UI will shutter Division of Access, Opportunity and Diversity following Regent directive
The University of Iowa will soon close its Division of Access, Opportunity, and Diversity at the direction of the Iowa Board of Regents, with any division functions not required by law or accrediting bodies set for review and elimination.
The university announced Thursday in a news release the division will close on March 27, which will result in three employees being moved to other areas of the university and one position elimination, with that employee being placed on furlough.
The university said the division was a product of the university's recent DEI restructuring under the direction of the Board of Regents.
More: UI stands to lose $5 million in revenue under bill prioritizing Iowans for medical school admission
The release said the UI has eliminated 12 job positions, all full-time, in the year since the Board of Regents told Iowa's public universities to restructure and eliminate positions and programs relating to diversity, equity and inclusion in accordance with state law.
'This action will ensure the university is in compliance with state and federal laws as well as recent changes to accreditation requirements across numerous disciplines,' the release stated.
Essential programs like TRIO Student Support Services and the Office of Civil Rights Compliance will be reassigned to different departments, according to the release, but the Office of Access and Support training program will close. Other student support programs will be reviewed to ensure compliance with state law before they move to University College, which also houses the university's orientation services, honors program, Army and Air Force ROTC and more.
More: A yet-to-be-built 84-unit apartment complex in Iowa City awaits rezoning. What to know:
TRIO services will also move to University College, the release stated, and the Office of Civil Rights Compliance will move to the Office of the President under the purview of the associate vice president for administrative affairs.
A link to Board of Regents President Sherry Bates's comments at a Feb. 27 board meeting was included in a notice of the closure posted on the division's website, where she stated more work needs to be done to comply with the spirit of the law, rather than just the letter. She also directed state universities to scrub all mention of DEI from its current and archived webpages and said the UI had closed three Living Learning Communities in order to follow the law.
As of October 2024, state universities had already reallocated more than $2 million away from DEI programs through closures, cancellations and position eliminations.
'While we have made significant progress, we need to complete the work,' Bates said in her statement during the meeting.
The UI launched the Division of Access, Opportunity, and Diversity last spring as part of a restructuring of its central DEI office after being directed to do so by the board of regents. Five open positions with salaries adding up to $360,000 were eliminated in the transition.
More: Nearly $1 million in grant funding for the UI's International Writing Program has been 'terminated'
The division, split into the Office of Civil Rights Compliance and Office of Access and Support, helped campus members ensure they're meeting accreditation standards and complying with state and federal law, provided student support and opportunities for growth and more. Programs listed in the division include professional development, high-school-to-college transition aid and the University of Iowa Anti-Violence Coalition.
The task force in charge of reviewing DEI policies, programming and positions is also listed as a part of the division, where it lists all 10 directives made by the board of regents in fall 2023 as completed.
'The Division of Access, Opportunity, and Diversity works to maintain a productive and welcoming campus culture where everyone can contribute, find community, and work toward finding common ground,' the division states on its website. 'We do this by ensuring compliance with federal and state laws, supporting both accreditation and research efforts across the institution, and sustaining effective pipeline recruitment programs for students.'
Find this story at Iowa Capital Dispatch, which is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions:kobradovich@iowacapitaldispatch.com.
