logo
The traditional indie film system is hurting. This executive says he's built a winning formula

The traditional indie film system is hurting. This executive says he's built a winning formula

Chris McGurk saw the writing on the wall for the independent film business more than a decade ago.
His distribution company Cinedigm released 'Short Term 12,' starring Brie Larson, to rave reviews in 2013. Hardly anyone showed up to see it in theaters.
'We probably lost $4 million on it,' McGurk told the Times. 'At that point, I said, we gotta stop doing this. Let's see if we can build a new machine.'
So the firm pivoted its focus, spending years assembling and growing its collection of 'new media' assets — streaming channels, a podcast network and its own ad technology.
It used those online channels, social media and its horror fan site Bloody Disgusting to wage a microbudget campaign for Damien Leone's gory underground killer-clown horror sequel 'Terrifier 2' in 2022, grossing nearly $11 million at the domestic box office.
Last year's follow-up, 'Terrifier 3,' did even better for the Los Angeles-based company, now called Cineverse: $54 million in North American ticket sales and $90 million worldwide.
Now the company is trying to fill its release slate with similar intellectual-property-driven movies that can leverage that same system, including a Legendary-produced revival of the Troma cult classic 'The Toxic Avenger,' starring Peter Dinklage (set for Aug. 29).
Cineverse's success comes at a time when many people believe the traditional way of releasing movies — with broad-based, expensive national ad campaigns — is broken for some types of movies. Certain films still do good business, including big action spectacles, low-cost horror pictures and animated movies. But indie releases and mid-budget films are increasingly risky.
Those themes will surely be much discussed this week at CinemaCon, the movie theater industry's annual trade show in Las Vegas.
With that in mind, I spoke to McGurk, who joined the company in 2011 after stints at Overture Films and MGM, about why his model is well suited to the digital age and what Hollywood might be able to learn from it.
How does your business model allow you to lean further into theatrical releases at this perilous time?
The all-in investment for 'Terrifier 3' was less than $5 million in acquisition costs and marketing spend. If you take the theatrical marketing costs out of the mix, it fundamentally changes the economics, not just for us but for producers and filmmakers.
This is something that non-Hollywood people don't understand. Often, for smaller movies, the marketing spend is a much bigger cost than making the film.
If you read a recent interview with Tom Quinn, CEO of Neon, that's exactly what he said. They spent $18 million on 'Anora,' and it was a $6 million movie. In our case, the producers were sitting behind a less-than-$5-million investment on our part, and they're pretty happy right now.
We've already added three movies to our release schedule. One is 'The Toxic Avenger,' which Legendary produced and we picked up. Our all-in investment in that will be less than $5 million.
And $5 million is low for a Legendary Pictures movie.
It was originally rated R, but we put some stuff back in it, and now we're going to take it out unrated, just like we did with 'Terrifier,' because we think there's a fan base out there that basically is saying 'screw it' to all the rules and regulations and the MPA [Motion Picture Assn.]. They want to see a raw, uncut movie.
The movie was in the can in 2023 and it went to Fantastic Fest and got great reviews, but the studios couldn't figure out how to release it. So part of our campaign is, 'We're giving you the movie that the big studios didn't want released or couldn't release.' And we'll go right after the 'Terrifier' audience, even though this isn't exactly a straight horror movie.
It's a Troma movie.
That's really the only way to describe it.
We also have 'Silent Night, Deadly Night,' which is a remake of the movie in the '80s that they banned from theaters. And then we also announced 'Wolf Creek: Legacy,' the third in that series.
The goal is to maybe get up to as many as eight wide releases a year. I know it's kind of counter to what everybody else is doing, but we're going to keep applying our formula until it doesn't work.
And that formula is what?
It's really saying, we've got this collection of new-media assets that we own and control, so how can we leverage that in order to drive media value and awareness?
We think on 'Terrifier 3' we probably created $5 million to $7 million in media value without spending a dime beyond the cost of producing the ads, which isn't that much.
You're able to do this because you are small by design, compared to the studio players.
And I think we're willing to throw out all the rules and leverage these assets. We're not going through a middleman.
If you're the head of marketing at a studio, your new spending plan is to do everything you did before, but do a little less of it.
Studios often won't do mid-budget movies because they're so challenging financially. Are there ways to be smarter about marketing those films?
I think we're onto something.
I hate to make the comparison, but it's analogous to how Trump won. He went with the podcasts and very targeted spending, TikTok and digital spending and things like that. Whereas Kamala Harris followed more of a national media buying approach but lost.
