
What You Hear if You Listen to the Costumes in ‘A Complete Unknown'
Playing Bob Dylan in 'A Complete Unknown,' Timothée Chalamet had 67 costume changes. If you didn't notice, then as the costume designer on the film, I did my job: A mark of success in costume design is your work's becoming invisible. Clothes help tell the story. But they should not become the story.
For any film, the early conversations I have with the director are rarely about the clothes themselves and more about the world we are creating. Ultimately it is the immersive experience, when all the elements come together, that is the goal — to transport the audience to a time and place. Costumes are not just there for show or to be looked at. They are to be heard more than seen. And what they're saying develops the character, sets a tone, creates a feeling or underscores an emotion.
I learned from working with Madonna for 22 years not to be too focused on what those in the audience will find appealing — that we shouldn't even be thinking about them, actually — but instead to be confident about our creative choices. I designed the costumes for six of her tours, several album covers, editorial shoots, more than 15 videos, a play in London's West End and a film she directed. Costuming for her was about what she wanted to express and not necessarily how she wanted to be seen.
That's the philosophy I brought to the costume design of 'A Complete Unknown.' It involved not just showing where we were, but also who Bob Dylan was at any given moment, how confident he was, his ingenuity, the resources he had, what his influences were, who he was becoming as an artist.
I was also thinking about how I could assist the work of the actors — help them get there, almost like giving them beam-me-up suits. I believe my job is to help ground actors in their characters, to find that part of themselves physically through the way a costume feels. I think we can all relate to this — if we walk out the door to meet someone and we feel like we're wearing the wrong shoes, we turn around and change them. Clothes make us feel a certain way.
Here's how they were working in 'A Complete Unknown':
The Denim
The evolution we see in the film is of a young man finding his voice as an artist. The denim Bob Dylan wears is a physical embodiment of that progression, as well as the changing times — the textile tells the story of the '60s.
My favorite detail is one you'd have to know to look for. I learned about it from Suze Rotolo's book, 'A Freewheelin' Time,' about her relationship with Mr. Dylan. Ms. Rotolo writes that the Levi's 501 jeans he was wearing in '63 and '64 needed to fit over his cowboy boots. They were bunching up, so she inserted a denim patch on the legs to allow them to lie over the boots. My friends at Levi's told me that was probably the first boot cut jean ever made. I love this very personal and D.I.Y. detail, which also represented the care in the relationship between the two.
Already, denim had changed significantly from what it was at the beginning of the decade, when it was relegated to work wear or recreation. In 1961, Mr. Dylan was wearing dungarees and work boots. That was the workingman style he had adopted by age 19 that was in line with the proletarian look of his hero, Woody Guthrie.
Over the decade, it became more popular to wear denim in places where it wasn't socially acceptable before. Denim would become a tribal signifier for young people, an act of rebellion, a departure from their parents' generation.
Early in the film, Mr. Chalamet is wearing jeans in the recording session at Columbia Records, where everyone else is wearing a suit. You really see that generational difference.
In the middle of the film, as Mr. Dylan was becoming known, gaining confidence and writing his own songs, he was developing his own style — still wearing denim but not work pants. His jeans had a slimmer silhouette — hence the need for the patch — that he paired with suede jackets, a look encapsulated on the cover of the album 'The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan.'
The third beat that we created visually was in 1965 when Mr. Dylan's look started to mirror the electric rock 'n' roll music he was making. The '65 Bob Dylan, I'd learned through my research, had gone to England, and he adopted that early-'60s mod look. You see it echoed in his tabbed shirts. His hair's longer, his silhouette's thinner. He clearly had some money in his pocket and looked like he had some clothes made. He was developing his identity — and the clothes underscore that. For those later scenes, we dressed Mr. Chalamet in a much slimmer-cut, stovepipe jean. According to Levi's, the style Mr. Dylan was wearing in those days was called the 'Super Slims.' Levi's recreated those for us.
The Dress
We did a lot of historical research and recreated specific outfits of Mr. Dylan's because we needed to have that authenticity — for example when he appeared at the Newport Folk Festival, recorded at Columbia or did the photo shoot for 'The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan' album cover. But in between those moments, we were free to improvise, and sometimes that allows you to get even closer to a particular truth.