This article originally appeared on Iowa City Press-Citizen: The UI is closing its Division of Access, Opportunity and Diversity
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Johnson & Johnson denies engaging in illegal DEI practices after group makes civil rights complaint
Johnson & Johnson is denying any wrongdoing after being accused of violating federal law and a Trump executive order with DEI hiring practices, according to an investigation request submitted by America First Legal (AFL). "Johnson & Johnson has always been and will continue to be compliant with all applicable laws and has never engaged in any "illegal DEI,'" a Johnson & Johnson spokesperson told Fox News Digital. AFL is accusing Johnson & Johnson of violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the federal government's Equal Opportunity Clause by engaging in what they claim is unlawful hiring and employment practices that they have openly promoted in past disclosures. The conservative legal watchdog is calling on the Department of Health and Human Services to launch an investigation into the drugmaker, claiming the company's commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion violates federal law and affects every aspect of the business. 'Woke' Hospital Could Be In Crosshairs Of Trump Admin After Scathing Complaint Alleges Dei Discrimination "[Johnson & Johnson's] public representations regarding the role of 'equity' in its employment practices reveal that it systematically and intentionally ignores its compliance obligations and instead violates [their] equal opportunity assurances to the federal government," AFL wrote in a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights. Read On The Fox News App According to Johnson & Johnson's 2023 Health for Humanity Report, the company sought to have 50% of its management positions held by women and 6.8% of management slots held by Black and African American employees by 2025 as part of its "aspirational goals." The report pointed to its progress in achieving 49% women representation and 6.5% Black and African American representation in management slots as of 2023. "The Company's disregard for American civil rights is brazen. It boasts about 'creating equity across our systems and fostering and advancing a culture of inclusion,'" the AFL complaint said. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture A LinkedIn business post entitled "How Johnson & Johnson is building a diverse talent pipeline" claimed that the pharmaceutical giant uses data to monitor its talent goals and holds leaders in the company accountable to them. The article claims the diversity of the talent pool they are recruiting from is tracked as part of this data. "One of the measures we are starting to look at is, not just the readiness of the pipeline… but what does the diversity of that mix look like? In order to provide a score or an assessment of the strength of the pipeline," Johnson & Johnson executive Sarah McKensey said in a video interview that accompanied the article. The article said the purpose of providing such an assessment on the talent pipeline was to ensure that diversity becomes "a natural feature of the hiring landscape" and said the company also holds external recruiters accountable for the diversity of their talent pool. Johnson & Johnson's 2023 DEI Impact Report stated that its leaders are responsible for developing "diverse and inclusive teams" and its 2023 health and humanity report detailed how the company would partner with women's professional associations in order to achieve "parity" in management. Johnson & Johnson had 3,719 contracts in 2024 with the departments of Health and Human Services, Defense, and other agencies, according to with $11.6 billion in potential total value. Upon taking office in 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order banning federal agencies from doing business with companies that engage in discriminatory DEI practices. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 says that "An unlawful employment or other hiring practice exists when race, color, religion, sex, or national origin is a motivating factor for any employment decision." Federal regulations state that federal agencies can cut off contracts from outfits that are not in compliance with the Civil Rights Act. The AFL claims the Biden administration shirked its responsibility to investigate whether companies in the medical space were in violation of the civil rights act, and is urging the Trump administration to act now. The company appears to have removed most of its DEI-related content from its public-facing website since Trump took office. The company's former DEI policy landing page, which once stated, "Johnson & Johnson and all its operating companies are committed to workforce diversity, creating equity across our systems, and fostering and advancing a culture of inclusion," now redirects to a more general appendix of ESG policies. The 2023 DEI impact report and the 2023 Health for Humanity report also redirect to the inclusion page. Another DEI landing page has been deleted and replaced with a more tepid "inclusion" page. However, AFL contends that the drugmaker is merely trying to conceal its ongoing DEI violations, and demands a federal investigation to uncover whether it is in compliance with the Civil Rights Act. "Until very recently, Johnson & Johnson proudly touted DEI policies on its website that AFL believes plainly violated the Civil Rights Act. Institutions across corporate America and academia are now taking steps to rebrand or conceal their unlawful DEI policies in order to evade detection and continue their discriminatory must investigate to determine whether Johnson & Johnson is still engaging in illegal discrimination and violating the Civil Rights Act," AFL Vice President Dan Epstein told Fox News Digital. The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for article source: Johnson & Johnson denies engaging in illegal DEI practices after group makes civil rights complaint
