Dad-of-three crushed to death under crane lift as builders try to save him
Hakan Yakisan was working as a plasterer on a building site when the steel cable of a cargo lift snapped and crushed him, with his workmates unable to save him before help arrived
A family has been left in mourning after a father died in a tragic workplace freak accident. The father of three is set to have his funeral today after he lost his life while on the job, while a massive investigation is underway by the authorities.
Hakan Yakisan, 46, was a professional plasterer, and was working on a building site at the time of his death on May 12. The dad was caught under a cargo lift, which fell on top of him while dangling above and crushed him. The heavy lift was used to hoist bricks up to the higher floors on the site, but its steel cable snapped and killed him instantly when the weight hit.
Other builders on the site in Aybasti, Turkey, rushed to try to save Yakisan from beneath the equipment, but the heavy lift couldn't be moved from man power alone.
Paramedics responded to the scene, but declared Yakisan dead before they reached the local Aybasti State Hospital. The plasterer underwent an autopsy, with his body returned to his bereaved family for the planned funeral today.
Now, Turkish police and figures from the Ministry of Labour are investigating the incident, and trying to figure out how the steel cable of the cargo lift snapped to take Yakisan's life. The outlet reports that building sites in Turkey are incredibly dangerous, with 152 workers dying on the job in April alone.
While Turkey might have a particular issue with unsafe building sites, a very similar case occurred in the UK when a mother - completely unattached to any building work - was caught in tragedy in east London.
In March 2018, Michaela Boor was walking past a construction site on Burdett Road in Bethnal Green when she was killed on the pavement. A pallet containing more than two tonnes of bricks fell 70ft from a crane and landed on the young mum, who was just 28 at the time.
Other Londoners who saw the incident gave her CPR to keep her alive until the air ambulance arrived and rushed her to hospital. Despite the care, Boor died just two days later after her 29th birthday had passed.
Years later, the building company and four men have been charged with manslaughter, and are due at Westminster Magistrates' Court on June 16.
The Metropolitan Police said Higgins Homes Plc, a construction company that develops and builds properties across London and the south east, was charged by postal requisition on Wednesday, May 7.
Crane operator McInnes and site manager Anstis were charged on May 8, while crane supervisor Maan and Coulson, who was responsible for compiling the lifting plan for the site, were charged on April 30.
Malcolm McHaffie, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's special crime division, said in part of a statement: "Higgins Homes Plc has been charged with corporate manslaughter and a Health and Safety at Work Act offence, while Thomas Anstis, 68, Stephen Coulson, 68, Dawood Mann, 59, and Alexander McInnes 32, have each been charged with a single count of gross negligence manslaughter and offences under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
This is a dangerous moment for free speech
Britain without blasphemy laws is a surprisingly recent development. Blasphemy was abolished as a common law offence in England and Wales only in 2008 and in Scotland in 2021. But that was the final burial of a law dead for much longer. The last execution for the crime was in 1697; the last imprisonment in 1921; and the last successful trial in 1977 – Mary Whitehouse's prosecution of Gay News for publishing a poem about a centurion's rape of Christ's corpse. Even if 11 local councils banned Monty Python's Life of Brian two years later, the trend since has been towards trusting that the Almighty is big enough to fend for himself. Yet this week the clock seemed to have been turned back to around ad 650. Hamit Coskun was convicted of a racially aggravated public order offence motivated 'by hostility towards… followers of Islam'. His crime? Setting fire to a Quran, shouting 'fuck Islam' and declaring the faith a 'religion of terrorism' outside the Turkish consulate. The Crown argued Coskun's demonstration could not have been peaceful, since it provoked a Muslim man to attack him. The alternative explanation – that Coskun had, in a rather regrettable way, proved his main point, eluded the professionals of Lord Hermer's Crown Prosecution Service. Coskun was originally charged with the exciting new crime of harassing the 'religious institution of Islam' – treating a faith with 1.9 billion followers like someone with hurt feelings. Although that charge was not pursued, the eventual ruling's impact is effectively the same. Henceforth, anyone criticising a religion is at the mercy of the tender sensibilities of any bystanders.
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Why I burnt the Quran
My name is Hamit Coskun and I've just been convicted of a religiously aggravated public order offence. My 'crime'? Burning a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish consulate in London. Moments later, I was attacked in full view of the street by a man. I was hospitalised. Then I was arrested. Some may say that book-burning is a poor substitute for reasoned debate. I would counter that it was a symbolic, non-violent form of expression intended to draw attention to the ongoing move from the secularism of my country of birth to a regime which embraces hardline Islam. As I told Westminster Magistrates' Court, what I did constituted political protest and the law, as I understood it, was on my side. CPS guidance makes clear that legitimate protest can be offensive and on occasion must be, if it is to be effective. In that spirit, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects not just polite speech but speech that offends, shocks or disturbs. Political expression, above all, is meant to enjoy the strongest protection. Alas, the judge ruled otherwise. And the reasoning deployed to convict me raises troubling questions, not only about the scope of public order law but about whether Britain is witnessing the quiet return of blasphemy laws. Although the man who assaulted me is being prosecuted separately, the Crown says his action helped to prove my guilt. It argued that because I was attacked, my behaviour must not have been peaceful. Under this logic, 'disorderly' no longer depends on conduct, but on how offended or aggressive someone else chooses to be in response.
NBC News
2 days ago
- NBC News
Trump says Putin told him he'll retaliate against Ukraine, casting doubt on peace progress
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin told him that Moscow would retaliate against Ukraine's major drone attack over the weekend, casting doubt that a peace deal to end the war could come soon. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he and Putin spoke for about an hour and 15 minutes and conveyed that it wasn't going to lead to "immediate" peace between Russia and Ukraine. "We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides. It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," Trump wrote, referring to Ukraine's massive drone attack on Russian air bases that took place Sunday. Trump said they also discussed negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," he said. "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" Putin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters during a phone briefing that the Russian president accused Ukraine of trying to thwart peace talks. Ushakov also said Trump told Putin that the U.S. was not made aware in advance of Ukraine's massive drone attack Sunday. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. A delegation of Ukrainian officials held meetings this week with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also serves as Trump's national security adviser, as well as Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau. Negotiators from Ukraine and Russia met in Istanbul on Tuesday for peace talks during which they discussed exchanges of prisoners of war, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Wednesday. Zelenskyy said that Russia gave Ukraine an "ultimatum," not a memorandum for a cease-fire agreement. He also said he's ready to meet with Putin and Turkish President Recep Erdoğan in the coming days. Despite these negotiations over ending the war that began in 2022, the conflict has continued. In addition to the massive drone attack Ukraine launched against Russia over the weekend, Ukraine has also attacked key Russian bridges, including a critical one that connects Russia to its territory of Crimea. Russia, meanwhile, has continued launching strikes against civilians in Ukraine. In the last 24 hours in Ukraine, four civilians were killed and more than a dozen were injured as a result of Russian strikes. Trump has in recent months publicly expressed frustration with the Russian leader, with whom he has long bragged about having an amicable relationship. Trump said last week that the U.S. would know within two weeks whether Putin was serious about ending the war in Ukraine.
