logo
Would you work here? 5 signs of a healthy workplace

Would you work here? 5 signs of a healthy workplace

Yahoo10-04-2025

If you're like most Americans, you'll spend one-third of your life working. And that doesn't account for commuting time, which averages 26 minutes each way, or nearly an hour a day.
When you spend all those hours with motivated colleagues who empower and inspire you, you'll look forward to clocking in. But when you're surrounded by managers who belittle and micromanage you, your emotional state can take a major hit, says Vicki Salemi, a New York City-based career expert for Monster. In an April 2024 poll, her team found that 67% of American workers feel like their job environment is toxic.
No job will ever be perfect, but Salemi says there are green and red flags to watch for during your job hunt and after you're hired that can signal whether you're at a top workplace or a toxic one.
Want a better boss? See the list of top-ranked workplaces.
Here are five signs of a healthy workplace:
Salemi says diversity and inclusion will be at the forefront of any positive work culture.
'A healthy workplace does not discriminate,' she explains. 'It is inclusive and treats everyone fairly and equally.'
In the job-hunting or interview process, consider scanning the leadership page. Is it composed of varying ethnicities, ages, and gender identities? That's likely a green flag.
In addition, Salemi says that a healthy workplace 'pays everyone what they're worth in the marketplace.'
If staff is underpaid and overworked, it will show in their performance, she notes. If employees are frequently sick, make mistakes, or if there's high turnover, that's a bad sign.
Top execs should be accessible, communicate frequently, and hold themselves accountable, Salemi says.
'Healthy environments typically stem from the top with effective leaders with morals and ethics who demonstrate company values,' she explains.
A telltale sign of healthy leadership is when executives directly address workers' anxiety over layoffs or economic uncertainty.
'They should be authentic and as transparent as they can be,' Salemi notes.
She explains that leadership can address concerns in a few ways, like company-wide messaging straight from the CEO, all-hands department meetings, and smaller, one-on-one meetings between managers and direct reports.
'They should address the elephant in the room by saying they realize there's a lot of uncertainty from layoffs,' Salemi says. 'Employees will feel seen and heard. Leaders may want to talk about growth, or stagnancy if that's the case; revenue, and where the company is positioned in relation to the industry as a whole.'
When employees have a solid understanding of how to earn a promotion, that's a big green flag, Salemi says.
She adds that it starts in the application process: 'Job descriptions won't be vague; there are tangible steps and responsibilities.'
She notes that a healthy workplace will provide many career opportunities and clearly defined paths toward promotions.
What's more, she says, a healthy workplace will guide employees in reaching those goals, too. 'They provide training and growth opportunities for employees to expand their skill sets and blossom in their careers.'
Salemi says it's a sign that the company wants employees to stick around long-term and is invested in their growth alongside the business.
Though return-to-office mandates have been on the upswing, Salemi says that work flexibility is still a major perk to look for.
'This could mean working remotely or four-day workweeks. Flexibility is just that—it's flexible,' she says. 'Our data has consistently shown over the past several years that flexibility—not only where they work, but also when they work—is a top priority for workers.'
Of course, you might not have a ton of power over your work situation—in that case, employers might show flexibility in other ways. Do managers gladly push out deadlines when, say, a sick kid needs to be picked up from school? Understanding that workers have lives outside of work is key, Salemi says.
Safety is highly important, Salemi notes. Employees should feel empowered to speak up and address issues while feeling seen, heard, and safe.
'They need to know there won't be retaliation,' she says.
She cites Monster data that 77% of workers have witnessed some type of workplace discrimination, while 28% didn't feel comfortable reporting an incident to human resources. 'Both sets of numbers are rather high,' Salemi says.
Importantly, Salemi says, the problems caused by toxic work environments don't just get resolved overnight.
'It takes time," she says, "and the company and its leaders need to be conscious and intentional about moving the needle to a healthy one,' she explains. "Often when there's a toxic situation, one of the best ways to change it is to leave for much healthier, better workplaces.'
If you're navigating a tough work culture and can't necessarily leave, rely on your inner circle.
'Surround yourself with supportive, loving family and friends ... as well as mental health counselors you can rely on,' she says. 'Take care of yourself, first and foremost.'
Each year, USA TODAY Top Workplaces recognizes organizations that excel at creating healthy workplace cultures. Employee feedback determines the winners, who are chosen based on surveys taken throughout the prior year. In 2025, over 1,500 companies achieved recognition. Top Workplaces also ranks regional employers throughout the United States.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 5 signs of a good company

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry
Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry

LONDON (AP) — Getty Images is facing off against artificial intelligence company Stability AI in a London courtroom for the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry. Opening arguments before a judge at the British High Court are scheduled for Monday. The trial could last for three weeks. Stability, based in London, owns a widely used AI image-making tool that sparked enthusiasm for the instant creation of AI artwork and photorealistic images upon its release in August 2022. OpenAI introduced its surprise hit chatbot ChatGPT three months later. Seattle-based Getty has argued that the development of the AI image maker, called Stable Diffusion, involved 'brazen infringement' of Getty's photography collection 'on a staggering scale.' Tech companies have long argued that 'fair use' or 'fair dealing' legal doctrines in the United States and United Kingdom allow them to train their AI systems on large troves of writings or images. Getty was among the first to challenge those practices when it filed copyright infringement lawsuits in the United States and the United Kingdom in early 2023. 'What Stability did was inappropriate,' Getty CEO Craig Peters told The Associated Press in 2023. He said creators of intellectual property should be asked for permission before their works are fed into AI systems rather than having to participate in an 'opt-out regime.' Stability has argued that the case doesn't belong in the United Kingdom because the training of the AI model technically happened elsewhere, on computers run by U.S. tech giant Amazon. Similar cases in the U.S. have not yet gone to trial. Stable Diffusion's roots trace to Germany, where computer scientists at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich worked with the New York-based tech company Runway to develop the original algorithms. The university researchers credited Stability AI for providing the servers that trained the models, which require large amounts of computing power.

