‘Heightened Scrutiny' Review: A Transgender Attorney Heads to the Supreme Court in an Emotional and Informative Doc
The visual approach in 'Heightened Scrutiny' — Sam Feder's documentary following a transgender lawyer prepping for a U.S. Supreme Court case — seems familiar at the outset. Its straightforward approach to locked-off sit-down interviews, interspersed with graphics and other B-roll footage, is hardly novel. However, an immense amount of care and detail goes into its construction, deepening its use of traditional form and packing a powerful punch.
'Heightened Scrutiny' follows ACLU attorney Chase Strangio, as he prepares to become the first transgender person to make arguments before the Supreme Court. However, this superlative — while it's certainly compared to other civil rights landmarks — is but a fleeting detail in the face of how vital the case in question might be. United States v. Skrmetti is, at the time of the film's Sundance premiere, still ongoing, and is set to determine whether Tennessee banning hormone therapy and puberty blockers for transgender youth violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
More from Variety
Marlee Matlin Says Hollywood Hasn't Changed Since 'CODA,' but That Won't Stop Her From Creating Her Own Projects: 'I'm Still Knocking on Doors'
'Wedding Banquet' Trailer: Bowen Yang, Lily Gladstone Plan a Sham Wedding in Remake of Ang Lee's Queer Rom-Com Classic
Why Isaac Mizrahi Both Cringes and Feels 'Weirdly Empowered' by the Re-Release of 'Unzipped' for Its 30th Anniversary at Sundance
For those unaware of the particulars, Strangio makes persuasive arguments to the camera. But 'Heightened Scrutiny' isn't just concerned with specific legalese. Feder seems aware that what determines such a ruling is much larger than constitutional language, and he therefore takes aim at the media building blocks of anti-transgender prejudice — the way Feder's previous work, 'Disclosure,' examined trans films in Hollywood — and the way news stories inform lawmaking. The film, in this way, takes on an occasionally essayistic form, as it holds major news organizations like The New York Times and The Atlantic accountable in jaw-dropping, thorough detail.
Its arguments are as academic as they are emotional. Strangio is joined by a number of trans activists — including famous faces like Elliot Page, and an outspoken 12-year-old named Mila — in not only expounding upon daily prejudices and hypocrisies of anti-trans alarmism, but also daily mundanities. In capturing Mila's family dinners, and in following Strangio home, watching him pick out outfits, and fawn over his cat, the movie's key persuasion becomes the everyday relatability of its subjects.
What separates 'Heightened Scrutiny' from similarly straightforward works is that it takes its time. Despite its slim 89-minute runtime, it feels entirely rigorous in its unraveling of personal and practical information. You could throw a penny blindfolded and have it land on a documentary that employs fleeting expert testimonials; where Feder's movie stands apart is that none of its interviewees are mere talking heads — whether lawyers, journalists, parents of trans children, or celebrities like Peppermint and Laverne Cox. No single subject is used merely to add color. Rather, they become full-fledged, fully-formed characters in and of themselves, whose inner lives are the focus as much as their expertise.
Furthermore, the film never separates these facets of their experience; their emotional connection to the case is paramount. As if in stern rebuke to the 'just asking questions' crowd, who reduce people's real lives to intellectual exercises, 'Heightened Scrutiny' interweaves thought and feeling simultaneously. Strangio may be the movie's anchor, but as much as he builds legal arguments, his sense of camaraderie with the film's other trans subjects widens the scope of what's at stake for trans lives, and for America as a whole, in the years to come. Beyond all the legal and even medical specifics resides a sense of communal understanding, and — at the risk of sounding mawkish — a deep and abiding love for one's fellow human beings, which Feder taps into with aplomb.
Best of Variety
The Best Albums of the Decade
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Congress Agrees on One Thing: National Seersucker Day
Congress can't seem to agree on anything these days with Republicans and Democrats seemingly at loggerheads over every piece of legislation. But Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, and Rev. Raphael Warnack, a Democrat from Georgia, have put aside party politics to partner on a resolution marking Thursday, June 12, National Seersucker Day. This is the 12th year that Cassidy has championed the cause, which celebrates the summer fabric, since he revived the tradition in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2014. More from WWD Ray and Charles Eames' Furniture to Be Focus of New Exhibition Gaurav Gupta Talks Bollywood Star Kiara Advani's Met Gala Gown - It's a Loaner Tarun Tahiliani Offers a Modern View of India-made Fashion 'Seersucker Day honors the New Orleans invention that's made America fashionable — and the summer heat bearable — since 1909,' Cassidy said. 'For one day a year, the Capitol looks a little more like the French Quarter. We might not always agree on policy, but we can all agree: wool in June is a mistake.' 'I'm excited to return as the co-chair for the annual Seersucker Day in our nation's capital and continue celebrating this iconic Senate tradition,' said Warnock. 'Seersucker is more than just a fabric, it is a material deeply woven into Southern culture. National Seersucker Day is a proud bipartisan tradition, and I look forward to working alongside Senator Cassidy to carry it on.' The use of seersucker was popularized in 1909 by New Orleans businessman Joseph Haspel Sr., who brought the puckered cloth popular in India to his home town and created suits that would stand up to the city's scorching summer heat and humidity. Haspel's great granddaughter Laurie Haspel Aronson still runs the company today. In 1996, former Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott brought Seersucker Thursday to Congress, where it was observed for several years. After falling by the wayside in 2012 and 2013, Cassidy revived it. The senator has invited other members of Congress to don their seersucker outfits for an official photograph at the Ohio Clock in the U.S. Capitol on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. ET, and he also encouraged all Americans to wear the fabric as well. Best of WWD Young Brooke Shields' Style Evolution, Archive Photos: From Runway Modeling & Red Carpets to Meeting Princess Diana The Most Memorable French Open Tennis Outfits With Serena Williams, Naomi Osaka & More [PHOTOS] Beyoncé's 'Cowboy Carter Tour' Outfits, Live Updates: Schiaparelli, Burberry, Loewe and More
