South Korea's Lee Wins Election Following Months of Chaos
Good morning. Lee Jae-myung defeats Kim Moon-soo in South Korea's presidential election. Meta bets nuclear energy can help power its AI efforts. And Huawei's new phone is an early test for in-house operating system HarmonyOS. Listen to the day's top stories.
South Korea's left-leaning maverick Lee Jae-myung won the presidential election, after Kim Moon-soo said he 'humbly' accepts defeat. The election marks a turning point for the country after months of chaos unleashed by former leader Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law debacle. The president-elect vowed to improve people's livelihoods and revive the economy. That may be tough as the country is one of the most vulnerable to Donald Trump's tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Firms' Less ‘Catastrophic' Outlook Kept Canada Rates on Hold
Businesses believing that the worst-case tariff scenarios were less likely to become reality helped convince Bank of Canada policymakers to stay on the sidelines this month. That's according to Deputy Governor Sharon Kozicki in a speech the day after officials held their key interest rate steady at 2.75% for a second straight meeting. In her prepared remarks, Kozicki highlighted how on-the-ground discussions and surveys supplemented traditional data sets, giving policymakers a more comprehensive picture of the economy when deliberating rate decisions.
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Should Get The Hint That Xi Just Isn't That Into Him
China's President Xi Jinping (R) and U.S. President Donald Trump. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKIFRED DUFOUR/AFP via Getty Images Xi Jinping probably doesn't know whether to be flattered or aggrieved by Donald Trump's late-night rantings about the Chinese leader. Sounding more like a jilted ex than a head of state — or a force to reckon with in negotiations — the U.S. president complained Xi is proving 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' Trump, on social media, sounded sincere enough — as if it just dawned on him that Beijing might not be interested in a bilateral trade deal after all. All this raises almost too many questions to pose here. One: Doesn't Trump recall Xi giving him the talk-to-the-hand treatment the first go around from 2017 to 2021? Another: What about Xi's energy, circa 2025, makes Trump think Xi is anxious for another go? Trump, like any wistful ex, is keeping his options open. He prefaced his 2:17 a.m. Washington-time rant with 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but…' It's time that someone on Trump's staff had the courage to tell him that perhaps the most powerful Chinese leader in many decades just isn't into him and his trade tactics. On one level, Xi can be excused for lacking the bandwidth to deal with Trump World's chaos right now. Even before the Trump 2.0 era started on January 20, Asia's biggest economy was grappling with a massive property crisis that's generating deflation. Xi's Communist Party was already facing weak domestic demand and record youth unemployment. Back in November, when Team Xi assumed Kamala Harris would be the next president, Beijing was struggling to stop the national birthrate from falling. It was mulling ways to address a rapidly ageing population. It was devising bigger social safety nets to encourage China's 1.4 billion people to save less and spend more. Pre-Trump 2.0, Beijing was in the throes of trying to reduce several trillions of dollars of local government debt. Before the latest Trump tariffs, Xi's government was working to shift its growth model away from exports and runaway investment to domestic demand-led growth. It was working to reduce the dominance of inefficient state-owned enterprises. It was endeavoring to increase the use of the yuan in global trade and finance. Team Xi is also contending with a notable increase in in-person protests. Especially factory workers getting stiffed as export growth slows. Now, Trump's tariffs, volatility in the dollar and bedlam in the U.S. Treasury market are sending intensifying headwinds China's way. So, yes, a busy time to be the leader of a giant, unbalanced economy directly in the Trumpian crossfire. And the White House thinks now is a good time to drop everything and do a hasty bilateral trade deal? Trade agreements are wildly complicated affairs in the best of times, taking several months, even years. Hence, Xi's strategy of slow-walking the process, one that's worked so far. Delaying talks is all the more rational given the decent odds U.S. courts will ultimately rule against Trump's claim that presidents have tariff powers. Trump, of course, is desperate for a trade deal, any deal, to try to convince Americans that, see, the tariffs are working. His splashy signing ceremony with London doesn't count, since the U.S. has a trade surplus with the United Kingdom. Japan hasn't been as pliant as Trump seemed to expect. And new South Korean President Lee Jae-myung is more Seoul's answer to Bernie Sanders than a kindred spirit keen to work with Trump World. Europe isn't exactly fertile ground for a win. Why would Trump be threatening 50% tariffs on the EU if concessions were forthcoming from the 550-million-person market? The U.S. Trade Representative sending reminder letters to trading partners so they don't forget about the upcoming deadline for talks is telling in itself. If White House phones were ringing with good offers, such embarrassing letters wouldn't need to be sent. Also, if Trump really believed Xi is ready to make big concessions, why would his team risk a deal by going after Chinese students with a ban on visas? China, meanwhile, knows how news this week that it may place an order for hundreds of Airbus aircraft, not Boeing, will have Trump fuming. Little about the last couple of weeks suggests these two economic giants are about to sit down for nuts-and-bolts trade negotiations in good faith. Trump's late-night post might've been his way of reminding Xi that the two men were supposed to catch up via phone this week. They did indeed talk on Thursday. But it still seems like high time Trump took the hint that Xi just isn't that into his trade deal.
