
Gasping for breath: Indians battle respiratory issues in world's most polluted city
Two-year-old Sumaiya Ansari, a resident of India's Byrnihat town, which is ranked the world's most polluted metropolitan area by Swiss Group IQAir, was battling breathing problems for several days before she was hospitalised in March and given oxygen support.She is amongst many residents of the industrial town on the border of the northeastern Assam and Meghalaya states - otherwise known for their lush, natural beauty - inflicted by illnesses that doctors say are likely linked to high exposure to pollution.advertisementByrnihat's annual average PM2.5 concentration in 2024 was 128.2 micrograms per cubic meter, according to IQAir, over 25 times the level recommended by the WHO.
PM2.5 refers to particulate matter measuring 2.5 microns or less in diameter that can be carried into the lungs, causing deadly diseases and cardiac problems."It was very scary, she was breathing like a fish," said Abdul Halim, Ansari's father, who brought her home from the hospital after two days. According to government data, the number of respiratory infection cases in the region rose to 3,681 in 2024 from 2,082 in 2022.
Ibamilari Dkhar, 5, sits on her mother's lap as they wait for consultation inside a primary healthcare centre as acute respiratory infections surge in the town of Byrnihat. (Photo: Reuters)
advertisement"Ninety percent of the patients we see daily come either with a cough or other respiratory issues," said Dr. J Marak of Byrnihat Primary Healthcare Centre.Residents say the toxic air also causes skin rashes and eye irritation, damages crops, and restricts routine tasks like drying laundry outdoors."Everything is covered with dust or soot," said farmer Dildar Hussain.Critics say Byrnihat's situation reflects a broader trend of pollution plaguing not just India's cities, including the capital Delhi, but also its smaller towns as breakneck industrialisation erodes environmental safeguards.Unlike other parts of the country that face pollution every winter, however, Byrnihat's air quality remains poor throughout the year, government data indicates.Home to about 80 industries - many of them highly polluting - experts say the problem is exacerbated in the town by other factors like emissions from heavy vehicles, and its "bowl-shaped topography"."Sandwiched between the hilly terrain of Meghalaya and the plains of Assam, there is no room for pollutants to disperse," said Arup Kumar Misra, chairman of Assam's pollution control board.The town's location has also made the solution tougher, with the states shifting blame to each other, said a Meghalaya government official who did not want to be named.Since the release of IQAir's report in March, however, Assam and Meghalaya have agreed to form a joint committee and work together to combat Byrnihat's pollution.Must Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Plantation drive planned after survey flags green concerns
1 2 Bhubaneswar: To increase the green cover and meet World Health Organisation's (WHO) recommendation of nine square metres per capita, the Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC) has drawn up a plan for a plantation initiative in and around the city's biggest slum, Salia Sahi. This area is recognised as a high extreme heat risk zone by iForest, an international organisation working on environmental issues. "We have made arrangements to start the plantation drive during monsoon. The locations have been selected and pits will be dug soon. Trees that can withstand wind and cyclones will be planted. We have selected species such as harida, ashoka, neem, radhachuda and krushnachuda. The saplings will be procured soon. Dedicated personnel will also be deployed for maintenance in subsequent years," BMC deputy commissioner (environment) Kajal Pradhan said. iForest conducted a survey in all 67 wards for heat mapping, factors affecting it and for evaluating green coverage. Salia Sahi, comprising Ward Nos. 20, 21 and 26, has the least amount of green cover, while five more wards do not meet the WHO-recommended standard of green cover per person.


Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Israeli fire kills 35 in Gaza, many near an aid site, medics say
Israeli gunfire and airstrikes killed at least 35 Palestinians in Gaza on Wednesday, most of them at an aid site operated by the U.S-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in the centre of the coastal territory, local health officials said. Medical officials at Shifa and Al-Quds Hospitals said at least 25 people were killed by Israeli gunfire as they approached the aid site near the former settlement of Netzarim, and dozens were wounded. A total of 163 people had already been killed and more than 1,000 wounded trying to reach the handful of aid sites operated by the foundation since it began work two weeks ago after a three-month blockade, according to Gaza's health ministry. The United Nations has said the blockade brought the Palestinian enclave to the brink of famine and that food supplies remain critically low. The foundation said it was unaware of the incident but that it is working closely with Israeli authorities to ensure safe passage routes are maintained, and that it is essential for Palestinians to closely follow instructions. 'Ultimately, the solution is more aid, which will create more certainty and less urgency among the population,' it said by email in response to Reuters questions. 'There is not yet enough food to feed everyone in need in Gaza. Our current focus is to feed as many people as is safely possible within the constraints of a highly volatile environment.' The UN and other aid groups have refused to supply aid via the foundation, which uses private contractors with Israeli military backup in what they say is a breach of humanitarian standards. Gaza health officials said 10 other people were killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis in the south of the enclave. The Israeli military had no immediate comment on the reports. On Tuesday, when Gaza health officials said 17 people were killed near another GHF aid site in Rafah in southern Gaza, the army said it fired warning shots to distance 'suspects' who were approaching the troops and posed a threat. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday there had been 'significant progress' in efforts to secure the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza, but that it was 'too soon' to raise hopes that a deal would be reached. Despite efforts by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar to restore a ceasefire in Gaza, neither Israel nor Hamas has shown willingness to back down on core demands, with each side blaming the other for the failure to reach a deal. Two Hamas sources told Reuters they did not know about any new ceasefire offers. The war erupted after Hamas-led militants took 251 hostages and killed 1,200 people, most of them civilians, in an October 7, 2023, attack, Israel's single deadliest day. Israel's military campaign has since killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to health authorities in Gaza, and flattened much of the densely populated strip, which is home to more than two million people.


Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Anti-rabies vaccine is very effective but there are other factors at play'
Rabies remains a formidable public health challenge in India, with around 20,000 annual deaths accounting for 36% of the global toll, according to WHO. In a conversation with Pushpa Narayan, Dr B Sekar, former director of the Pasteur Institute of India in Coonoor which supplies vaccines to the Centre, explains why some bites are more dangerous than others Last month, three children died in Kerala even after rabies shots, raising questions about quality. Why are such deaths happening despite vaccinations? Aren't the vaccines effective? Anti-rabies vaccines are incredibly effective. But, in some cases, they may fail owing to several factors, including the time of vaccination, dosage, and the type of wound care. For instance, if someone is bitten by a rabid animal and has a category 3 wound, then getting the vaccine right away, along with a rabies immunoglobulin shot, is crucial to make treatment 100% effective in preventing the disease. Also, the person must complete the full vaccination course — day 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28 for most intramuscular route vaccinations and day 0, 3, 7, and 28 for most intradermal vaccinations. Many skip vaccinations if they see the wound heal or if they don't see visible wounds, both of which are wrong. What is a category 3 wound? Why is it so serious? Doctors classify wounds into categories to determine appropriate post-exposure treatment for rabies. Category 3 is considered the most severe type of exposure and typically has one or multiple transdermal bites or scratches where the animal's teeth or claws puncture the full thickness of the skin, causing bleeding. Such wounds carry the highest risk of rabies transmission as the virus-laden saliva has a direct pathway into the body's tissues and potentially the nervous system. If the animal licks a person's eyes, nose, mouth, broken skin (or wound), or any other mucous membrane, that's also category 3 exposure. Any direct contact with bats can be very tiny and go unnoticed but is often treated as category 3. The recommended treatment for category 3 exposures involves immediate and thorough wound washing and rabies vaccination, along with a rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) shot which provides the immediate antibodies to neutralise the virus at the wound site, offering crucial passive protection while the body develops its own immune response from the vaccine. Does the bite site play a key role in prevention? Yes, it does. The rabies virus travels along the peripheral nerves to reach the brain through the spinal cord. If a bite is on the head, neck, or face, the virus has a shorter distance to travel, which can lead to a shorter incubation period and faster onset of symptoms. Prompt and aggressive medical response is critical in such cases. Areas with a lot of nerve endings, such as fingers and toes, also pose increased risk as the virus can easily find a nerve to latch on to. Of course, category 3 wounds, deep bites, contamination of mucous membranes, or broken skin allow more direct access for the virus, whereas a superficial scratch or lick on intact skin carries a much lower risk. What about the risk of a higher viral load in the animal? The amount of rabies virus present in the biting animal's saliva directly impacts the likelihood of transmission. An animal in the later stages of rabies (when the virus has multiplied significantly and spread to the salivary glands) will typically have a higher viral load in its saliva. If it bites, more virus particles are introduced into the body and can enter the nervous system to cause infection. This can overwhelm the local immune response much before vaccination takes effect and contribute to a shorter incubation period before symptoms appear. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change