Bihar 2023 police scam;ED conducts multiple searches
Patna: The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday conducted multi-state searches in connection with a money laundering investigation into an alleged scam in the recruitment of police constables in Bihar during 2023, official sources said.
At least a dozen locations of private entities like agents, exam paper leak syndicate members and their associates in Patna and Nalanda in Bihar, Ranchi (Jharkhand), Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) and Kolkata (West Bengal) were raided under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the sources said.
A press in Kolkata in which the exam papers were printed was also covered by the investigators of the federal probe agency, they said.
The masterminds of this alleged scam are the same as that of the NEET UG paper leak 'scam' of 2024, they said.
The Bihar Police Constable 2023 recruitment was aimed to fill 21,391 vacancies across various units of the Bihar police.
The examination was conducted at 529 centres across 37 districts of Bihar on October 1, 2023 attracting over 18 lakh aspirants.
Following allegations of the exam paper leak, it was cancelled by the state central selection board of constables (CSBC) on October 3 that year.
The money laundering case stems from some Bihar Police (economic offences unit or EOU) FIRs. The ED suspects money laundering in this case as a gang of agents generated 'proceeds of crime' (illicit funds) by leaking the exam papers and selling it to aspirants and used the money given by the candidates to create personal assets.
Some Bihar police officials are also under the scanner of the ED, as per the sources.
The state police had arrested seven private people in this case, including three from West Bengal. An inter-state gang headed by Sanjeev Mukhiya was termed by the police as the perpetrators of this paper leak.
Mukhiya has worked as a technical assistant in a government college in Nalanda district. He is currently lodged in judicial custody.
The Bihar EOU found that an accused named Kaushik Kumar Kar had a Kolkata-based firm, Caltex Multiventure Pvt Ltd, and he was awarded the contract to print and supply the question papers for the constable recruitment examination.
However, it was discovered that Caltex Multiventure Pvt Ltd was a a one-room 'shell' company with no employees, and printing and supply of question papers was outsourced to a company named Blessing Secured Press Pvt Ltd, where Kar's wife was a director.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Delhi Police apologises for wrongly identifying journalist as suspect in criminal case
NEW DELHI: The Delhi Police has apologised for wrongly identifying a Noida-based journalist as a suspect in a criminal case, an official said on Friday. A team from the Prem Nagar Police Station in outer Delhi, comprising a sub-inspector, a head constable and a constable, was investigating a case registered under sections 318(4) (cheating involving valuable security) and 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, he said. "The team was tracking the location of the accused identified as Rahul, a resident of Bahadurgarh, through his mobile phone," Deputy Commissioner of Police (Shahdara) Prashant Gautam said. It led the team to a petrol pump in Sector 38, Noida, where they found a man in a car with his wife, whose description matched the suspect, he added. "When the team asked him to produce an identity card, he reportedly refused and entered into an argument. The man later identified himself as Rahul Shah, a Noida-based journalist," the DCP said. Upon realising the mistake, the police team apologised and returned to the police station. "No misbehaviour or force was used during the incident," the officer said. The confusion was due to the similarity in facial features and the name, the DCP said, adding, "As soon as the team confirmed that the individual was not the accused, it expressed regret and disengaged from the interaction." An internal note has been made regarding the incident, and no further action is being pursued.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Maharashtra IPS officer Rashmi Karandikar's husband arrested by Mumbai Police's EOW. Here's why
Mumbai Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has arrested Purushottam Chavan, husband of an IPS officer, on Wednesday for allegedly duping a Surat-based businessman and others of ₹ 7.42 crore, reported PTI. According to the report, Purushottam Chavan, is married to IPS officer Rashmi Karandikar, was taken into EOW custody in the evening. He is already in judicial custody after being arrested in a previous case involving similar allegations. EOW stated that Chavan allegedly duped a Surat-based businessman and others by promising them land parcels at discounted rates under a purported 'government quota' scheme. He also allegedly offered to secure government contracts for supplying T-shirts to the Maharashtra Police Academy, further enticing his targets with the prospect of official connections. Earlier in May, Chavan was arrested by the EOW in another high-value fraud case where he was accused of cheating multiple people to the tune of ₹ 24.78 crore. He had purportedly promised to sell government quota flats in Mumbai, Thane and Pune at concessional prices, added PTI.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Wrong Rahul, Wrong Place: Noida Journalists Harassed In Shocking Police Mix-Up
