Still Frustrated? Everything iOS Needs to Fix (But Hasn't)
Apple's iOS is often celebrated for its sleek design and seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem. However, beneath its polished surface lie several limitations that restrict customization, functionality, and overall user experience. The video below from Sam Beckman provides more insights into the most prominent shortcomings of iOS, highlighting areas where it falls short compared to Android's more adaptable and user-friendly approach.
Watch this video on YouTube. Customization: Limited and Constrained
iOS provides only minimal options for personalizing your device, resulting in a rigid and uniform experience. The home screen is tightly bound by Apple's grid system, which forces app icons into predefined positions. Unlike Android, where you can freely place icons, resize widgets, or use third-party icon packs, iOS users must rely on cumbersome workarounds to achieve even basic customization. This lack of flexibility leaves users with fewer ways to make their devices feel truly personal.
The dock, a central element of the interface, is similarly restrictive. It remains static, offering no options to adjust its appearance or functionality. While Apple introduced the App Library to help organize apps, its rigid categorization system often complicates app management. The absence of an alphabetical grid further exacerbates this issue, making it difficult to locate specific apps quickly. In contrast, Android's home screen design and robust customization tools empower users to tailor their devices to their unique preferences, offering a more dynamic and personalized experience. User Experience: Aesthetic Over Usability
While iOS is often praised for its simplicity, this focus on aesthetics sometimes comes at the expense of usability. One notable example is the absence of a universal back gesture. On Android, users can swipe from the edge of the screen to navigate back, regardless of the app. In iOS, navigation relies on app-specific gestures or back buttons, which vary widely between apps. This inconsistency disrupts the otherwise smooth user experience and can lead to frustration.
Another usability issue lies in the system vibration toggle. Unlike Android, which provides quick toggles for vibration and other settings in its notification shade, iOS buries this option deep within the Settings menu. This design choice makes adjusting basic preferences unnecessarily time-consuming, especially for users who frequently switch between silent and vibrate modes. These examples highlight how iOS prioritizes visual appeal over practical functionality, leaving users with a less intuitive experience. Keyboard Functionality: Falling Behind
The iOS keyboard has long been a source of frustration for many users. Autocorrect often misinterprets context, leading to unnecessary and disruptive corrections that can slow down typing. Cursor placement is another weak point; moving the cursor to edit text feels clunky and less intuitive compared to Android's more precise controls, such as the ability to drag the cursor with a dedicated handle or use gestures for fine adjustments.
While third-party keyboards like Gboard offer some improvements, they cannot fully integrate with iOS due to system restrictions. This lack of integration limits their functionality, leaving users with a subpar typing experience. For a platform as advanced as iOS, the keyboard's shortcomings stand out as a missed opportunity to enhance usability and productivity. Clipboard Management: A Missed Productivity Tool
Clipboard functionality on iOS is notably limited, retaining only the most recently copied item. In contrast, Android offers a system-level clipboard manager capable of storing multiple copied items, allowing users to access and reuse them as needed. This feature is particularly valuable for multitasking and productivity, as it streamlines workflows that involve frequent copying and pasting.
While third-party clipboard apps are available for iOS, they often come with drawbacks such as clunky interfaces, additional permissions, or subscription fees. These limitations make it difficult for users to achieve the same level of efficiency that Android's native clipboard management provides. For users who rely on their devices for work or creative tasks, this shortcoming can be a significant hindrance. Notification Handling: Clean but Restrictive
iOS notifications are visually clean and well-organized, but they lack practical features that enhance usability. For instance, there is no quick swipe-to-dismiss option for notifications, requiring users to interact with each one individually. This can be particularly frustrating when managing multiple notifications at once. Additionally, notifications disappear from the lock screen after an hour, increasing the likelihood of missing important alerts.
