Mike Lee outrages Minnesota politicians with social media jabs about lawmaker's murder
U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, participates in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on May 13, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by)
Editor's note: As of Tuesday, two of Sen. Mike Lee's posts about the suspect in the assassination of Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman no longer appeared on his personal X account. Lee has not made public comments about the posts.
Utah Sen. Mike Lee is facing criticism from a number of Minnesota politicians after appearing to make a joke about the suspect accused of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses, claiming it was the result of 'Marxism.'
That outcry includes the chairman of the state's Democratic Party, who called Lee 'one of the most dishonorable senators in American history;' Minnesota Democrat Sens. Tina Smith and Amy Klobuchar, who said the joke was inappropriate and 'fuels this hatred and misinformation;'; Minnesota Rep. Kelly Morrison, also a Democrat, who said Lee's comments represented 'the watershed moment where things need to change;' and several state Republican lawmakers, who pushed back on Lee's attempt to connect the alleged shooter to Democrats.
Vance Boelter was arrested Sunday night, suspected of the murder of Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home. Boelter allegedly wounded state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, in a separate shooting. Police say Boelter had a 'hit list' of 45 Democrat elected officials. He's facing several charges, including first-degree murder.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz called the shootings 'an act of targeted political violence,' although police have yet to publicly announce Boelter's motive.
Lee, who posts frequently on his personal X account, took to social media on Sunday, claiming Boelter has ties to Democrats and liberal politics.
'Nightmare on Waltz Street,' Lee wrote, attempting to connect Boelter to Walz, with his name misspelled. Lee's post featured two images of Boelter, including one taken from the crime scene.
Boelter was initially appointed to a Workforce Development Council by former Democratic Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton in 2016, then reappointed in 2019 by Walz, according to the Minnesota Reformer.
'My plumber is connected to me and my wife. That doesn't mean we have anything to do with his other activities,' wrote Minnesota state Rep. Walter Hudson, a Republican from Albertville, in a social media post, arguing 'this has nothing to do with Governor Walz.'
Lee also made two other posts tying Boelter to 'Marxism,' the political philosophy serving as the foundation for communism that's often used by Trump-aligned conservatives to insult Democrats. That includes a post featuring the same image from the crime scene that read 'This is what happens … When Marxists don't get their way.'
Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.
Members of Congress on edge after assassination of Minnesota state legislator
Lee, a prolific poster, made the comments on Sunday morning around 9 a.m. on his personal account on X, where he is known to be more inflammatory.
Hours later, at 2:30 p.m., Lee posted from his official U.S. Senate account, where he typically takes a more measured tone, writing 'These hateful attacks have no place in Utah, Minnesota, or anywhere in America.'
'Please join me in condemning this senseless violence, and praying for the victims and their families,' the post reads.
The Utah senator has since faced widespread backlash for his comments, including calls for his resignation. Critics have pointed out that Boelter was targeting Democrats, that his 'hit list' included abortion clinics, and that his roommate told reporters Boelter was a Trump voter.
'Senator Lee's heinous lies have only made the pain that Melissa's loved ones and colleagues are going through even worse. Using Melissa's murder to spread these lies is an act of evil that will cement his legacy as one of the most dishonorable senators in American history,' said Richard Carlbom, chairman of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, in a statement to Utah News Dispatch.
Smith, the junior Minnesota senator, confronted Lee in Congress on Monday, telling him his comments were 'brutal and cruel.'
'He should think about the implications of what he's saying and doing. It just further fuels this hatred and misinformation,' she said, according to CNN. 'I wanted him to hear from me directly how painful that was and how brutal that was to see that on what was just a horribly brutal weekend.'
Smith said Lee 'didn't say a lot. Frankly, I think he was a bit stunned. … He certainly didn't promise to take it down or say anything publicly about it. … He seemed kind of surprised to be confronted.'
Speaking on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' on Monday, Klobuchar said she also plans to confront Lee.
'What I'm going to tell him is this isn't funny what happened here. This is an incredible woman,' she said, adding that 'there was no Father's Day' for Hortman's children.
'I'll tell him about the law enforcement that did incredible work here,' Klobuchar continued. 'That's what I'm going to tell Sen. Lee when I get back to Washington today. Because this is not a laughing matter and certainly what we are seeing in increasing violence and this evil man who did this, this is not a joke.'
