Less than five percent of Gaza's agricultural land is usable says UN
The UN has warned that 95 percent of Gaza's agricultural land has been rendered unusable by Israeli attacks, further exacerbating the risk of famine in the territory.
A new joint assessment released on Tuesday by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the United Nations Satellite Centre (UNOSAT) found that over 80 percent of Gaza's crop land has been damaged by Israeli attacks.
According to the report, only 4.6 percent of it can be cultivated, while 71.2 percent of Gaza's greenhouses and 82.8 percent of agricultural wells have been laid to waste by Israeli attacks.
The FAO said that Israel's targeting of agricultural infrastructure in the territory risked 'further deteriorating food production capacity and exacerbating the risk of famine'.
Beth Bechdol, FAO's deputy director-general, warned that the destruction could precipitate the "collapse of Gaza's agri-food system and of lifelines'.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
She stated: 'What once provided food, income, and stability for hundreds of thousands is now in ruins. With cropland, greenhouses, and wells destroyed, local food production has ground to a halt.
"Rebuilding will require massive investment, and a sustained commitment to restore both livelihoods and hope.'
Four-year-old boy dies of starvation in Gaza due to Israeli blockade Read More »
The study comes weeks after the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) reported that famine is imminent in Gaza amid the ongoing total Israeli blockade since 2 March, which has severely restricted food and medical aid into the territory.
According to the IPC's analysis, half a million people in Gaza are facing 'catastrophic' hunger from May to September, with over one million at 'emergency' levels.
Under international pressure to ease its siege, Israel has permitted limited humanitarian aid to enter the Strip, however relief organisations say that aid has so far failed to reach Gaza's starving population.
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the controversial US-backed private humanitarian organisation, said it will begin distributing aid in the besieged enclave on Monday, after the sudden resignation of its executive director.
The organisation has received fierce criticism from UN officials, who had said its aid distribution plans, initiated by Israel and only involving private companies, would foster displacement of Palestinians and more violence.
While GHF reported that truckloads of food has been delivered to its hubs and distribution had begun, Palestinians in Gaza said that there had been no sign of aid reaching the territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Support for Israel in Europe drops to record low, finds YouGov poll
Public support for Israel in European countries has fallen to its lowest recorded level, according to a recent survey by YouGov. Fewer than a fifth of respondents in six countries held a favourable view of Israel in a poll carried out last month. The survey was conducted between 12 and 26 May in Britain, France, Germany, Denmark, Spain and Italy. Asked which side they sympathised with in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, 14 percent of Brits said they sided with Israel, while 32 percent sided with Palestinians. Twenty-one percent said both sides equally, and 32 percent were unsure. The proportion of people that sided with Israel was 18 percent in France, 17 percent in Germany, 18 percent in Denmark, 15 percent in Spain and just 7 percent in Italy. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters All six countries sided with Palestinians more, though in Germany the difference was by just one percentage point. In five of the six countries, more respondents said they could understand the attitudes Palestinians had to the conflict - even if they didn't personally agree with them - than those who said they could not. The difference was most stark in Britain, where 51 percent said they could understand the Palestinian viewpoint, whereas 22 percent said they could not. Asked the same question about Israel, more respondents in France, Germany, Spain and Italy said they could not understand the Israeli viewpoint than those who said they could. Net favourability towards Israel was at the lowest since YouGov began polling the question in Germany, France, Denmark, Italy and Spain. Respondents in all of the countries said they did not think Hamas' attack on 7 October 2023 was justified. Similarly, respondents in all six overwhelmingly said Israel's war on Gaza since October 2023 was unjustified. On a more specific question about Israeli actions, between just 6 (Italy) and 16 (France) percent across the countries agreed that Israel was right to send ground troops into Gaza, and that Israel generally responded in a proportionate way to Hamas' attack. More people - between 29 (Italy) and 40 (Germany) percent - across the six countries thought Israel was right to send in troops but went too far and caused too many casualties. Between 12 (Germany) and 24 (Italy) percent thought that Israel should not have used military force in Gaza at all. Asked whether they thought a permanent peace agreement was likely in the next decade, respondents in every country were more likely to say it was unrealistic than realistic. Several of the European countries surveyed, including France, Spain, Italy and the UK, have halted the supply of some weapons to Israel since the war began. The UK and France, along with Canada, have threatened Israel with sanctions if it fails to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter. France is also leading efforts to lobby other European countries, including the UK, Belgium and the Netherlands, to recognise Palestinian statehood at a UN conference in New York opening on 17 June. Some 147 of 193 UN member states currently recognise the State of Palestine. European states Spain, Ireland and Norway agreed to recognition last year. Israeli attacks on Gaza have killed more than 54,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 120,000 since October 2023. A further 10,000 are missing and presumed dead.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) calls for Government intervention and deployment of security services to prevent persistent intercommunal conflict in Tonj East, Warrap
The United Nations Mission in South Sudan is deeply concerned about escalating intercommunal violence in Tonj East, which has caused hundreds of deaths, the destruction of homes and widespread displacement. The Mission is urging the country's leadership to intervene and deploy security services to address the situation. Since December 2024, Tonj East, in Warrap State, has been plagued by a series of violent incidents, including cattle raiding and revenge attacks involving large numbers of armed youth from neighbouring communities. In March, more than 200 people are estimated to have died during the intercommunal conflict. Over the past few days, there has been another surge of violence, driven by attempts to recover stolen cattle and revenge for the previous loss of lives. This has resulted in more than 80 casualties, although the numbers are yet to be verified. 'Urgent intervention is needed from the national Government to prevent the conflict from escalating to catastrophic levels and to bring communities together to peacefully resolve grievances,' said the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (Political), Guang Cong. UNMISS is intensively engaging with state and local leaders to calm the situation and has increased its peacekeeping patrols. However, peacekeepers are experiencing significant challenges reaching some of the affected areas, due to a proliferation of checkpoints manned by armed youth. 'While UNMISS is doing its utmost to deter further mobilization and conflict, the Government is primarily responsible for protecting civilians and we, therefore, encourage the Government to rapidly deploy security services to prevent further violence and create a safe environment for community dialogue and peacebuilding,' said Mr. Cong. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS).
