logo
Republican senators to watch in the maneuvering over Trump's big bill

Republican senators to watch in the maneuvering over Trump's big bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has set an ambitious timeline for passing President Donald Trump's sweeping legislation to cut taxes and spending. But getting it on the Republican president's desk by July 4 will require some big decisions, and soon.
Republican senators are airing concerns about different parts of the legislation, including cuts to Medicaid, changes to food aid and the impact on the deficit. To push the bill to passage, Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota and other negotiators will need to find a compromise that satisfies both ends of their conference — and that can still satisfy the House, which passed the bill last month by only one vote.
A look at some of the groups and senators who leaders will have to convince as they work to push Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill toward a Senate vote:
Rural state lawmakers
Every Republican senator represents a state with a rural constituency — and some of their states are among the most rural in the country. Many in those less-populated areas rely heavily on Medicaid for health care, leading several of them to warn that the changes to the program in the bill could be devastating to communities that are already struggling.
Of particular concern is a freeze on a so-called provider tax that some states use to help pay for large portions of their Medicaid programs. The extra tax often leads to higher payments from the federal government, which critics say is a loophole that allows states to inflate their budgets. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri and several others have argued that freezing that tax revenue would hurt rural hospitals, in particular.
'Hospitals will close,' Hawley said last month. 'It's that simple. And that pattern will replicate in states across the country.'
Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville said Thursday that provider taxes in his state are 'the money we use for Medicaid.'
'You start cutting that out, we've got big problems,' Tuberville said. Eliminating those taxes 'might lose some folks.'
At the same time, Republican senators have little interest in a House-passed provision that spends more money by raising a cap on state and local tax deductions, known as SALT. The higher cap traditionally benefits more urban areas in states with high taxes, such as New York and California.
The House included the new cap after New York Republicans threatened to oppose the bill, but Senate Republicans uniformly dislike it. 'I think there's going to have to be some adjustment' on the SALT provision, Thune said Wednesday, noting that 'senators are just in a very different place' from the House.
Former (and maybe future) governors
The House-passed bill would also shift some Medicaid and food stamp costs to states, a change that has the former governors in the Senate, in particular, worried.
West Virginia Sen. Jim Justice, who was governor of his state for eight years before his election to the Senate last year, said he favors many aspects of the bill. He supports the new work requirements for Medicaid and food stamp recipients, the restrictions on benefits for immigrants who are in the country illegally and the efforts to cut down on fraud. 'There's real savings there,' Justice said. 'But then we ought to stop.'
'We're on our way to cannibalizing ourselves,' Justice said. 'We don't want to hurt kids and hurt our families.'
The provision stirring the most unease would shift 5% of administrative costs to the state for administering food stamps — known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. States that have high error rates in the program would have to take on an even higher percentage of federal costs.
North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven, also a former governor, said senators are working to get feedback from current governors and may propose some 'incentive-oriented ideas' instead of a penalty for the high error rates.
'We don't know if the states have really looked at the impacts of some of this yet,' Hoeven said.
Tuberville, who is running for governor of Alabama next year, said the program should be reformed instead of shifting costs.
'I know what our budget is and what we can afford, and we can't start a federal program and then say, 'Oh, let's, let's send it back to the states and let them take a big hunk of it,'' Tuberville said. 'I mean, that's not the way we do it.'
The moderates
Thune needs to bring Republican moderates on board with the bill, including Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Both have reservations with the Medicaid cuts, among other things.
Collins said she wants to review how the SNAP changes will affect her state. Murkowski has questioned expiring subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and whether they might be needed if people are kicked off Medicaid.
Last month, Murkowski said she wants to make sure that people are not negatively impacted by the bill, 'so we're looking at it through that lens for both Medicaid and on energy.'
Murkowski and Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, John Curtis of Utah and Jerry Moran of Kansas have also supported energy tax credits that would be phased out quickly under the House bill. The four senators argued that the quick repeal creates uncertainty for businesses and could raise prices for consumers.
The right flank
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Mike Lee of Utah and Rick Scott of Florida have argued the legislation does not save enough money and threatened to vote against it.
Paul is considered the least likely to support the measure. He says he won't vote for it if it raises the debt ceiling — a key priority for GOP leaders in both the House and the Senate. The package would raise the nation's debt limit by $4 trillion to allow more borrowing to pay the nation's bills, as the Treasury Department says the limit needs to be raised by the middle of July.
Johnson has been railing against the legislation since it was unveiled in the House, arguing that it does little to reduce government spending over time. He took those arguments to Trump last week at a meeting between the president and members of the Senate Finance Committee.
After the meeting, Johnson said he would continue to argue that the bill needs to do more to cut costs. But he said he came away with the recognition that he needed to be 'more positive' as Trump exerts political pressure on Republicans to pass it.
'We're a long ways from making the deficit curve bend down, but I recognize that's going to take time,' Johnson said. 'The truth is, there are a lot of good things in this bill that I absolutely support. I want it to succeed.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says
U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says