Spam filtering for calls and messages is another area where iOS lags behind. Android devices, particularly those from Google, use advanced AI to block unwanted communications more effectively. In comparison, iOS's spam filtering feels less robust, leaving users more vulnerable to spam calls and messages. These limitations highlight how iOS's notification system, while visually appealing, lacks the functionality needed to meet the demands of modern users. Home Screen Design: Stuck in the Past
The iOS home screen, while functional, remains largely unchanged and uninspired. The inability to freely position icons or use third-party icon packs limits users' ability to personalize their devices. Although Apple introduced widgets to add some versatility, they remain less dynamic and customizable than those on Android. For example, Android widgets can be resized and interact with apps in more meaningful ways, offering greater utility.
The App Library, intended to simplify app organization, often complicates it instead. Apps are sorted into rigid, predefined categories, and the lack of a universal alphabetical grid makes finding specific apps unnecessarily tedious. This rigid approach contrasts sharply with Android's more flexible and user-centric design, which prioritizes ease of use and customization. Navigation Gestures: Inconsistent and Frustrating
Navigation gestures on iOS, while an improvement over older methods, still lack the consistency and intuitiveness found on Android. The absence of a universal back gesture is particularly frustrating. On Android, the back gesture works seamlessly across all apps, creating a cohesive and predictable experience. In contrast, iOS relies on app-specific navigation methods, which vary widely and disrupt the overall flow of using the device.
This inconsistency can make navigating iOS feel disjointed, especially for users who are accustomed to Android's more uniform approach. Addressing this issue would significantly enhance the user experience, making navigation more intuitive and efficient. Final Thoughts
While iOS excels in design and ecosystem integration, its limitations in customization, functionality, and user experience are difficult to overlook. From rigid home screen layouts to inconsistent navigation gestures, these shortcomings hinder the platform's overall usability. Addressing these issues would not only improve the iOS experience but also bring it closer to the flexibility and functionality that Android users have long enjoyed. For Apple to remain competitive, it must prioritize these improvements in future updates, making sure that iOS evolves to meet the needs of its diverse user base.
Master iOS customization with the help of our in-depth articles and helpful guides.
Source & Image Credit: Sam Beckman Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
From banning X to funding Dems: All the ways Musk and Trump could hurt each other as they go nuclear
An alliance between the two most powerful men in the world seemed destined to blow up into a volatile feud yet somehow held ... until it didn't. Within a few hours on Thursday, the public spat between Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded into debates over the president's impeachment, calls to launch primary challengers against Republican allies in Congress, and Musk's accusation that the president is implicated in a sexual abuse scandal. But how they choose to escalate from here could have far-reaching impacts — and not just for the fate of a massive bill that sparked their breakup. Trump and Musk command the world's attention, own competing social media platforms, and are each in a position to wield the power of the presidency and spend, and lose, billions of dollars against one another. How Trump could go after Musk Kill government contracts Trump has already suggested yanking government contracts for Musk's companies Tesla and SpaceX, which are due to receive at least $3 billion in contracts from 17 agencies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. On his War Room podcast, Trump ally Steve Bannon urged Trump to retaliate against the world's wealthiest man by, among other things, using the Defense Production Act to take control of SpaceX. 'The U.S. government should seize it,' Bannon said Thursday. Cut off Elon's access to the White House Musk ended his 130-day 'special government employee' term in the Trump administration last week after serving as an 'adviser' to the president for the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which Musk unleashed across the federal government to make drastic cuts to spending and the workforce. But Trump left the door open for Musk to return. That 130-day term can be renewed next year. Trump could sever that arrangement at any time. Bannon also called on Trump to strip Musk's top-secret clearances, which he is granted in conjunction with his work on SpaceX and NASA. Make X illegal With more than 220 million followers on a social media platform under his control, Musk can use that audience and ability to shift media narratives against the president to advance his agenda. Trump, whose entire campaign was built on retribution, possesses executive authority to shut X down, according to experts. Trump could declare X a national security risk, 'which would permit him to ban the platform outright,' claims Devan Leos with AI platform Undetectable AI. The president could invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act on national security grounds to prevent X from operating, which would likely trigger a high-profile legal battle. 