
Does Trump's birthright citizenship order create a ‘birth tax'?
Some U.S. couples could face a minimum of $3,000 in a 'birth tax' under President Trump's executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship, according to a cost analysis conducted by a non-partisan think tank.
The National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) used current government fee structures for proving U.S. citizenship to calculate the 'tax.' Nearly half of the costs ($1,385) would go toward completing the required 14-page Application for Certificate of Citizenship through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the group estimated.
At least another $1,500 would go for legal fees associated with completing the government form — or one like it — if Trump's executive order were to go into effect for children born in the U.S. to parents who are not Americans or legal permanent residents.
The fees compiled by NFAP are contingent on Trump's executive action clearing legal hurdles. The birthright citizenship executive order is currently under a temporary nationwide ban, but the Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the ban. The nation's highest court has not yet ruled on the matter.
Margaret Stock, an immigration and citizenship attorney with Cascadia Cross Border Law Group who worked with NFAP on the study, told NewsNation that the $3,000 estimate is 'very conservative'.
She said families could pay much more depending on how complicated the immigration status of the child's parents is considered by government officials and other unforeseen costs.
To determine estimated costs, Stock said NFAP used the fees associated with the N-600 citizenship form that is used by parents in the U.S. whose children are born overseas but are seeking American citizenship and are required to file paperwork with USCIS.
However, she predicts that paving a road where a 'birth tax' becomes a reality for immigrant parents is far from completion due to the unsettled nature of the legality of Trump's order.
'There's no existing process in place to do what the president wants to do,' Stock said.
What Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship does
The order prevents U.S. government agencies from issuing citizenship to anyone when the person's mother is not in the country legally or was temporarily legal at the time of the child's birth and if the person's father is not a U.S. citizen or a legal resident at the time of the child's birth.
In the executive order, Trump wrote that the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which affords U.S. citizenship to anyone born in the country, has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the nation's borders.
The order was immediately met with legal challenges filed by attorneys general in 22 states and by immigrant advocacy groups, which sued the Trump administration over his sweeping immigration actions since returning to the White House.
Federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Washington state, have blocked the order while the matter is being considered by the courts.
The American Civil Liberties Union called the order 'unconstitutional' and 'reckless.'
Attorneys for the Trump administration argued the order should only be blocked in states where judges have ruled against the order's legality and constitutionality.
How costly would ending birthright citizenship be to expecting parents?
Stock first calculated the costs to prospective parents affected by birthright citizenship in 2012, when she was debating the topic and first collaborated with NFAP on the cost analysis, which estimated the 'birth tax' at the time would be around $1,600.
Now, in addition to fees nearly doubled from the initial study, NFAP believes biometrics would have to be submitted to USCIS or another agency to confirm the baby's identity, a test which currently costs $85 per person, Stuart Anderson, NFAP's executive director wrote for Forbes.
Anderson told NewsNation that the Trump administration has not provided details about how it plans to verify whether a child is a U.S. citizen. He said the administration will likely not allow for an honor system in which the parents are taken at their word about their own citizenship status.
The Trump administration and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not immediately respond to requests for comment from NewsNation about the NFAP cost estimates.
Even more costs could be added if the parents and newborn babies were required to appear in person at the Social Security Administration or if DNA tests are needed to determine the baby's father, Stock said.
The Alaska-based immigration attorney said she has been involved in some citizenship cases in which parents paid upwards of $50,000 in fees to settle their child's citizenship, making the $3,000 figure a bare minimum parents could pay.