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
French mayor bans Palestine flag and protests after PSG victory incidents
The mayor of Chalon-sur-Saone, in west-central France, has announced that he was banning the Palestinian flag in the city, calling it a "rallying sign" following the urban "riots" that broke out after Paris Saint-Germain's (PSG) victory on Saturday night. The Parisian football club's win in the Champions League final against Inter Milan was marred by unrest and violence in various cities across the country, which led to more than 550 arrests - including 490 in Paris. Hundreds of cars were torched in the capital and fireworks set off, while youths clashed with police, reports said. "Events of the most extreme gravity took place last night in our city," Mayor Gilles Platret wrote in a statement on Sunday. "Individuals chose to seize the opportunity to create disorder on a political basis," he said, adding that "one of the riot leaders" was "conspicuously displaying a Palestinian flag as a rallying sign". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "The Palestinian flag has become the symbol of the rioters, the rallying sign of Islamist gangs determined to defy republican institutions," the mayor said. Platret announced a decree banning the Palestinian flag from the town of 45,000 inhabitants as well as its sale in markets starting Monday. The decree also prohibits "all pro-Palestine demonstrations in Chalon". The mayor justified the move "by a need for security", citing video surveillance footage. On Monday evening, Platret reiterated his comments on X: "What if we talked a little about what is hiding behind the Palestinian flag? […] Strategies are established, infiltration is planned, interference is at work. Muslim Brotherhood? Islamic Republic of Iran? Or another hostile state?' 'The hypotheses are numerous, even intersecting. But the fact remains: the Palestinian flag has become the catalyst for unrest among the youth of the neighbourhoods with the aim of fracturing the country," he wrote. Platret's decision sparked an outcry from left-wing political groups and NGOs. Aline Mathus-Janet, co-president of the local branch of the Ligue des Droits de l'Homme, denounced the measure as unjust and "totally illegal". Islamist 'entryism': French Muslims refuse to be labelled 'enemies' within Read More » The only Palestinian flag seller in the city centre also reacted by asking why the Palestinian flag was banned and not the others. "Perhaps only because these people are dark-skinned and that bothers the right-thinking people [...] the pro-Zemmour crowd, convicted multiple times of incitement to hatred [...] history will judge," he said. The vendor was referring to Eric Zemmour, president of the far-right Reconquete! party and former candidate in the 2022 presidential election, who has been convicted of incitement to religious hatred against Muslims and incitement to racial hatred, among other offences. "Selling Palestinian flags had no other purpose than to show my support for a people who has been subjected to genocide, which should be the reflex of every human being worthy of the name," he added. Late on Monday afternoon, around 250 people came to defy the ban on demonstrations in front of the town hall to protest the municipal decree. Some demonstrators flew the Palestinian flag or displayed its colours on their clothing. 'Grossly illegal' The Ligue des Droits de l'Homme and various local politicians have indicated they are considering legal action to have the municipal decree overturned. Legal experts have challenged the legality of the order and predicted its rapid suspension by the administrative courts. Nicolas Hervieu, a lawyer specialising in public and European human rights law, denounced the decree as "grossly illegal" and "completely disproportionate". "The question here is to determine whether displaying or selling a flag can be presented as the cause of the unrest," he told TF1info. Netanyahu 'unsettled' by Macron's push to recognise Palestinian statehood Read More » "The answer is clearly no," the lawyer said, adding that flying a flag is protected as a right to freedom of expression. The situation would be different, he explained, if the flag bore symbols prohibited by law, such as those of the Nazi party. In July 2014, the courts suspended, due to its "disproportionate nature", an order by the right-wing mayor of the southern city of Nice, Christian Estrosi, prohibiting the "ostentatious use" of foreign flags during the World Cup. The order implicitly targeted Algerian supporters. Platret, who has been the mayor of Chalon-sur-Saone since 2014, is no stranger to issuing controversial decrees, most of which were overturned by the courts. He notably banned pork-free menus in school canteens, tried to impose the use of French on construction sites and refused to validate a French-Turkish wedding, before being forced to do so by the courts. The mayor, a former vice-president of the right-wing Les Republicains (LR) party who was reportedly tempted to align himself with Zemmour, has repeatedly positioned himself as a defender of the "French people" against the "ethnic cleansing" allegedly practised by "Muslim blocs".
