Florida students' visas revoked amid Trump immigration crackdown
Federal immigration authorities have revoked the visas of at least two dozen international students from Florida universities.
Why it matters: The Trump administration has expanded efforts to revoke student visas nationwide — often without immediate explanation — leaving many students scrambling and fearful.
The big picture: Nationally, more than 1,000 students have had their visas revoked, per Inside Higher Ed.
The administration has claimed some lost their status because they were affiliated with pro-Palestinian protests.
For others, revocation was attributed to a crime or traffic offense or reasons unknown, Axios' Avery Lotz reported.
State of play: As of Monday morning, at least 26 student visas had been revoked across the state — 18 from Florida International University and eight from the University of Florida, according to Inside Higher Ed, which is tracking the revocations.
At FIU, 11 were current students, while seven were recent graduates on Optional Practical Training (OPT), which allows students with F-1 status to receive training, the Miami New Times reported.
Reality check: But the number of students affected could be far greater, with the burden falling to universities to track changes and inform those impacted.
Case in point: The University of South Florida in Tampa told Axios the university is aware some students "have experienced a change in their visa status," but declined to provide a number when asked.
Changes to students' visas could be made by the federal government "without notice or explanation" to the university, a spokesperson said.
The latest: At least three public universities — UF, USF and Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton — are seeking partnerships with federal authorities to carry out immigration enforcement on campuses, the Associated Press reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
7 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Guatemalan man deported to Mexico returns to US after court orders Trump administration to do so
A Guatemalan man deported to Mexico, whom President Donald Trump's administration was working to bring back after a court order, landed in the United States on Wednesday, his attorneys confirmed. The man, identified in court documents by initials O.C.G., landed in California via a commercial flight and made contact with his legal team while waiting in line to go through U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said Trina Realmuto of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. 'We expect that he will be detained, but we don't know where yet,' she said in an email to The Associated Press. The Trump administration said in court filings last month that it was working to bring him back after he was deported to Mexico, despite his fears of being harmed there, days after a federal judge ordered the administration to facilitate his return. The U.S. Department of Justice didn't immediately respond to a request for comments and details from the AP. The man, who is gay, was protected from being returned to his home country under a U.S. immigration judge's order at the time. But the U.S. put him on a bus and sent him to Mexico instead, a removal that U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy found likely 'lacked any semblance of due process.' Mexico later returned him to Guatemala, where he was in hiding, according to court documents. In a court filing before his return, government lawyers said that a so-called significant public benefit parole packet had been approved. The designation allows people who aren't eligible to enter the U.S. to do so temporarily, often for reasons related to law enforcement or legal proceedings. An earlier court proceeding had determined that the man risked persecution or torture if returned to Guatemala. But he also feared returning to Mexico, where he says he was raped and extorted while seeking asylum in the U.S., according to court documents. 'As far as we know, it is the first time since January 20 that (Department of Homeland Security) has facilitated return following a district court order,' Realmuto said. The case is among a string of findings by federal courts against recent Trump administration deportations. Those have included other deportations to third countries and the erroneous deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadoran man who had lived in Maryland for roughly 14 years. The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. from a notorious Salvadoran prison, rejecting the White House's claim that it couldn't retrieve him after mistakenly deporting him. Both the White House and the El Salvadoran president have said they are powerless to return him.
CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
Hakeem Jeffries calls Elon Musk's attacks on Trump-backed budget bill "the stone-cold reality"
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, says he agrees with Elon Musk's characterization of President Trump's domestic policy bill as a "disgusting abomination," torching what he called a "Republican civil war" among GOP lawmakers in an interview with CBS News. "What Elon Musk said is the stone-cold reality," Jeffries said in an interview with "CBS Evening News" co-anchor Maurice DuBois of Mr. Trump's "big, beautiful bill" — which passed the House last month. "When you try to take away healthcare from more than 15 million Americans, that's a disgusting abomination," Jeffries said of the cuts to Medicaid included in the bill. "When you are endeavoring to rip food, literally, out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors with the largest cut to nutritional assistance in American history, that is a disgusting abomination. And it's certainly a disgusting abomination, when all of this is being done to provide massive tax breaks to their billionaire donors, and they're going to stick the American people with the bill and increase the debt by trillions of dollars." Musk's "disgusting abomination" comments came in a post on X Tuesday, calling the bill "outrageous" and "pork-filled." Musk and Jeffries' criticisms of the bill differ: Musk has attacked the legislation's price tag, while Jeffries has criticized its cuts to Medicaid and food stamp spending — though the Democratic leader has also pushed back on its cost. Musk previously criticized the bill last month, telling "CBS Sunday Morning" correspondent David Pogue he's "disappointed" by the bill's cost. His comments are striking because Musk was previously a key ally of President Trump, helping to lead the Trump administration's effort to reduce the size of the federal government. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has pushed back against Musk, defending the bill and calling his criticisms "flat wrong." Musk's criticisms come as Senate Republicans prepare to take up the domestic policy bill, which extends Mr. Trump's signature 2017 tax cuts, imposes work requirements on some Medicaid recipients, adds new restrictions to food stamps and boosts border spending. Some senators are pushing for changes — including a few who are skeptical of its changes to Medicaid. Any changes passed by the Senate will also need to be approved by the House. "What we see right now is a Republican civil war," Jeffries said. "Elon Musk is attacking the GOP tax scam, this reckless budget that's going to hurt everyday Americans. House Republicans are attacking Senate Republicans, Senate Republicans are attacking House Republicans." See more from the interview with Jeffries on the "CBS Evening News" Thursday.
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
A College President Tried to Make the Move to a Republican State, and Failed
Last month, Santa Ono was vying to become the next president of the University of Florida, and declared in an opinion essay that he believed in Florida's 'vision for higher education.' But on Tuesday, the state's higher education leaders said they did not believe in Dr. Ono. A board overseeing Florida's public universities unexpectedly rejected his bid to lead the 60,000-student Gainesville campus. The officials expressed concerns about his leadership at the University of Michigan, where he was president, criticizing its sprawling diversity, equity and inclusion program and what they characterized as its failures to curb antisemitism. Even though Dr. Ono sought to distance himself from those efforts, board officials said they did not find his new posture credible. The state-level saga over Dr. Ono's candidacy comes as the federal government wages an assault on the nation's colleges, revealing how deeply politicized higher education has become. His failed bid was welcomed by those on the right and even some on the left who believed he had tailored his message depending on the audience he was addressing. In May, the Gainesville campus's board of trustees unanimously approved Dr. Ono for the job, but the Board of Governors, which oversees the 12-institution state university system, shot down the nomination in a 10-to-6 vote. The decision came after a four-hour hearing during which the governors peppered him with questions about his time at Michigan. It did not seem to matter to the Florida officials that his previous university's diversity program had preceded Dr. Ono, who arrived in 2022, and that he had presided over its dismantling. Supporters of pro-Palestinian activism on Michigan's campus also said that Dr. Ono had taken a hard-line approach against them. Dr. Ono's effort to leap from Michigan to the red-state higher education politics of Florida, known for trying to stamp out 'woke ideology,' ended with him out of a job and the $1.5 million base salary it came with. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
