The ultra-affordable Galaxy A16 5G is even cheaper on Amazon, but for a limited time
Looking for an ultra-cheap Samsung phone with 5G and an impressive six years of software support under $200? The Galaxy A16 5G is the one to consider. This bad boy is currently 13% off at Amazon, bringing its affordable ~$200 price down under the $180 mark.
$25 off (13%)
The entry-level Galaxy A16 5G is even cheaper on Amazon right now! The device is 13% off in both color options, making it a suitable choice for Samsung fans on an ultra-tight budget. The deal will only stay live for a limited time. Buy at Amazon
Trade-in
$249 99
$399 99 $150 off (38%)
If you don't mind extending your budget for something way more premium, the Galaxy A36 might be the perfect fit. This model is down by up to $150 at the official Samsung Store, provided you trade in an eligible device in good condition. Buy at Samsung While this isn't the first time we've come across that sale, we haven't seen it in some time, making it a tempting choice if you missed out on previous deals. The promo is available on both color options and will only stay live for a limited time.Right off the bat, we must point out the obvious drawback of this Android phone — poor performance. Despite being more powerful than the previous-gen Galaxy A15, this fella doesn't quite deliver a smooth everyday experience. It stutters at times, which may be a dealbreaker for users on a very tight budget.
If you're concerned about those performance hiccups, the pricier Galaxy A36 might be a better pick. Trading in an older device in good condition at the Samsung Store lets you save up to $150 on its regular $399.99 price. But if you're not a power user anyway, the Galaxy A16 might just be right for you. It has a good-looking 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh rate and decent brightness level for the price.
It also packs a triple rear camera system featuring a 50MP main lens, a 5MP ultra-wide, and a 2MP macro sensor. In general, the device delivers mostly acceptable photos, though, as the camera samples in our Galaxy A16 5G review show, images taken with the main camera have a slightly cooler hue.
What's arguably most impressive here is that Samsung has committed to a very long software support. As you probably know, many similarly-priced Motorola phones barely deliver two years of Android updates, while this device gets six years of software support.
Overall, we can't deny the Galaxy A16 5G isn't the most impressive entry-level device. But it's cheap, has a decent display and camera performance, and is on sale right now. Grab yours for 13% off at Amazon and save before this limited-time promo expires.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Apple's surprises for WWDC 2025 leak ahead of event
Apple's WWDC ( Worldwide Developers Conference ) event for this year begins on June 9. Thanks to Apple insider Mark Gurman however, we now know most of what the company plans to show off at the event. Consistent with reports circulating for weeks now, this year's WWDC event will be a much more subdued affair when it comes to promises for the future. Apple doesn't want the embarrassment of last year's event: when it promised a ton of Apple Intelligence features that either remain absent or half-baked to this day. To that end, the company will not focus as much on AI, opting instead for the tried and tested hype generation that comes after a complete software redesign. While some think that Apple is hurting itself by showing everyone that it's lagging behind in AI, I think that most consumers will be happy to have an event that's not entirely based around AI advancements. Here's everything we now know that Apple will showcase at WWDC 2025. This will be like the jump from iOS 6 to iOS 7 all over again. | Image credit — Nobel Tech Remember iOS 7? That was when Apple completely redesigned its operating system for the iPhone, opting instead for a much sleeker and more modern look. The same thing is happening again, but this time with all of the operating systems under the company's umbrella, even watchOS and tvOS. CarPlay will be getting redesigned too, as the idea is to provide a consistent experience across all Apple new design is based off visionOS, the operating system that powers the Apple Vision Pro MR ( Mixed Reality ) headset. All of Apple's operating systems will get a much glassier look, and light will be used throughout the user interface to make for a visually appealing experience. Pop-out menus will become more common as to many rumors, the app icons on iOS and iPadOS are not going to become round. Widgets will also, naturally, mimic the new look. All of the operating systems are going to follow a new naming convention as well: each of them will now sport the number '26' for the upcoming year. This will continue on to '27', '28', and so on. Safari has remained a staple of the iOS experience. | Image credit — PhoneArena The Phone, Camera, Messages, and Safari apps are going to change as well. For the Phone app, Apple is introducing a new scrollable window which will combine recent calls, favorite contacts, and voicemails. This change is optional, and users can revert to the old look from within the Safari web browser is mostly getting cosmetic changes to reflect the new look across all of Apple's operating systems. This includes a more transparent and glass-like address bar, in addition to other minor tweaks. The camera app will mostly focus on decluttering its interface in order to provide much simpler access to its myriad of the Messages app is getting a modern overhaul to help it