Elon Musk's X Corp sues to block New York social media transparency law
• Elon Musk's X Corp has filed a federal lawsuit against a New York state law 'Stop Hiding Hate Act' that requires social media companies to submit semi-annual reports on how they moderate hate speech and disinformation.
• X argues the law violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive moderation practices.
• The law targets companies with over $100 million in annual revenue, imposes $15 000 daily fines for violations.
Elon Musk's X Corp has filed a lawsuit challenging a New York state law that requires social media companies to report how they moderate hate speech and disinformation.
The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices.
"Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California.
"X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said.
The New York law requires social media companies with more than $100 million in annual revenue to submit semi-annual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment.
Companies face fines of $15 000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office.
X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech.
The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing.
New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds.
X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy."
READ | Musk's X sues to block California anti-hate speech law
The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage.
Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee - who introduced the law - said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law".
"Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilise," they added.
"The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers as required by our statute illustrates exactly why we need the Stop Hiding Hate Act."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Dem mayor blames Trump for ‘escalating tensions' with ICE raids
All times eastern Making Money with Charles Payne FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Fed Chair Powell speaks after announcing decision on interest rates
CNET
24 minutes ago
- CNET
Mortgage Forecast: Homebuyers on Hold After Fed Puts Off Interest Rate Cuts
As the Federal Reserve likely holds interest rates steady, mortgage rates are expected to stay in a narrow range. Tharon Green/CNET The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady for the fourth consecutive time this year at its monetary policy meeting this week. However, rising jobless claims, intensified geopolitical conflict and slowing economic growth could force the central bank to cut rates as early as the fall. As turbulent trade policies pressure financial markets, investors have been wondering how President Donald Trump would influence the Fed's interest rate forecast. Trump has repeatedly scolded the Fed for not lowering borrowing costs already. The central bank is cautiously projecting two rate cuts in 2025. The Fed is tasked with maintaining maximum employment and containing inflation, primarily through setting its short-term benchmark interest rate for lenders. A sluggish economy typically warrants interest rate cuts to stimulate growth, but lowering rates too quickly could fuel price growth when inflation is still above target. At the same time, the Fed only indirectly impacts the mortgage market. In 2024, the central bank cut interest rates three times, but mortgage rates didn't fall. According to Bankrate data, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage has moved in a narrow range between 6.7% and 7% since mid-April. Though housing affordability was expected to gradually improve in 2025, uncertainty over the direction of the economy has altered those forecasts. Most economists say mortgage rates will stay above 6.5% for the better part of the year. "You'd need to see mortgage rates pretty far below current levels, certainly below 6.75%, to incentivize homebuyers," said Beth Ann Bovino, chief economist at U.S. Bank. "Everybody's in a wait-and-see mode, not just the Fed," Bovino added. Mortgage rates aside, prospective homebuyers are also contending with a long-standing housing shortage, high home prices and a loss of purchasing power due to inflation. "Prices are still incredibly high," Bovino said. "Add to that the borrowing costs of a mortgage, and it's prohibitively expensive for most people to get into the housing market." Experts say many of the Trump administration's policies, such as tariffs, could cripple housing affordability even further, putting upward pressure on interest rates and the cost of building materials, like lumber, used to build new homes. CNET What's the path for mortgage rates now? Mortgage lenders base their rates on a range of factors. While the Fed's monetary policy changes regarding interest rates can influence overall borrowing rates, mortgage rates are primarily driven by movement in the bond market, specifically the 10-year Treasury yield. Bond yields and interest rates rise or fall depending on how new economic data shifts market speculation and risk assessment. If tariff policies recharge inflation, more affordable mortgages and housing will be difficult to achieve. "Even though many of the tariffs are in place, some of the big ones have yet to take effect," said Bovino. When people are nervous about finances, they'll be more reluctant to take on new debt. The average household in the US is expected to lose about $3,000 in income from tariffs, with lower-income households getting hit even harder, according to Bovino. Despite Trump's earlier claims that he would bring mortgage rates down to 3%, the White House doesn't set rates on home loans. Moreover, those kinds of rock-bottom pandemic-era rates would normally indicate that the country is in a severe economic crisis. Still, mortgage rates have the potential to dip this year. Given the economy's precarious nature, any sign of risk could lower bond yields and put downward pressure on mortgage rates. For example, Bovino said that markets will be weighing the impact of the Israel-Iran conflict, which could increase oil prices and spark concerns of an economic downturn. If unemployment spikes or a recession appears likely, mortgage rates could start decreasing. How to deal with high mortgage rates Prospective homebuyers who have been waiting for mortgage rates to drop for the past few years may soon have to adjust to the "higher for longer" rate environment, with mortgage loan rates fluctuating between 5% and 7% over the longer term. Since the 1970s, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage has been around 7%. While market forces are out of your control, there are ways to make buying a home slightly more affordable. Last year, nearly half of all homebuyers secured a mortgage rate below 5%, according to Zillow. Here are some proven strategies that can help you save up to 1.5% on your mortgage rate. 💰 Build your credit score. Your credit score will help determine whether you qualify for a mortgage and at what interest rate. A credit score of 740 or higher will help you qualify for a lower rate. 💰 Save for a bigger down payment. A larger down payment allows you to take out a smaller mortgage and get a lower interest rate from your lender. If you can afford it, a down payment of at least 20% will also eliminate private mortgage insurance. 💰 Shop for mortgage lenders. Comparing loan offers from multiple mortgage lenders can help you negotiate a better rate. Experts recommend getting at least two to three loan estimates from different lenders. 💰 Consider mortgage points. You can get a lower mortgage rate by buying mortgage points, with each point costing 1% of the total loan amount. One mortgage point equals a 0.25% decrease in your mortgage rate. Now Playing: 6 Ways to Reduce Your Mortgage Interest Rate by 1% or More 02:31
CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Social Security won't be able to pay full benefits in 2034 if Congress doesn't act
Social Security will not be able to fully pay monthly benefits to tens of millions of retirees and people with disabilities in 2034 if lawmakers don't act to address the program's pending shortfall, according to an annual report released Wednesday by Social Security's trustees. The combined Social Security trust funds – which help support payments to the elderly, survivors and people with disabilities – are expected to be exhausted in 2034, one year earlier than previously forecast, according to the trustees' annual report. At that time, payroll tax revenue and other income sources will only be able to cover 81% of benefits owed. The deterioration in the forecast stems from several factors, including a law passed by Congress last year that increased benefits for certain workers and the trustees' assumption that it will take longer for the nation's fertility rate to recover from historically low levels. Average earnings are expected to grow somewhat more slowly over the coming decade, according to the report. Medicare's fiscal outlook also worsened. Its hospital insurance trust fund, known as Medicare Part A, is expected to be able to cover scheduled inpatient hospital benefits until 2033, compared to 2036 in last year's report from the program's trustees. At that time, Medicare will only be able to pay 89% of total scheduled Part A benefits, which also cover hospice care, short-term skilled nursing facility services and home health services following hospitalizations. The program's trustees project that Medicare's trust fund will be drained sooner because of increased medical spending in 2024, which also raised the forecast for future expenditures. Plus, the trustees raised their assumed growth level of inpatient and hospice services in coming years. Medicare Part B, which covers physician services and medical supplies, and Part D, which covers prescription drugs, are financed through beneficiary premiums and federal contributions that are adjusted annually to cover costs. Their trust fund is fiscally sound. The Medicare trustees are projecting that the standard monthly Part B premium will jump to $206.50 in 2026, from $185. The amount will not be finalized until later this fall. The driving factor in the quickening of Social Security's trust fund insolvency is Congress' passage late last year of a bipartisan bill that increased benefits for nearly 3 million federal, state and local employees. The Social Security Fairness Act eliminated two policies that had reduced Social Security payments for public sector workers. Experts had warned the measure would hurt the program's finances. It was a 'political giveaway masquerading as reform,' Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said in a statement. 'Instead of tackling Social Security's structural imbalances, Congress chose to increase benefits for a vocal minority — accelerating trust fund insolvency by 6 months in the process,' Boccia said. 'It's a clear sign that populist pressure now outweighs fiscal responsibility and economic sanity on both sides of the aisle.' Looking solely at the trust fund that covers retirement and survivor benefits, Social Security will only be able to afford scheduled payments in full until 2033, three fiscal quarters earlier than last year's projection. At that time, the fund's reserves will be depleted, and continuing income will cover only 77% of benefits owed. The Disability Insurance Trust Fund is expected to be able to cover full benefits at least through 2099, when the projection period ends. Merging the two trust funds would require an act of Congress, but the combined projection is often used to show the overall status of the program. Just over 60.1 million people received Social Security retirement and survivors benefits at the end of 2024, while 8.3 million Americans received disability benefits, according to the program's trustees. Some 67.6 million people were enrolled in Medicare. Social Security and Medicare have long been on shaky financial ground, largely because the nation's population is getting older and living longer. The number of beneficiaries is ballooning, but fewer workers are paying into the programs. Also, health care usage and spending are growing. Social Security and Medicare, however, will not run out of money since current workers are paying payroll taxes, which support the programs. The problem is that the revenue will not be enough to fully cover the benefits owed after the trust funds run dry. Still, the trustees' dire warnings are not likely to spur Congress to act any time soon, experts say. GOP lawmakers, who control both chambers, are focused on passing President Donald Trump's agenda bill. The president, meanwhile, has not released any proposals for extending the life of the entitlement programs' trust funds, promising only not to cut Social Security and Medicare as part of his megabill. 'Any politician who doesn't support increasing Social Security's revenue is, by default, supporting benefit cuts,' Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group, said in a statement. The longer lawmakers wait to address the looming shortfall, the fewer options they will have, experts say. 'As the date gets closer and closer, Congress really needs to start getting more focused,' said Bill Sweeney, senior vice president for government affairs at AARP. 'The American public expects them to get focused on this, to protect the money that they've earned.' Options to address Social Security's fiscal issues include raising the payroll tax rate; delaying the ages when people can start collecting benefits or receive their full retirement payments; increasing the amount of income subject to the payroll tax; and curtailing benefits or the rate at which they increase annually, among other proposals. 'Taking action sooner rather than later will allow consideration of a broader range of solutions and provide more time to phase in changes so that the public has adequate time to prepare,' the trustees wrote in a message to the public.
