SERES Leads Chinese EV Innovation at Davos, Championing Global Collaboration for the Intelligent Age
CHONGQING, China, Jan. 26, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- During the World Economic Forum's 2025 annual meeting held from January 20-24 in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, nearly 3,000 representatives from 130 countries and regions discussed the theme 'Collaboration for the Intelligent Age,' exploring topics such as reimagining growth and industries in the intelligent era. SERES Vice President Kang Bo was the sole Chinese new energy vehicle enterprise representative invited to attend and participate in multiple forum activities.
In today's globalized landscape, open collaboration has become essential. By sharing resources and expertise across industries, innovative business models and development approaches are emerging, enabling high-quality collaboration in the intelligent age. Kang Bo emphasized that sector boundaries are becoming increasingly fluid, with cross-industry collaboration becoming critical. SERES has substantially benefited from this collaborative approach, building partnerships with global automotive suppliers and leading technology companies to enhance its products' intelligence and connectivity. The company now shares its powertrain technology with 12 partners worldwide, driving collective progress in the automotive industry.
'Advancements in new quality productive forces have propelled China's new energy vehicle industry to new heights,' Kang Bo highlighted. Domestic automakers have made significant strides in core competencies, developing cutting-edge technologies in electric powertrains, artificial intelligence, new materials, and advanced manufacturing processes. These innovations have strengthened the entire industry value chain, positioning Chinese vehicle enterprises competitively in the high-end market. SERES stands as a prime example of high-quality innovation, with its brand image and perceived value continuously evolving.
In 2024, SERES achieved remarkable results, with annual new energy vehicle sales exceeding 420,000 units, representing a year-on-year growth of over 182%. Kang Bo believes the core competitiveness of intelligent vehicles lies in Software-Defined Vehicles (SDV). Through continuous over-the-air (OTA) updates, they provide users with an innovative and frequently renewed driving experience, enhancing both software features and overall hardware performance throughout the vehicle's lifecycle.
SERES has pioneered innovative technology in intelligent manufacturing, establishing a globally benchmarked Super Factory in Chongqing. The facility, housing over 3,000 robots, achieves 100% automation in critical processes and comprehensive vehicle inspections, significantly boosting production efficiency and product quality. The company has implemented 10,000-ton integrated die-casting technology, dramatically reducing component count and enhancing overall vehicle quality.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
14 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
What ‘China shock'? Trade didn't wreck the U.S. economy
When Donald Trump first campaigned in 2016, he capitalized on a potent narrative: that China's rise gutted American manufacturing, leaving countless blue-collar communities devastated. Known now as the 'China shock,' that idea paved the way for a dramatic resurgence in protectionism, culminating in sweeping tariffs including Trump's controversial 'Liberation Day' duties. Yet we continue to learn just how shaky the theory's foundations are. Pioneered by economists David Autor, David Dorn and Gordon Hanson, the China shock trope suggests that American regions heavily exposed to Chinese imports suffered significantly greater job losses than did less-exposed areas. Populists seized upon it to argue that China's 2001 accession to the World Trade Organization caused millions of job losses in the U.S. and social disintegration. But a theory's easy and outsized application to policy does not settle questions about its accuracy. That's what American Enterprise Institute scholar Scott Winship wanted to determine in a recent comprehensive review that set out to prove whether the China shock reduced American manufacturing employment. By examining alternative studies and methodological adjustments, Winship contends that the negative effects of trade with China have been significantly exaggerated and that populist narratives blaming this trade for U.S. economic decline aren't supported by rigorous evidence. The originators of China shock examined how Chinese imports affected certain U.S. locales compared with others — not with the entire country — based on initial industry composition and employment size. By these metrics, areas heavily exposed to Chinese imports showed disproportionately worse manufacturing job losses. However, Winship points out that even if we accept these estimates, the findings suggest only relatively modest employment effects. To put things in perspective, Winship gives the example of two hypothetical commuting zones with 200,000 working-age residents and 20,000 manufacturing workers. Data from the theory's proponents indicate that moving from low (10th percentile) to high (90th percentile) exposure to Chinese imports would result in a loss of roughly 2,700 manufacturing jobs — just a 1.4 percentage point drop in overall manufacturing employment. While significant, this does not convincingly explain the community decline, social disruption, and populist backlash often blamed specifically on Chinese trade. In addition, Winship flags multiple methodological issues. Once other economists revised the proponents' methods, the estimated negative impact shrank dramatically. Various follow-up studies found the China shock effect on manufacturing employment to be 50% smaller than initially