Far More Powerful B61-13 Guided Nuclear Bomb Variant Joins U.S. Stockpile
The first production example of the new B61-13 nuclear bomb has been completed roughly a year ahead of schedule, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. The B61-13 is based on the preceding B61-12, but offers a higher maximum yield that U.S. officials say offers important additional capacity to hold hardened targets, such as underground command and control facilities, and ones spread across physically larger areas, at risk.
The U.S. military first announced plans to develop and field the B61-13, primarily as a replacement for the B61-7 variant, in 2023. The plan had previously been for the B61-12 to supplant the B61-7, as well as the B61-3 and B61-4 versions. The B61 is America's longest-serving family of nuclear gravity bombs, and you can read more about the existing members thereof here.
NNSA has completed the First Production Unit of the B61-13 nuclear gravity bomb @PantexPlant. This is a major accomplishment for stockpile modernization. Thanks to the entire NNSA team who worked to achieve this milestone nearly a year ahead of schedule.https://t.co/XNlOZsS1JU pic.twitter.com/Y4ETedebz6
— NNSA (@NNSANews) May 19, 2025
'[The] Pantex Plant has completed the first production unit of the B61-13 nuclear gravity bomb – designed to strengthen the flexibility and credibility of America's nuclear deterrent,' according to a social media post today from the Department of Energy, which also included a small glimpse of the weapon. 'This major milestone for America's nuclear stockpile was completed a year ahead of schedule!'
'Modernizing America's nuclear stockpile is essential to delivering President Trump's peace through strength agenda,' Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said in a statement today. 'The remarkable speed of the B61-13's production is a testament to the ingenuity of our scientists and engineers and the urgency we face to fortify deterrence in a volatile new age. It was my honor today to stamp the first completed unit at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas, where all the efforts of NNSA's labs, plants, and sites culminated in this amazing milestone. This achievement signals American strength to our adversaries and allies alike.'
B61-13 with DOE Gold Star Quality Stamp https://t.co/Q0a7CMom64
— Casillic (@Casillic) May 19, 2025
The Pantex Plant in Texas is where U.S. nuclear weapons are assembled and disassembled, and the facility also oversees testing and evaluation activities. Pantex falls under the oversight of the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which manages the development of new and improved nuclear weapons and sustains America's existing nuclear stockpile.
'NNSA anticipated achieving the first production unit for the B61 Mod 13 later this month, almost a full year ahead of schedule,' Teresa Robbins, NNSA's Acting Administrator, had told members of the House Armed Services Committee on May 7. Robbins' prepared remarks for the hearing said that 'taking advantage of existing B61 production lines' had been a key factor in accelerating work on the new version.
'Decades of B61 design and qualification data gave NNSA's program managers and engineers from the national laboratories and production plants confidence that they could accept calculated risks to speed production,' per an NNSA press release today. 'By streamlining or in some cases combining 'design gates' – the rigorous reviews conducted at each step of a weapon design process – engineers were able to commence production far sooner than a standard schedule would allow. These efficiencies allowed B61-13 hardware 'test builds' to be manufactured just three months after the program received authorization and appropriation from Congress.'
From the pictures that have been released to date, looks essentially identical to the B61-12 externally. The B61-13 notably features the same tail kit assembly (TKA) containing an inertial navigation system (INS) guidance package that was introduced on the B61-12.
In addition, 'the B61-13 incorporates the same modern safety, security, and accuracy features as the B61-12,' according to today's NNSA release.
Yield is where the B61-13 is understood to differ most from the B61-12. All B61 variants are so-called 'dial-a-yield' weapons that can be set to detonate with varying degrees of explosive force. Though the exact figures are classified, the U.S. government has said the maximum yield of the B61-13 will be in line with the previous B61-7 version it is intended to replace, the highest yield setting on which is reportedly between 340 and 360 kilotons. The reported maximum yield of the B61-12 is 50 kilotons.
