Louisiana lawmakers put some limits back in place on gifts to public officials
Rep. Beau Beaullieu has updated his proposal to change state ethics laws concerning gifts to public officials. (Allison Allsop/Louisiana Illuminator)
Louisiana lawmakers are no longer looking to broadly lift restrictions on gifts to elected officials and public employees while doing their jobs, but they appear intent on discouraging ethics investigations. Rep. Beau Beaullieu, R-Iberia, removed language from House Bill 674 that would have allowed public servants to receive $200 worth of gifts annually. This would have applied to all local and state government employees, from a local police officer to the governor.
Instead, Beaullieu has rewritten the legislation to keep a portion of a current limitation on government worker gifts in place. Now, gifts that aren't food would be mostly restricted to $200 worth of flowers or a charitable donation to express sympathy for a family death. New allowances for 'seasonal' food and beverages remain in the legislation, however. Under current law, most public officials are not supposed to receive food and drink as gifts unless it's at a party or reception.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Under existing rules, they have to consume the food in person at the event where it is given. The edible gift can cost no more than $79 per person, a cutoff the Louisiana Board of Ethics adjusts every year based on the Consumer Price Index. Beaullieu's updated proposal would allow elected leaders and public employees to take seasonal or holiday foods as gifts for a religious or state holiday, even outside of a party or reception. The cap on food gifts would also be $79 per person per holiday or whatever new price the ethics board adopts in future years.
Besides the gift policy changes, Beaullieu's bill contains several ethics law modifications that would make it much harder for the state ethics board to investigate and charge people with misconduct. The ethics board oversees enforcement of campaign finance laws and the state ethics code for public employees, elected officials and lobbyists. Anyone from a public school teacher to the governor can be subject of one of its investigations. The adjustments Beaullieu proposes would require more members of the ethics board to vote in favor of pursuing an investigation and give the board far less time to decide whether a person should be charged with ethical wrongdoing. People accused of ethics violations would also have more ability to push back on the allegations under Beaullieu's bill.
If the legislation were to pass, the new standards that would have to be met in order for the ethics board to launch an investigation would be very difficult to achieve. For example, the ethics board would have to be confident that wrongdoing had occurred in order to sign off on any preliminary probe into the alleged misconduct. Ethics Administrator David Bordelon said earlier this month the process Beaullieu seeks would 'skew' the process in favor of the public servant accused of wrongdoing. He also took issue with a new restriction Beaullieu proposed Tuesday on ethical investigations and charges. The state representative added language to his bill prohibiting the ethics board from launching an investigation based on information it received through an advisory opinion request.
The board is frequently asked to explain how ethics laws apply in specific situations through advisory opinions. It issues at least a few of these public letters monthly providing feedback.
'If someone submits an advisory opinion request that indicates a violation has already occurred, it should be within the board's prerogative to initiate an investigation of that,' Bordelon told senators at a committee hearing Tuesday.
Beaullieu said he is trying to overhaul state ethics investigations because many elected officials feel the board has been too aggressive when pursuing allegations.
The state's preeminent state government watchdog, the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana, has come out strongly against the bill. 'This is designed to make sure we don't have ethics investigations,' Steven Procopio, the organization's president, said of the proposed changes.
The legislation is backed by Gov. Jeff Landry, who has had several personal conflicts with the ethics board over his nine years in statewide office.
In 2023, the board charged Landry in 2023 with the ethics violation of failing to disclose flights he took on a political donor's private plane to Hawaii for an attorneys general conference. That dispute is ongoing because the governor and board members have not reached an agreement on what Landry's punishment for the violation should be.
Stephen Gelé, the attorney representing Landry in this ethics dispute, also helped write Beaullieu's legislation to overhaul the state's ethics laws.
The Louisiana Senate and Governmental Affairs Committee approved the bill Tuesday with no objections. An earlier version of the proposal also passed the Louisiana House unanimously, but both the Senate and the House will have to approve the amended version before it can become law.
