‘What's going on?': Why the Exclusive Brethren are out in force this election
'Why are they campaigning?' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese asked on Tuesday, referring to Plymouth Brethren Christian Church members in Liberal and National Party T-shirts staffing pre-poll stations around the country.
Their church was a cult, he said, adding: 'They don't vote ... but they all of a sudden have found this enthusiasm in their hundreds to travel around the country to hand out how-to-vote [cards]. What's the quid pro quo? What is going on there?'
This is what's going on: a systematic, lavishly funded attempt by an organisation with a strong financial agenda to influence the federal election without disclosing who they are or what want.
Its campaign is part of a long history of attempted political influence, money politics and secrecy, from the sect once known as the Exclusive Brethren.
In 2004, its global leader, Sydney businessman Bruce D. Hales, feared Labor's Mark Latham might win power and urged followers to act in support of John Howard.
Letters, witnesses and public documents emerged two years later showing that, within days of Hales' callout, Brethren businessmen had set up a holding company, raised hundreds of thousands of dollars from mystery sources, funded anti-Labor and anti-Greens advertising and put boots on the ground.
Initially, none of this was linked to the church. The authorisations for material came from unknown individuals, sometimes using their middle names, in obscure places, or using false addresses.
Confronted later, the Brethren denied any involvement, saying its members had acted independently.
Taken together it was a material intervention. Its advertising spend in the 2004 Australian election exceeded $370,000 – the fifth largest of any third-party donor that year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
AUKUS review comes after US calls for more defence spending from Australia
Sky News host Andrew Bolt discusses how the United States' review on AUKUS comes after their call for more defence spending by the Albanese Labor government. 'The more you see of how this submarine story has unfolded, the more it seems like it is Donald Trump's team putting a squeeze on Australia,' Mr Bolt said. 'Telling us, well, you want your submarines, then you do what we say and you pay billions more for your defence.'

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Violent US organised rioters target police horsemen
Sky News host Rita Panahi discusses the disturbing violence plaguing Los Angeles and how they are spreading to Democrat strongholds such as Atlanta. 'The anti-Trump, anti-ICE protests, riots, really, have spread to other blue cities,' Ms Panahi said. 'The violent protests are spreading to Democrat strongholds.'

AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
PM won't get raucous over AUKUS, however hard he's pushed
A month or so ago, after newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney invited Anthony Albanese to attend the G7 summit in Alberta, Australian government officials made inquiries about scheduling a side trip to the White House. For various reasons – chaos among them – it never eventuated. This was not deemed to be a disaster within the government. Far from it, given leaders blowing through the Oval Office currently risk finding themselves the subject of humiliation.