'Musk now faces a difficult choice. He can ban Trump from X in retaliation, but that would almost certainly trigger an executive response from the White House,' according to Leos. The president, meanwhile, owns more than 100 million shares, or roughly 53 per cent, of Trump Media & Technology Group, the parent company of social media platform Truth Social. His stake in the company is worth billions of dollars. Investigate Musk's immigration status and drug use Musk was born in South Africa before he emigrated to Canada and later the United States. Last year, The Washington Post reported that the billionaire worked in the country illegally before gaining citizenship. Bannon called on the president to deport him. 'Elon Musk is illegal. He's got to go too,' Bannon said on his War Room podcast. Trump also could wield the power of his office to initiate other investigations under a Department of Justice controlled by his fierce ally Attorney General Pam Bondi, including into allegations of his drug use at the campaign trail and within the administration. How Musk could go after Trump Flood opponents with cash The world's wealthiest person spent tens of millions of dollars supporting Trump's 2024 campaign. On Thursday, he took credit for his victory. But this year, his multimillion-dollar effort to support a conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate blew up in his face, with his DOGE efforts tanking his — and Tesla's — appeal. Still, Republican candidates fear being his target. Musk and his allies have threatened to fund primary challenges against any GOP member of Congress who supports legislation he doesn't. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 percent in the middle?' Musk asked on Thursday. Democrats agree with Musk that Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is a disaster but aren't necessarily welcoming him to the party after the right-wing billionaire torched government agencies and helped but Trump back in office. 'We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, whose district represents Silicon Valley, told Politico. 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Liam Kerr, co-founder of the centrist WelcomeFest meeting underway in Washington during the Trump-Musk feud, told the outlet that 'of course' Democrats should be open to Musk. 'You don't want anyone wildly distorting your politics, which he has a unique capability to do. But it's a zero-sum game,' Kerr told Politico. 'Anything that he does that moves more toward Democrats hurts Republicans.' Wield social media against the president It took just four hours for a feud playing out on two different social media platforms for Musk to drop what he called a 'bomb' against the president. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' he wrote on X. '[Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' That loaded accusation — Musk's suggestion that Trump was involving the sex offender's trafficking scheme — appeared to be the tipping point in their feud. Musk, who just days ago seemed to have no problem associating with a man he is now alleging is implicated in Epstein's crimes, could launch a humiliation campaign against the president for an audience that has been largely disappointed with the Trump administration's approach to the Epstein case. Far-right influencers have turned on top federal law enforcement officials over the case, accusing Trump of continuing what they believe is a 'deep state' conspiracy theory covering up powerful people. Musk could leverage that hostility. Use DOGE against Trump Musk hired a small army of young loyalists and old allies for his government-wide operation to not only eliminate jobs and spending but extract reams of data from millions of Americans. DOGE's unprecedented access to Americans' data 'is alarming, made worse by the complete absence of meaningful oversight,' according to Ben Zipperer, a senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute. 'That unrestrained access to data will likely worsen the problem of identity theft in the United States, which could cost working families tens of billions of dollars annually.' A report from Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren's office also uncovered more than 100 instances that Musk allegedly abused his role as a 'special government employee' overseeing DOGE to benefit his private interests. Musk violated 'norms at an astonishing pace,' amounting to 'scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution.' The report accuses Musk of using the government to promote his businesses, including turning the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom, and allegedly discovered roughly two dozen instances where the government 'entered or explored new lucrative contracts' with the billionaire while halting enforcement actions against his companies.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Stablecoin firm Circle scales record high after blockbuster NYSE listing