Morrison, a first term congresswoman, took to X on Monday accusing Lee of promoting 'dangerous and harmful rhetoric we need everyone to call out and condemn.'
'This is the watershed moment where things need to change,' Morrison said, urging Democrats and Republicans to condemn Lee's remarks.
'This was posted one day after my friend — one of Minnesota's elected representatives — and her husband were assassinated in a politically-motivated attack. One day after another elected representative and his wife took 17 bullets from the assassin,' she said. 'We cannot accept this from a sitting United States Senator.'
Minnesota state Rep. Nolan West, a Republican from Blaine, posted to X that he has 'tremendous respect' for Lee.
'But it doesn't mean he is immune from the base impulses social media incentivizes. People say stupid stuff on the internet all the time. The best they can do is admit they shouldn't have and be better,' he wrote.
Speaking on the Senate floor Monday, Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, of New York, said he was 'deeply disappointed' in Lee, accusing him of taking 'cheap political shots at the other side.' Lee's comments, Schumer said, risk 'escalating a perilous moment.'
'What the senior senator from Utah posted after the shooting was reckless and beneath the dignity of his office,' Schumer said. 'For a senator to fan the flames of division with falsities while the killer was still on the loose is deeply irresponsible. He should take down his post immediately and apologize to the families of the victims.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
36 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Donald Trump Replaced Hillary Clinton's Portrait With Some Questionable "Art" Of Himself
Donald Trump unveiled his extremely large American flag pole on Wednesday. There it is: He also unveiled some new wall art: Reuters White House correspondent Jeff Mason posted that Trump replaced a portrait of former first lady Hillary Clinton with this picture/meme of himself: "That looks really good," this person said. I'm about 100% sure they were kidding lol. Another person compared it to something you'd buy at Spencer's Gifts. This person said it was like the "art" you buy at HomeGoods. And this person joked, "Cornier than my Italian grandma's velvet painting of a crying clown.' The comments don't stop there! This person asked: "They couldn't even go to Framebridge first?" Another person likened it to, "Your dorm when you and your roommate have different styles." And this person said, "They're putting Wildwood T-shirts up at the white house." Snooki's impact. Thoughts on the new art?!
an hour ago
After opening success, Israel, US consider endgame in Iran
LONDON -- The repercussions of Israel's surprise campaign against Iran's nuclear program and military leadership launched last Friday were evident within hours. "We are racking up achievements," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said after the opening salvo, which appeared to have devastated Iran's anti-aircraft defense network and decapitated its military, killing many among the top brass, according to Israeli officials. Netanyahu, his top officials and the Israel Defense Forces have made clear some of their war goals -- the destruction of Iran's nuclear program plus the erasure of the country's ballistic missile arsenal. But, as in Israel's operations in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, there are already signs of "rapid mission creep" in Iran, Julie Norman, a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute think tank in the U.K., told ABC News. Iran's weakened defense has prompted fresh questions about "regime change" -- long a priority for Iran hawks in Israel and the U.S. seeking to topple Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the theocratic system he heads. Critics of such a policy, though, warn that government collapse in Iran could unleash regional chaos. "The record of regime change is not great, to say the least," Yossi Mekelberg of the Chatham House think tank in the U.K. told ABC News, warning that the regime's collapse would more likely produce a dangerous power vacuum in Iran than a coherent and pliant successor. "You want to experiment with chaos? Well, good luck," Mekelberg said. The nuclear front Netanyahu faces significant challenges to achieve his two expressed goals -- an end to Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile threats. On the nuclear front, Israel has inflicted damage at several of Iran's key sites. The International Atomic Energy Agency has reported damage to surface facilities at the Natanz and Isfahan enrichment sites. On Tuesday, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said the body "identified additional elements that indicate direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at Natanz." But Israel does not have the capabilities needed to destroy the Fordow enrichment plant -- where the IAEA says no damage has been reported -- which is built deep inside a mountain outside the city of Qom. Only American strategic bombers could deliver a payload capable of punching through up to 300 feet of mountain to reach the underground facility. Netanyahu is trying to press the White House into intervention. "Today, it's Tel Aviv, tomorrow, it's New York," the prime minister told ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl on Monday. Trump responded to Israel's opening attacks by calling for Iran to return to negotiations over its nuclear program. He has since dismissed talk of a ceasefire, said he wants a "real end" to the Iran nuclear issue and warned residents of Tehran -- of whom there are around 17 million in the wider metropolitan area -- to evacuate. On Tuesday, Trump raised the prospect of killing Khamenei and wrote on his social media platform that "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran," while lauding the impact of U.S. weaponry. The president has also demanded "unconditional surrender," a concept Iran's supreme leader rejected. Despite Trump's rhetoric, the U.S. has not joined Israel in attacking Iran offensively. Last year the U.S. twice assisted Israel in helping to shoot down Iranian drones and ballistic missiles Iran had launched in retaliation for Israeli attacks in Syria and Tehran. This marked the first time the U.S. actively participated in Israel's defense, which has historically taken the form of weapons sales, transfers and intelligence sharing support. As the conflict escalated this week, the U.S. deployed additional fighter jets and refueling tankers to the Middle East. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier has also been diverted to the region, to join the USS Carl Vinson carrier which was already deployed there. The deployments, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, are "intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region." President Trump told top advisers Tuesday that he approved attack plans for Iran that were presented to him, but said he was waiting to see if Iran would be willing to discuss ending their nuclear program and has not made a final decision on US involvement in the conflict, sources familiar with the matter said. The news of the attack plan approval was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. "As President Trump said himself today, all options remain on the table," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. Without destroying Fordow, Mekelberg said, the job of neutralizing Tehran's nuclear program will be incomplete. "If you want to set it three years back, that is not a good enough reason to go for a war of such scale," he said. "If the idea was to push Iran to the negotiation table and to scare them -- the Iranians are not easily scared. They fought eight years with Iraq in a much inferior situation, and they prevailed. This is not Hezbollah, this is not Hamas, this is not Islamic Jihad." Sina Toossi, a senior non-resident fellow at the Center for International Policy think tank, told ABC News that Israel and the U.S. -- if Trump opts to engage militarily against Iran -- could face a "quagmire." "To verifiably destroy what they've said they want to destroy, they need boots on the ground eventually," Toossi said, referring to Iran's nuclear facilities. Ballistic missiles Erasing Iran's ballistic missile threat is another key goal, Netanyahu has said. The IDF claims to have destroyed at least one-third of Iran's launch vehicles, along with an unknown number of stockpiled missiles. The IDF estimated that Tehran started the conflict with 2,000 missiles and as of Tuesday had fired around 400 toward Israel. The number will have been further eroded by ongoing IDF strikes across the country. "That capacity is going to be weakened," Norman said, though added that Iran has "a pretty deep arsenal, and I think those will keep coming for some time." Toossi noted that American involvement would raise the stakes for Tehran, which still has the capacity to hit American and allied targets in Iraq, across the Persian Gulf and elsewhere. If faced with an existential conflict, "they can inflict a lot of damage in their periphery," Toossi said. As time wears on, the burden on Israeli and U.S. anti-missile systems will grow, Toossi said. Interceptor missiles are finite and expensive, plus their production takes time. "There's an economics to this warfare right now that's not necessarily in the favor of Israel and the U.S.." Toossi said. "I think there's sometimes an overestimation as to how quickly other groups will surrender, or in this case other states will surrender," Norman said of Netanyahu and his government. While Israel sees its conflicts as existential, so do its enemies, Norman added. Regime change Pushing for regime change -- a goal the IDF has explicitly denied and Netanyahu has dodged questions on -- might prove the biggest gamble of Israel's attack, experts told ABC News. Such a policy makes two assumptions, Mekelberg said. "First, that you can bring down the regime, and second, that you'll get the people that you want." Indeed, the 1979 revolution that birthed the Islamic Republic "started with the liberals, not with the religious," Mekelberg said. "Look how it ended." "In any such episode, there is the best case scenario -- which usually doesn't happen -- and there is the worst-case scenario," he said. "And in between, there is the war with its own dynamics and momentum." Even if the regime is at risk of collapse, it would be hard to say when. Israel, Mekelberg said, will need to be prepared for an open-ended war of attrition with levels of destruction inside the country that "people are not used to seeing." Netanyahu has repeatedly appealed to the people of Iran to act against the government in Tehran. "This is your opportunity to stand up," he said over the weekend. But a population under fire may have different priorities. "People are going to be focusing on surviving and getting out, not on starting a revolution," Norman said. Continued attacks may also produce a rallying effect. "Many people do not like the Islamic Republic, the theocracy. But Iranians, despite their disgruntlement with the government, when it comes to Iran, its sovereignty, its stability, its territorial integrity, there's a strong sense of nationalism across the board from secular to religious, to young to old," Toossi said. "And that is really being stirred right now." Skylar Thomson of the Human Rights Activists in Iran NGO -- which is based in the U.S. -- told ABC News there is a "real atmosphere of fear" among Iranians she is in contact with. "In the initial days, people were seeing the assassinations of these Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders that were notoriously cruel" and considered "the leading oppressors in their world," Thomson said. But fear and uncertainty have spread as hospitals, residential areas, infrastructure and other non-military targets have been attacked, she added. "You're talking about a population of people that are already struggling because of external matters," Thomson said. "And this is just another layer of that."
