‘Confusing' new roundabout needs three-minute explainer video
A new £2 million 'Dutch-style' roundabout needs a three-minute-long video explaining how to use it.
The roundabout, currently under construction in Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, includes a dedicated space for cyclists away from motorised vehicle traffic.
The project is slated to open on June 6 but has been controversial with locals for its 'inclusive route' for cyclists and pedestrians.
It has been dubbed Britain's 'most woke' roundabout because drivers must give priority to pedestrians, then cyclists, and then other cars and lorries before continuing on themselves.
Locals have pointed out the priority for cyclists and pedestrians is unnecessary because only cars and lorries regularly use the Boundary Way route.
It has also been branded 'complicated' and 'confusing' with Hertfordshire county council releasing a CGI walk-through on how to use it.
The three-minute-long video explains how cyclists must give way to pedestrians and 'keep attentive' for cars – despite having priority on their segregated cycle track.
It also demonstrates how cars and lorries must give way to both cyclists and pedestrians when joining or leaving the roundabout.
Criticism has flooded in online, with one local saying: 'For cyclists heading to, or coming off of, the M1, this is money well spent.'
Another said: 'That's going to be carnage at rush hour. Literally eyes needed everywhere. Assuming anyone uses it. I don't like the idea of braking when exiting the roundabout to give way to pedestrians.'
Some locals have branded the roundabout an 'disaster waiting to happen' citing the similar Dutch-style one in Cambridge.
In 2023, it was revealed the roundabout had seen more collisions in the three years since it was built compared to its predecessor over the previous three years.
Between 2020 and 2023, there had been 10 collisions on the Cambridge roundabout compared to six incidents between 2017-19.
Speaking on the Hertfordshire roundabout, one man said: 'There was a perfectly usable roundabout already there. Now they've pimped it up at great cost – what a joke.'
Another added: 'A disaster waiting to happen.'
The Hertfordshire roundabout has been funded by Active Travel England, the Government's executive agency for promoting walking, wheeling and cycling.
There are currently three Dutch-style roundabouts in operation around the UK.
The first one opened in Cambridge in 2020, followed by one in Sheffield in December 2024, and the third opened in Chichester in February 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
World Environment Day 2025: What is plastic pollution and why is it a problem?
It's World Environment Day on 5 June, a day organised by the United Nations where campaigners aim to inspire people to take action to protect our planet from climate change and raise awareness of issues around the year's theme is all about plastic pollution and what we can do to tackle it.A recent study by an ocean charity found that the amount of plastic rubbish found on beaches in the UK had increased by nearly 10%.The Marine Conservation Society (MCS) said that their volunteers had picked up three quarters of a million pieces of litter across beaches in the UK in what is plastic pollution and why is it a problem? Keep reading to find you or your school doing anything for World Environment Day? Let us know in the comments below. What is plastic? Plastic is in lots of things we use from clothing to crisp packets, and bottles to things from plastic is popular because there are many different types - and it can be made in to all sorts of shapes, colours and can be coloured or clear, thick or thin, strong or you look around your home or school, you'll find most things have plastic in them, including your pencil case, games consoles, and even are man-made and can be produced from natural materials like coal and oil. What is plastic pollution and why is it a problem? Plastic pollution is when plastic waste ends up in the environment, and it can damage our oceans, rivers, lakes and main problem with plastic is that most of it isn't biodegradable. That means it doesn't break down in the environment like paper or food, so instead it can hang around for hundreds of year, 400 million tonnes of plastic is produced and 40% of that is single-use - plastic we'll only use once before it's of single-use plastic are carrier bags, drinks bottles and crisp packets. Millions of tonnes of plastic enters the world's oceans each year and most of that escapes from bits of plastic, called microplastics, have also been found in things like the food we eat and soil in the ground and even in the air we can be blown into the sea from ships and beaches, or carried there by river. Some also gets flushed down the issue is that not all plastic can be might be because of the way it is made up or because it is too expensive or difficult to do. What's already being done about plastic pollution? In March 2022, nearly 200 UN countries agreed to start negotiations on an international plan on how to deal with plastic leaders are trying to agree the plastic pollution treaty - setting rules on how plastic is made, used and thrown away - and how the treaty is paid year's World Environment Day comes exactly two months before countries meet in Switzerland to continue negotiating a global agreement to end plastic UN Environment Programme (Unep) aims to bringing countries together to try to work on issues that affect the to the programme, plastic pollution is one of the defining environmental challenges of our time.