June 6 (Reuters) - Stablecoin issuer Circle Internet's (CRCL.N), opens new tab shares climbed 41% to hit a record high on Friday, extending a stellar run after a blowout market debut on the New York Stock Exchange a day earlier. The New York-based company's stock touched as much as $117.45, more than triple its offer price of $31 and valuing the company at $30.5 billion on a fully diluted basis. The blockbuster listing also reinforced expectations that the IPO market was regaining its momentum after being stifled by tariff-driven volatility. "This is big enough that it extends beyond crypto," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital, a provider of IPO-focused research and ETFs. Wall Street executives also struck an optimistic tone on Thursday at an industry conference, emphasizing that markets were ready for the right companies. NYSE President Lynn Martin said Circle's IPO was a bellwether for the IPO market this year and not just for crypto listings. Investors are also realizing that the uncertain environment is going to be relatively persistent and focusing on putting their dollars at work, Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman said. "This is the latest sign of building momentum in the IPO market. We'll likely continue to see moderate activity over the next month, but there is still some tariff uncertainty on the horizon, which is why we're expecting more of a full IPO rebound in the fall," Kennedy said. Digital banking startup Chime is poised to go public in New York next week. Sixth Street-backed cancer diagnostic firm Caris Life Sciences, private equity-backed debt buyer Jefferson Capital and Florida-based Slide Insurance have also joined the IPO pipeline in recent weeks.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
How AI could help stop the next pandemic before it starts
Could artificial intelligence tools be used to stop the next pandemic before it starts? During the Covid pandemic, new technology developed by researchers at Johns Hopkins and Duke universities didn't exist. But, for the first time, researchers there say they've devised a revolutionary large language modeling tool - the type of generative AI used in ChatGP - to help predict the spread of any infectious disease, such as bird flu, monkeypox, and RSV. That could help save lives and reduce infections. 'Covid-19 elucidated the challenge of predicting disease spread due to the interplay of complex factors that were constantly changing,' Johns Hopkins' Lauren Gardner, a modeling expert who created the Covid dashboard that was relied upon by people worldwide during the pandemic, said in a statement. 'When conditions were stable the models were fine. However, when new variants emerged or policies changed, we were terrible at predicting the outcomes because we didn't have the modeling capabilities to include critical types of information,' she added. 'The new tool fills this gap.' Gardner was one of the authors of the study published Thursday in the Nature Computational Science journal. The tool, named PandemicLLM, considers recent infection spikes, new variants, and stringent protective measures. The researchers utilized data that had never been used before in pandemic prediction tools, finding that PandemicLLM could accurately predict disease patterns and hospitalization trends one to three weeks out. The data included rates of cases hospitalizations and vaccines, types of government policies, characteristics of disease variants and their prevalence, and state-level demographics. The model incorporates these elements to predict how they will come together and affect how disease behaves. They retroactively applied PandemicLLM to the Covid pandemic, looking at each state over the course of 19 months. The authors said the tool was particularly successful when the outbreak was in flux. It also outperformed existing state-of-the-art forecasting methods, including the highest performing ones on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's CovidHub. 'Traditionally we use the past to predict the future,' author Hao 'Frank' Yang, a Johns Hopkins assistant professor of civil and systems engineering, said. 'But that doesn't give the model sufficient information to understand and predict what's happening. Instead, this framework uses new types of real-time information.' Going forward, they are looking at how large language models can replicate the ways individuals make decisions about their health. They hope that such a model would help officials to design safer and more effective policies. More than a million Americans have died from Covid. It's not a matter of if there will be a next pandemic, but when. Right now, the U.S. is dealing with the spread of H5N1 bird flu, RSV, HMPV, pertussis, and measles, among other health concerns. Vaccination rates for measles have plunged since the pandemic, and general vaccine hesitancy has increased. That has resulted in fears that the nation could see decades of health progress reversed. Furthermore, U.S. health officials have acted to separate from global efforts to respond to pandemics, withdrawing from the World Health Organization earlier this year. Last month, they limited access to Covid vaccines for certain groups. 'We know from Covid-19 that we need better tools so that we can inform more effective policies,' Gardner said. 'There will be another pandemic, and these types of frameworks will be crucial for supporting public health response.'