'I don't think (the Trump administration) is paying any attention to the economic costs at all,' Stock told NewsNation. 'We're talking about a wholesale change to the entire system for acknowledging people's citizenship in America and there's no bureaucracy in place to do any of this.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
34 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
National Guard Troops Line up in Front of LA Protestors
National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday under orders from President Donald Trump, escalating a showdown with California leaders who say the federal deployment is politically driven and unnecessary. (Source: Bloomberg)


New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles it promised to Ukraine and sent them to US troops, Zelensky says
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Trump administration diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally meant for Kyiv to American forces in the Middle East. Zelensky revealed Sunday that he had secured a deal for the missiles under the Biden administration to counterattack Moscow's deadly, Iranian-designed Shahed drones, which have been at the center of Russia's mass bombardment campaign. 'We have big problems with Shaheds,' Zelensky told ABC News' 'This Week.' 'We counted on this project — 20,000 missiles. Anti-Shahed missiles. It was not expensive, but it's a special technology.' Advertisement 5 Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Trump administration diverted anti-drone missiles originally meant for Kyiv to American forces in the Middle East. ABC News 5 A firefighter extinguishes a fire at a civilian plant following powerful attacks to Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. AFP via Getty Images The diversion of the weapons was first reported by the Wall Street Journal last week, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly issuing an 'urgent' call to redirect the weapons on June 4 away from Ukraine. The missiles were instead sent off to American forces in the Middle East as the US braces for possible conflict with Iran over the stalled nuclear deal, as well as the Houthi rebel group in Yemen, according to the WSJ. Advertisement The order also coincided with Hegseth's absence from the most recent Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting, which was the first time a DOD chief missed the conference since Russia began its invasion in 2022. Under Hegseth and Trump, the US has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine, with the administration previously putting a temporary halt on weapons shipments earlier this year. With Moscow ramping up its drone and missile strikes against Ukraine, Zelensky has called on the US to reaffirm its support for Kyiv and for President Trump to not give up on America's role mediating the strained cease-fire efforts. Advertisement 5 Under President Trump and Pete Hegseth, the US has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine. via REUTERS 5 Smoke billows after drone strikes in Kharkiv, northeastern Ukraine, amid the Russian invasion. SERGEY KOZLOV/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 'I am convinced that the president of the United States has all the powers and enough leverage to step up,' Zelensky said, adding that Ukraine already backs the 30-day cease-fire deal proposed by the US. He also rejected Trump's latest characterization of the war as 'two young children fighting like crazy' in a playground. Advertisement 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park. This is why I am saying he is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids,' he said. 5 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park. This is why I am saying he is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids,' Zelensky said. AFP via Getty Images Along with renewed military aid, Ukraine is pushing the US to join the rest of the world in imposing new economic sanctions against Moscow. Zelensky maintains that sanctions from the US will hurt Moscow the hardest as he backed a proposal from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to slap 500% tariffs on any nation that buys Russian energy products.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump economic adviser ‘very comfortable' with a trade deal closing with China on Monday
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday that he is 'very comfortable' with a trade deal closing between the United States and China after the two sides meet Monday in London. Hassett's comments on CBS' 'Face the Nation' come after President Donald Trump said last week that he had a 'very good' conversation with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and that talks with China are 'very far advanced.' Hassett said the United States is looking to restore the flow of 'crucial' rare earth minerals, which are used in the manufacturing of electronics, to the same levels before early April, when the US-China trade war escalated. 'Those exports of critical minerals have been getting released at a rate that is higher than it was, but not as high as we believe we agreed to in Geneva,' Hassett said. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will lead the negotiations in London, along with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who in May led a weekend of the trade talks in Geneva. But tensions between the nations escalated weeks later after Trump posted on Truth Social that China 'totally violated' its 90-day trade agreement, which had dialed back the tit-for-tat trade war. Under the agreement, the US temporarily lowered its overall tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China cut its levies on American imports from 125% to 10%. Under the agreement, China said it would suspend or cancel its non-tariff countermeasures imposed on the United States since April 2. Part of Beijing's retaliatory measures included export restrictions on some rare earth minerals, which are essential parts used in products such as iPhones, electric vehicles and fighter jets. The Trump administration on April 2 imposed sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of trading partners before pausing them for 90 days and lowering them to a 10% baseline. Hassett on Sunday declined to say what baseline tariffs could be in place moving forward as the Trump administration continues negotiations with trading partners ahead of the July 9 deadline. 'You could be certain that there's going to be some tariffs,' Hassett said. Lutnick told CNN's 'State of the Union' in May that 'we will not go below 10%' and to expect that baseline rate for the foreseeable future. The Trump administration has so far announced only one trade deal, with the United Kingdom. The Trump administration has touted that other countries, particularly China, will bear the burden of tariffs. Businesses and economists have warned otherwise, spurring uncertainty about consumer spending and fears of a potential recession. Amid those concerns, US inflation slowed to its lowest rate in more than four years in April. The annual inflation rate fell from a 2.4% increase in March to 2.3% as consumer prices rose 0.2%, according to Consumer Price Index data. 'All of our policies together are reducing inflation and helping reduce the deficit by getting revenue from other countries,' Hassett said. The Treasury Department reported that a record $16.3 billion was collected in gross customs duties in April, a sharp jump from the $8.75 billion that was collected in March. Since the start of the 2025 fiscal year, which began in October 2024, the United States has collected about $63.3 billion in gross customs duties — a more than $15 billion increase from the same period during the last fiscal year. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that increased tariff revenue, without accounting for effects on the US economy, could reduce total deficits by $3 trillion over the next decade. The US government deficit stood at about $2 trillion in 2024, or roughly 7% of gross domestic product, according to a June 2024 report by the CBO. Meanwhile, House Republicans' sweeping bill to enact Trump's policy agenda would pile another $3.8 trillion to the government's $36 trillion debt pile, according to recent CBO estimates. CNN's Matt Egan and Alicia Wallace contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data