claimed. Further research revealed that job losses in exposed areas were often offset or even outweighed by employment gains in other sectors. One detailed Census Bureau study even found that firms with greater Chinese import exposure increased manufacturing employment, reallocating jobs to more efficient domestic production lines enabled by cheaper imports. Moreover, the steady decline in U.S. manufacturing employment began decades before China's WTO entry. Between the late 1970s and 2000, factory employment had already decreased substantially, mostly because of technological advances and shifting consumer demand. Notably, there was no sudden acceleration of this decline after China joined the WTO. The rate of manufacturing job losses remained consistent with earlier trends, undermining claims that Chinese trade uniquely devastated American manufacturing. Furthermore, former manufacturing workers generally did not face permanent unemployment. In fact, unemployment rates among this group were lower in recent years compared to the late 1990s, before the peak of Chinese imports. Many workers transitioned successfully into other sectors, belying the notion of an enduring displacement crisis. It's also worth noting that there are around a half of a million unfilled manufacturing jobs today. Despite these realities, the exaggerated narrative persists as a political force. Trump's tariffs — taxes on American consumers raising prices on everyday goods from cars to clothing — have greatly increased economic uncertainty. American manufacturers reliant on imported components face higher input costs, dampening their competitiveness and causing unintended layoffs. In fact, evidence from Trump's first term showed that his tariffs often hurt American firms more than their foreign competitors. With broader and higher tariffs, we can only fear the worst. Instead of doubling down on tariffs and isolation, we need to empower U.S. workers to adapt to economic changes, whether caused by trade or economic downturn. Economists have shown that to the extent that workers sometimes don't recover from shocks, it tends to be a failure to adjust because of obstacles erected by government. Winship's critical reassessment of the China shock clarifies the actual, limited role Chinese imports have played in manufacturing-employment trends. The real 'shock' America faces in 2025 is not from Chinese imports, but from a resurgence of misguided protectionism based on a misdiagnosed problem. The path forward harnesses trade's real benefits rather than chasing economic illusions. Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LONGi Ranks on the Bloomberg Tier 1 List
XI'AN, China, June 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- On June 2nd, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), a renowned global research institution, released its "Global PV Module Maker Tier 1 List" for Q2 2025. LONGi, leveraging its exceptional comprehensive strength, has secured a position on the highly anticipated Tier 1 (Level 1 PV Module Manufacturers) list. As one of the most credible industry rating systems in the global new energy sector, BNEF's " Global PV Module Maker Tier 1 List " is known for its rigorous evaluation criteria. The rating system takes bankability as its core consideration — namely, whether an enterprise's products can secure non-recourse debt financing from banks. Meanwhile, it requires manufacturers to physically own production facilities and sell products under their own brands, ensuring the professionalism and authority of the rating through qualification thresholds. The Tier 1 criteria are even more rigorous: The enterprise must have supplied modules for six different projects with its own brand and self-produced products in the past two years; These projects must have obtained non-recourse financing from six different (non-development) banks; The scale of the above transactions must exceed 10 MW. All the above conditions are indispensable, and failure to meet any one of them will result in removal from the list. It is worth noting that in Q2 2025, the transaction scale was increased from 5 MW to 10 MW for the first time, making the number of listed enterprises fewer than previous years. For this reason, the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list is often regarded as a fair, objective, and highly credible reference. It serves as an important basis for global PV project investment attraction, risk assessment by financial institutions, and market expansion by enterprises. As a leading global solar technology company, LONGi's ranking on the Tier 1 list not only demonstrates the continuous improvement of its brand credibility and the steady growth of its market competitiveness, but also represents the industry's high recognition of LONGi's comprehensive strength. LONGi has been ranked on the list multiple times. LONGi has always continued to strive for technological innovation and product engineering. Its high-efficiency and reliable Hi-MO series products are highly favored by the market, providing stable and efficient clean energy solutions for numerous global PV projects. In terms of operation and management, LONGi has always maintained a steady development strategy, demonstrating strong risk resistance and bankability, which has earned high trust from the global PV market and financial sector. With the global acceleration of the transition to clean energy, LONGi will continue to focus on technology leadership and join hands with the industry to march toward new heights. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE LONGi Solar Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU businesses lobby China for rare earths ‘fast-track' channel
EU businesses are lobbying Beijing to set up a special channel to fast-track Chinese approval of rare earth export licences for 'reliable'