What turned out to be the most challenging costume for me in this film was what Elle Fanning wore as Sylvie (based on Ms. Rotolo) at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965. Her character has gotten back together with Mr. Dylan, but when she sees what's happening between him and Joan Baez onstage, she has an emotional reaction and leaves. I wanted to underscore the emotion of the scene and help Ms. Fanning (who doesn't need my help!); I wanted to give her a sense of vulnerability there.
Until that point, I had kept her character in pants because I wanted to show that she was a modern, confident young woman. Ms. Rotolo was an activist and an artist, and had her own full life. I didn't want to feminize her too much. For the Newport scene, though, I wanted her in a dress. I knew she'd be moving through the crowd, so I wanted what she was wearing to move, too, and I wanted to give Ms. Fanning a tool to support the heartbreak of that scene.
People wore a lot of prints in the '60s, but I struggled to find one that felt right. I didn't want something too graphic or bold or overly romantic. I ultimately found a print that Marimekko had reissued from that era. I liked that it was an ombré color wash, like a Rothko painting, so it had that same emotional quality that seemed perfect for the scene.
The Polka-Dot Shirt
For me, costuming works best when it's an intimate collaboration with the actors, as it was on 'A Complete Unknown.' We are the people in filmmaking whose first words to an actor are: 'Nice to meet you. Please take your clothes off.'
Working closely with Mr. Chalamet is what gave us that scene where he's wearing a green polka-dot shirt.
When he puts it on, it's more of a traditional costume moment because it is so jarring, a real departure from his folk persona. I'd seen a photograph of Mr. Dylan wearing a green polka-dot shirt at the soundcheck before his Newport performance, but we weren't doing that scene in the movie. Still, I couldn't let the idea of the shirt go. The director, Jim Mangold, wasn't sold on using it; he thought it was too loud. I loved the shirt because it's a glimpse of what Mr. Dylan was becoming. In 1966, which is after our film, his style became completely mod and vibrant — he was wearing polka-dot shirts and striped suits. I wanted to echo his departure from being a solo folk musician to having a band and playing rock 'n' roll.
We ended up recreating the shirt because historical photographs show Mr. Dylan's bandmate, Al Kooper, wearing it at the Newport performance.
Mr. Chalamet liked the shirt, too. During rehearsal for the scene where Pete Seeger comes to Mr. Dylan's hotel room in Newport, Mr. Chalamet called me to the set. He thought the scene would be the perfect moment for him to wear the shirt. And when he does put it on, he transforms the energy of that scene, almost making it comical. He's in his boxer shorts and that clown shirt, and Mr. Seeger is telling a ridiculous story. This is the joy of working with an actor who understands the storytelling process.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Cosmopolitan
7 hours ago
- Cosmopolitan
Bella Hadid Convinced Me to Buy 501 Levi's Shorts on Amazon
Aside from the fact that Bella Hadid is a super rich supermodel with a cowboy BF who looks like he galloped straight out of a smutty beach read, I can sooo relate to the Kin Euphorics co-founder. I, too, have dyed my brunette hair a blinding blonde and think women shouldn't have to work on their period. We're two peas in my (delulu) pod. And while her wardrobe might occasionally lean unrelatable—she is still a super rich supermodel, after all—her latest look is not only totally accessible, but has convinced me to finally buy a pair of 501 Levi's cutoffs for myself. Bella was photographed making a quick pit stop to pump gas (see, relatable queen, told you!) in Aspen on Sunday, wearing a medium wash of the style with Classic Micro Uggs, a casual tee, and red varsity jacket. Though, TBH, I don't know her exact shade, I found a pretty (if not exact) match for her shorts on Amazon—and they're only $34. The universally flattering summer staple has that lived-in vintage feel but with a little update from the OGs. The style has a waist-defining high rise fit and 100% cotton fabric that won't stretch out two sizes too big after just one wear. But, even though they hold their shape well, they still have just the right amount of give so you're not uncomfy. Thousands of shoppers raved about the denim shorts. "This is my first pair of Levi's or shorts without stretch so I went through hundreds of reviews to settle on a size and these are perfect," one customer said, before adding that "they make [their] legs look longer" and are "surprisingly comfortable too." Another said that the "fit is amazing" and they're "snug in all the right places without being too tight." Others added that they're "always true to size" and "super flattering on any body type." If you want to complete Bella's entire look, you can snag her Uggs to pair with the denim and toss on a simple red bomber (maybe this one or this one?). I'm certainly going to just in hopes I manifest a cowboy BF of my own. Megan Schaltegger is an NYC-based writer. She loves strong coffee, eating her way through the Manhattan food scene, and her dog, Murray. She promises not to talk about herself in third person IRL.

