logo
Judge Backs Unions, Issues Temporary Restraining Order in Ed Dept. Privacy Suit

Judge Backs Unions, Issues Temporary Restraining Order in Ed Dept. Privacy Suit

Yahoo24-02-2025

As debates about education issues and policy intensify across the nation, teachers unions are participating in rallies, lawsuits and legislative sessions to make their voices heard. Bills proposed in multiple states focus on unions, their work and funding, and unions are organizing to protest developments in education on the federal level. Here's a roundup of recent activities across the country as 2025 unfolds:
On Thursday, a federal district court judge in Maryland granted a temporary restraining order barring the Department of Education and the Office of Personnel Management from disclosing personally identifiable information to Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
The American Federation of Teachers, the nation's second-largest teachers union, filed a federal lawsuit with a coalition of labor unions Feb. 12 alleging that the department illegally gave DOGE access to millions of private and sensitive records.
The court ruled that the AFT would likely succeed in its lawsuit and agreed that the two agencies 'likely violated the Privacy Act by disclosing their personal information to DOGE affiliates without their consent.' The restraining order will expire March 10.
'This is a significant decision that puts a firewall between actors whom we believe lack the legitimacy and authority to access Americans' personal data and are using it inappropriately, without any safeguards,' union President Randi Weingarten said in a press release.
Related
In other action, the union announced on Feb. 19 that March 4 will be a 'Day of Action' as part of a recently launched campaign called Protect Our Kids.
The National Education Association, the nation's largest teachers union, organized a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 12 to protest the nomination of Linda McMahon as secretary of education.
In response to administration efforts to downsize federal agencies, the American Federation of Government Employees filed a lawsuit to stop a resignation program that prompted thousands of workers to leave their jobs. The nation's largest federal employee union — which represents U.S. Department of Education staff — argued that the program was unlawful, according to The New York Times.
Members of unions in 32 California school districts have banded together to negotiate a shared set of contract demands: improved wages and benefits, smaller class sizes, fully staffed schools and more resources for students.
Related
The locals united as part of the California Teachers Association's 'We Can't Wait' campaign, which launched Feb. 4. The districts employ a total of 77,000 educators and teach 1 million students, and include some of the largest in the state: Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland and Sacramento.
Many of the unions' contracts are set to expire this summer. California Teachers Association President David Goldberg said in a Feb. 4 webinar that the campaign is intended to build pressure statewide, according to EdSource.
At one charter school in the San Fernando Valley, teachers staged a four-day strike after working without a contract since July 1. Educators at El Camino Real Charter High School, who are represented by United Teachers Los Angeles, walked out from Feb. 10 to 14 before reaching an agreement that includes a 19% salary increase over three years, the Los Angeles Daily News reported.
Related
The nation's first charter school strike occurred in 2018, a four-day work stoppage at Acero, one of Chicago's largest charter school networks. The vast majority of charter schools are not unionized.
A bill that would ban taxpayer funds from going toward teachers union operations advanced out of committee to the full House on Feb. 12. The bill's sponsor, state Rep. Judy Boyle, said the measure is intended to cut down on what she called 'under-the-table' dealings between school districts and unions, according to the Bonner County Daily Bee.
HB98 would apply only to teachers unions, not to other public-sector unions that represent occupations like first responders, according to the Idaho Education Association. It would require teachers to use personal leave to do union work, eliminate payroll deductions for dues and ban distribution of union materials on school property. Violators could be fined up to $2,500.
'This wasn't the outcome we wanted, but we're not done fighting this bad bill yet,' Chris Parri, the union's political director, said in a statement. 'We'll need all hands on deck to kill it for good in the [state] Senate when the time comes.'
The Chicago Teachers Union rejected a recommendation Feb. 4 from a neutral arbitrator that negotiators return to the bargaining table and reach agreement with Chicago Public Schools on a new contract that includes higher pay for veteran teachers and more librarians. In a letter to the district, the union wrote that the mediator 'rightly notes that [Chicago Public Schools] consistently signs … labor contracts despite claiming it lacks the funds to afford them.'
Once the recommendation is rejected, the union has to wait 30 days before it can give the district a 10-day strike notice. The Chicago Teachers Union went on strike during contract negotiations for seven days in 2012, one day in 2016 and 11 days in 2019.
Lawmakers questioned the state's largest teachers union at a special hearing Feb. 10 over learning materials that some members believe were antisemitic.
The Massachusetts Teachers Association, which represents more than 117,000 educators, was criticized by legislators for materials made available to teachers about the Israel-Hamas conflict. President Max Page said in a statement that the documents were created by request from the union's board and published in a members-only area of the union website.
Examples included a poster on the Israel-Hamas war reading, 'what was taken by force can only be returned by force' and a book about a Palestinian girl who says, 'a group of bullies called Zionists wanted our land so they stole it by force and hurt many people,' according to Boston.com.
'The notion that our union is trying to 'indoctrinate' our young people is simply not true, and accusations to that effect have led to death threats to me and my staff, and to other attacks on our union,' Page said. 'Posting resources does not imply agreement with each and every document. Nor would we ever expect that our members would look at these resources with an uncritical eye.'
An online petition by the Israeli-American Civic Action Network that asks lawmakers and state agencies to halt collaboration with the union on legislation has received more than 17,000 signatures.
One of the first bills Gov. Spencer Cox signed into law this year bars teachers unions from bargaining collectively and conducting operations on school property.
The governor signed HB267 on Feb. 14, marking the end of a weeks-long debate about how public-sector unions should operate. Lawmakers who favored the bill said it will ensure transparency in unions and protect taxpayer resources, but educators said it will only make a job that's already full of challenges more difficult.
Related
While it doesn't prevent employees from joining a union, the law prohibits public agencies — which employ teachers, firefighters, police officers and county workers, among others — from 'recognizing a labor organization as a bargaining agent' and 'entering into collective bargaining contracts.'
The Utah Education Association said HB267 will also weaken advocacy because it cuts off access to schools by barring unions from using public property for free. Some opponents of the bill charged it was created to retaliate against the Utah Education Association, which is challenging the constitutionality of Utah's school voucher program in court. The association is the state's largest teachers union, with 18,000 members.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk
NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk

Washington Post

time26 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk

Federal officials at NASA and the Pentagon moved swiftly this week to urge competitors to Elon Musk's SpaceX to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft after President Donald Trump threatened to cancel Space X's contracts and Musk's defiant response. Government officials were especially stunned after Musk responded to Trump with a salvo of his own: SpaceX would stop flying its Dragon spacecraft, a move that would leave the space agency with no way to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station.

Opinion: Where are the compassionate and moderating voices on Trump's travel ban?
Opinion: Where are the compassionate and moderating voices on Trump's travel ban?

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: Where are the compassionate and moderating voices on Trump's travel ban?

Before he secured the Republican nomination for president in 2016, Donald Trump announced that he would seek 'a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.' Reaction, including from human rights organizations and fellow Republicans, was swift, and, for the most part, was characterized by astonishment, outrage and condemnation. Marco Rubio posted online, 'I disagree with Donald Trump's latest proposal. His habit of making offensive and outlandish statements will not bring Americans together.' At that time, Trump was an unknown entity in politics, and many believed he would never actually seek to implement the outrageous things he said. Unfortunately, one of Trump's first actions as a newly inaugurated president in January 2017 was to sign an executive order banning nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S. This was immediately met with lawsuits and protests. The order was amended two different times in response to court challenges; eventually, a scaled-back version was upheld by the Supreme Court. To their credit, many leaders and members of the president's party were dismayed by this ban at the time. They saw it for what it was — a threat to the religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution. They could see it as a clear attack on the pluralism that has long guaranteed that our nation — a nation of immigrants — remains a haven for people seeking to practice their religion according to their conscience while also contributing to society. When candidate Trump first voiced his pledge to prevent Muslims from entering the U.S. in 2015, Utah Governor Herbert spoke out strongly against this idea: 'I am the governor of a state that was settled by religious exiles who withstood persecution after persecution, including an extermination order from another state's governor. In Utah, the First Amendment still matters. That will not change so long as I remain governor.' We remember both the early rhetoric of candidate Trump and the later actions of President Trump well. It was shocking and disorienting to watch his efforts to discriminate against others. It was disheartening to watch a political party descend into unchristian and uncharitable legalese, all with the aim to exclude others based solely on their faith or nationality. Mormon Women for Ethical Government was born in response to these efforts. At the outset, MWEG's founders envisioned a small group of women working together through peaceful, faithful, nonpartisan and proactive ways to counteract the unbelievable turn the government was making. But these women were not alone in their desire to take action. They were quickly joined by thousands of other women of faith who were ready to work for a more peaceful, just and ethical world. Over time, MWEG has become a strong voice in advocating for compassionate and moderating forces in government. The organization continues to attract women who want to proactively and peacefully support systems rooted in constitutional principles and the rule of law. We now have women in all 50 states engaging in the political arena as informed and principled citizens. Though much has changed since the formation of MWEG eight years ago, immigration remains a central and divisive issue. Immigrants, including refugees and asylum seekers, have been victims of dehumanizing language and unfair stereotyping. The current administration has invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport people without due process. It has detained students without cause, deported a man by mistake and refused a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return, attempted to end birthright citizenship, revoked student visas, ended temporary protected status for many, and suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP). This week, President Trump signed another proclamation that bans citizens from 12 countries from entering the U.S. In comparison to eight years ago, the large-scale response has been muted or even resigned. As the world has changed and political rhetoric has become ever more extreme, have we changed with it? Do things that were once the source of personal outrage and deep concern still concern us? Has our once-strong commitment to love our neighbor as ourself weakened? And, if we cannot love them, are we at least as committed to maintaining their claim to Constitutional protections as we were eight years ago? As an organization, MWEG is committed to amplifying the best aspects of our Christian faith. That faith is rooted in a gospel of generosity. We are also committed to preserving the Constitution that, among other things, protects our ability, as members of a minority faith, to participate freely in civic life, to express our views and to practice our religion without fear of repercussions. Actions like this ban seem directed at a particular group, but they actually undermine the constitutional rights that protect all of us from government overreach. As citizens of a free nation, we can and should speak out when we see those rights being violated. In 2017, the threat was widely recognized by leaders and citizens from both parties. It is worth contemplating why this is no longer the case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store