
When Nature Is More Precious Than Gold: New Report Highlights How The U.S. Can Be Strategic In Mining Critical Minerals
In southern Montana, tucked away in the shadows of the Gallatin and Absaroka Mountains, lies an ecological treasure. Paradise Valley is an appropriately named haven just north of Yellowstone National Park. There you can see mule deer dotted along the fields of alfalfa and hear dragonflies buzz over the wetlands on the riverbank. Elk and pronghorn graze the valley as they migrate to escape the deep snow of the nearby mountains. But not too long ago, the balance of this passageway was under threat.
Mining activity—specifically gold mining and exploration of other minerals—encroached on nearby land in the Yellowstone River watershed. When the local community expressed concerns for how mining could contaminate the river and impact wildlife habitat, there was a rally of bipartisan support. A 20-year ban on mining was made permanent in 2019 when the Yellowstone Gateway Protection Act passed, protecting more than 30,000 acres of national forest land from gold mining. I know from my years in federal policy making, when people from all sides of the aisle come together like that, it's a message worth paying attention to—sometimes nature is more precious than gold.
Paradise Valley is just one example of a growing national challenge: how do we mine minerals—especially the ones that power modern-day technologies, like lithium, cobalt, and nickel—without destroying the very lands and waters we depend on? It's not an either/or. It's a question of how. And the good news is: we can choose to do this right.
Critical minerals are in the policy spotlight for good reason. An Executive Order has been signed to accelerate domestic supply chains, and a bipartisan bill has been reintroduced in the Senate. These minerals are essential to producing the clean energy technologies—solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries—that will power our future. As American energy consumption rises, we need an 'all of the above' approach. That means expanding clean energy capacity, and for that, we need more minerals.
It's not just about power—it's about independence. Currently, the U.S. imports over 80% of its critical mineral supply. Yet the lower 48 states alone hold more than 100 years' worth of global lithium reserves, based on 2021 demand. Fifteen years from now, lithium demand is projected to be more than eight times what it is today. We have what we need, here at home. But how we get it matters.
As someone who served in the U.S. Senate and worked firsthand on policies at the intersection of energy, environment, and health, I understand the complexity of these decisions. Policymaking is rarely straightforward. It requires weighing trade-offs, listening to diverse perspectives, and crafting solutions that stand the test of time.
Mining is not without costs. It has environmental, public health, and justice impacts. Irresponsible extraction can contaminate waterways, diminish drinking water, and send toxic sludge downstream. It can also disrupt or destroy habitats vital to fishing and hunting—watersheds that support trout and salmon, for example—and infringe upon sacred cultural and historic sites belonging to Indigenous communities. And ultimately, what affects our environment affects our human health—from the quality of the air we breathe to the safety of the water we drink.
Given our rich domestic reserves, the U.S. has a unique opportunity—and responsibility—to be strategic. We can choose where we mine. We can choose to listen to local voices. And we can choose to protect what cannot be replaced.
A new report from a coalition of hunting, fishing, and conservation groups offers guidance to policymakers. Here are five of its top recommendations:
1. Start with recycling. Instead of defaulting to new extraction, we should invest in battery and solar panel recycling. Redwood Materials in Nevada, for example, recently secured a $2 billion federal loan to ramp up its battery recycling operations. In Arizona and Nevada, efforts to recycle photovoltaic panels are also growing. Comstock Metals is pioneering solar panel recycling.
2. Prioritize industrialized lands. The Idaho Cobalt Project is a model: a defunct mine site brought back into operation to extract minerals while also helping clean up legacy pollution. Reusing already-developed sites reduces new damage.
3. Use the best available science. Not all mineral deposits are created equal—and not all landscapes are suitable for mining. Smart mapping, such as the one featured in the new report, helps identify where resources overlap with high-value habitats, allowing us to make informed decisions.
4. Minimize harm where impacts are unavoidable. At the Silver Peak Lithium Project in Nevada, high bird mortality was observed due to toxic evaporation ponds. In response, mitigation measures were implemented—like installing nets over ponds and launching waterfowl protection research, in coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
5. Recognize that some places are too valuable to mine. Paradise Valley is a prime example. Its groundwater-fed ecosystems are irreplaceable, and mining here would jeopardize endemic species and community water supplies. Unlike more politically charged projects—such as the proposed sulfide-ore copper mine near Minnesota's Boundary Waters—the Paradise Valley area has bipartisan, local support for protection. Areas like Paradise Valley deserve more than short-term moratoria.
The stakes are high. To meet American energy needs and accelerate the clean energy transition, we need access to critical minerals. But we can—and must—do this the right way.
Let's lead not just in production, but in responsibility. Let's ensure that clean energy doesn't come at the cost of clean water, sacred lands, or treasured fishing grounds. And let's remember that some places, like Paradise Valley, are simply too special to risk.
Because when we protect what's rare, we preserve what's essential—for people and for the planet.