Associated Press
11 hours ago
- Associated Press
Book Review: 'Bob Dylan: Jewish Roots, American Soil' doesn't live up to book's promise
One of the most challenging things about any biography of Bob Dylan is piercing the reticence the legendary singer and songwriter has displayed in talking about his roots. In addition to that, biographers have had to to sift through the myths Dylan has built up about his life story. That's why it's somewhat forgivable that 'Bob Dylan: Jewish Roots, American Soil' by Harry Freedman doesn't quite live up to its promise of tracing how the singer's early career was influenced by his Jewish roots. Freedman offers a serviceable introduction to Dylan's early discography and his biography, including his childhood on the Iron Range of Minnesota. But the books offers little new illuminating information into how Dylan's Jewish heritage may have influenced his career. What's frustrating are the times Freedman instead relies on speculation rather new insights. At one point, Freedman questions whether antisemitism played a role when a 1963 Newsweek profile that angered Dylan mentioned the singer's family name, Zimmerman. At the same time, Freedman is able to richly conceptualize the impact of Dylan's music and the context of his rise. Freedman describes how Dylan's early career came at a time for young people when 'music was the only thing that made sense.' With more solid evidence — or perhaps a less elusive subject — Freedman could have turned that prose into a book that lives up to its title. ___ AP book reviews:


Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses
Saturday afternoon out west and evening back east, as citizens faced off against ICE agents in the streets of Los Angeles, 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' George Clooney's 2005 dramatic film tribute to CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow, became a Major Television Event, broadcast live from Manhattan's Winter Garden Theater, by CNN and Max. That it was made available free to anyone with an internet connection, via the CNN website, was a nice gesture to theater fans, Clooney stans and anyone interested to see how a movie about television translates into a play about television. The broadcast is being ballyhooed as historic, the first time a play has been aired live from Broadway. And while there is no arguing with that fact, performances of plays have been recorded onstage before, and are being so now. It's a great practice; I wish it were done more often. At the moment, is streaming recent productions of Cole Porter's 'Kiss Me, Kate!,' the Bob Dylan-scored 'Girl From the North Country,' David Henry Hwang's 'Yellow Face' and the Pulitzer Prize-winning mental health rock musical 'Next to Normal.' Britain's National Theater at Home subscription service offers a wealth of classical and modern plays, including Andrew Scott's one-man 'Vanya,' as hot a ticket in New York this spring as Clooney's play. And the archives run deep; that a trip to YouTube can deliver you Richard Burton's 'Hamlet' or 'Sunday in the Park With George' with Mandy Patinkin and Bernadette Peters is a gift not to be overlooked. Clooney, with co-star Anthony Edwards, had earlier been behind a live broadcast of 'Ambush,' the fourth season opener of 'ER' as a throwback to the particular seat-of-your-pants, walking-on-a-wire energy of 1950s television. (It was performed twice, once for the east and once for the west coast.) That it earned an audience of 42.71 million, breaking a couple of records in the bargain, suggests that, from a commercial perspective, it was not at all a bad idea. (Reviews were mixed, but critics don't know everything.) Like that episode, the 'live' element of Saturday's broadcast, was essentially a stunt, though one that ensured, at least, that no post-production editing has been applied, and that if anyone blew a line, or the house was invaded by heckling MAGA hats, or simply disrupted by audience members who regarded the enormous price they paid for a ticket as a license to chatter through the show, it would presumably have been part of the broadcast. None of that happened — but, it could have! (Clooney did stumble over 'simple,' but that's all I caught.) And, it offered the groundlings at home the chance to see a much-discussed, well-reviewed production only a relatively few were able to see in person — which I applaud on principal and enjoyed in practice — and which will very probably not come again, not counting the next day's final performance. The film, directed by Clooney and co-written with Grant Heslov (who co-wrote the stage version as well), featured the actor as producer and