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of Sexual Assault After Tensions Explode on New York Jury
Harvey Weinstein has been convicted of one count of committing a criminal sexual act but acquitted on another in his sex crimes retrial in New York City. The majority-female jury on Wednesday found the former Hollywood producer guilty of sexually assaulting Miriam Haley, but acquitted him of a second charge of sexually assaulting Kaja Sokola. The jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on a third count involving Jessica Mann and was told to resume deliberations Thursday morning. More from Variety Amanda Seyfried Grossed Out She Invited 'Dictator' Harvey Weinstein to Past Sundance Premiere: 'It's Just the Way It Was - We All Needed Him' Harvey Weinstein Says He Has 'Regrets' and 'Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: 'But Never Illegal, Never Criminal' Harvey Weinstein's New York Retrial Closes With Prosecutors Urging Jury to 'Let Him Know the Rules Apply to Him' Ahead of Deliberations The partial verdict comes after a weeks-long trial that began in April, during which three women testified about the alleged sexual assaults committed by the former Hollywood producer. Weinstein faced two counts of committing a criminal sexual act in the first degree and one count of third-degree rape. Prior to the mixed verdict, Weinstein himself addressed the court, urging the judge to declare a mistrial as several jurors reported ongoing tensions in the deliberation room. 'This is my life that's on the line,' Weinstein told Judge Curtis Farber, adding, 'I am not getting a fair trial.' Weinstein then told the judge, 'You are endangering me, Your Honor.' Earlier on Wednesday, the jury foreperson in Weinstein's retrial informed the judge that tensions remained during deliberations and requested a private meeting with the judge and attorneys to discuss the situation. In court, Farber conveyed the foreperson's account, stating that there was infighting among the jurors and that the foreperson was 'not going to change his position — whatever that position is.' 'He did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming,' the judge said. 'A crime was committed against this juror,' Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued, describing the situation in the deliberation room as 'menacing and harassment.' Aidala added: 'Their verdict is all about coercion and threats.' Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, however, argued that the foreperson didn't seem frightened or apprehensive — just 'stubborn.' 'He said he'd made up his mind, he didn't want to change it, and people were pressuring him to change it,' Colangelo said. 'That's what jury deliberations involve.' In his 2020 trial, Weinstein was found guilty of sexually abusing Haley and Mann. He was serving a 23-year sentence in New York until those convictions were overturned in April 2024. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to all charges in his retrial; both Haley and Mann testified against him again. In their testimonies, Haley alleged that Weinstein forcibly sexually assaulted her at his apartment in 2006, while Mann accused him of raping her at a hotel in 2013. Sokola, who did not testify in Weinstein's 2020 trial, was first identified by the prosecution during opening arguments in late April. (She was previously referred to as Complaining Witness No. 3.) In her testimony, Sokola described two alleged sexual assaults by Weinstein: one in 2002, when she was 16, and another in a Manhattan hotel in 2006 — the latter being the incident for which Weinstein was charged in the retrial. Weinstein is still serving a separate 16-year prison sentence following his 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sex crime at retrial in New York, acquitted on one charge
Disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of committing a sex crime by a jury in New York, more than a year after the state Supreme Court overturned his 2020 conviction on felony sex crime charges. A jury of seven women and five men returned a partial verdict on Wednesday, finding Weinstein guilty of a first-degree criminal sexual act. The jury acquitted him on a second count of first-degree criminal sexual act, and it did not reach a unanimous verdict on a count of third-degree rape. Jurors will continue to deliberate on the third-degree rape count on Thursday, NBC News reported. This time around, the charges stemmed from allegations that Weinstein raped aspiring actor Jessica Mann in 2013 and that he forcibly performed oral sex on two others, former 'Project Runway' production assistant Miriam Haley and former model Kaja Sokola in 2006. Sokola's accusation was not included in Weinstein's first trial. The jury on Wednesday found him guilty of committing a criminal sex act against Haley; it found him not guilty on the charge related to Sokola; and it will continue to deliberate on the rape charge as it relates to Mann. Weinstein has maintained that all of the sexual encounters were consensual. He did not testify in this trial or during his 2020 trial. Weinstein's conviction comes more than five years after he was convicted of felony sex crimes at his first Manhattan trial, which was a watershed moment for the #MeToo movement. He was sentenced to 23 years in prison. Then, in early 2023, he was sentenced to 16 years in prison after being convicted of sex crimes in Los Angeles. He was ordered to serve those sentences consecutively, essentially ensuring that the once-powerful entertainment mogul, now 73, would spend the rest of his life in prison. But his New York conviction was overturned by the state's high court in April 2024, after the justices determined in a 4-3 ruling that he did not get a fair trial. Almost immediately after, Manhattan prosecutors said that they would seek a retrial. Since then, Weinstein has been languishing in New York City's notorious Rikers Island jail, with his attorneys saying that the facility's conditions have exacerbated his health issues. This is a developing story. Check back for updates. This article was originally published on