compete with alternative messaging apps like Meta's WhatsApp. This includes the ability to create polls and set background images that are synced across devices. Using Preview on a Mac. | Image credit — Apple The Preview app from macOS is finally coming to iOS and iPadOS, so users can view PDFs or make small edits to them. Before this, iPhone and iPad users would have had to use third-party solutions from the App Store. Preview will be pre-installed on iOS and is also going to introduce the Games app, as the company makes a push into the gaming industry. This will also be pre-installed, and will be available on a lot more operating systems and devices. However, Gurman claims that this app is 'underwhelming' and not as good as Apple needs it to be. Apple's premium MR headset remains a niche product. | Image credit — PhoneArena The Apple Vision Pro — which is lending its software design to all of Apple's operating systems this year — won't be missing out on all the fun. Aside from the previously reported eye scrolling feature, the Vision Pro is finally going to support VR games more seriously. There were reports about Apple and Sony teaming up to provide PSVR2 controller support for the Vision Pro . Turns out, Apple's headset is getting a completely new tool that will allow owners to use other third-party VR controllers as well. This should definitely help sell a few more Vision Pro headsets, as gaming remains the biggest reason most people buy a VR headset in the first place. Apple Intelligence features promised for the iPhone 16 last year. | Video credit — Apple Though Apple will not focus much on AI, it wouldn't be a 2025 smartphone event without some mention of improvements in that field. Here are some of the standout Apple Intelligence upgrades that the company plans to announce at WWDC that we've not covered before: Live translation of phone calls and text messages Combining two existing emojis for a brand new Genmoji Shortcuts app will use Apple Intelligence And that's a wrap! There are a few other things that were leaked before, which we've already covered: like the iPadOS improvements and updates to the Apple Pencil. Apple will allegedly refrain from making any promises about features still in development. And while that makes for a 'less exciting' event, it certainly means one that sets much more realistic expectations.
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
This budget carrier now supports Android smartwatches, but only if you use this watch
Receive the latest Android news By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy Comment byu/VisibleCM from discussion inVisible One Reddit user pointed out a possible reason why Pixel Watches were prioritized. Citing a comment from the US Mobile CEO, they noted that "Google actually put in a lot of the legwork themselves to get the Pixel watch working on Verizon MVNOs like US Mobile and Visible." That might explain why Samsung support is still unavailable. It's also worth noting that Google's Pixel devices are often sold unlocked directly from Google, making them more common on MVNOs like Visible. In contrast, Samsung wearables are often sold through the big three carriers. Right now, only Pixel Watch 2 and newer LTE models are supported. It's a limited start, but one that signals Visible is finally expanding its Android offerings beyond phones. For now, Samsung Galaxy Watch users will need to wait, but given the popularity of those devices, it seems likely that broader support is on the way. One Reddit user pointed out a possible reason why Pixel Watches were prioritized. Citing a comment from the US Mobile CEO, they noted that "Google actually put in a lot of the legwork themselves to get the Pixel watch working onMVNOs like US Mobile and Visible." That might explain why Samsung support is still unavailable. It's also worth noting that Google's Pixel devices are often sold unlocked directly from Google, making them more common on MVNOs like Visible. In contrast, Samsung wearables are often sold through the big three now, onlyand newer LTE models are supported. It's a limited start, but one that signals Visible is finally expanding its Android offerings beyond phones. For now, Samsung Galaxy Watch users will need to wait, but given the popularity of those devices, it seems likely that broader support is on the way. Visible, the Verizon -owned budget carrier, has rolled out support for Android smartwatches — but only for a small group of users. If you own a Google Pixel Watch 2 or newer with LTE, you can now connect your wearable to Visible's smartwatch is a welcome update for Android users, who have been waiting for the same level of support Apple Watch users have had on Visible for some time. According to the company, the new feature allows Pixel Watch users to link their devices for an extra $10 per month on the basic Visible and Visible+ plans. If you're on the top-tier Visible+ Pro plan, the smartwatch feature is included at no additional get started, users need to pair their Pixel Watch with their Android phone , then open the Pixel Watch app. From there, go to Watch Settings > Mobile Network. When prompted, sign in to your Visible account and follow the on-screen instructions to complete setup. At this time, Visible is not selling any compatible smartwatches directly, so users must bring their own the update is a step forward, some users were quick to notice what's missing. There's currently no support for Samsung Galaxy smartwatches, which are among the most widely used Wear OS devices. Many in the community hope Galaxy Watch support will be added soon.