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Antifa's violence in LA is not helping immigrants
Once more, the streets of Los Angeles are filled with chaos, burned buildings, looted businesses, law enforcement under siege, and ideological flags flying high in American air. We've been here before. And if we do not course-correct, we will be here again. And again. Let's start with the uncomfortable truth: The root of the current riots lies in the previous administration's failure. A failure that permitted millions to enter our country without any real verification process. No accountability. No enforcement. No border management that reflects both compassion and security. That porous approach to immigration, driven by virtue-signaling rather than vision, has produced what we're now witnessing: unrest tied directly to policies that abandoned common sense for political optics. Second, let's name the perpetrators. The majority of these riots are being led, organized, and amplified by Antifa factions and ultra-left progressive groups whose mission is not reform but total revolution. These are modern-day anarchists. Their goal is not justice but chaos. They want to tear down capitalism, dismantle law enforcement, and erase every institutions that hold Western society together. Their agenda is disorder, and their strategy is infiltration — hijacking moments of genuine civil concern and setting fire to the very cities they claim to protect. Third, we must be honest about the optics and outcomes. Some individuals are peacefully protesting. The constitutional right to assembly and civil disobedience must be protected at all costs. But the images we are seeing of foreign flags waving amid anti-American rhetoric, rocks thrown at police officers, and masked agitators shouting for the abolition of ICE and capitalism, undermine any moral high ground. The presence of Mexican, Salvadorian, and Palestinian flags during riots does not help the cause of immigration reform, either. It alienates the public and further mobilizes opposition even to the most rational and compassionate immigration policies. If you genuinely believe in legal immigration and you care about the millions who have been here for 20, 25, or 30 years, raising families, working hard, living peacefully, then you must agree that these riots hurt and did not help their cause. This lawlessness is antithetical to everything the immigrant rights movement hopes to achieve. The riots in downtown Los Angeles serve as a stark and unmistakable reminder that we are only inches away from the breakdown of law and order at any given moment. The same spirit of lawlessness that engulfed our nation after the murder of George Floyd has returned. And this time, it has been weaponized with even more ideological fervor and less spiritual clarity. A segment of our population, especially among younger generations, has been captivated by a narrative that rejects the rule of law and lacks any foundational understanding of our constitutional republic. Worse still, there is a spiritual void and a lack of prophetic bandwidth to discern the difference between justice and vengeance, between righteous indignation and reckless rage. At the end of the day, no one should ever be protesting the deportation of individuals who are violent criminals, rapists, murderers, or pedophiles. That is indefensible. There is a legitimate space for expressing concern over the deportation of longstanding immigrants who have lived here peacefully and, despite having overstayed their visas decades ago, have contributed to society and never engaged in criminal behavior. To conflate those two narratives — criminal and non-criminal — destroys our credibility and sabotages efforts at reform. The Los Angeles riots should wake us up not only to what is happening in our streets, but also to what's happening in our hearts. If we do not recover respect for truth, wisdom, discernment and law and order tempered by grace, we will lose our nation not to conquest but to chaos. Pastor Samuel Rodriguez is the lead pastor of New Season, one of America's most influential megachurches, and president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, which represents millions of Christians worldwide.