The B61-7 is one of the most powerful nuclear gravity bombs in the U.S. stockpile now. Despite the lower maximum yield, the U.S. military had previously argued that the new guidance capability found on the B61-12, which is also spin-stabilized using small rocket motors positioned around the rear of its body for additional accuracy, would allow it to hold hardened targets, even ones deep underground, at risk by being able to focus is explosive force on a more precise point. Even before the announcement of plans for the B61-13 two years ago, the U.S. government had already been steadily walking back expectations for the B61-12.
It's worth noting here that the B61-13 will be reserved for U.S. military use only, unlike the B61-12, which America's NATO allies could employ via the alliance's nuclear sharing agreements if authorized. Interestingly, in 2022, U.S. officials confirmed that not all aircraft set to be certified to carry the B61-12, particularly certain tactical jets in NATO service, will be able to employ the precision guidance capability, as you can read more about here.
In addition, unlike the B61-12, which U.S. F-15E Strike Eagles and F-35A Joint Strike Fighters are certified to employ, the B61-13 will be reserved for use by B-2 Spirit and forthcoming B-21 Raider stealth bombers. U.S. B-52 bombers are no longer certified to drop nuclear gravity bombs of any type, though they are still able to fire nuclear-tipped cruise missiles.
Overall, work on the B61-13 has come as China, America's chief global competitor and pacing threat, as well as Russia, have continued to expand their underground military infrastructure. In addition to new subterranean command and control facilities, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) has notably constructed vast new fields of new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos in recent years. The PLA also has an underground submarine base and many airfields with cavernous hardened hangars.
Smaller countries like North Korea and Iran have also been increasingly pushing strategic and other military assets, particularly facilities tied to their nuclear and long-range ballistic missile programs, deeper underground just in response to potential conventional threats, primarily from the United States. This includes silo-based and other hardened ballistic missile launch infrastructure.
At the same time, the B61-13 is not expected to be able to hold absolutely all deeply buried targets at risk. There are still no known plans for a direct successor to the highly specialized B61-11 variant, which features a substantially reinforced outer shell and a rocket booster in the tail to help it penetrate down toward especially deeply buried targets. Russia's Kosvinsky Kamen, a key component of that country's nuclear command and control enterprise that is situated under a mountain, is understood to have been a key driver behind the B61-11's development in the first place.
B61-11 Nuclear Earth Panetrator pic.twitter.com/MgiUvrOFjS
— Casillic (@Casillic) December 14, 2021
A contracting notice in January did hint at the possibility that further B61 versions could be on the horizon. In the meantime, production of higher-yield B61-13s is now well underway.
Contact the author: joe@twz.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 164 — Goodbye NASA?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On Episode 164 of This Week In Space, Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik discuss these concerning times for NASA with Casey Dreier, the Chief of Space Policy for The Planetary a wild week it's been for NASA. With drastic budget cuts looming — pending any action by Congress — then comes the sudden and unexpected pulling of Jared Isaacman for the role of NASA Administrator, with no replacement named. Then came the very public split between President Trump and Elon Musk, and a flurry of furious Twitter/X and Truth Social postings, aimed at each other with razor-sharp edges. And finally, the proposed and drastic cuts to NASA outreach and education budgets, slimming them to nearly nothing. These are strange and concerning times for America's space agency, a premier global brand and icon of peaceful American prowess. We turned to Dreier, who has been quite vocal in his concern, for context. These are critical times for spaceflight, so you won't want to miss this episode! Download or subscribe to this show at: episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at Musk vs Trump--THE BROMANCE HAS EXPERIENCED A R-U-D ispace strikes out 60th Anniversary First US Spacewalk Marc Garneau, First Canadian in Space, Dies at 76 Joined by Casey Dreier of the Planetary Society Smallest budget since 1961 NASA Workforce Changes Chart The Planetary Society reissues urgent call to reject disastrous budget proposal for NASA These Are All The NASA Missions That Trump Wants To Cancel Proposed NASA cuts to space science: 'Staggering' NASA FY 2026 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET REQUEST SUMMARY Proposed NASA cuts to space science: 'Staggering' Senate response to White House budget for NASA: Keep SLS, nix science After Trump pulled