The problem is, every executive in that business is trying not to screw up. So it really does stifle innovation and risk-taking.
How do you target the marketing for 'The Toxic Avenger?'
We're going to use our own ad technology to identify where the fan base is for this type of movie — the Troma fans. And we're going to place ads to target that audience and market it on our podcast network as well.
The other thing that we've had real success in doing is creating stunts and promos that have attracted a lot of attention.
For 'Terrifier 3,' we had a guy dressed up as Art the Clown walking through Times Square the week before our movie opening, and looking up at a billboard of the Joker. For 'Toxic Avenger,' we did a stunt where they dyed the Chicago River green for St. Patrick's Day and we had Toxie on a boat with his mop going around to clean it up.
You've got the Troma geeks, but you've also got Macon Blair directing, who has a following.
With 'Terrifier 3,' our whole thing was, how do we expand the audience beyond the people who went to see 'Terrifier 2'? So we spent a lot of time really focusing on the Hispanic audience and the African American audience, and almost half the viewers on opening weekend were Hispanic.
Then it was trying to figure out how we could have group attendance and increase our female attendance. And we did that in two ways.
One was, we tried to make Art the Clown this must-see character and not focus on the gore. Sort of what we did with 'Hannibal' back at MGM, where we sold Hannibal Lecter as the James Bond of serial killers. And then toward the end, we really did the whole 'You've got to see this movie, because everybody's going to be talking about it.'
So we need to do that here. We need to make sure that Troma fans go to see the movie. But we need to expand out of that and focus on the comedy and the actors to try to get more of a female audience and more group attendance.
That's key to the decision to go unrated, right? You're going for a 'You really shouldn't be seeing this' kind of appeal.
The studios can't really release an unrated movie, because they're signatories to MPA. It gives us a real advantage, because we really don't care.
There's a space for filmmakers to do things outside the traditional system.
The thing is, we didn't have final cut on the 'Terrifier' films, and we were fine with that. Let him make his movie. That's our approach.
When I was at MGM, I was trying to get Christopher Nolan to do [James] Bond, and the Bond producers would not give him final cut. Now he's Christopher Nolan times five.
Well, now they'll have another chance with producers Amy Pascal and David Heyman in charge of 007 for Amazon.
He'll get final cut now, but it's 20 years too late, in my view.
Anything to add?
Just one important point. I hated how everybody on Wall Street and in the entertainment press set up this big thing of 'streaming versus theatrical,' with streaming being the villain, because it was helping to destroy this great institution in America.
What we tried to do with the 'Terrifier' movies is show that there could be a symbiotic relationship between the two. We use streaming and the podcasts to basically help make a theatrical success in a unique and different way, and hopefully everybody can do more of that.
FCC chair opens investigation into Disney and ABC for DEI practices. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr has opened an inquiry into Disney and ABC's DEI programs, marking the second investigation of a major media company.
Jen Salke is out at Amazon MGM Studios. Salke said she would start her own production company after leaving her perch at the company. She had some major hits like 'Reacher' but was criticized for her spending on shows including 'Citadel' and for mishandling the Bond franchise.
How California legislators aim to sweeten film tax credits for Hollywood. The proposed legislation would increase to 35% the amount of qualified production the credit would cover. Los Angeles has been losing productions to other states and countries with generous programs.
Republicans grill PBS, NPR chiefs as Democrats mock proceedings. The two public media entities have become frequent targets in the GOP's efforts to reduce government spending. There was grandstanding about drag queens and jokes about Elmo.
Inside Paramount's bumpy sale: the president, a scion and a possible sheikh. 'They have to get [the deal] approved,' said Mario Gabelli, a longtime Paramount shareholder. Gabelli and others are eager for a new chapter, but the Skydance deal has turned into a fitful slog.
ICYMI:
In a surprise, Jason Statham's mid-budget action movie 'A Working Man' was No. 1 at the U.S. box office last weekend with $15.2 million, topping Disney's troubled 'Snow White.' That live-action remake grossed $14.2 million, a 66% drop from a disappointing debut that generated poor word-of-mouth.
'A Working Man' comes at an interesting time for Amazon MGM Studios, which last week announced the departure of leader Jennifer Salke after seven years. Film head Courtenay Valenti, the former Warner Bros. film executive who joined Amazon in 2023, now will report directly to Salke's old boss, Mike Hopkins.
Local shoot days were up 5% last week compared with a year ago, according to FilmLA data.
Listen: Alison Krauss and Union Station released their first album in 14 years. No surprise, it's excellent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wordle hint today: Clues for June 5 2025 NYT puzzle #1447
Wordle hint today: Clues for June 5 2025 NYT puzzle #1447