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Anti-Brexit newspaper changes name to reflect ‘reality' of global politics
The New European, a 'Remainer' magazine launched in response to the Brexit referendum, is being renamed to reflect the changing picture of global politics. The rebrand to The New World is a nod to the 'the global unravelling' which started with Britain leaving the EU but is now being seen worldwide in countries such as the US, according to founder and editor in chief Matt Kelly. 'The New European was conceived as a pop-up provocation; a defiant middle finger to the rising tide of right wing populism that brought us Brexit,' said Mr Kelly. 'Nine years later, the world and The New European has changed dramatically. This is a reflection of that new reality. 'We know there is enormous appetite for our style of journalism - vibrant, constructive, witty and full of ideas and great reads that make sense of this extraordinary moment in world politics and culture.' The New European, which has published more than 400 editions, had 35,000 paying subscribers and claim revenues have trebled since the business moved independent three years ago. Tony Blair's former spin doctor Alastair Campbell, who is editor-at-large of The New European newspaper, said themes that underpinned Brexit are playing out around the world, including a political shift to the right in many nations. 'We're always going to be very passionately anti-Brexit, very pro internationalism, liberal democracy,' said Mr Campbell. 'When we started the paper, you could never have predicted [where we are]. Just to look at United States alone. You wouldn't have predicted that Ukraine and Russia were going to be fighting a war on the edge of Europe. Lots has happened - it's a reflection of that.' Mr Campbell said he will 'never resile from the view that Brexit is the biggest act of self harm that we've inflicted upon ourselves', but added: 'I'm hoping this will be the next chapter of a story that we're going to keep telling, which is that liberal democracy is the way forward, that nationalism is not the answer to the challenges that we face, that populism is doomed to fail, and there's a better way that involves people with an optimistic, internationalist outlook.' New contributing editors slated to join The New World include Sonia Sodha, formerly of The Observer, The Revenge of Power author Moises Naim and Tom Baldwin, Keir Starmer's biographer and former senior advisor to Labour.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Conspiracy theorists share bizarre claims over Meghan Markle's twerking video saying baby bump is FAKE and it wasn't filmed inside hospital
Social media conspiracy theorists have weaponised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's twerking hospital video to spread wild and groundless speculation that she wasn't pregnant at all and was wearing a 'moonbump '. A group of Twitter critics of the Sussexes have even made the extraordinary claim that the dancing video was faked and made on a film set - or could be AI-generated. Meghan Markle yesterday posted a video of her and Prince Harry twerking in a hospital room in an attempt to induce Lilibet's birth. The Duchess of Sussex shared the throwback clip on her Instagram to mark her daughter's fourth birthday saying 'there was only one thing left to do' when the princess was overdue and spicy food, walking and acupuncture failed to kickstart labour. But conspiracy theorists have pored over the film in order to make wild and even unhinged claims about her including that her pregnancy was faked and she wore a prosthetic fake pregnant belly known as a 'moonbump'. Several claimed, without credible evidence, that her bump was too high or the wrong shape to be real. Others said her ability to dance that way at nine months meant she was either 'superhuman' or not pregnant at all. Others have sought to back the incredible and baseless claim that the Sussexes used a surrogate by claiming the equipment in the background suggested it was not on a labour ward. Trolls have also claimed that Meghan would have been wearing a gown and would have had her jewellery removed. Others have questioned why she wasn't hooked up to an IV drip containing induction medication. One person claiming to be a nurse said that she should have had a canula in her hand. Another alleged that she would not have one fitted while in her own clothes. Some Twitter users crudely marked the pictures with what they considered inaccuracies, using child-like scribbles. MailOnline has asked a spokesman for the Sussexes to comment. The video has sparked baseless claims on social media that it was faked The video has sparked a social media frenzy. In it, Harry is seen coming into view of the camera as Starrkeisha's viral Baby Mama song begins to play. A heavily pregnant Meghan then starts twerking in front of a hospital bed before she gyrates around the room. 