It must pass by the Louisiana Legislature's session adjournment June 12.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mortgage lenders raise rates amid uncertainty over BoE interest rate cuts
Many of the major lenders raised their mortgage rates this week, amid uncertainty over the pace of future interest rate cuts by the Bank of England. The average rate for a two-year fixed mortgage stands at 4.89%, while five-year fixed deals average 5.09%, according to data from Uswitch. Comments by Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey at a cross-party Treasury select committee session on Tuesday over the impact of US president Donald Trump's tariffs on policymaking cast more doubt over the central bank's pace of rate cuts. Bailey said that while the interest rate "path remains downwards, but how far and how quickly is now shrouded in a lot more uncertainty, frankly.' The Bank of England has cut interest rates from 4.5% to 4.25% in early May, meaning the average homeowner on a tracker mortgage will see their monthly repayments fall by nearly £29, after the quarter-point snip to the base rate. However, the primary inflation measure, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), stood at 3.5% in the 12 months to April, a higher-than-expected increase from the previous month. That means price increases are moving away from the BoE's 2% target. This week, no major lender cut rates, with the majority hiking mortgages for first-time buyers as the market moves away from the mini price war that pushed deals deep into under-4% territory. HSBC (HSBA.L) has a 4.01% rate for a five-year deal, which is up from the previous week. For those with a Premier Standard account with the lender, this rate is 3.98%. Looking at the two-year options, the lowest rate is 3.96% on a Premier Standard account with a £999 fee, slightly higher from the previous week. Both cases assume a 60% loan-to-value (LTV) mortgage, meaning buyers need to have at least 40% for a deposit. HSBC offers 95% LTV deals, meaning you only need to save for a 5% deposit. However, the rates are much higher, with a two-year fix at 5.05% or 4.89% for a five-year fix. This is because their financial situation and deposit size determine the rate someone can get. The larger the deposit, the lower the LTV, allowing buyers to access better deals because lenders consider them less risky. NatWest's (NWG.L) five-year deal is 3.99% with a £1,495 fee, which is unchanged from last week. The cheapest two-year fix deal is 3.94%, which is also unchanged from last week. You'll need at least a 40% deposit to qualify for the rates in both cases. At Santander (BNC.L), a five-year fix is 4.08% for first-time buyers, higher than the previous 3.93%. It has a £999 fee, assuming a 40% deposit. Read more: Average first-time buyers in London need almost £140,000 for a deposit For a two-year deal, customers can also secure a 4.01% offer, with the same £999 fee, higher than the previous 3.90%. Barclays (BARC.L) was the first among major lenders to bring back under-4% deals and currently has a five-year fix at 3.99%, which is slightly higher than 3.89% last week. For "premier" clients, this rate dips to 3.98%. The lowest for two-year mortgage deals is 3.97%, which is also up on 3.87% last week. Barclays has launched a mortgage proposition to help new and existing customers access larger loans when purchasing a home. The initiative, known as Mortgage Boost, enables family members or friends to effectively "boost" the amount that can be borrowed toward a property without needing to lend or gift money directly or provide a larger deposit. Read more: Best credit card deals of the week Under the scheme, a borrower's eligibility for a mortgage can increase significantly by including a family member or friend on the application. For example, an individual with a £37,500 annual income and a £30,000 deposit might traditionally be able to borrow up to £168,375, enabling them to purchase a home priced at around £198,375. However, with Mortgage Boost, the total borrowing potential can rise substantially if a second person, such as a parent, joins the application. In this case, if the second applicant also earns £37,500 a year, the combined income could push the borrowing limit to £270,000, enabling the buyer to afford a home worth up to £300,000. Nationwide (NBS.L) offers a five-year fix at 4.24%, with a £999 fee and a 40% deposit and was down from 4.34% last week. Nationwide offers a two-year fixed rate for home purchase at 4.04% with a £999 fee — also for borrowers with a 40% deposit. Again, down from 4.34% in the previous week. The lender has announced it is changing the eligibility criteria for its mortgage scheme, which allows people to borrow up to six times their income. The minimum income required