NASA nomination, Musk ally Jared Isaacman says stint in politics was 'thrilling' Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: 'Major blunder' Lieutenant General STEVEN L. KWAST SAY NO TO A DARK AGE OF NASA SCIENCE Advocacy Action Center TOP TELESCOPE PICK: Looking for a telescope to see planets and comets? We recommend the Celestron Astro Fi 102 as the top pick in our best beginner's telescope guide. Finally, did you know you can launch your own SpaceX rocket? Model rocket maker Estes' stunning scale model of a Falcon 9 rocket that you can pick up now. The launchable model is a detailed recreation of the Falcon 9 and retails for $149.99. You can save 10% by using the code IN-COLLECTSPACE at checkout, courtesy of our partners This Week in Space covers the new space age. Every Friday we take a deep dive into a fascinating topic. What's happening with the new race to the moon and other planets? When will SpaceX really send people to Mars? Join Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik from as they tackle those questions and more each week on Friday afternoons. You can subscribe today on your favorite podcatcher.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk
NASA and Pentagon officials moved swiftly this past week to urge competitors to Elon Musk's SpaceX to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft after President Donald Trump threatened to cancel Space X's contracts and Musk's defiant response. Government officials were especially stunned after Musk responded to Trump with a salvo of his own: SpaceX would stop flying its Dragon spacecraft, a move that would leave the space agency with no way to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Musk later recanted his threat. But it alarmed officials at NASA, which entrusts SpaceX with the lives of its astronauts, and at the Pentagon, which relies heavily on the company to launch its most sensitive satellites. The worried reaction within space and national security agencies highlights the risks of the government's heavy dependence on SpaceX for crucial tasks, including classified missions. SpaceX, with billions of dollars in government contracts, flies people and cargo to the ISS, launches satellites for the Pentagon and develops satellites used by intelligence agencies. The concerns are compounded by the fact that its competitors have been slow to catch up, leaving SpaceX's dominance largely unchallenged and the government with few options. This account is based on interviews with a dozen people in industry and government who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about internal deliberations. One NASA official said that watching the feud between Trump and Musk play out on social media Thursday at first was 'entertaining.' But once Musk called for decommissioning Dragon, 'it turned really terrifying.' There was a similar reaction in the Pentagon, where a person said staff officers 'looked at each other and said, 'oh, it's not funny anymore.' There was a realization that we're not watching TV. This is a real issue.' Musk's behavior has worried NASA officials before. In 2018, NASA ordered an investigation into SpaceX's safety culture after Musk appeared to take a small hit of marijuana on the Joe Rogan podcast. But his sudden threat on social media to cut off NASA's access to the orbiting space station, which has cost NASA some $100 billion over its lifespan, 'crossed a line,' one former space agency official said. 'When you realize that he's willing to shut everything down just on an impulse, that kind of behavior and the dependence on him is dangerous. … I can tell you there is deep concern within NASA.' The rift between Musk and Trump was also fueled by the White House's withdrawal of Jared Isaacman's nomination to be NASA administrator. Isaacman had flown to space twice with SpaceX and was seen as closely aligned with Musk. SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment. Since Thursday's exchange, at least three commercial space companies, RocketLab, Stoke Space and Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, have been contacted by government officials about the status of their rockets and when they might be available for government missions, according to four people familiar with the inquiries. (Bezos owns The Washington Post.) Officials at Sierra Space, which is developing a Dream Chaser spaceplane that could deliver cargo to the space station, were in a meeting with NASA officials on Thursday as the Trump-Musk feud was getting underway. 'Sierra Space stands ready to ensure uninterrupted support for the International Space Station,' Fatih Ozmen, the company's CEO, said in a statement to The Post. He added that 'NASA mentioned to us that they want diversity and do not want to rely on a single provider.' Dream Chaser 'is in final testing and integration at Kennedy Space Center,' Ozmen said. 