logo
Former cop sues police chief and town of Amherst

Former cop sues police chief and town of Amherst

Yahoo31-03-2025

A former Amherst, N.S., police officer is suing the town and the chief of police for defamation.
Mark Rushton, who filed his suit in Nova Scotia Supreme Court earlier this month, alleges accusations last year that he misrepresented his qualifications for his job have ruined his reputation and career and caused personal hardships.
Rushton resigned on June 6, 2024, just 10 days after being told a complaint had been made against him under the Nova Scotia Police Act. He worked for the Amherst Police Department for about a year as a constable and says in his lawsuit that his resignation was not related to the complaint, but rather was the result of a decision to move to the Annapolis Valley to be closer to his family.
According to his lawsuit, Rushton was served with the complaint on May 27, 2024, and it accused him of acting "in a disorderly manner" and having "willfully [made] a false or misleading statement in an official record."
When Amherst police announced the following month that they were conducting an internal investigation of one of their own officers, police Chief Dwayne Pike never identified Rushton by name in his public statements when he said they were investigating questions about an officer's credentials and qualifications.
But the Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service and court documents did identify him. The prosecution service launched a review of all cases Rushton handled during his time on the Amherst force, resulting in nine charges against seven people being dropped.
In his lawsuit, Rushton contends Pike's comments "tend to lower the reputation of the Plaintiff by right thinking members of society" and were "libellous and defamatory."
In an email, Laura Neilan, the lawyer who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Rushton, said she "looked forward to vindicating his reputation during the litigation process."
"We have not seen a shred of evidence to suggest that Mr. Rushton was dishonest during the interview process, or that he lacks the necessary qualifications to work as a police officer in Amherst," the email said.
Rushton worked as a military police officer in 2017 and served as a special constable with a town in Alberta before taking the job in Amherst.
Reputation, career 'have been destroyed'
Rushton said the Amherst department had his resumé and a full record of his training, which includes graduation from the Canadian Forces Military Police Academy and Dalhousie University's police leadership program.
His suit says there's nothing in the Police Act to suggest his military police training was inadequate and asserts that "his reputation and career have been destroyed as a result of Chief Pike's libellous statements."
Rushton says he's been unable to get a job with a municipal police force because any background check invariably leads to stories about his problems with the Amherst force.
He says he tried to resume work as a military police officer, but the force wouldn't accept him until after it conducted its own investigation into his credentials. He was able to land a short-term contract with them that expires this month.
Rushton says in the suit that he has lost custody of his children and been forced into bankruptcy because of his lack of steady employment.
"Chief Pike's statements were made with a reckless disregard for the consequences to the Plaintiff's reputation and livelihood and as such, they amount to bad faith, warranting both aggravated and punitive damages," the lawsuit says.
While no specific monetary amount is referenced in the suit, Rushton's lawyer said in its preamble that the case falls within a rule that limits damages to under $150,000.
None of the allegations in the lawsuit have been tested in court and none of the participants accepted CBC's invitation to comment on the case.
MORE TOP STORIES

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tracking the major Supreme Court cases of 2025
Tracking the major Supreme Court cases of 2025

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Tracking the major Supreme Court cases of 2025

All eyes are on the Supreme Court as it issues this term's final flurry of opinions — some of which concern hot-button issues like birthright citizenship and gender-affirming care — before breaking for summer recess. CNN is tracking the key Supreme Court cases of the 2024-2025 term. Justices have ruled on some major cases already, including one involving 'reverse discrimination' and another tied to gun violence at the border. More than 40% of total cases remain. Here's what we know so far and what we're still waiting on. Among the cases that have already landed is Ames v. Ohio, a lawsuit in which a woman alleged she was discriminated against by her gay boss because she is straight. The court unanimously sided with the plaintiff in early June, making it easier to win 'reverse discrimination' suits in some parts of the country. The Supreme Court also threw out a lawsuit from the Mexican government that argued American gunmakers should be held accountable for contributing to gun violence and chaos at the border. The lawsuit alleged that the American companies were marketing firearms specifically to drug cartels and gangs. In a 9-0 ruling, however, the court said the Mexican government did not 'plausibly allege' that manufacturers aided and abetted unlawful sales. The Supreme Court has yet to weigh in on some of the most important cases of the term, which could have far-reaching implications for millions of Americans. One of those cases centers on birthright citizenship — which guarantees citizenship to all children born on US soil, regardless of their parents' immigration status. The justices will decide whether President Donald Trump can deny birthright citizenship through an executive order, effectively reshaping long-standing legal precedent. A high-profile case concerning transgender care is also on the docket. The court is reviewing Tennessee's gender-affirming care ban, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender minors and penalizes healthcare providers who violate the law. More than half of all US states have passed bans on medical care for trans youth. Sixteen states and the District of Columbia, however, have enacted 'shield' laws to preserve access to trans health care. As part of a yearslong effort to expand parental rights in schools, parents of Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland are suing the state's board of education for violating their religious beliefs. The justices will decide whether elementary schools need to allow parents to opt their children out of reading LGBTQ+ books in class. The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority has signaled that they would side with the parents.

Thai panel upholds suspension of doctors who helped ex-PM Thaksin dodge jail
Thai panel upholds suspension of doctors who helped ex-PM Thaksin dodge jail

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Thai panel upholds suspension of doctors who helped ex-PM Thaksin dodge jail

BANGKOK (Reuters) -Thailand's medical council on Thursday upheld its suspension of two doctors who enabled influential politician Thaksin Shinawatra to spend his prison sentence in hospital, a day ahead of the start of a Supreme Court case that could see him jailed. Thaksin, the driving force behind the current government, returned from 15 years of self-exile in 2023 to serve a prison term for abuse of power and conflicts of interest, but was sent to hospital after only a few hours in jail complaining of chest problems. The polarising billionaire, whose daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra is prime minister, stayed in a VIP wing of the hospital for six months until his release on parole without a single night in jail, prompting public outrage and deep scepticism about the extent of his ailments. "More than two-thirds of the council voted to uphold the punishments," Medical Council of Thailand vice president, Prasit Watanapa, told reporters. "Members made the decision based on medical principles, evidence and reason." The suspensions could impact a case at the Supreme Court that begins on Friday in which the legality of Thaksin's hospital stay has been challenged, with the possibility the tycoon could be made to serve that time again, in prison. Thaksin, 75, remains a towering figure in Thai politics and though he holds no formal government role, he is highly influential. His lawyer declined to comment on Thursday on the council's decision. The revival of the controversy over Thaksin's hospital stay comes at a challenging time for Paetongtarn's government, which is seeing its popularity dwindle amid a prolonged struggle to spur economic growth and domestic pressure to take a tougher stance on an ongoing border dispute with Cambodia. Thaksin's sentence was originally eight years, but it was commuted to a year by the king and he became eligible for parole after six months. The medical council's vote overrides a veto of its earlier decision by Health Minister Somsak Thapsutin, a Thaksin ally. The council had yet to confirm the duration of the suspension of the two doctors, who it found had issued documents that contained false medical information. They had denied wrongdoing and stood by their medical assessments. Another doctor with the corrections department received a warning for failing to meet medical standards in a referral notice for Thaksin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store