logo
Somebody that I used to know: On the weird grief of colleague departures

Somebody that I used to know: On the weird grief of colleague departures

CNAa day ago

This question has become part of my awkward welcome ritual for new hires: 'So ... are you a coffee person?'
Day one usually begins at the cafe downstairs with a quick hello, a commemorative libation (coffee or otherwise), then a climb up the stairs to commence our journey as co-workers.
Over the past decade of running my company, I've continued to personally onboard new workers. It's not that I can't trust someone else to do it. I just really enjoy it.
I like showing them our 'designated crying area' (our pantry space) and explaining the curious phenomenon of the office bidet geyser.
I like going through our culture deck, throwing in a few jokes to break the ice and seeing them decide how heartily they should laugh.
It's orientation, yes, but also something more – a quiet hope that if you make them feel welcome and you remember their coffee order, they might stay a little longer.
Then they leave. Sometimes after three years, sometimes three months. Sometimes on a good note, sometimes a strained one.
And in that abrupt silence that follows, between offboarding checklists and looking at handover documents, I find myself wondering if any of these efforts were worth it.
WON'T YOU STAY WITH ME?
About a decade ago, the first person that I hired when I started the company decided to make a jump to a much bigger, more prestigious agency.
It was a competitor but it paid her better and had a much more conducive structure for her career development. It made sense for her.
We parted on good terms, but it was hard to maintain the same friendship once we no longer shared the day-to-day routines.
Even seeing her career milestones pop up on social media triggered a small wave of disappointment – not at her, but at myself. It was insecurity and a bit of resentment all wrapped up in a forced double-tap of the 'like' button.
We didn't speak for a long time. Only after a good five years had passed could we both approach the situation with some perspective and humour. Thankfully, we're now friendly again.
This isn't a story about attrition rates or talent migration. It's about the emotional tax of investing in people who eventually walk away.
No one tells you, when you first become a manager, that the job requires a strange kind of short-term memory.
You pour time into someone, build a rhythm, start speaking in shared references and inside jokes – and then, poof, they're gone. Off to bigger things and better pay.
The relationship seems to end abruptly there, apart from the occasional LinkedIn sightings.
I know that's just the way the cookie crumbles. The workplace today is a revolving door of industry pivots, mental health breaks and career realignments.
Everyone's chasing something – balance, purpose, remuneration, title and so on – and it's unlikely that staying in one place can offer everything.
Still, why do I feel a small sting every time someone leaves?
SOMEBODY THAT I USED TO KNOW
I'll be honest. I still find it difficult not to take departures from the company personally.
Not in a dramatic, weeping-in-the-toilet way, but in those smaller moments.
When a photo of a past team outing pops up on social media, in a photo album or the memories in your head. Or when you retrieve an old presentation deck and you see the names tagged in the slides.
Certainly not because they're wrong to go but maybe it's because, for a brief window of time, I had imagined a future where we'd keep building something together.
This emotional dilemma isn't exclusive to managers and supervisors.
The departure I've taken the hardest happened when I was still a junior executive, in the infancy of my career.
At the time, I was part of a desk cluster with a senior who wasn't my direct boss, but who had become a de facto mentor.
Christopher was soft-spoken, serious and a little stoic, but he always humoured my terrible puns. We'd often sneak off for 'planning sessions' at the canteen that had very little to do with planning. We talked about movies, music, family – the kind of conversations that anchor you during chaotic work days.
One afternoon, Christopher told me that the following week would be his last with the company. He'd found a better opportunity elsewhere.
In the 2002 Hong Kong movie Infernal Affairs, there's a pivotal scene where Tony Leung, playing an undercover police officer, watches the only person who knows his true identity get killed. The camera lingers on his expression of shock and horror and this remains one of the strongest gut punches in cinematic history.
On that day when Christopher told me the news, my expression would've made Tony's look mild at best.
'Oh. Congrats, Chris!' I managed to say. 'Happy for you.'
Two weeks later at his cleaned-out desk, I shook his hand and said all the right things: 'Let's keep in touch. Don't be a stranger.'
What I couldn't shake was the strange sense of grief and futility. What would be the point of keeping in touch if we no longer worked together?
FRIENDS ARE FRIENDS … FOREVER?
What is 'workplace culture'?
We like to talk about it in terms of values and vision statements, but most of it comes down to the people.
It is who you sit next to, the person who replies with a meme instead of a boring thumbs-up, the one who makes the 5pm slump bearable.
So when they leave, it isn't just another email from the human resource department. It's a permanent glitch in your work day.
Conventional business wisdom dictates that investing in people is never a waste, even when they might come and go – because people are the most valuable assets of any company.
I've echoed those things. I even genuinely believe them.
But there's another truth, too: that what isn't a waste can still sometimes feel like one regardless.
It's only human of us to feel something, especially after we've poured hours into someone – coaching, giving feedback, having conversations over coffee and bubble tea – only to have them resign right when they finally started getting it.
Maybe it is not quite bitterness but certainly, there is a sense of jadedness. The kind that makes you want to pull back with the next person, just a little.
Don't get too attached. Don't ask about their weekend or their interests. Don't joke too much.
Here's the catch: If you stop investing in your people earnestly and genuinely, you will slowly become the kind of manager you swore you'd never be. Transactional. Coldly efficient. Checked out.
And ironically, that's exactly the kind of environment people want to leave.
So I will keep trying, even when the farewell Slack message reads like a LinkedIn boilerplate.
I will keep hoping that somewhere along the way, the time we spent together meant something. That, in between rushed deadlines and Monday check-ins, we managed to become more than just colleagues ticking boxes on a task list.
Maybe that's the point – to make the workplace not just somewhere people pass through, but somewhere they felt seen, where they felt real connection, even if briefly.
I love how Andy Bernard movingly puts it in the series finale of American sitcom The Office: "I wish there was a way to know you're in the good old days before you've actually left them."
The real treasure, as they say, might just be the friends we made along the way.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