New Delhi: On a humid Thursday afternoon at a petrol pump in Sector 38, Noida, Ayantika Pal and Rahul Saha, a married couple and dedicated journalists, stopped to refill their car. Both accustomed to navigating high-pressure situations in their work. But nothing could have prepared them for the ordeal that unfolded leaving them shaken and questioning the systems meant to protect them. As they waited for their tank to fill, three individuals approached - Sub-Inspector Ritu Dangi, Head Constable Harendir, and Constable Amit from the Delhi Police's cyber cell. The trio, dressed in plain clothes, had their eyes fixed on 31-one-year-old Rahul. Without warning, Harendir grabbed Rahul's arm, accusing him of being a suspect in a criminal case involving cheating and conspiracy. "You're Rahul, aren't you?" the constable demanded, his tone leaving no room for doubt. Ayantika, sensing the situation spiralling, pulled out her phone and began recording. "Who are you? Show us your identification!" she insisted. The officers, claiming to be tracking a cybercriminal named Rahul from Bahadurgarh, barely acknowledged her. The officers coerced them to exit their car and began forcing Rahul into a private vehicle. When Ayantika resisted one of the male constables ordered the woman constable " kheecho isko peeche se". Ayantika, stunned, produced her press ID, clearly stating that her husband is Rahul Saha, a Noida-based journalist, and they're both originally from West Bengal. "Please verify before you do this," traumatised Ayantika kept insisting. HARASSMENT. TRAUMA. When some officers claiming to be of @DelhiPolice cyber cell tried to KIDNAP us in broad daylight. Here's what happened today that has left me and my husband (@rahoolism) traumatized. — ayantika pal (@AyantikaTOI) June 19, 2025 But the officers pressed on, unconvinced, their actions fuelled by a flawed assumption. They had tracked a mobile signal to the petrol pump, and Rahul, by sheer coincidence, matched the first name and general description of their target. The interaction grew heated, with Ayantika's video capturing the chaos: fuel dispensers in the background, bystanders watching, and the couple's growing distress. "This is harassment. We're journalists, and you're treating us like criminals without checking who we are," Ayantika said. Describing the fragility of personal security in the face of unchecked authority, Rahul and Ayantika told NDTV: "If we weren't from the media, we'd likely be in a jail cell right now, no questions asked. This is terrifying - how many others go through this without a voice?" Ayantika, still shaken, shared, "I feel traumatised and humiliated. We were just refilling our car, and suddenly saw my husband being manhandled. What happens to people who don't have press IDs or cameras to protect them?" She added, "I keep seeing it in my mind - the way they grabbed him, the way they dismissed us. It felt like we were nothing. If we weren't journalists, would anyone have listened?" Rahul emphasised the broader implications: "This isn't just about us. It's about a system that lets this happen to anyone, anywhere, without accountability. We were lucky to have our press cards and a camera. Most people don't." The officers, after several tense minutes, finally checked Rahul's ID and realised their mistake. The Rahul they sought was a different man, from a different city, tied to a different life. SI Dangi, visibly chastened, scribbled a handwritten apology on a piece of paper, using the car's bonnet as a makeshift desk. It read: "SI Ritu Dangi, HC Harendir & Ct Anit, PS-Cyber, Shahdara misunderstood Mr Rahul Shah as our alleged person Mr Rahul and apologised on behalf of my team and in future this thing will not be done from our side." The note, riddled with errors, was a small gesture in the face of a profound violation. The Delhi Police later issued a formal statement through Deputy Commissioner Prashant Gautam, explaining that the team was investigating a case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for cheating and conspiracy. They had tracked a suspect's mobile signal to the petrol pump, where Rahul's presence was a tragic coincidence. "No misbehavior or force was used," the statement claimed, adding that the team apologised and disengaged upon realising the error. An internal note was filed, with no further action planned. But for Ayantika and Rahul, the incident was far from resolved. The video, now circulating widely, sparked outrage and raised critical questions. How could a police team, equipped with mobile tracking technology, fail to verify basic details before confronting an innocent couple? What does this say about the training and protocols of a cyber cell tasked with precision in a city plagued by sophisticated crimes? And most troublingly, how many others without the visibility of journalists or the evidence of a recorded video- face similar treatment?