Fast Company
43 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Enjoy ‘AI slop' summer. What's coming next is worse
Welcome to AI Decoded, Fast Company 's weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of AI. You can sign up to receive this newsletter every week here. 'AI Slop' summer is here AI image and video generation tools have gone mainstream, with millions creating content and using them on platforms like TikTok and YouTube. Social networks such as Facebook and Pinterest are also seeing a surge in AI-generated posts. Meta is actively promoting this trend, as AI content is easy to produce and often drives higher engagement, creating more opportunities to sell ads. Much of the AI-generated content is what critics call 'AI slop'—low-quality material often produced by low-wage workers in developing countries aiming to harvest clicks on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and TikTok. This content frequently spreads further via messaging apps like WhatsApp and is often political in nature. One growing genre features right-wing fantasy videos portraying acts of revenge or defiance by MAGA figures such as Donald Trump or Pam Bondi. These are typically just still images with overlaid text—clearly fictional. (Left-leaning versions exist too, though they more often rely on real footage, such as Jamie Raskin or Jasmine Crockett dismantling Republican talking points in Congress.) AI-generated content is also increasingly surfacing in search results, often pushing aside higher-quality human-created material. E-commerce platforms like Amazon are flooded with AI-generated product descriptions, user reviews, and even entire books. Some news organizations have started publishing AI-written articles, especially in sports and news roundups—many riddled with inaccuracies. Recently, the Chicago Sun-Times and The Philadelphia Inquirer unintentionally ran book list inserts featuring AI-generated descriptions of books that don't actually exist. Right now, much of the AI-generated content online can still be distinguished from genuinely human-made material. Take, for example, a viral AI video from April that depicted overweight U.S. factory workers (a satire of Trump's tariff policies). It looked fairly realistic but still gave off that unmistakable 'generated' vibe. Still, the line is blurring fast. Consider the recent viral clip of an Australian woman trying to pass airport security with her ' service kangaroo.' It racked up over a million likes before it was revealed to be AI-generated. Some viewers saw through it—many did not. The video proved that with a semi-plausible premise and decent AI tools, the boundary between real and fake can dissolve entirely. It's not hard to see where this is going. Google's new Veo 3 video generation tool is a case in point: The sample videos are alarmingly realistic. Time recently showed how these tools can create convincing deepfakes of political riots and election fraud. AI-generated content has been advancing for years, but we may have arrived at a moment where even video—once the hardest medium to fake—can no longer be trusted. With more powerful tools and social platforms eager to boost engagement, we're likely heading toward a web saturated with AI-generated content. And when anything can be fake, everything becomes suspect. Are we ready for the 'zero-trust' internet? Reddit sues Anthropic over AI training data The social platform Reddit says the AI company Anthropic has used content created by Reddit users to train AI models in ways that violate its policies. In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in a San Francisco court, Reddit accused Anthropic of using users' posts without permission, causing harm to the platform. AI companies rely heavily on information stores like Reddit to train the large language models that power popular chatbots such as ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude. Reddit is seen as a particularly valuable resource because it holds millions of human-to-human conversations across thousands of topics, spanning the past two decades. The conversations are not only valuable for their content, but for how authentically they reflect the way people write and speak. No wonder Reddit cofounder and CEO Steve Huffman calls it 'the most human place on the internet.' And content licensing for AI training is a big and growing business for the platform. Reddit's shares on the New York Stock Exchange finished the day up more than 7% after news of the lawsuit broke Wednesday. The company has already formed content licensing agreements with Google and OpenAI (Sam Altman is a major shareholder in Reddit). It's possible that the lawsuit was filed after Reddit and Anthropic failed to come to terms on a content licensing agreement. Reddit certainly isn't the first content company to sue a well-funded AI lab for alleged misuse of data. OpenAI, Perplexity, Google, and others have all been the target of legal actions related to training data. Many of these cases center on the question of whether or not data that's publicly available on the internet falls under the 'fair use' safe harbor of the Copyright Act, rendering it fair game for AI training. Trump's foreign student ban: a master class in the art of the self-own Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last week that the U.S. will begin revoking visas for visiting Chinese students, including those in 'critical fields,' and will tighten visa requirements for future applicants. The Trump administration repeatedly claims it wants America to win the global AI race, while being openly hostile to the very brains that could help the U.S. achieve that goal. Research from the National Foundation for American Policy shows that two-thirds (66%) of U.S.-based AI startups have immigrant cofounders, and 55% of billion-dollar startups were founded or cofounded by immigrants. Meanwhile, other countries are rolling out the red carpet. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology offered guaranteed admission to any Harvard international student. Germany and Ireland are courting current and prospective Harvard students. China, too. As AI impacts talent needs, foreign students will be needed to fill demand. Because AI coding assistants are significantly increasing the productivity of individual engineers, big tech companies are investing less in entry-level programmers (and more in GPUs and data centers). CEO Satya Nadella says 20% to 30% of Microsoft code is now AI-generated, and that he expects that rate to grow to 95% by 2030. Tech companies will likely need people with PhDs or other graduate-level degrees to fill more specialized roles such as those responsible for training and steering AI models. And that talent pool isn't big enough. International graduate students with advanced technical skills are more valuable than ever. The Administration is signaling a retreat from the global competition for AI talent.
