and how it might eventually end'. Then, as she was cruising along Tel Aviv's beach promenade at 15mph, the wind whipped her cap off and she ended up in trouble.
A moment's thought, please, for Isabel Oakeshott, who has done herself a mischief while doing the entirely normal thing for a 50-year-old of riding an e-scooter in a baseball cap.
'Perhaps I hit a bump as I turned to look at my disappearing hat, or just somehow lost my balance,' she wrote in the Daily Telegraph. 'Either way, I flew over the handlebars, landing hard. While my jaw and chin hit the pavement, the rest of me smacked onto the scooter's jack-knifed chassis.
'And so it was that I found myself at the Sylvan Adams Emergency Hospital, a state-of-the-art facility designed to deal with casualties of war. When air raid sirens sound and locals take cover in bomb shelters, doctors and nurses at this hospital continue their work underground. It is all set up for electricity blackouts and flying missiles.'
And guess what Oakeshott's very brief ('By 10pm I was back in my hotel room… I had been at the hospital for less than two hours') experience of Israel's healthcare system taught her? Yes – that she'd been right all along about how terrible the NHS is!
Oakeshott is the co-author, along with former Tory deputy chair Michael Ashcroft, of Life Support, a 480-page romp through the NHS's failings, and happily her 120 minutes in a Tel Aviv hospital was enough to confirm all her prejudices.
'The accident shifted my focus onto Israel's widely admired healthcare system,' she writes. 'The contrast with the NHS was too glaring to ignore… Based on mandatory health insurance with not-for-profit providers, Israel's health system is means-tested but universal, ensuring even the poorest citizens are covered.'
Are they, though? A 2023 study by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research found that more than one million Israelis – 12 per cent of the entire population – had to forgo medical services in 2021 or 2022 because they couldn't afford the contributions despite being insured. The rates were especially high among women, the poor and people with chronic illnesses.
35 per cent said they gave up on doing medical tests or treatments through the health maintenance organisations because of long wait times. Of those, 51 per cent resorted to private medicine, which is even more expensive.
And earlier this year, writers of a report by the Taub Centre for Social Policy Studies were critical of the investment into the country's health services. In 2023, Israel's per capita current health expenditure, in terms of purchasing power parity, was lower than that of most OECD countries. This expenditure has since decreased by a further 0.9% in the past two years, with only South Korea, Portugal, Greece, Chile, and Mexico ranking lower in health spending.
Prof Nadav Davidovitch, who heads Ben-Gurion University of the Negev's School of Public Health and who co-led the study, compared Israel's healthcare system to an Eastern European folktale of a workhorse. 'The owner is happy the horse works so hard, so he gradually reduces the horse's food, and then he's so happy that the horse continues to work,' he said. 'Until, finally, the horse is dead.'
Even Oakeshott saw the problems with her comparison of two healthcare systems, fleetingly conceding that 'Israel is a fraction of the size of the UK, with very different demographics'. But no matter – she may have gone to learn more about war, but left with a replacement for the NHS.
Incidentally, she was treated by 'a cheerful Polish surgeon with excellent English'. Her allies didn't seem so keen on these when campaigning for the hardest possible Brexit!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Government can hit NHS waiting times targets despite scepticism, says Reeves
The Chancellor has insisted the Government can hit its NHS waiting times targets despite scepticism from some leaders. Speaking after her spending review, Rachel Reeves said the Government was confident it could hit pledges set down by the Prime Minister last year. Sir Keir Starmer said in December the NHS will carry out 92% of routine operations within 18 weeks by March 2029. However, in March this year, the NHS waiting list for hospital treatment in England rose for the first time in seven months. The Times has also reported that internal Department of Health modelling shows the NHS is on course to hit only about 80% by the end of the parliament, with officials suggesting anything above that is overly optimistic. Asked about the pledge on Wednesday afternoon, Ms Reeves told reporters: 'We've already delivered around three-and-a-half million additional appointments since we came to office last July. 'Waiting lists are already down by 200,000 so we are confident that we can meet our plan for change commitments because of the 3% annual increase in funding for the National Health Service. 'On top of that of course, we're investing in capital spending in the NHS, including in more scanners, but also investment in the NHS digital app to make it easier for patients to access information, to book services, to take some of the costs out of the bureaucracy, as well in running our health service.' Earlier, the 3% increase in real terms for the health service per year in the spending review was welcomed by health leaders but there were warnings it is not enough. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, said the NHS funding boost was welcome, 'given the precarious state of public finances and will help the NHS to cope with rising demand from an aging population, often with multiple or more complex physical and mental health conditions'. But he warned 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So, on its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Mr Taylor said NHS leaders will need continued backing from the Government to redesign services and balance budgets. 'That means getting political backing when some services are redesigned or cut, including moving hospital services into the community and closer to people's homes as part of the Government's three shifts,' he said. He added that the 'flat settlement' from the Chancellor 'continues to leave a major shortfall in capital funding, and it also fails to lift the ban on private investment that is required to boost NHS capital funding'. There is currently an almost £14 billion maintenance backlog bill to repair NHS hospitals and buildings. Mr Taylor said those issues needed to be addressed in the upcoming national infrastructure strategy and 10-year plan for the health service. Government documents accompanying the spending review show that, on average, from 2023-24 to 2028-29, the NHS in England will receive 3% real terms growth in day-to-day spending, equivalent to a £29 billion real terms increase in annual budgets. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) budget will increase by £2.3 billion in real terms by 2029-30, compared with 2023-24, 'representing a more than 20% real terms increase by the end of the spending review period', the documents said. Overall, the figures suggest DHSC spending will rise 2.8%, though this is less than the average 3.6% in recent years. Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said the 2.8% average increase in DHSC spending – or 3% for day-to-day NHS spending – 'will have been hard-fought for in the spending round negotiations, despite still being lower than the historical average the NHS has received over recent years'. She added: 'We know there are already trade-offs happening in the NHS due to tight finances. 