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Why unemployment for Black women is rising
The jobless rate for Black women has been creeping higher all year. Why it matters: This could be a sign of weakness in the overall job market, economists say, though others point to the Trump administration's purge of the federal workforce and its push to eliminate DEI efforts. By the numbers: The demographic-level data on unemployment from the Labor Department can be volatile month-to-month, so Axios looked at the three-month trailing average, based on the jobs numbers released Friday. By this measure, Black women's unemployment rose to 5.8% in May, up from 5.3% a year ago, surpassing the jobless rate for Black men, which declined to 5.6%. For white women, the jobless rate has stayed relatively flat. While it rose for white men, their unemployment rate is still below the overall number. The intrigue: The share of Black women working in the federal government shrank nearly 33% over the past year, per data cited by Bloomberg last month. Between the lines: Women comprise a slight minority of the federal workforce but represent the majority of employees among the agencies targeted by the White House, including USAID, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Education, where Black women make up 28% of workers. Women also make up a greater share of probationary workers, the National Women's Law Center notes. Black women are overrepresented in the federal employment compared with the private sector, accounting for nearly 12% of the federal workforce in 2020, compared with about 7% in the civilian labor force, according to a federal report. Zoom out: It's "largely an untold story," according to a ProPublica report last week on how firings have disproportionately impacted Black women. Federal contract work has also fallen, though those numbers are harder to come by. "The layoffs at the federal level where Black people are more represented, the impacts of the tariffs, particularly on small businesses that hire Black women, and the overall use of DEI as a slur, which may be contributing to a lack of hiring of Black women, all of these factors are probably at play," Andre Perry, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution told Bloomberg. Reality check: The federal job loss doesn't fully explain the decline in overall employment for Black women. Federal employment has fallen by 69,000 this year, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but the number is expected to move higher, since those on paid leave or receiving severance are counted as employed. From January to March, Black women's employment fell by a whopping 306,000. It has recovered a bit since then and now is down by 233,000 for the year to date. "It's a really large drop and it can't just be the federal layoffs," according to Jessica Fulton, senior fellow at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. What to watch: Black unemployment in the U.S. always trends higher than the overall number. Historically it has been double the rate of white workers, but that gap narrowed a bit in the post-pandemic job market. A higher Black unemployment rate can be an early recession warning sign, Fulton says.
Fast Company
5 hours ago
- Fast Company
Why Target's Pride merch feels so bad
In the last 12 months, Target has publicly walked back its long-held DEI commitments, faced a weeks-long boycott from customers, and become one of several corporations that diminished its annual support for NYC Pride. But when June 1 rolled around, the company still trotted out its annual collection of Pride-inspired, rainbow-adorned merch—and, for a number of reasons, it's not landing well with queer customers. This year's collection includes a series of apparel printed with slogans like 'Authentically Me' and 'Glowing with Pride,' rainbow-hued cat and dog doys, and, oddly enough, a couple of Pride-themed collectible bird figurines. Since the merch debuted, customers have been quick to notice an issue: Several of the items' labels are printed with 'lorem ipsum' filler copy. 