'We are working closely with NASA leadership to fly the vehicle later this year.' The company is also working on a variant of Dream Chaser to carry astronauts, he said, 'which NASA is studying.' Musk's declaration also rattled staffers on Capitol Hill. A key congressional committee asked about the status of Boeing's Starliner space capsule vehicle, according to a person with knowledge of the inquiry. NASA intends to use Starliner to fly crews to the space station along with SpaceX's Dragon capsule. The spacecraft is years behind schedule, however, and during its first human spaceflight mission to the ISS last summer, it ran into so many problems that NASA decided it was unsafe to return to the crew with Boeing. But with Musk threatening to end Dragon, the congressional aide wanted to know when Starliner would be ready to fly again. In recent months, NASA has said little about the status of Starliner. But in response to reporters' questions, the agency issued a statement late Friday saying that it is planning for a Starliner flight to the space station 'in early 2026, pending system certification and resolution of Starliner's technical issues.' NASA is still evaluating whether the capsule would fly with astronauts on board or with cargo only. Even though he later recanted, Musk's threat to curtail NASA's use of Dragon could be damaging to a company that has been one of the government's most trusted partners, said Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the American Enterprise Institute. 'It's almost like an embargo of the space station,' he said. 'Musk was saying he is going to cut NASA off from its own laboratory in space.' Harrison said the threat was reminiscent of Musk's refusal to activate the Starlink Internet system so that Ukraine could carry out an attack on Russian forces in 2022. That decision also prompted an outcry that the nation's defenses should not be in the hands of a single person or company. Given that SpaceX has experience operating its Starlink Internet satellite constellation, it had been considered to be a natural choice for Trump's proposed Golden Dome missile defense shield, which would rely on swarms of satellites in orbit. But Musk's threat was so impulsive that it will undoubtedly rattle defense officials, Harrison said, who would not look favorably on the 'idea that the nation's missile defenses could be held hostage to the twittering whims of Elon Musk.' For NASA's astronauts, Musk's social media post 'got very personal' because it could impact their ability to fly, said Garrett Reisman, a former NASA astronaut who previously worked at SpaceX. 'We shouldn't overreact to a fit of pique on social media. But when your hopes and dreams are tied up in this, you can't help but think, 'Oh my goodness am I going to fly in space?'' The Pentagon has recently made an effort to broaden the military and space industrial base, allowing for competition to drive down cost and increase innovation. The Space Force last year released a strategy that said the service would seek to avoid 'overreliance on any single provider or solution.' To allow more companies to vie for lucrative space contracts, the Pentagon recently created two 'lanes' of launch competitions. Lane 1 allows new entrants to bid on individual contracts to launch satellites that are smaller and not as vital; Lane 2 would be reserved for more powerful and proven rockets that would hoist satellites that cannot risk failure. SpaceX, however, has continued to dominate those missions. Its Falcon 9 rocket launches at an unprecedented cadence, while those of its competitors, including the United Launch Alliance's Vulcan, Blue Origin's New Glenn and RocketLab's Neutron, are still largely unproven. New Glenn has launched just once; Vulcan twice; Neutron not at all. And even before Musk's social media posting, the Pentagon publicly expressed worry about the pace of Vulcan's development even though it has won certification to fly national security missions. In a statement to the House Armed Services Committee last month, U.S. Space Force Maj. Gen. Stephen Purdy said that contractors like ULA must 'establish a culture of accountability, and repair trust deficit to prove to the [Service Acquisition Executive for Space] that they are adopting the acquisition principles necessary to deliver capabilities at speed, on cost and on schedule.' From a legal and practical standpoint, the threats by the president and Musk would be difficult to carry out, said procurement specialists. If either the government or the company opted out, they would face major financial penalties, government procurement experts said. And if the contractor pulled out, it could affect its ability to win future contracts. Still, some had warned about Musk's foray into politics and the consequences for his companies. In an interview last year, Peter Beck, the CEO of RocketLab, which is seeking to compete for national security launch contracts, predicted that Musk's acquisition of Twitter, now X, and time at Trump's side could end up hurting his businesses. 'It certainly makes people uncomfortable,' he said at the time. 'At the end of the day, if you're delivering important national security missions, the buck stops with the CEO.' Related Content To save rhinos, conservationists are removing their horns Donald Trump and the art of the Oval Office confrontation Some advice from LGBTQ elders as WorldPride kicks off amid fears