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry
Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry

San Francisco Chronicle​

time27 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry

LONDON (AP) — Getty Images is facing off against artificial intelligence company Stability AI in a London courtroom for the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry. Opening arguments before a judge at the British High Court are scheduled for Monday. The trial could last for three weeks. Stability, based in London, owns a widely used AI image-making tool that sparked enthusiasm for the instant creation of AI artwork and photorealistic images upon its release in August 2022. OpenAI introduced its surprise hit chatbot ChatGPT three months later. Seattle-based Getty has argued that the development of the AI image maker, called Stable Diffusion, involved 'brazen infringement' of Getty's photography collection 'on a staggering scale." Tech companies have long argued that 'fair use' or 'fair dealing' legal doctrines in the United States and United Kingdom allow them to train their AI systems on large troves of writings or images. Getty was among the first to challenge those practices when it filed copyright infringement lawsuits in the United States and the United Kingdom in early 2023. 'What Stability did was inappropriate,' Getty CEO Craig Peters told The Associated Press in 2023. He said creators of intellectual property should be asked for permission before their works are fed into AI systems rather than having to participate in an 'opt-out regime." Stability has argued that the case doesn't belong in the United Kingdom because the training of the AI model technically happened elsewhere, on computers run by U.S. tech giant Amazon. Similar cases in the U.S. have not yet gone to trial. Stable Diffusion's roots trace to Germany, where computer scientists at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich worked with the New York-based tech company Runway to develop the original algorithms. The university researchers credited Stability AI for providing the servers that trained the models, which require large amounts of computing power.

New DOT rule could mean you spend $600 more on gas each year
New DOT rule could mean you spend $600 more on gas each year

Miami Herald

time35 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

New DOT rule could mean you spend $600 more on gas each year

The United States is a pretty car-dependent country, and we are also a country with a lot of cars that are not the most fuel-efficient in the world, including a substantial number of pickup trucks and large SUVs that guzzle gas. Since we do use a lot of gasoline, it's probably not surprising that the U.S. Energy Information Administration says that gas is consistently the type of energy that we devote the largest portion of our household energy spending to. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter In fact, the Consumer Expenditure survey shows that the average annual household spending on gas came in at around $2,148 per year in recent years. This is more than the amount that we're spending on natural gas, electricity, and fuel oil combined. There's no getting around the fact that you're going to have to keep putting gas in your car if you live the typical American lifestyle and aren't ready to abandon it for a walkable city and public transportation. Unfortunately, for those of us who are frequent drivers, it is entirely possible that fuel costs are going to rise. In fact, a new final rule issued by the Department of Transportation recently could mean that Americans end up spending around $600 more on gas each year than original projections suggested they would. Here's why gas spending may be higher than anticipated. The DOT action that is going to have an impact on your gas consumption came last Friday. On June 6, 2025, the DOT officially declared that Joe Biden had exceeded his authority as president when establishing fuel economy rules while in office. Specifically, under the Biden Administration, the DOT had put a rule in place that was finalized in 2024 that required manufacturers to improve fuel economy by 2% per year for passenger cars made between 2027 and 2031 and by 2% annually for SUVs and other light trucks made from 2029 to 2031. Related: New DOT rule could worsen trucker shortage, cause delivery delays Now, the DOT claims the Biden Administration did not properly exercise its authority when setting those fuel economy rules because it set them based on the assumption that there would be increased usage of electric vehicles regardless of what the emissions standards required. A statement accompanying the DOT's rule publication explained that the problem with the Biden administration's actions was that current statutory requirements prohibit the consideration of electric cars when the government establishes fuel efficiency requirements. The DOT says that the Biden Administration ignored that limitation and assumed a high number of consumers would switch to EVs. This new declaration has opened up the door for the Trump Administration to rescind the Biden standards and put in their own looser limits. When the Biden Administration established the stricter fuel efficiency standards, that rule was expected to save consumers more than $600 in gas costs each year, as well as help to fight climate change. Without those new standards going into effect, though, the $600 in savings promised by Biden's plan is not likely to materialize. Consumers will have to spend that extra money instead, since car makers are no longer going to be required to make such drastic cuts to the fuel that common vehicles use. Related: Major trucking company files Chapter 11 bankruptcy While spending $600 more per year on fuel costs doesn't sound very appealing, those who support the Trump Administration's actions believe that the order will give consumers more choice. Many car makers had their hands severely tied in trying to meet the Biden administration's standards, which would likely either force them to increase costs or to change the kinds of vehicles they were producing. They won't be subject to these rules anymore and can continue making cars that consume more gasoline, which, frankly, appear to be the cars many Americans want. "We are making vehicles more affordable and easier to manufacture in the United States. The previous administration illegally used CAFE standards as an electric vehicle mandate," Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement regarding the rule change. More Economic News: Tesla, Elon Musk make drastic decision amid U.S.-China trade warMajor U.S. automaker makes harsh decision in the wake of tariff tussleTariffs will devastate this entire industry Still, those hoping car makers would have been inspired to find new ways to improve fuel efficiency may be disappointed in the fact that some key incentives that could have prompted those changes are now disappearing. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store