McLaughlin-Levrone impresses in 100m debut in Philadelphia
McLaughlin-Levrone impresses in 100m debut in Philadelphia

CNA

time26 minutes ago

  • CNA

McLaughlin-Levrone impresses in 100m debut in Philadelphia

Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone ventured beyond her usual 400 metres event, clocking an impressive 11.21 seconds to take second place in her first professional 100 metres flat race at the Grand Slam Track meet in Philadelphia on Sunday. The American four-time Olympic champion and world record holder in the 400 metres hurdles, accustomed to dominating the one-lap event, found herself beaten by Jamaica's Ackera Nugent, who won in 11.11 seconds. Nugent's victory completed a weekend double, securing the women's short hurdles group with a perfect 24 points following her success in Saturday's 100 metres hurdles. American Melissa Jefferson-Wooden scorched the track with a blistering time of 10.73 seconds in the 100 metres, cementing her victory in the short sprints group with 24 points after her 200 metres triumph on Saturday. Meanwhile, Dominican Republic's Marileidy Paulino dominated the women's long sprints group with 24 points, having won the 200 metres in 22.46 seconds. Britain's Lina Nielsen also shone, capturing the 400 metres hurdles in 52.60 seconds, while Etiopia Diribe Welteji secured victory in the 800 metres in 1:58.94. In the men's events, American Kenny Bednarek shaved one-hundredth of a second off his personal best in the 100 metres, finishing in 9.86 seconds and took the short sprints group getting 24 points. Meanwhile, Olympic silver medallist Josh Kerr from Britain beat gold medallist Cole Hocker by just seven-hundredths of a second in a thrilling 1500 metres race, finishing in 3:34.44. American Trevor Bassitt provided late drama in the 400 metres hurdles, outduelling Alison dos Santos and Chris Robinson to win in 45.47 seconds. He also won the men's long hurdles group with 20 points. There were also wins for Americans Trey Cunningham in the short hurdles group 100 metres with a time of 10.36 seconds and Nico Young in the men's 3000 metres in his first Grand Slam Track appearance, while Dominican Alexander Ogando took the men's 200 metres with a time of 20.13 seconds. The Grand Slam Track season will conclude with its fourth meeting in Los Angeles on June 27-29.

FBI investigating 'targeted terror attack' in Boulder, Colorado, director says
FBI investigating 'targeted terror attack' in Boulder, Colorado, director says

CNA

time3 hours ago

  • CNA

FBI investigating 'targeted terror attack' in Boulder, Colorado, director says

WASHINGTON: Police said a male suspect was taken into custody on Sunday (Jun 1) after an attack that injured multiple people in Boulder, Colorado, in what the FBI director described as a "targeted" act of terror. While stressing that the information was "very preliminary", Boulder Police Chief Stephen Redfearn said that the man was apprehended following calls to the police dispatch of someone with a weapon who was "setting people on fire". Redfearn said he was not in a position to identify the suspect yet, whom he noted had been taken to the hospital. He said there were multiple injuries among the victims, ranging 'from very serious to more minor". The Boulder attack occurred in the vicinity of a walk to remember the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza. FBI Director Kash Patel, in a statement, described the incident as a targeted terror attack and said agents were on the scene. Redfearn, however, said it was too early to speculate about a motive. "We are not calling it a terror attack at this moment," he said. 'This was a beautiful Sunday afternoon in downtown Boulder on Pearl Street and this act was unacceptable," he said. "I ask that you join me in thinking about the victims, the families of those victims, and everyone involved in this tragedy." The incident comes amid heightened tensions in the United States over Israel's war in Gaza, which has spurred both an increase in antisemitic hate crime as well as moves by conservative supporters of Israel led by President Donald Trump to branded pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic. His administration has detained protesters without charge and cut off funding to elite US universities that have permitted the demonstrations. It also follows the arrest of a Chicago-born man in the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy employees in Washington, D.C. Someone opened fire on a group of people leaving an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee, an advocacy group that fights antisemitism and supports Israel.

Spalletti confident in Italy's quest for World Cup return
Spalletti confident in Italy's quest for World Cup return

CNA

time5 hours ago

  • CNA

Spalletti confident in Italy's quest for World Cup return

Italy manager Luciano Spalletti is framing Friday's clash at Norway as a decisive moment in their 2026 World Cup qualification and says his side are fully equipped to deliver. Spalletti's side begin their qualifying campaign in Group I in Oslo against hosts off to a flying start with six points from two matches and nine goals scored. Four-time World Cup champions Italy have failed to reach the World Cup finals since 2014, and are only now beginning their qualifiers after competing in the Nations League quarter-finals in March, where they lost to Germany. "Let's be clear: in Norway, everything is on the line when it comes to whether or not we'll qualify for the World Cup," Spalletti told reporters. "We have a duty to fulfil this task that's been entrusted to us. We need to qualify because it's absolutely crucial for us. "As for us, we have everything we need to play our game. We have all the potential for a great match, and that's exactly what we intend to put into practice." Norway coach Stale Solbakken was also optimistic. "I'm not sure they're the favourites. For me, it's more of a 50–50 match on our home ground," he told reporters. "The most important thing for us is that we are ourselves." The 2026 World Cup will take place in Canada, Mexico, and the United States from 11 June to 19 July next year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store