to take out a Helping Hand mortgage has been reduced to £35,000 — meaning more people will be eligible for the scheme. The minimum income requirement for joint applications will remain at £55,000. Helping Hand mortgages enable people to borrow up to six times their income, meaning potential homeowners can borrow 33% more compared to Nationwide's standard lending at 4.5 times income. Halifax, the UK's biggest mortgage lender, offers a five-year rate of 4.03% (also 60% LTV). The lender, owned by Lloyds (LLOY.L), offers a two-year fixed rate deal at 4%, with a £999 fee for first-time buyers. Read more: How to negotiate house prices It also offers a 10-year deal with a mortgage rate of 4.78%. The lender has announced the launch of a new 1.5-year fixed-rate remortgage product in response to growing demand among borrowers for shorter-term deals. Shorter-term fixes offer certainty over monthly payments while allowing households to switch to a new deal sooner to take advantage of lower rates. As providers start hiking rates, prospective homeowners are quickly running out of good options. HSBC's (HSBA.L) 3.98% is currently the cheapest deal for five-year fixes and for two-year fixes at 3.96%, though access requires a hefty 40% deposit. The average UK house price is £273,427, so a 40% deposit equals about £120,000. A growing number of homeowners in the UK are opting for 35-year or longer mortgage terms, with a significant rise in older borrowers stretching their repayment periods well into their 70s. Read more: UK house prices rise in May as higher wages, low unemployment boost market Lender April Mortgages offers buyers the chance to borrow up to seven times their income on loans fixed for five to 15 years. Both those buying alone and those buying with others can apply for the mortgage. As part of the independent Dutch asset manager DMFCO, the company offers interest rates starting at 5.15% and an application fee of £195. Skipton Building Society has also said it would allow first-time buyers to borrow up to 5.5 times their income to help more borrowers get on the housing ladder. Leeds Building Society is increasing the maximum amount that first-time buyers can potentially borrow as a multiple of their earnings with the launch of a new mortgage range. Aspiring homeowners with a minimum household income of £40,000 may now be able to borrow up to 5.5 times their earnings. Mortgage holders and borrowers have faced record-high repayments in recent years, as the Bank of England's base rate has been passed on by banks and building societies. According to UK Finance, 1.3 million fixed mortgage deals are set to end in 2025. Many homeowners will hope the Bank of England acts quickly to cut rates more aggressively. At the same time, savers will likely root for rates to remain at or near their current levels. Read more: Best credit card deals of the week UK mortgage approvals drop for third month in a row How next week's spending review could impact your financesError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal
The Brown County Board voted to approve a deal June 5 with Green Bay and C. Reiss Co. to relocate the coal piles to the Fox River Terminal and use the former Pulliam site to store C. Reiss' bulk commodities. Many eyes were on Green Bay and Brown County this week as officials inched closer to a deal that had $15 million at stake. The deal marks a historic milestone to a decades-long effort to relocate the coal piles from its 125-year home at 115 W. Mason St. Under the agreement, C. Reiss will lease the former Pulliam power plant to store salt and other bulk commodities instead of coal. The terms still fulfill decades of community leaders' goal to free up prime riverfront property for industrial, commercial and residential use at the mouth of the Fox River. The Brown County Board unanimously voted to approve the terms of the agreement. Board member Dixon Wolfe was not at the meeting. Former Green Bay mayors Jim Schmitt and Paul Jadin awaited the County Board's momentous vote, along with state Sens. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, and Jamie Wall, D-Green Bay; and state Reps. David Steffen, R-Howard; Ben Franklin, R-De Pere; Ryan Spaude, D-Ashwaubenon; and Amaad Rivera-Wagner, D-Green Bay. C. Reiss will lease 16 acres of the Pulliam site to store bulk commodities. The coal piles will be housed at the Fox River Terminal. Lease payments with a rate of $350,000 per year with increases every five years during the first 25 years based on the Consumer Price Index. The length of the lease is 60 years and can be extended. The lease needs to be executed by Sept. 25, according to the agreement. The new plan is a notable shift from previous proposals that had intended to make the Pulliam site the new home of the coal piles. Key