'Target's pathetic 2025 Pride collection has arrived,' one Reddit post on the subject reads. According to a spokesperson, Target is aware of the error, which it says originated with a vendor, and is working to address the issue. But for many customers, this labeling oversight feels like both a symptom and a symbol of larger issues at Target. For years, the company has turned Pride Month into a full-on branding extravaganza, releasing entire collections in stores and showing up as a sponsor at Pride parades across the country. In a series of events starting in 2023, though, Target has capitulated to rising conservative pressure, dialing back its Pride merch, ending its DEI commitments, and, this year, retreating from Pride parade sponsorship. Taken together, these factors make Target's 2025 Pride collection feel, at best, like a desperate bid to save face, and, at worst, like an attempt to cash in on a community that it's too afraid to support outside of store walls. Target's retreat from Pride Target first launched pride products in 2015, and largely continued to expand its Pride-based inventory in the years following, openly doubling down on its support for the queer community during a bout of transphobic backlash in 2017. However, starting in 2023, the brand's approach to Pride has been in flux. In May of 2023, CEO Brian Cornell told Fortune's Leadership Next podcast that the company's DEI efforts had 'fueled much of our growth over the last nine years.' Mere weeks later, though, Target removed some items from its annual Pride collection after receiving an influx of conservative pushback, and even threats to its employees, over the items. The waters have been increasingly muddy for Target's Pride efforts ever since. In 2024, the company scaled back its Pride Month sections from all stores to only select locations and online. Then, this January, as companies across the country stepped back from DEI initiatives under the Trump administration, Target announced a series of its own concessions. The brand shared it was 'concluding' certain goals and initiatives tied to racial equity in hiring, no longer participating in external surveys from the LGBTQ+ advocacy organization the Human Rights Campaign, and renaming its 'supplier diversity' team to 'supplier engagement', shifting its focus away from explicitly courting brands with diverse ownership. To many loyal customers, this announcement felt like a betrayal, especially given that Target had previously been more vocal than its corporate peers on DEI initiatives—and that the company has profited annually on Pride Month. This sparked a boycott of the brand that caused foot traffic to drop and share prices to plummet. In the aftermath, the Twin Cities pride parade announced that it would no longer accept Target as a sponsor. And, according to NYC Pride spokesperson Kevin Kilbride, Target was one of several brands that either backed out, reduced its contribution, or asked for its involvement to go unpublicized in the event. Target's retreat from Pride is part of a larger trend this year of corporations choosing not to renew their sponsorship; a pattern that's left many queer consumers wondering if corporate support was always just 'rainbow washing,' or an attempt to signal affinity with LGBTQ+ customers merely to profit off of them. 'The [queer] community has been completely abandoned by a number of major companies, across a lot of brand categories,' Joanna Schwartz, a professor at Georgia College & State University with a specialty in LGBTQ+ marketing, told Fast Company in May. 'The current prevailing wind is out of a far more conservative place, and companies are trying not to make anyone mad, but the companies that were really trying to make an easy buck off of the community were the first ones to leave.' 'Now they're trying to keep getting our money, while denying our humanity' Now that Pride Month has officially arrived, Target is left in a sticky situation. The company is attempting to walk a tightrope between avoiding a conservative outcry for its Pride merch while also striving not to alienate LGBTQ+ customers (who, according to a 2023 study by the investment adviser LGBT Capital, hold an estimated $3.9 trillion in global purchasing power). This year, Target's Pride collection looks fairly similar to last year's and is, once again, only available in some locations. In a statement to Fast Company, a spokesperson shared, 'We are absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity for everyone—our team members, our guests, our supply partners, and the more than 2,000 communities we're proud to serve. As we have for many years, we will continue to mark Pride Month by offering an assortment of celebratory products, hosting internal programming to support our incredible team and sponsoring local events in neighborhoods across the country.' Regardless of its intentions, Target's Pride merch is coming off decidedly hollow for queer customers this year, given its backtracking from the community at large. 'Whenever it's time to profit off Pride, Target rolls out the rainbows,' one X user wrote. 'But when it comes time to actually stand with the queer community? Crickets. Your Pride merch means nothing without a spine.' On Reddit, users under a post regarding the unfinished 'lorem ipsum' tags expressed discomfort with parts of the collection. One of the items is a moving truck figurine decked out in the lesbian flag and the phrase 'Move N;' a reference to the concept of 'U-Hauling.' Per Urban Dictionary, the slang term pokes fun at the stereotype of 'the speedy act of moving in together after a brief courtship between lesbians.' One commenter called the figurine 'insulting af.' Others pointed out the lack of any reference to the trans or non-binary communities. Still others were generally frustrated with the company's unreliable support. 'Gay folks never asked for target to sell cheap low quality merch with rainbows splattered all over it,' one user commented. 'All we asked for is to be treated fairly and allowed to live our lives. They made this shit to get our business. Now they're trying to keep getting our money, while denying our humanity.'
