Republican lawmakers look for ways to weaken state judges
TOPEKA, Kansas (AP) — Measures in several state legislatures this year have called for new approaches to weaken the power of judges.
One would abandon a centuries-old precedent that courts can decide whether laws are constitutional. Another would change how judges are selected.
Tension between the courts and other branches of government is not new. But it's growing. The latest wave comes as President Donald Trump faces scores of lawsuits challenging his policies. His administration says the issue isn't what he's trying to do but rather that judges acting as 'judicial activists' are in some cases are standing in his way.
William Raftery, an analyst at the National Center for State Courts, said the battle between branches of state government for power dates to the earliest years of the U.S. and that lawmakers often make proposals aimed at weakening judges. Most of them aren't adopted.
He said it won't be clear whether the efforts are getting more traction until most states' legislative sessions wrap up in a few months.
Here's a look at the measures:
Who can decide what's constitutional?
In 1803 the U.S. Supreme Court established a precedent in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison that courts can find laws unconstitutional.
A Montana legislative committee has voted to reject that concept. It advanced a measure that says the idea that courts alone have the power to decide what laws are constitutional is 'a myth' and does not accurately reflect the 1803 ruling.
Instead, the GOP-sponsored bill asserts that 'no single branch has exclusive power to bind its decisions on another branch of government.'
A vote in the full House is the next step. The same measure passed the Senate but failed in the House two years ago.
The push comes after Montana court rulings that Republican lawmakers didn't like. A district judge last year blocked enforcement of three laws to restrict abortion access and the state Supreme Court kept a law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors on hold.
Rep. Lee Deming, the sponsor of the resolution, said he's not responding to any particular rulings.
An analysis of legislation by the bill-tracking service Plural shows Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia have similar legislation this year.
Kansas considers changing how Supreme Court is selected
In Kansas, GOP leaders have long been frustrated with state Supreme Court rulings that forced them to spend more on public schools, overturned death sentences and protected abortion rights. They're renewing a push to change how justices are selected.
The governor now chooses a justice from three nominees put forth by a commission controlled by lawyers. Voters get a say every six years on whether the justice can continue serving.
Senate President Ty Masterson said he and others want to cut the influence of lawyers and have voters choose justices, as they did in Kansas before 1960, and as 22 other states do.
If lawmakers approve the idea, it would go before voters.
Fred Logan, a lawyer and former Kansas Republican Party chair, said during a legislative hearing Tuesday that shifting to elections will make raising money for a campaign the key skill for potential justices, instead of their legal knowledge and experience.
Who can decide if a regulation is legal?
An Oklahoma bill would tell judges not to defer to government agencies' interpretation of laws if the statutes themselves are not crystal clear.
That effort would tell judges how to do their jobs while at the same time taking power away from the executive branch.
The concept echoes a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that supporters, including conservatives and business groups, said will stem overreach by agencies.
At least 20 states have adopted a similar stance through court rulings, laws and a constitutional amendment in Florida, according to an analysis by Ballotpedia.
A committee has advanced the Oklahoma bill to the full Senate.
A Missouri lawmaker introduced a bill to oust a judge but pulled back
A Missouri legislative leader proposed a bill designed to oust a circuit court judge whose rulings he didn't like, but has since decided against the move.
House Speaker Pro Tem Chad Perkins, a Republican, said his bill to reduce the number of judges in a mid-Missouri circuit from four to three was aimed at pushing Judge Cotton Walker off the bench.
Some of Walker's rulings have paved the way for a marijuana legalization ballot question to go before voters and another that forced a rewrite of the state's description of an abortion rights ballot measure.
Perkins told The Associated Press this week that the legislation is on hold because the circuit has so many cases on its docket that it doesn't make sense to cut a judgeship.
'With that being said, I will reiterate I'm not happy with Judge Walker's rulings,' Perkins said, 'but that's a matter for the voters of Cole County to take care of.'
Walker would be on the ballot next year if he seeks reelection.
___

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers
Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla (TSLA) CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step down. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward When Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. "I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle," Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. "That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target." Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are "business not personal," however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsAnalyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price targetElon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment "The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero," he says of Tesla. "The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising "jam tomorrow" which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised." Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders. Related: Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 "Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling," states Stanzione. "I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town." He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating "Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets." That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to "treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal" and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable stock. Related: Billionaire fund manager, skeptical of AI, backs shocking stock The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian affirms independence after Trump says he fired head of Portrait Gallery
The Smithsonian tried to affirm its autonomy from outside influences in a statement on Monday after President Donald Trump announced that he fired National Portrait Gallery head Kim Sajet for being a "highly partisan person." The institution, which is the world's largest museum, education and research complex, sent the statement after a Monday Board of Regents meeting with Vice President JD Vance and Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, according to a document the Smithsonian sent ABC News on Monday. Board of Regent meetings are held at least four times a year. Vance and Roberts are both ex officio members, meaning they act in advisory roles. "All personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the Secretary, with oversight by the Board," the Smithsonian said in its statement. "Lonnie G. Bunch, the Secretary, has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." MORE: Trump signs executive order targeting monuments at parks, museums, zoo The panel is also comprised of senators appointed by the president, including Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI); Representatives selected by the Speaker of the House, including Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA), Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE) and Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL); and nine Citizen Regents, according to a document the Smithsonian sent ABC News on Monday. The Smithsonian's statement comes after Trump's May 30 announcement on social media that he fired Sajet, the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery director. He described Sajet as "a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position." Sajet rejected artist Julian Raven's 2016 Trump painting for submission in the National Portrait Gallery, according to a statement from a Smithsonian spokesperson on Tuesday. She is still reporting to work at the Portrait Gallery, the spokesperson noted. "While the vast majority of our content is rooted in meticulous research and thoughtful analysis of history and facts, we recognize that, on occasion, some of our work has not aligned with our institutional values of scholarship, even-handedness and nonpartisanship. For that, we must all work to do better," Bunch, the board secretary, said in a message to Smithsonian staff on Monday after the board meeting. "Our institution must be a place where people feel inspired and challenged, but most importantly feel welcome. ... As always, we thank the President and Congress for their steady commitment to the Smithsonian and to preserving it for our visitors and our country." The museum also appeared to address the Trump administration's concerns about biased content and staff at the institution in its statement on Monday. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes," the Smithsonian said in its statement Monday. The museum did not respond to ABC News' questions regarding deadlines for museum directors to make changes and report back to the board, and the vice president's office did not immediately reply to a request for a statement. MORE: Concerns at national parks ahead of spring break Trump signed an executive order last month placing Vance in charge of supervising efforts to "remove improper ideology" from all areas of the Smithsonian and targeted funding for programs that advance "divisive narratives" and "improper ideology," according to the Associated Press. The president also fired members of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts' board of trustees and installed himself as chairman of the institution in February. ABC News' Kyra Phillips, April Williams, Molly Nagle and Lalee Ibssa contributed to this story.


USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests
'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests Show Caption Hide Caption Demonstrations critical of ICE near Twentynine Palms Marine base The protesters gathered along Highway 64 along the route between the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms and Los Angeles. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is not holding back as top Republican officials criticize his handling of the increasingly hostile protests over President Donald Trump's immigration policies. In addition to his ongoing feud with Trump, who suggested the Democrat be arrested, Newsom has responded to sweeping criticism by Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas and other GOP officials. The tension between the Golden State and federal regulators comes after the Trump Administration deployed National Guard troops to crack down on violent protests against immigration raids in LA. Around 700 U.S. Marines and 2,000 National Guardsmen have been ordered to mobilize protestors in the area after the president already authorized the deployment of 2,000 guardsmen. The San Francisco native criticized the president's comment Monday, June 9 that "it would be a great thing" for border czar Tom Homan to arrest him. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America," he wrote on X. "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Newsom for most of the day fired back with all tools in his arsenal, including 800 additional police officers, a lawsuit and invectives warning Trump is acting like a 'dictator.' 'Los Angeles: don't take Trump's bait. Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' Newsom said in a post on X. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' White House Communications director Stephen Cheung took to social media to accuse Newsom of being "the biggest cuck in American politics," a centuries-old insult that the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines in a few different ways, none of them flattering. Cheung accused Newsom of allowing "domestic terrorists to desecrate and defile communities across CA." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the Marines are being sent "due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty... are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order." "We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers - even if Gavin Newsom will not," Hegseth said. The post was viewed more than 3 million times within four hours. Trump and Newsom have often clashed but the showdown over Los Angeles marks a new low in their heated relationship. In a lawsuit, Newsom says the Trump administration is violating California's sovereignty. 'One of the cornerstones of our Nation and our democracy is that our people are governed by civil, not military, rule,' the lawsuit says. Trump 'used a protest that local authorities had under control to make another unprecedented power grab." Newsom used the official governor of California website to skewer the president over sending federal troops to the state without the governor's consent, saying he would send 800 state and police officers "to clean up President Trump's mess." Here's a breakdown of who Newsom has clashed with on social media. Vice President Vance urged the California governor control the chaos that escalated in the state himself before blaming Trump or the White House's action. "Do your job. That's all we're asking," Vance wrote. Less than two hours later Newsom replied "Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California." Vance later responded to a video shared by Homeland Security's official X account of a masked demonstrator holding a Mexico flag while standing on top of a graffitied vehicle as burning cars line the street. "This administration will not be intimidated by lawlessness," he wrote. "We will stand by the FBI agents tracking down violent criminals, by the guardsmen, local police, and Marines restoring order, and by the ICE agents enforcing our immigration laws. President Trump will not back down." Tom Cotton Senator Cotton blamed the Democratic party for violence that escalated in LA Sunday. "They demand open borders, or they will riot. And Dem politicians like Newsom will back them," the U.S. Senator from Arkansas wrote on X. "It won't work. We must never tolerate this lawlessness." Newsom replied on X writing: "The only one supporting lawlessness is you and every one of Trump's minions who are allowing him to illegally militarize our city and incite violence." Cotton replied with a photo of the demonstrator holding the Mexico flag writing "What kind of governor blames police officers and the National Guard for 'inciting' this violence? Your policies created this mess. And California deserves a lot better." Jim Jordan Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio indirectly addressed LA protestors waving flags for Mexico or other countries writing: "We fly the American flag in America. Newsom later quoted the X post with pictures rioters from the Jan. 6 insurrection storming the US Capitol in 2021 holding American flags. "Like this?" Newsom quipped. While Jordan did not reply to the governor's comment, he continued to address the situation in LA writing "President Trump is deporting CRIMINAL illegal aliens. And the Left is burning down Los Angeles." "Republicans back law enforcement. Leftist rioters throw rocks at them," he later wrote. Tommy Tuberville Newsom later responded to a Florida's Voice report of U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville from Alabama echoing Trump's call to arrest the California governor. "Lock him up," Tuberville told Florida's Voice. "LA looks like a third world country — anarchists are in charge, law enforcement is being attacked, and the rule of law is nonexistent." Newsom replied to the retired college football coach citing that Alabama has three times the higher homicide rate of California. According to most recent CDC data, in 2022 Alabama had a homicide rate of 14.9 with over 700 deaths while California had a rate of 5.9% with over 2,300 deaths. "Its murder rate is ranked third in the entire country," Newsom wrote. "Stick to football, bro." Contributing: Dinah Voyles Pulver