Senator William H. Frist, MD currently serves as chair of the Global Board of the Nature Conservancy, the largest conservation organization in the world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Topeka churches swap locations to accommodate congregation sizes
TOPEKA (KSNT) – Two Topeka churches are proving that faith and flexibility can go hand in hand. When one congregation grew and the other downsized, they made an unusual move to help each other out. It's not often you hear of two churches trading places, but two congregations in Topeka say swapping locations has been an amazing decision. Topeka Baptist church had been steadily growing, eventually outgrowing their place of worship off of 45th and Southwest Gage. 'The church is a family. And we are a growing family, so we just needed a bigger space,' Topeka Baptist Pastor, Mark Doss said. 'We were looking to either expand and it's just so expensive to build right now.' Just a few miles away, light of the world Chrisitan center was having a shift in numbers. Topeka man gets Bobo's Drive In logo tattoo With a smaller congregation, they realized some of their space was going unused. 'First day we listed it. They are the first ones that come look at it that day,' Light of the World Pastor Wes Oakley said. And so, we knew that maybe something was aligning. And we'd drive around Topeka looking for another place, so we could kind of downsize. We'd always come back to this place.' Now Topeka Baptist is holding services in Light of the World's old location near 33rd and Southwest Gage. They say they saved around $10,000,000 on reconstruction. Light of the World has moved into the smaller space that they left behind. 'Two different denominations that can work together to get something done,' Light of the World Member, Chris Croft said. 'I mean, that's a good example for anybody.' Both churches say the swap is a win – win. Both groups now have spaces that can accommodate the size of their congregations. For more local news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oklahomans kick off Pride Month in the metro with packed parade on 39th Street
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — June is Pride Month and Oklahomans from near and far gathered across the metro to celebrate. Joy and freedom is what many at Sunday's Pride parade say it's all about. 'It's a family outside of blood. It's a family that's there for people who don't have a blood family,' said Dusty Engel. Sonja Martinez told News 4, 'It's about everybody and we all need each other, especially in today's time. We all need each other and this is our party.' Families, kids and pets packed 39th Street to kick off Pride Month, enjoying music, food and community. 'It's like kind of triumph through adversity and like, that's something to be proud of and being true to yourself and who you are and everything like that,' said David Gleeson. Gleeson is the oldest of ten siblings, teaching them about the history of Pride and why it's important. 'I've spent my life being open and, like, visible to my younger siblings. And so, I feel like that's important because, if kids see it early, then they won't become hateful as adults,' Gleeson said. In this year's legislative session, Governor Kevin Stitt signed a bill banning obscene performances adult performances in the public. Many people at Sunday's parade heard about the law. Dusty Engel said, 'People like to judge before seeing something. Come out to Pride, see what a drag queen really does with the community. They're the backbone and they're here to push our rights. They're here to just help us, they're here to educate kids. You know, they're not here to show obscenities. Gleeson added, 'If they would just come out here and have an open mind I would hope they change their minds.' Sonja Martinez said everyone in the community depends on one another. 'We all have basically the same dreams. We just want to let people love who we want to love and let us be ourselves,' Martinez said. Oklahoma City Mayor, David Holt, also kicked off the month with a post on social media reading, 'As the eyes of the world turn to our city this coming week, they will know that all people are welcome in Oklahoma City, a place of inclusion, freedom and love. Happy Pride, OKC!' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Historic deal following sacred site destruction
The traditional owners of land destroyed by Rio Tinto's explosives in 2020 have signed a management agreement with the mining giant. 'This is a groundbreaking and innovative agreement,' PKKP Aboriginal Corporation chairman Terry Drage said. 'I believe it will change the way mining is carried out, certainly in the Pilbara, and hopefully across Australia. 'The PKKP community have made it clear to me that they are not against mining, it just has to be undertaken in a culturally sensitive way, with traditional owners at the forefront.' In May 2020, Rio Tinto destroyed the prized, 46,000-year-old Juukan Gorge in WA's Pilbara region. On Monday, the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura Aboriginal Corporation announced it had signed a management agreement with Rio Tinto. The agreement guarantees traditional owners 'will receive certainty that our important places on country will be protected from mining, while at the same time Rio Tinto will receive certainty around where they can develop much earlier in the mine cycle,' Mr Drage said in a statement. Rio Tinto's legal destruction of the heritage site in 2020 garnered international news coverage and sparked a federal parliamentary inquiry. The inquiry concluded Rio Tinto 'knew the value of what they were destroying but blew it up anyway'. 'Rio Tinto's conduct reflects a corporate culture which prioritised commercial gain over the kind of meaningful engagement with traditional owners that should form a critical part of their social licence to operate,' the final report said. The Western Australian government was already drafting new Indigenous heritage laws when the two caves were destroyed. The state government, under considerable pressure from the farming and resources sectors, then backflipped and revoked the laws just five weeks after they took effect in 2023. Rio Tinto has been paying a PKKP Aboriginal Corporation-linked charity undisclosed amounts since the caves were destroyed. The dollar figure has been kept secret to avoid putting a price on heritage. On Monday, Rio Tinto iron ore chief executive Simon Trott again admitted the blasting of the caves was a mistake. 'Our actions were wrong. We failed to uphold our company values, and our systems and processes were inadequate,' he said. 'Simply put, it should never have happened, and for that we will forever be sorry.' The First Nations corporation had graciously educated Rio Tinto, he said. 'Through the open and gracious sharing of knowledge and experiences, the PKKP have helped to shape a renewed approach to managing cultural heritage protection and mining activities,' Mr Trott said. The two Juukan caves had been cared for by the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura/Binigura people for more than 40,000 years. The shelters had been archaeologically excavated multiple times and contained a high number of artefacts and stone tools, preserved human hair, and pollen sediments that mapped thousands of years of ecological history.