'The Chancellor said she wants the public to have an NHS there when they need it. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions: faster ambulance times; more GP appointments; and adequate mental health services and more; can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.' According to spending review documents, the Government expects the NHS to deliver 2% productivity growth each year, 'unlocking £17 billion savings over three years' to reinvest back into the NHS to improve patient care. The Government will also invest up to £10 billion in NHS technology and digital transformation by 2028‑29, the documents showed. NHS England boss Sir Jim Mackey, speaking at the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester, said the NHS has done 'really well relative to other parts of the public service'. He added: 'But we all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, all things we want to do, the day-to-day cost pressures we're trying to get on top of, etc. 'We're always going to be in a world where we want more money, but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand that we've got what the country can afford to give us. 'We really need to get better value for that money – it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount of money by any standards.' NHS England has already budgeted a 2.8% increase in pay for staff in 2025-26, but many leaders the King's Fund spoke to were worried about funding pay rises above this amount. After the spending review, Royal College of Nursing (RCN) general secretary, Professor Nicola Ranger, said staff will now decide whether the 3.6% pay rise offered by the Government is enough. She added: 'Against a backdrop of other cuts, nursing staff will see the NHS being protected but not transformed by today's spending plans. 'When the Government lays out its vision for the future of the NHS and its workforce, it must say how it intends to reverse collapsing student recruitment, boost retention and deliver urgent, structural reform to nursing pay.' Nuffield Trust senior policy analyst, Sally Gainsbury, said: 'Compared to the settlements for other departments – from policing to education – the NHS deal looks generous. 'But seen in the context of all the promises made by the Government to the British people – to drive down waiting lists, shift care closer to home, rapidly improve tech – and the commitments to meet staff pay demands and rising costs of new drugs, today's settlement soon melts away. 'With capital funding staying flat in real terms for the rest of the spending review period, it will be difficult for the NHS to invest in the technology and facility upgrades it needs to meet the Government's ambitious productivity targets.'
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
NHS should ‘tear up the outpatient model'
Around 130,000,000 outpatient appointments – procedures or appointments which take place in hospitals or clinics but do not require an overnight stay – take place in the NHS in England every year. The majority of people on the NHS waiting list are waiting for outpatient appointments. An estimated 7.42 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of March, relating to 6.25 million patients, according to official figures. The latest performance figures for the NHS in England are due to be published on Thursday. Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, told the NHS ConfedExpo conference that the service should take 'big leaps' such as 'tearing up the outpatient model' and 'tearing up the frustrations about technology' and 'tearing up the multiple touch points for patients when it should be one'. And Dr Penny Dash, chairwoman of NHS England, told delegates: 'There are seven and a half million people on the waiting list, half of them waiting more than 18 weeks, and the majority of those people waiting for an outpatient appointment. 'Surely we can fix outpatients to help bring down the waiting list.' Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: 'Outpatient services should and could be transformed with most checks and follow-ups done in neighbourhoods or remotely.' Meanwhile, Sir Jim said the NHS has 'lost its way' on quality of care, as he told delegates that the forthcoming 10-year plan for health, which is to be published in July, will 'focus on quality'. 'Neighbourhood care – I think that part of the plan is still a really big standout for me,' he said. 'The focus on quality, I think it's really welcome – we have lost our way a little bit on quality coming out of Covid, and again, looking at quality in the round and not just safety.' But he said that the NHS would move on from the 'over-prescription centrally' and the 'labyrinthine approval processes' to give local health leaders more freedom. Dr Dash added: 'We do need to have a comprehensive strategy for quality. 'We've had a big focus on safety, rightly, over the last 10 years, but that has been a bit at the expense of patient experience and also effectiveness. We need to regroup, set out that strategy.'
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
NHS should ‘tear up the outpatient model'
Around 130,000,000 outpatient appointments – procedures or appointments which take place in hospitals or clinics but do not require an overnight stay – take place in the NHS in England every year. The majority of people on the NHS waiting list are waiting for outpatient appointments. An estimated 7.42 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of March, relating to 6.25 million patients, according to official figures. The latest performance figures for the NHS in England are due to be published on Thursday. Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, told the NHS ConfedExpo conference that the service should take 'big leaps' such as 'tearing up the outpatient model' and 'tearing up the frustrations about technology' and 'tearing up the multiple touch points for patients when it should be one'. And Dr Penny Dash, chairwoman of NHS England, told delegates: 'There are seven and a half million people on the waiting list, half of them waiting more than 18 weeks, and the majority of those people waiting for an outpatient appointment. 'Surely we can fix outpatients to help bring down the waiting list.' Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: 'Outpatient services should and could be transformed with most checks and follow-ups done in neighbourhoods or remotely.' Meanwhile, Sir Jim said the NHS has 'lost its way' on quality of care, as he told delegates that the forthcoming 10-year plan for health, which is to be published in July, will 'focus on quality'. 'Neighbourhood care – I think that part of the plan is still a really big standout for me,' he said. 'The focus on quality, I think it's really welcome – we have lost our way a little bit on quality coming out of Covid, and again, looking at quality in the round and not just safety.' But he said that the NHS would move on from the 'over-prescription centrally' and the 'labyrinthine approval processes' to give local health leaders more freedom. Dr Dash added: 'We do need to have a comprehensive strategy for quality. 'We've had a big focus on safety, rightly, over the last 10 years, but that has been a bit at the expense of patient experience and also effectiveness. We need to regroup, set out that strategy.'