Globe and Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says

President Donald Trump says the U.S. has reached an agreement with China to stand down on a series of punitive measures enacted over the past month, returning the two economic giants to the partial trade-war détente reached in May. The U.S. government said Wednesday that the deal involves China agreeing to stop restricting exports of rare earth minerals and related magnets to the U.S. in exchange for the U.S. reversing planned restrictions on Chinese students and lifting export controls on software. The full deal, reached after two days of talks at Lancaster House in London, was not immediately released. 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME,' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!' He added that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping 'are going to work closely together to open up China to American trade.' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC that China is now going to 'approve all applications for magnets from United States companies right away. Think of that language: right away. Very much like the same day.' The magnets and the minerals from which they are made are used in cars, military hardware and other products. Mr. Lutnick said tariffs between the two countries will remain unchanged. The U.S. will continue to levy 30-per-cent tariffs on Chinese goods, plus a 25-per-cent tariff on some products that was imposed during Mr. Trump's first term. China's tariff on U.S. imports will stay at 10 per cent. 'We like our position. We like the way things are working with China,' Mr. Lutnick said of the negotiations. 'Every inch of that room was gold-leafed. It was, like, the perfect place to negotiate a Donald Trump deal.' Not everyone was so excited. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a congressional committee hearing Wednesday that 'China has proven an unreliable partner' and 'we will see' if Beijing fulfills the bargain this time. He said the text of the agreement wasn't available yet because 'we are in the midst of constructing it.' Mr. Bessent, who said he flew back to the U.S. capital from London at 4 a.m. after talks finished, cautioned that the agreement was narrowly focused on resolving the critical minerals issue and did not represent a full trade deal between the two countries. 'It will be a longer process. The trade deal today – or last night – was for a specific goal,' he said. Nor does the agreement represent a truce on the broadest front of Mr. Trump's global trade war. A large chunk of Mr. Trump's tariffs on China remains in place as does Beijing's lower tariff on Washington. How to win a trade war: Canada, Trump and a delicate dance in asymmetric warfare Beijing's official news agency, Xinhua, referred to the deal as an 'agreement in principle.' The agreement effectively restores the situation as it was in May, when the two countries agreed to dial back tariffs for 90 days while they worked on a broader trade agreement. Before that, Mr. Trump had imposed 145-per-cent tariffs on China, which retaliated with 125-per-cent levies. Those eyewatering figures had all but shut down trade and raised fears that the U.S. would soon face shortages of a wide range of consumer goods. After the May 12 deal in Geneva, however, the Trump administration accused China of breaking the agreement by withholding shipments of magnets and critical minerals. The U.S. retaliated with a plan to revoke the visas of Chinese students in 'critical fields' and a clampdown on exporting software for making semiconductors. Mr. Trump and Mr. Xi spoke by phone last week for the first time since Mr. Trump returned to office, a key step toward de-escalating tensions. The off-again, on-again trade restrictions have been a hallmark of the U.S. President's commercial policy in his second term. He imposed a sweeping set of tariffs on nearly every country and territory in the world on April 2, which he dubbed 'liberation day.' Within a week, he had rolled most of those back after a stock market rout. He next hiked tariffs on China in a bid to focus the trade attack on the U.S.'s primary economic adversary. But he eventually reversed many of those, too, amid fears of severely damaging the U.S. economy. Before 'liberation day,' he separately imposed 20-per-cent tariffs on China to punish it for Chinese-made fentanyl in the U.S. Those, plus the 10-per-cent remainder of the 'liberation day' levies and 25 per cent from Mr. Trump's first term, mean many Chinese goods face 55-per-cent tariffs in the U.S. even after the President's climbdowns.