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Motorola Razr (2025) vs Razr Ultra (2025): one is a pretty cover, the other is the whole package
But here's the real question: if you're looking at Motorola's foldable lineup, is the Ultra worth the Ultra price tagover the standard Razr? Or is the regular Razr good enough? Let's dive in — spec sheets are fine, but how these phones feel, look, and perform in the hand matters more. $200 off (13%) The Motorola Razr Ultra is here, and the official store has a splendid deal to help you celebrate it! For a limited time, you can buy the 1TB variant at the price of the 512GB model, which saves you $200. Select colors are available right now. Buy at Motorola The Motorola Razr+ (2025) has finally been announced. You can buy the high-end flip phone with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip at the Motorola Store. You can trade in an eligible device to score some savings. Buy at Motorola Don't want to pay top dollar for your next flip phone? Consider the Motorola Razr (2025), now available for purchase. The handset features a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chip and sports AI features. Buy at Motorola Motorola Razr 2025 vs Razr Ultra 2025 differences explained: Table of Contents: Design and Display Performance and Software Camera Battery Audio Specs Conclusion Both Razrs follow the same DNA and come in as elegant lifestyle accessories first. This is due to Motorola always picking fresh colors in partnership with color expert Pantone. But it's not just the hues — Razr and Edge phones come with different stylish finishes on the back, not just the boring old glass. First, Motorola started dressing its phones in vegan leather. Now, the Ultra models also get wood or velvet covers, which is pretty neat! But even if you go for the base Razr 2025, you will still get a faux leather-covered shell, or stylish latex wrapping. Depending on which color you choose, it'll have different patterns over it. The Razr (2025) comes in: Pantone Gibraltar Sea (dark blue) Pantone Spring Bud (green) Pantone Lightest Sky (cream) Pantone Parfait Pink (pink) The Razr Ultra is available in the following colors: Pantone Scarab (black, with a leather/velvet back) Pantone Rio Red Pantone Mountain Trail (wooden back) Pantone Cabaret Both phones feel pretty nice to handle and open / close. Motorola has been working on that hinge for a while now and it incorporates titanium elements that will hopefully make it last longer. It certainly feels sturdy and both phones open and close with pleasing snaps, and are able to hold the screen open at multiple angles. You'd expect some trade-offs between models, but this these are quite close. The Razr Ultra has a 7.0-inch internal display with 165 Hz refresh rate, while the regular Razr "settles" for a 6.9-inch panel at 120 Hz. OLED panels, of course, with a few different color profiles to pick from — from natural and grounded, to punchy, vibrant and saturated. Brightness? The Ultra edges ahead slightly with 2,400-ish nits at 20% APL vs the Razr's ~2,100. A 20% APL test measures a more "realistic" scenario for smartphone usage and those numbers here mean that these look excellent outdoors. Too bright to be outshone! But, if peak brightness is what interests you — the Razr 2025 specs say 3,000 nits peak, the Razr Ultra 2025 goes up to 4,500! (Peak brightness only measures a small portion of the screen for limited time) A minimum of 2 nits is not an excellent bedside reader, and 2.4 is slightly worse. These won't be poking your eyes out per se, but you will probably avoid using them when the lights are off. Then there's the cover screen. The Ultra's 4-inch external display is a whole productivity panel compared to the 3.6-inch one on the regular Razr. It looks better, too, with the entire upper shell of the Ultra housing a screen, instead of having a thick-ish bezel. Still, both are usable in the typical Motorola style — there are useful widgets to be found here, but you can launch full apps if you so desire. Android will re-scale them to fit (most of the time). The fingerprint scanners on both phones are located in the power button — they work lightning fast on both, even if it's not the most optimal positioning. Here's where things get spicy. The Razr Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Elite, backed by a hefty 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB storage out of the box. The regular Razr? Well, it cuts some corners and ends up with the far less powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, 8 GB RAM, and 256 GB storage. Daily use? Both are OK, though if you engage with the AI more often, the Snapdragon definitely feels faster — of course. Once you start gaming, video editing, or multitasking like a maniac, the Ultra's extra horsepower becomes very real. The Motorola Razr 2025 is only here as your daily communicator, not the pocket computer experience. And yeah, if you ever doubted it, the CPU benchmarks show that the Razr Ultra is up to 3 times faster — barely any surprise there. While the regular Razr's score looks quite bad in comparison, we do emphasize that it runs daily tasks just fine. In the graphics department, the Ultra is three to five times better — depending on whether it's throttling or not. Considering it's a clamshell smartphone, we