ally Fred W. Friendly to David Strathairn's memorable Murrow. Here, a more aggressive Clooney takes the Murrow role, while Glenn Fleshler plays Friendly. Released during the second term of the Bush administration, the movie was a meditation on the state of things through the prism of 1954 (and a famous framing speech from 1958 about the possibilities and potential failures of television), the fear-fueled demagoguery of Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy, and Murrow's determination to take him on. (The 1954 'See It Now' episode, 'A Report on Sen. Joseph McCarthy,' helped bring about his end.) As in the film, McCarthy is represented entirely through projected film clips, echoing the way that Murrow impeached the senator with his own words. It's a combination of political and backstage drama — with a soupcon of office romance, represented by the secretly married Wershbas (Ilana Glazer and Carter Hudson) — even more hermetically set within the confines of CBS News than was the film. It felt relevant in 2005, before the influence of network news was dissolved in the acid of the internet and an administration began assaulting the legitimate press with threats and lawsuits; but the play's discussions of habeas corpus, due process, self-censoring media and the both-sides-ism that seems increasingly to afflict modern media feel queasily contemporary. 'I simply cannot accept that there are, on every story two equal and logical sides to an argument,' says Clooney's Murrow to his boss, William F. Paley (an excellent Paul Gross, from the great 'Slings & Arrows'). As was shown here, Murrow offered McCarthy equal time on 'See It Now' — which he hosted alongside the celebrity-focused 'Person to Person,' represented by an interview with Liberace — but it proved largely a rope for the senator to hang himself. Though modern stage productions, with their computer-controlled modular parts, can replicate the rhythms and scene changes of a film, there are obvious differences between a movie, where camera angles and editing drive the story. It's an illusion of life, stitched together from bits and pieces. A stage play proceeds in real time and offers a single view (differing, of course, depending on where one sits), within which you direct your attention as you will. What illusions it offers are, as it were, stage magic. It's choreographed, like a dance, which actors must repeat night after night, putting feeling into lines they may speak to one another, but send out to the farthest corners of the theater. Clooney, whose furrowed brow is a good match for Murrow's, did not attempt to imitate him, or perhaps did within the limits of theatrical delivery; he was serious and effective in the role if not achieving the quiet perfection of Strathairn's performance. Scott Pask's set was an ingenious moving modular arrangement of office spaces, backed by a control room, highlighted or darkened as needs be; a raised platform stage left supported the jazz group and vocalist, which, as in the movie, performed songs whose lyrics at times commented slyly on the action. Though television squashed the production into two dimensions, the broadcast nevertheless felt real and exciting; director David Comer let the camera play on the players, rather than trying for a cinematic effect through an excess of close-ups and cutaways. While the play generally followed the lines of the film, there was some rearrangement of scenes, reassignment of dialogue — it was a streamlined cast — and interpolations to make a point, or more directly pitch to 2025. New York news anchor Don Hollenbeck (Clark Gregg, very moving in the only role with an emotional arc) described feeling 'hijacked … as if all the reasonable people went to Europe and left us behind,' getting a big reaction. One character wondered about opening 'the door to news with a dash of commentary — what happens when it isn't Edward R. Murrow minding the store?' A rapid montage of clips tracking the decay of TV news and politics — including Obama's tan suit kerfuffle and the barring of AP for not bowing to Trump's Gulf of America edit and ending with Elon Musk's notorious straight-arm gesture, looking like nothing so much as a Nazi salute — was flown into Clooney's final speech. Last but not least, there is the audience, your stand-ins at the Winter Garden Theatre, which laughed at the jokes and applauded the big speeches, transcribed from Murrow's own. And then, the curtain call, to remind you that whatever came before, the actors are fine, drinking in your appreciation and sending you out happy and exhilarated and perhaps full of hope. A CNN roundtable followed to bring you back to Earth.