Troops begin detaining immigrants in national defense zone at border in escalation of military role
Troops begin detaining immigrants in national defense zone at border in escalation of military role

Winnipeg Free Press

time31 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Troops begin detaining immigrants in national defense zone at border in escalation of military role

EL PASO, Texas (AP) — U.S. troops have begun directly detaining immigrants accused of trespassing on a recently designated national defense zone along the southern U.S. border, in an escalation of the military's enforcement role, authorities said Wednesday U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Chad Campbell described in detail the first detentions by troops last week of three immigrants accused of trespassing in a national defense area near Santa Teresa, New Mexico. Those migrants were quickly turned over to U.S. Customs and Border Protection and are now among more than 1,400 migrants to have been charged with illegally entering militarized areas along that border, under a new border enforcement strategy from President Donald Trump's administration. Troops are prohibited from conducting civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil under the Posse Comitatus Act. But an exception known as the military purpose doctrine allows it in some instances. Authorities 'noticed three individuals crossing the protective barrier into the United States,' Campbell said. 'A Department of Defense response went to interdict those three individuals, told them to sit down. … In a matter of three minutes, border patrol agents came in to apprehend. So that three minutes is that temporary detention' by the military. Trump has designated two national military defense areas along the southern U.S. border for New Mexico and a 60-mile (97-kilometer) stretch of western Texas, from El Paso to Fort Hancock, while transferring much of the land from the Interior Department to oversight by the Department of Defense for three years. The Trump administration plans eventually to add more militarized zones along the border, a military spokesman said Wednesday at a news conference in El Paso. 'We have been very clear that there will be additional National Defense Areas across the southern border,' said Geoffrey Carmichael, a spokesperson for an enforcement task force at the southern border. 'I won't speculate to where those are going to be.' Proponents of the militarized zones, including federal prosecutors, say the approach augments traditional efforts by Customs and Border Protection and other law enforcement agencies to secure the border. 'These partnerships and consequences exist so that we can promote the most humane border environment we've ever had,' El Paso sector Border Patrol Chief Agent Walter Slosar said. 'We are dissuading people from entering the smuggling cycle … to make sure that smugglers cannot take advantage of individuals who are trying to come into the United States.' Defense attorneys — and judges in some instances — are pushing back against the novel application of national security charges against immigrants who enter through those militarized zones — and carry a potential sentence of 18 months in prison on top of a possible six-month sentence for illegal entry. A judge in New Mexico has dismissed more than 100 national security charges against immigrants, finding little evidence that immigrants knew about the national defense areas. Those migrants still confronted charges of illegal entry to the U.S. In Texas, a Peruvian woman who crossed the U.S. border illegally was acquitted of unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone in the first trial under the Trump administration's efforts. U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons, who oversees western Texas, vowed to press forward with more military trespassing charges. 'We're gonna keep going forward on these NDA charges,' Simmons said. 'We are gonna still bring them, we may win on them, we may not. … At the end of the day, you are not going to be allowed to stay in this country if you enter this country illegally.' Greater military engagement at the border takes place at the same time dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand that the Trump administration stop the stepped-up immigration raids that have spread fear across their cities and sparked protests across the U.S. Trump has authorized the deployment of an additional 2,000 National Guard members to respond to immigration protests in LA. That directive brings the total number of Guard put on federal orders for the protests to more than 4,100. The Pentagon had already deployed about 700 Marines to the protests to the city.

Kennedy's new CDC panel includes members who have criticized vaccines and spread misinformation
Kennedy's new CDC panel includes members who have criticized vaccines and spread misinformation

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Kennedy's new CDC panel includes members who have criticized vaccines and spread misinformation

NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. They include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and became a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns, and a professor of operations management.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store