do find its thermals to be doing a pretty decent job at keeping it productive! Motorola gave both Razrs a 50 MP main camera, but the Ultra doubles down with a 50 MP ultrawide, while the regular Razr gets… a 13 MP secondary sensor. It's also worth noting that these 50 MP main cameras are not the same — the Ultra's sensor is bigger than the one in the vanilla Razr, and you will spot that in the samples below. On the front, the Razr Ultra triples down with yet another 50 MP camera, while the Razr (2025) has the still respectable 32 MP resolution for selfies. All that's left is to see how they do! As can be seen from our camera score, that main camera makes quite the difference. Despite both being 50 MP, the base Razr fell short with more oversharpening and artifacts. Both ultra-wide cameras scored about the same, despite their vast differences in hardware. And both phones don't do well with zooming, though with different issues. Let's look at the samples: Both cameras deal well with wide dynamics, but the Ultra does allow itself to amp up highlights just a bit more. Color reproduction from both is pretty down to earth and pleasant, with just a tinge of saturation to make that photo shareable on social media. However, when it comes to detail, the Ultra definitely takes it — fine details are visible, but soft and natural. Whereas the 50 MP snapper of the Razr (2025) presents a lot of oversharpening, even in the perfect lit conditions. These phones don't have dedicated zoom cameras, so any magnification they give you is a digital crop-in. The Razr Ultra tops out at 30x, but you won't be using it — it's pretty degraded at that point. The Razr (2025) maxes out at 10x, and it's very fuzzy there, too. At 2x (the samples above), they are both quite usable. Though, the base Razr's tendency to oversharpen is amplified, while the Ultra photo still looks good. Here's a comparison at 10x: As mentioned at the start of the camera section, their zooms are bad for different reasons. The base Razr has a lot of noise. The Razr Ultra photo looks "cleaner" at first glance because it applies a ton of noise reduction. As a result, the image becomes washed-out, painting-like. We won't be knocking these a lot — they are not zoom camera phones and not marketed as such. The ultra-wide camera of the Ultra presents a bit more neon-y colors in the skies but definitely has a much better dynamic range and slightly better details. The ultra-wide of the Razr (2025) has more natural colors, but is darker, crushes shadows, and it shows a lot more HDR bloom than the one on the Razr Ultra does. The selfie camera of the Razr (2025) is a bit too warm, a bit too red, and a bit too soft. Not bad in general, but when compared side-by-side, the Razr Ultra selfie looks more realistic and sharper. The video quality of the Razr Ultra is hands-down just better. Colors are more realistic, details are slightly sharper, the stabilization is more... stable, and the microphone does a better job at noise reduction. The Razr (2025) video, in comparison, looks murky, the grass is a bit too saturated, the sky is a weird dark hue, and its microphone is noisier. It's still usable, but loses in this side-by-side. The Motorola Razr Ultra has a slightly bigger body, which allows it to fit a slightly bigger battery — 4,700 mAh. That's not a huge difference from the 4,500 mAh cell of the base Razr (2025), however there's another factor to consider — the processors. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is built on a 3 nm process, which is more energy-efficient than the 4 nm process of the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. But then again, the Dimensity should require less power, since it's not as big of a monster. So, we went into our tests with curiosity: With a massive 24 hour endurance in our browsing test, the Razr Ultra shows that it can comfortably be a 2-day phone with casual use. Curiously, it fell behind in the video streaming test, where it should've scored another easy win. But then, at the gaming test, it lasted 3 hours longer than the base Razr, showing that even though that Snapdragon is a fire breather, the Ultra still makes good use of the energy it has on hand. The Razr Ultra is also a bit faster to charge — 30 minutes on a 68 W charger got us up to 80%! The Razr (2025) supports 30 W charging and only got up to 60% in the same time frame. Still respectable and can get you out of a pickle if you forgot to charge. The speakers of the Razr (2025) noticeably lack depth and bass, and they have a pronounced mid hump. So, videos with speech will come through, but you won't enjoy the soundtracks. Its vibration is not a click, but a tight buzz — still pretty satisfying, just noticebly different from flagships. The Ultra, on the other hand, has surprisingly boomy speakers which put a smile on our face. Not to the level of an iPhone Pro Max or Galaxy Ultra, but definitely more usable. The haptic motor here is a click — quick, pronounced, and satisfying. But if you want the best flip phone Motorola has ever made — no compromises, no 'if onlys' — the Razr Ultra (2025) is worth the splurge. Bigger, faster, sharper, bolder. You get what you pay for — and in this case, what you pay for a pretty good camera, better speakers, a prettier external display, more premium finishes, and very fast performance.
