Sarcoma is an aggressive form of cancer. Here's key symptoms to know
Sarcoma is an aggressive but less recognised cancer affecting connective tissues like nerves, bones, and fat cells, with around 5,300 diagnoses annually in the UK.
Public awareness of sarcoma remains low due to its relative rarity and less descriptive name compared to more common cancers.
Key symptoms include a growing or changing lump for soft tissue sarcomas, persistent bone pain for bone sarcomas, and subtle signs like bloating or internal bleeding for GISTs.
Diagnosis typically involves imaging such as ultrasound, X-ray, and MRI, followed by a crucial biopsy to determine the specific subtype for effective treatment planning.
The primary treatment for sarcoma is surgery to remove the tumor, often combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, with early diagnosis significantly improving patient outcomes.
The truth about the aggressive type of cancer you've probably not heard of
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Illegal cannabis vapes could contain deadly opioid, warns coroner
Illicit cannabis vapes may contain a deadly opioid that is 20 times more powerful than fentanyl, a coroner has warned. The potent drug presents a 'significant' risk of overdose as the level ingested by inhalation could 'vary enormously', according to Sarah Bourke, the Inner North London assistant coroner. She found vape users may be unaware that nitazene, a synthetic pain reliever, could be present and are unlikely to have access to the antidote naloxone. The warning came following the death of Frederick Ireland-Rose, who overdosed on a cannabis vape laced with the drug in September last year. The 30-year-old was using marijuana to withdraw from opiates and ordered liquid refills online, an inquest heard. After he was found unresponsive at home with a vape in his hand, paramedics initially managed to resuscitate him, but he never regained consciousness and died in hospital a few days later. More potent than fentanyl A toxicologist told the inquest a specific form of nitazene, estimated to be around 20 times more potent than the synthetic opioid fentanyl, was found in Mr Ireland-Rose's blood. Summarising their findings in a Prevention of Future Deaths Report, Ms Bourke said: 'Mr Ireland-Rose was known to purchase cannabinoid vaping fluids online from unknown sources outside the UK.' N-pyrrolidino isotonitazene was found at a level of 0.37 ng/ml in a sample of his blood, she added. 'The toxicologist reported that this is 'a potent synthetic opioid' which is 'thought to be similar or greater in potency to isotonitazene, which is estimated to be approximately 20 times more potent than fentanyl',' she said. 'The toxicologist also reported that 'nitazenes are illicit synthetic opioids which have recently emerged in the heroin supply in the UK'.' There was no evidence to suggest Mr Ireland-Rose used street heroin before his death, the coroner added. Nitazenes detected in refillable vapes She said: 'The toxicologist confirmed that nitazenes can be ingested from a vape and that they have been detected in refillable vapes and vapes bought illicitly.' Fentanyl and other synthetic opioids have caused a decade-long drug overdose epidemic in the US, with annual deaths rising from 2,600 in 2011 to 70,601 in 2021. The inquest heard Mr Frederick-Rose had been opiate-free for 10 days when he was found unconscious on Sept 15 last year. After he was resuscitated, he was taken to hospital, where a CT scan revealed a severe brain injury caused by a lack of oxygen, which was 'not compatible with extended life'. He died on Sept 19. Ms Bourke concluded that his death was drug-related and recorded the cause of death as a hypoxic brain injury and acute opioid toxicity.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
MPs back historic End of Life bill with slim majority
& Kate Devlin The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has successfully passed its final stage in the House of Commons. The assisted dying bill was approved by a vote of 314 to 291, securing a narrow majority of 23, which marks a significant victory for its sponsor, Kim Leadbeater. This legislation is now set to advance to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, where it is expected to encounter more opposition. Proponents of the Bill, said that it provides terminally ill individuals with a choice in how they die and aims to alleviate prolonged suffering. Opponents voiced concerns regarding the adequacy of safeguards, the potential for private companies to profit from assisted dying services, and the risk to vulnerable individuals. Assisted dying set to be legalised as MPs back Kim Leadbeater's bill in historic vote
Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
MPs back legalising assisted dying in England and Wales after historic Commons vote
MPs have voted to approve a historic bill that would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. After months of deliberation, the bill - which would give some terminally ill adults the right to end their lives - was approved by 314 votes to 291 - a majority of 23. The controversial legislation passed its third reading in the Commons and will now go to the House of Lords, where it will face further scrutiny. Speaking ahead of the vote, the bill's proponent, the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, said she was "confident" the bill would pass, despite the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Physicians all raising concerns about the proposals. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed its first parliamentary hurdle in November by a majority of 55 votes. It would allow terminally ill adults with fewer than six months to live to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs have brought about historic societal change A chain of events that started with the brutal murder of an MP almost 10 years ago has today lead to historic societal change. The like of which many of us will never see again. Assisted Dying will be legalised in England and Wales. In four years' time adults with six months or less to live and who can prove their mental capacity will be allowed to choose to die. Kim Leadbeater, the MP who has made this possible, never held political aspirations. Previously a lecturer in health, Ms Leadbeater reluctantly stood for election after her sister Jo Cox was fatally stabbed and shot to death in a politically motivated attack in 2016. And this is when, Ms Leadbeater says, she was forced to engage with the assisted dying debate. Because of the sheer volume of correspondence from constituents asking her to champion the cause. Polls have consistently shown some 70% of people support assisted dying. And ultimately it is this seismic shift in public opinion that has carried the now follows Canada, the USA, Belgium, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Australia. All countries with sophisticated health systems. Nowhere has assisted dying been reversed, once introduced. The relationship between doctor and patient will now also change. The question is being asked: Is an assisted death a treatment? There is no decisive answer. But it is a conversation that will now take place. The final answer could have significant consequences, especially in mental health settings. There are still many unknowns. Who will be responsible for providing the service? The NHS? There is a strong emotional connection to the health service and many would oppose the move. But others will argue that patients trust the institution and would want to die in its arms. The challenge for health leaders will be to try and reconcile the bitter divisions that now exist within the medical community. The Royal Colleges have tried to remain neutral on the issue but continued to challenge Ms Leadbeater until the very end. Their arguments of a failure of safeguards and scrutiny did not resonate with MPs. And nor did concerns over the further erosion of palliative care. Ms Leadbeater's much repeated insistence that "this is the most scrutinized legislation anywhere in the world" carried the most weight. Her argument that patients should not have to fear prolonged, agonising deaths or plan trips to a Dignitas clinic to die scared and alone, or be forced to take their own lives and have their bodies discovered by sons, daughters, husbands and wives because they could not endure the pain any longer was compelling. The country believed her. Since then, it has undergone some significant changes - the most notable being the requirement for a High Court judge to approve assisted dying applications, which was replaced by the expert panel. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