USA Today

time12 hours ago

  • USA Today

Wordle hint today: Clues for June 5 2025 NYT puzzle #1447

Wordle hint today: Clues for June 5 2025 NYT puzzle #1447 WARNING: THERE ARE WORDLE SPOILERS AHEAD! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT THE JUNE 5, 2025 WORDLE ANSWER SPOILED FOR YOU. Ready? OK. We've seen some hard Wordle words over the years and if you're here, you're probably struggling with today's and are looking for some help. So let's run down a few clues with today's Wordle that could help you solve it: 1. It has two vowels. 2. You'd be more familiar with it in plural form. 3. It's associated with information. And the answer to today's Wordle is below this photo: It's ... DATUM. While you're here, some more Wordle advice: How do I play Wordle? Go to this link from the New York Times and start guessing words. What are the best Wordle starting words? That's a topic we've covered a bunch here. According to the Times' WordleBot, the best starting word is: CRANE. Others that I've seen include ADIEU, STARE and ROAST. Play more word games Looking for more word games?

‘White Lotus' Stars Finally Open Up About Nasty Feud Rumors
‘White Lotus' Stars Finally Open Up About Nasty Feud Rumors

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘White Lotus' Stars Finally Open Up About Nasty Feud Rumors

The White Lotus stars Walton Goggins and Aimee Lou Wood have reunited in an aggressive attempt to finally put rumors of an ongoing 'feud' between them to bed. In a new interview for Variety released Wednesday from an interview conducted on May 3, Goggins and Wood were resolute that 'there is no feud.' Goggins unfollowing Wood on Instagram soon after filming the show's third season sparked the initial feud rumors, but the actor is now attempting to explain why he did it. 'I knew what we had gone through, and I knew how close that we had gotten, and I needed to begin to process saying goodbye to Rick and Chelsea,' Goggins said. 'It's just a part of me just saying goodbye to this character so that now Aimee and I will be friends for f---ing ever,' he continued. He called the assumptions about the online move 'ridiculous,' as he always cuts some ties with co-stars to 'process' the experience after a project. 'I let her know, this is what I've gotta do. And she was extremely supportive about that.' The fictional couple had become so close off-screen during filming, as shown in their Instagram posts together at the time, that rumors of beef after the unfollow also accompanied rumors of an affair. Neither rumor has any founding, the two actors said, even as it pertains to Goggins and his other co-stars. He explained why he was absent from many of the post-season cast hangouts. 'I haven't spoken to anyone,' he said. 'I couldn't handle it. Judge me or don't. I don't give a f--- what you think. This is my process. Rick means everything to me, and Chelsea means everything to me. And so that's what I needed to do for me to process all of this,' he said. As for why she never addressed the rumors, which continued to grow louder and louder even after Goggins had an unpleasant encounter with a Times reporter, Wood said, 'Eventually I just started to sit back and watch these people making something out of absolutely nothing.' Something was certainly made. When Goggins insisted on not discussing the rumors with The New York Times, the actor was taken aback by the response he got from his interviewer, he told Variety. 'What he was insinuating, it was so disgusting. It was so appalling. I was flabbergasted. And I said, 'F--- mate, wow. I think we're done here.' He didn't want to get into it at the time because Wood wasn't there, he said. 'What am I gonna do, speak for both of us? Never.' The rumor mill only churned harder after Goggins appeared to praise the Saturday Night Live sketch mocking Wood's teeth and intelligence. Wood slammed the 'misogynistic' sketch again in the interview. 'I know for a fact a man wrote that,' she said. For his part, Goggins told Variety he was half asleep and heading into makeup to become The Fallout's 'Ghoul' when he complimented Jon Hamm's impression of him in the taped sketch. He didn't see Wood's reaction online until hours later, after which he deleted the post. 'I've been posting for 14 f---ing years, and if I'm gonna say something, I'm gonna say it to your face,' he said Wednesday, adding he'd never 'make a vicious swipe against my friend.' To make his his affection for his former co-star as clear as possible, Goggins gushed, 'I adore, I love this woman madly, and she is so important to me... She's special. There is no feud. She is love and I know that I am that to her. We care about each other very deeply.' With that, he concluded, 'Hopefully that answers everybody's questions.'

The Washington Post is planning to let amateur writers submit columns — with the help of AI
The Washington Post is planning to let amateur writers submit columns — with the help of AI

The Verge

timea day ago

  • The Verge

The Washington Post is planning to let amateur writers submit columns — with the help of AI

The Washington Post could soon allow non-professional writers to submit opinion columns using an AI writing coach known as Ember, according to a report from The New York Times. The move is reportedly part of a broader initiative to open the paper to outside opinion pieces, including from other publications, Substack writers, and amateur columnists. Sources tell the Times that Ember 'could automate several functions normally provided by human editors,' including by offering a 'story strength' tracker that indicates how a piece is progressing. The tool also reportedly has a sidebar showing the fundamental parts of a story, such as an 'early thesis,' 'supporting points,' and a 'memorable ending.' the Times adds that writers would also have access to an AI assistant, which would support them with prompts and 'developmental questions.' The project is reportedly called Ripple internally, and sources tell the Times that the articles will be available without a subscription on the outlet's website and app. The publication aims to secure its first partnerships this summer, while incorporating the AI writing coach will be part of the project's 'final phase' that could begin testing this fall, according to the Times. Human editors would reportedly review the pieces before they're published, which would be separate from the newspaper's opinion section. The Washington Post has undergone a major shift over the past several months, with newspaper owner and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos reportedly intervening to cancel the outlet's endorsement of Kamala Harris for president. The billionaire later told staff that the Post will no longer publish opinion articles that go against 'free speech and free markets,' according to a February report from The New York Times. Ripple is reportedly meant to cater to readers looking for 'more breadth' than the paper's existing opinion section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store