parties were sorting out the agreement just a few minutes before starting the County Board meeting June 5, Buckley said ahead of the vote. The board voted on the deal June 5, just hours before the deadline to retain the $15 million state grant. The Wisconsin Department of Administration gave the County Board until June 6 to approve terms of a deal after extending the deadline from the end of May. Brown County agrees to buy the 43.75-acre Pulliam site for $2.7 million in January 2021. Brown County approves the Pulliam site purchase and agrees to sell almost 10 acres of the site to GLC Minerals for an expansion in February 2021. Gov. Tony Evers awards the city and county a $15 million Neighborhood Investment Fund Program grant funded through American Rescue Plan Act dollars in March 2022. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg presents the county with a federal $10.1 million Port Infrastructure Development grant to support the project in May 2023. Offers, counteroffers and rejections began in mid-December 2024 when the county officials and C. Reiss tentatively agreed to a $26 million plan that would lease 14.5 acres of the Pulliam property to C. Reiss for up to 75 years at a rate of $110,000 per year with an annual 2.5% increase. The County Board on Dec. 18, 2024, approved modified terms that reduced the lease to 40 years, changed the portion of the Pulliam property C. Reiss would use and added air quality compliance measures. C. Reiss considered the changes a rejection of the negotiated deal. The county's Port of Green Bay published a request for companies' general interest in using the new port site envisioned for the Pulliam property in January 2025. C. Reiss was one of eight to respond with a $28.5 million proposal to improve and use the Pulliam site for coal storage. C. Reiss in mid-March formally rejected the County Board's terms and proposed the county and company spend several months negotiating a deal. The County Board on March 19 rejected the company's offer. The county instead sought to shift negotiations to two alternate sites for coal storage, saying the Pulliam property's future use would be determined by the request for interest process. State officials in March gave the county, company and city a May 30 deadline to reach a deal to relocate the coal piles to the Pulliam site or lose the $15 million grant. Two new proposals emerged in late May as the county, company and city jointly met to discuss options and ideas. State Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, on May 23 asked the state to extend the May 30 deadline and the Department of Administration did so on May 30, giving the parties until June 3. Brown County and C. Reiss reached a tentative agreement June 3 and announced the parties would put together the terms in writing June 4 and 5. More: Who still uses coal? Answers to questions about Green Bay coal piles and the possible move More: Brown County, C. Reiss strike deal to move coal piles after extensive negotiations Press-Gazette reporter Jeff Bollier contributed to this report. Contact Benita Mathew at bmathew@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Brown County votes on C. Reiss deal for coal piles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Louisiana state employees could lose jobs under Civil Service amendment
Louisiana Senate chambers during the close of the 2023 legislative session on June 8, 2023. (Photo credit: Wes Muller/Louisiana Illuminator) Louisiana lawmakers are trying to change the state constitution to wrestle power away from the Civil Service Commission to eliminate state worker protections and allow for the quick firing of thousands of employees for any reason, creating fear among critics that some dismissals could be politically motivated. Senate Bill 8, sponsored by Sen. Jay Morris. R-West Monroe, is nearing final passage in the Louisiana Legislature, though voters will get the final say on a constitutional amendment on a ballot that could have significant consequences for how state government operates. Morris' proposal would give state lawmakers power that currently rests with the Civil Service Commission, a seven-member independent review panel that oversees the hiring and firing of 28,000 'classified' state workers. The commission hears complaints from classified employees and appeals from any who want to contest their dismissal or demotion, affording them due process when it comes to discipline and terminations. In an interview Tuesday, Morris said his bill would let lawmakers 'unclassify' state employees, removing them from the oversight of the commission. An unclassified employee does not have Civil Service protections and can be fired 'at will' for no reason. The bill's current version would also apply to local civil service workers such as municipal police and firefighters, but Morris said he intends to change his measure to exclude them and restrict it to only state employees. 