'Four years ago today, this also happened. Both of our children were a week past their due dates… so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work - there was only one thing left to do!,' Meghan wrote on her Instagram. The Baby Mama dance was a social media craze in 2018 with celebs Shay Mitchell, and Chloe and Lauryn Goodman all previously posting videos of themselves taking part in the trend. Meghan had earlier shared two previously unseen photos of Lilibet with Harry. One of the pictures showed the Duke of Sussex holding his daughter's hand as they walked along a sandy road barefoot in the sunshine, while he held his shoes and a cap. The other image was of Harry holding Lilibet as a baby while they looked at each other. Meghan wrote in a post accompanying the pictures: 'The sweetest bond to watch unfold. Daddy's little girl and favorite adventurer. Happy birthday Lili!' The post was made at 7.40am California time (3.40pm UK), just under eight hours after Meghan earlier posted two other intimate family photos of her with Lilibet. In that post, the Duchess shared a black-and-white snap of herself cuddling Lili, who was sat on her lap, with the pair both sporting windswept hair, seemingly on a boat. The second image in the first post showed Meghan tenderly cradling newborn Lilibet as she enjoyed skin-to-skin time with the new addition to her family in 2021. Meghan wrote in the first post: 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl! Four years ago today she came into our lives - and each day is brighter and better because of it. 'Thanks to all of those sending love and celebrating her special day!' The duchess usually only shares photos of her daughter pictured from behind to protect her privacy. But in the more recent photo, Lili's eyes and the top half of her face could be seen, with her nose and mouth and the rest of her face covered by Meghan's arms as she hugged the princess. Lili - the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's youngest child - was born on June 4 2021 and was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. She only became entitled to be a princess when her grandfather the King acceded to the throne, because of rules set out by King George V in 1917. Harry and Meghan started using prince and princess for Archie and Lili after the princess's christening in 2023, following correspondence with Charles about the matter. Yesterday, Meghan expressed her dream of launching a future business with Lili as she chatted to Beyonce's mother Tina Knowles on her podcast. 'I wonder if one day I'll be in business with Lili and we'll be building something,' the duchess said, with Knowles adding: 'That's the best.' Last week, the Duchess shared a clip of her and her daughter beekeeping in matching protective suits, writing: 'Harvesting honey with my little honey. (Like mother, like daughter; she's even wearing my gloves).' Lilibet is named after her great-grandmother Queen Elizabeth II. Princess Elizabeth had difficultly pronouncing her own name as a toddler and her grandfather George V would affectionately call her Lilibet, imitating her own attempts to say Elizabeth. The sweet nickname stuck and she became known as Lilibet to her family from then on. But the late Queen was reportedly 'as angry as I'd ever seen her ' after Harry and Meghan claimed they had her blessing to use the name for their daughter Lilibet, a royal aide said. Royal author Robert Hardman, in his biography of the King, told how a member of staff recounted Elizabeth II's fury following Harry and Meghan's announcement in 2021 over the use of her childhood family nickname. The BBC later reported a Palace source said the Queen was not asked by the Sussexes whether they could use Lilibet. But the Sussexes' lawyers fired off legal letters to the broadcaster and other publishers, saying the claim was false and defamatory. A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan insisted at the time that the duke spoke to his grandmother in advance and would not have used the name had the monarch not been supportive. Hardman wrote however: 'One privately recalled that Elizabeth II had been 'as angry as I'd ever seen her' in 2021 after the Sussexes announced that she had given them her blessing to call their baby daughter 'Lilibet', the Queen's childhood nickname.'
