Trump travel ban barring citizens from 12 countries goes into effect
Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the US by citizens of a dozen countries, mainly in Africa and the Middle East, went into effect at 12am ET on Monday, more than eight years after Trump's first travel ban sparked chaos, confusion, and months of legal battles.
The new proclamation, which Trump signed last week, 'fully' restricts the nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the US. The entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted.
Unlike Trump's first travel ban in 2017, which initially targeted citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries and was criticized as an unconstitutional 'Muslim ban', the new ban is broader, and legal experts said they expect it to withstand legal challenges.
The announcement of the new travel ban was greeted with less outrage and protest than his initial 2017 ban. On Monday, the new ban appeared to be overshadowed by Trump's other immigration battles, including furious protests in Los Angeles over Trump's deportation raids, which were followed by Trump deploying the national guard to the city despite the opposition of California's governor.
The newly instituted ban notably includes citizens of Haiti, a majority Christian country. Haitians in the US were demonized by Trump during his presidential campaign, with the president spreading the baseless conspiracy theory that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were eating people's pets.
It also imposes heightened travel restrictions on citizens of Venezuela, who have been targeted repeatedly by the White House in recent months, as the Trump administration's sudden deportation of Venezuelans in the US to a notorious prison in El Salvador sparked a massive legal battle.
The ban is also expected to have a disproportionate effect on African countries, with some citizens of targeted countries worrying about being cut off from opportunities for education, professional development, and networking.
Mikhail Nyamweya, a political and foreign affairs analyst, previously told the Guardian that the new travel bans and restrictions would 'bring about a pattern of exclusion' and 'may also institutionalise a perception of Africans as outsiders in the global order'.
'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization, said.
While five of the countries on the new ban list are not majority-Muslim, including Republic of the Congo, Myanmar, Eritrea and Equatorial Guinea, as well as Haiti, the list does target citizens of non-white countries in the developing world, fueling criticisms that the ban is fundamentally racist and shaped by 'bigotry'.
Trump's first travel ban, in 2017, was widely criticized as a fulfillment of Trump's campaign pledge to institute 'a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States'. The Trump administration later added citizens of other non-Muslim countries to the banned list.
The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the US even after the ban takes effect.
In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens.
Trump also tied the new ban to a recent attack in Boulder, Colorado that wounded a dozen people, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. US officials say the alleged perpetrator overstayed a tourist visa. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list.
The Associated Press contributed reporting
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Texas governor orders national guard to deploy for protests in San Antonio
The governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, has ordered the state's national guard to deploy to the city of San Antonio ahead of immigration-related protests planned for this week, saying the soldiers are 'on standby'. Abbott posted on social media early on Wednesday that the national guard 'will be deployed to locations across the state to ensure peace & order. Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest.' The Texas national guard, he added, 'will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order'. Abbott's move to mobilize troops follows Donald Trump's decision on Saturday to send the California national guard into Los Angeles after some limited and mostly peaceful protests against immigration raids. California leaders described the sending of the troops, and then 700 US marines, as a deliberate provocation. Widespread demonstrations against the Trump administration's deportation raids are expected on Wednesday, according to local media reports, and on Saturday nationwide protests are planned as part of a 'No Kings' event, according to organizers. Trump has planned a military parade in Washington for the same day and has threatened to treat any protesters harshly, despite the right to protest being enshrined in the US constitution. Unlike in California, where neither the state governor not local civic leaders asked for military help – and where the state has sued to have them removed – in Texas the guard was reportedly sent after San Antonio law enforcement requested their assistance. According to the San Antonio Express News, the city police chief, William McManus, contacted state officials on Monday night seeking to confirm the presence of guardsmen in the city. Abbott's press secretary, Andrew Mahaleris, later said that national guard soldiers 'are on standby in areas where mass demonstrations are planned in case they are needed'. 'Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles,' Mahaleris said in a statement on Tuesday night. 'Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be swiftly held accountable to the full extent of the law.' A press conference is planned for Wednesday to discuss preparations for the protests in the city. On Sunday about 300 protesters had gathered in downtown San Antonio, some carrying flags and signs reading: 'Abolish ICE,' 'Power to the People,' and 'Mexicans Ain't Going Anywhere.' On Monday six demonstrators in Austin were arrested by officers with the Texas department of public safety after what the department called a 'planned and well-publicized protest' near the state capitol. They have been charged with felony criminal mischief, resisting arrest and other offenses. 'Texas is a law-and-order state, and the department has zero tolerance for individuals disrupting public order or endangering law enforcement officers,' DPS said in a news release. The 'No Kings' protest planned for San Antonio on Saturday is being organized by the 50501 Movement, in coordination with the Bexar County Democratic Party, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, Indivisible and Women's March. The protest, the organization said, will 'culminate in an act of peaceful resistance'. The 50501 organization said on its website that it 'stands in opposition to billionaire influence in government and advocates for the rights and empowerment of the working class'. The Texas national guard is the largest of its kind in the US, with 22,000 soldiers and airmen. The governor serves as its commander, except when the president has mobilized the troops for federal duty.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US prices continued to rise in May amid Trump tariffs
US prices continued to rise in May as companies and consumers grappled with Donald Trump's tariffs. The president has repeatedly pledged to lower costs across the economy. Annualized inflation ticked higher to 2.4% in May, up from 2.3% in April, and . On a month-to-month basis, the consumer price index rose by 0.1%, down from 0.2% the previous month. The readings were softer than expected. Economists had expected a headline CPI reading for 2.5% in May, amid widespread uncertainty over the direction of the US economy. Core inflation, which measures price increases outside of food and gas, went up 0.1% on the month, down from 0.2% in April, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In recent weeks, there have been signs of a slight cooldown in the economy, which had initially shown resiliency in the face of Trump's tariffs. In May, the economy saw 139,000 new jobs, down from an average monthly gain of 149,000 over the prior 12 months. March and April's job gains were also revised down. The unemployment rate has remained stable, however, hovering between 4% and 4.2% over the last few months. Since announcing the bulk of his tariffs on 'liberation day' in early April, the Trump administration has tried to frame tariffs as good for the US economy in the long run. Trump has denied that his tariffs are leading to inflation, saying last week that prices have been going down. But economists say that gradual price increases will likely stay. Multiple retailers have said that they will increase prices due to tariffs, even as a supposed last resort. In a survey published last month by insurance company Allianz, 54% of US companies surveyed said they will have to raise prices. Meanwhile, there have been no indications that Trump's tariffs have driven an increase in domestic manufacturing. In a survey published earlier this month, US manufacturing sentiment actually declined for the third consecutive month, reaching a six-month low. Several of Trump's tariffs are still in place, even after he paused the bulk of his reciprocal tariffs, which are set to go back into effect in July. There's still a 10% baseline tariff on all imported goods, 30% tariff on Chinese imports (although Trump hailed a tentative deal between Washington and Beijing early on Wednesday) and 25% tariffs on auto imports, among others. Because the supply chain is so delicately intertwined between different countries and industries, tariffs can still cause price increases on seemingly unrelated goods. For example, after Trump doubled the tax on imported steel to 50%, canned foods are likely to see price increases as the cost of cans has gone up. Investors are closely watching the Federal Reserve's board meeting next week to see how monetary policymakers view the state of the economy. The Fed is expected to hold interest rates, which currently sit at between 4.25% and 4.5%, after officials have noted the instability caused by Trump's tariffs.
Western Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Trump says US will get magnets and rare earth minerals in China trade deal
In return, Mr Trump said the US will provide China 'what was agreed to', including allowing Chinese students to attend American colleges and universities. Several global brands are among dozens of companies at risk of using forced labour through their Chinese supply chains because they use critical minerals or buy minerals-based products sourced from the far-western Xinjiang region of China, an international rights group said on Wednesday. The report by the Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance says companies including Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola and paint supplier Sherwin-Williams may be linked to titanium sourced from Xinjiang, where rights groups allege the Chinese government runs coercive labour practices targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities. Hotan, in western China's Xinjiang region (Andy Wong/AP) The report found 77 Chinese suppliers in the titanium, lithium, beryllium and magnesium industries operating in Xinjiang. It said the suppliers are at risk of participating in the Chinese government's 'labour transfer programmes,' in which Uyghurs are forced to work in factories as part of a long-standing campaign of assimilation and mass detention. Commercial paints, thermos cups and components for the aerospace, auto and defence industries are among products sold internationally that can trace their supply chains to minerals from Xinjiang, the report said. It said that companies must review their supply chains. 'Mineral mining and processing in (Xinjiang) rely in part on the state's forced labour programmes for Uyghurs and other Turkic people in the region,' the report said. The report came as China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, said that they have agreed on a framework to get their trade negotiations back on track after a series of disputes that threatened to derail them. The two sides on Tuesday wrapped up two days of talks in London that appeared to focus on finding a way to resolve disputes over mineral and technology exports that had shaken a fragile truce on trade reached in Geneva last month. Asked about the report, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that 'no-one has ever been forcibly transferred in China's Xinjiang under work programmes'. 'The so-called allegation of forced labour in China's Xinjiang region is nothing but a lie concocted by certain anti-China forces. We urge the relevant organisation to stop interfering in China's internal affairs and undermining Xinjiang's prosperity and stability under the guise of human rights,' ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said. The named companies did not immediately comment on the report. A UN report from 2022 found China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where more than one million Uyghurs are estimated to have been arbitrarily detained as part of measures that the Chinese government said were intended to target terrorism and separatism. The Chinese government has rejected the UN claims and defended its actions in Xinjiang as fighting terror and ensuring stability. In 2021, then-US president Joe Biden signed a law to block imports from the Xinjiang region unless businesses can prove the items were made without forced labour. The law initially targeted solar products, tomatoes, cotton and apparel, but the US government recently added new sectors for enforcement, including aluminium and seafood. Many of China's major minerals corporations have invested in the exploration and mining of lithium, a key component for electric vehicle batteries, in Xinjiang, Global Rights Compliance said. Xinjiang is also China's top source of beryllium, a mineral used for aerospace, defence and telecommunications, its report said. A recent report by the International Energy Agency said that the world's sources of critical minerals are increasingly concentrated in a few countries, notably China, which is also a leading refining and processing base for lithium, cobalt, graphite and other minerals.