'If you believe in democracy or republicanism — [because] we're a republic — then the Legislature should have some ability to alter how our civil service system works,' Morris said. 'Right now we can't do anything because the constitution prevents it.' Some Democrats have taken issue with the latest iteration of the ballot language in Morris' bill because it doesn't explicitly mention classified employees and could mislead voters into thinking the amendment doesn't affect those state workers who are currently protected under Civil Service. When asked about the proposal following Tuesday's meeting of the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure, Rep. Wilford Carter, D-Lake Charles, said the ballot language doesn't align with what's in the bill. The ballot language states: 'Do you support an amendment to allow the legislature to remove or add officers, positions, and employees to the unclassified civil service?' Critics have pointed to other issues that have not been addressed or debated in any of the committee hearings on Morris' proposal. One of those is the vague use of the word 'remove,' which could be interpreted to mean 'fire' or 'terminate,' said Peter Robins-Brown, who opposes the bill on behalf of Louisiana Progress, which advocates for low and middle-income people. He said lawmakers have not drafted any kind of companion measure that would establish statutes or regulations to implement the specific necessary changes. 'No one has really been paying attention to the details,' Robins-Brown said. 'I'm not sure how the average voter will be able to figure it out, especially when the bill doesn't have a statutory companion to prove the goal of this exercise.' Gov. Landry fails to remove civil service protections from 900 state jobs Rep. Nicholas Muscarello, R-Hammond, who chairs the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure, said the intent of the amendment is to give lawmakers the power to unclassify state employees, not fire employees. Hiring and terminating decisions would be left up to the executive branch, he said. The Civil Service Commission, a nonpartisan entity, has taken a neutral position on Morris' proposal. When asked about it Wednesday, commission administrators said they assume 'remove' means the act of changing an employee's classification status, but they pointed out the word is not actually defined in the bill. State Civil Service Director Byron Decoteau said Morris' civil service amendment amendment, if adopted, could technically allow lawmakers to simply 'remove' an unclassified job position with no intention of classifying it, leaving a current employee in a limbo with neither a classified nor unclassified status. Sherri Gregoire, Civil Service general counsel, said the lack of a clear definition invites different interpretations, including that the amendment gives lawmakers the power to remove governor's staff members, and creates a situation that would certainly end up in court. The more likely course of events, if voters decide to approve the amendment, would be that the legislature designates all future hires as unclassified employees — a move that would eventually end the classified civil service system altogether, Gregoire said. The Civil Service Commission, itself, would still exist under the constitution but would effectively become pointless because it would no longer have anything to oversee. 'Eventually you won't have any classified employees, so why do you need a commission?' Gregoire said. Morris said he doesn't yet have a vision for how lawmakers would exercise their new power if voters approve the amendment. Republican Gov. Jeff Landry has tried repeatedly to exert authority over the commission. In February, he tried unsuccessfully to revoke civil service classifications from 900 state jobs, mostly positions for engineers, shortly after President Donald Trump made a similar move at the federal level. The state Civil Service Commission rejected Landry's request in a 4-2 decision in February. Because unclassified workers can be subject to political punishment and coercion, removing such a large number of engineers from the classified service could create ethical conflicts and unnecessary risks to the public, the commissioners said. A similar version of Morris' bill stalled on the House floor last year, but some Republicans who likely would have supported the bill were absent when the final vote took place. Morris' bill is expected to earn final passage before the regular session ends June 12 and will be placed before voters on the Nov. 3, 2026, statewide election ballot. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX