
Editorial: Money talks with Florida's new attorney general
Tallahassee's dealership-driven car sales legislation made Tesla a winner in 2023 by allowing it to bypass dealerships and sell cars directly to Floridians, even while banning the practice for others.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier intends to make another automotive startup, Scout Motors, a loser for just thinking about it.
That's no surprise. Since Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed his ex-chief of staff to the state's top legal post, Uthmeier has repeatedly flexed state power to choose winners and losers while winking at fairness and accountability.
When it comes to cars, Uthmeier is with wealthy dealers — not cost-conscious car buyers.
In this case, Scout Motors plans to revive the discontinued but popular Scout truck brand, with electric vehicles. The U.S. subsidiary of Volkswagen bought billboard space in Miami and Fort Lauderdale and invited people to pay a reservation fee of $100. The money secures the right to buy a truck or SUV directly from Scout.
Buying cars directly from manufacturers instead of through dealers is a boon for buyers. No dealer haggling. No murky pricing. Dealers hate it, of course. They argue consumers are best served by the middleman system of dealerships started in 1889.
Years of research poke holes in that idea, and buyers navigating a thicket of add-on dealer costs would disagree.
Scout trucks won't roll off an assembly line before 2027. Dealers aren't waiting. Several sued Scout Motors in Miami-Dade, citing Florida's ban on almost all direct sales. Dealers also asked the judge to let them rifle through Scout's business records. They want to find out how many Floridians paid $100 reservation fees.
Independent Florida journalist Jason Garcia revealed that Uthmeier's office wrote to Scout, asking how many Florida consumers paid $100 reservation fees and how much money Scout raised.
Uthmeier then hopped onto the Attorney General's X account to warn that Scout is hiding the fact that it will not sell cars in Florida.
Directly below it was a link to an opinion piece, announcing dealerships are best suited to sell Scout vehicles. The post is inexplicably misleading. Scout hasn't finalized its distribution plan, but it absolutely intends to sell and transport cars directly to Floridians. That's what the dealerships hope to stop.
This is not happening in a political vacuum.
The unelected, unknown Uthmeier must face voters next year as he'll be up for election. As Garcia details, Uthmeier's office started quizzing Scout Motors after Miami dealership mogul Norman Braman and his wife donated $25,000 to Uthmeier's political committee.
Braman Automotive is at the top of the Miami lawsuit. In total, dealerships and their lobbyists have chipped in almost $90,000 to keep Uthmeier in office, according to the Orlando Sentinel.
In this case, Scout Motors is the hand-picked loser: It will have to defend itself in the Miami dealership case and answer to the A.G.'s office.
But Uthmeier's picks aren't confined to dealerships.
Target's Pride Month started a decade ago. Company stock fluctuated both before and after its 2023 promotion turned political.
That didn't stop Uthmeier from filing a class action lawsuit, alleging that Target should have signaled that consumer backlash would undercut its stock, devaluing shares held by the state's retirement fund.
That fund also owns more than two million shares of Tesla. Its stock price fell sharply this year in large part because Elon Musk's politics hurt the brand. No one is talking about suing Tesla over how the entirely predictable political backlash hurt shareholders. Tesla wins, but Target loses.
Then there's the Snapchat lawsuit. The harmful impact of social media on mental health is real. But Uthmeier zeroed in on a business with $5.3 billion in revenue while disregarding social media businesses whose collective revenue is measured in the hundreds of billions, and whose platforms share several problems outlined in the Snapchat suit.
Instagram and Twitter have been used to sell drugs. WhatsApp uses disappearing messages. Facebook addiction research is mounting. All platforms manipulate users to keep them scrolling.
Uthmeier has spent just over 70 days picking winners and losers. If elected in 2026, he could have eight years to do the same.
That's eight banner years for the attorney general's deep-pocketed donors — less so for people who just wanted to buy a new Scout.
The Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board includes Executive Editor Roger Simmons, Opinion Editor Krys Fluker and Viewpoints Editor Jay Reddick. The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board consists of Executive Editor Gretchen Day-Bryant, Editorial Page Editor Steve Bousquet, Deputy Editorial Page Editor Dan Sweeney and editorial writers Pat Beall and Martin Dyckman. Send letters to insight@orlandosentinel.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk is not leaving Washington quietly
Elon Musk is not leaving the nation's capital quietly. The Tesla CEO confirmed his exit from Washington, D.C., in a post on X Wednesday night, saying that his scheduled time as a special government employee is coming "to an end." "I would like to thank President [Trump] for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending," Musk wrote on X, referring to his work with the Department of Government Efficiency. The post came one day after telling CBS in an interview that is scheduled to air in full this weekend that he was "disappointed" by the price tag of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" that could produce over $3 trillion in new red ink if the bill is passed. The bill "increases the budget deficit ... and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," he said. White House adviser Stephen Miller said on X that the bill would in fact reduce the deficit and that DOGE cuts would have to be formalized in subsequent legislation. The world's richest man is making his views on a variety of subjects well known in Washington as he returns his attention to his many businesses, including Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX ( He told Bloomberg last week that he is going to do less political spending in the future, saying "I think I've done enough," and acknowledged to Ars Technica that "I think I probably did spend a bit too much time on politics." His ongoing feud with OpenAI's Sam Altman even became part of the Washington conversation after the Wall Street Journal reported that Musk pushed back against a deal announced last week that has OpenAI ( and other tech giants building an AI data center in Abu Dhabi. The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reported that Musk tried to include his AI company, xAI, in the deal, but that didn't happen. Musk also made it clear this week that he is returning to the office so he can focus on his businesses, including Tesla, SpaceX, and X. "Back to spending 24/7 at work and sleeping in conference/server/factory rooms," he said Tuesday on X, adding that he "must be super focused on X/xAI and Tesla (plus Starship launch next week), as we have critical technologies rolling out." Tesla itself is gearing up for crucial robotaxi trials in Austin, starting at the end of July. Musk and Tesla have bet the future of the company on self-driving and the ability for its cars to perform robotaxi services. Tesla's dedicated robotaxi — the Cybercab — is slated for a 2026 launch as well. And Tesla's long-awaited, more affordable EVs are expected to be revealed in the first half of the year. Musk's return to work has been teased since April, when he said his time in D.C. would be dropping. "Starting early next month, in May, my time allocation to DOGE will drop significantly," Musk told investors on Tesla's Q1 earnings call. But reports showed Musk was still spending time in D.C. in April. Last week, during two separate interviews with Bloomberg and CNBC, Musk reiterated his rededication to his companies. He also said he sees himself in the Tesla CEO chair for at least the next five years. Musk and his DOGE allies rode into Washington months ago with giant promises to cut "at least" $2 trillion from the government's annual budget, an effort that has shown little results even after causing chaos among the federal workforce and seeing Musk recently take a step back. A tracker of real-time government spending from the Brookings Institution shows that overall government spending in calendar year 2025 is actually slightly up from 2024 spending levels, even as the effects of DOGE can clearly be seen on smaller agencies like the US Agency for International Development (USAID). In an interview this week with the Washington Post, Musk lamented the criticism and opposition his cost-cutting project engendered, saying, "DOGE is just becoming the whipping boy for everything." Musk previously appeared to signal his opposition to the bill when he posted last week — as the bill was being debated — that "the profligacy of government means that only radical improvements in productivity can save our country." This week's CBS interview has seen him be much more specific. "I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both," he joked, adding, "My personal opinion." But in his post on X Wednesday night, Musk struck a note of optimism: DOGE's mission, he said, "will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government." Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can Tesla sales recover in Europe amid Elon Musk backlash? Yahoo Finance readers have their say
Tesla (TSLA) shares rose this week, as CEO Elon Musk confirmed his exit from Washington DC, despite data showing that the electric vehicle (EV) company's sales in Europe nearly halved last month. Musk said in a post on X on Wednesday night that his scheduled time as a special government employee is coming "to an end". "I would like to thank President [Trump] for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending," Musk wrote on X, referring to his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This came a day after Musk said in a CBS interview, due to be aired in full this weekend, that he believed Trump's tax bill "increases the budget deficit ... and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing". Musk has faced backlash over his role heading up DOGE and overseeing cuts to government agencies, with protests having been held at Tesla (TSLA) facilities around the world. Tesla sales have continued to fall amid the backlash against the billionaire. Figures from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA), released on Tuesday, showed that sales of Tesla (TSLA) vehicles dropped by 49% to 7,261 units in April, compared with the same month last year. The EV maker's market share declined to 0.7% from 1.3% in April of 2024. ACEA data has shown Tesla's (TSLA) sales in Europe dropping since the start of the year, even as electric car sales grew in the region. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio In April, Tesla (TSLA) reported global deliveries of 336,681 for the first quarter, which missed expectations of 390,342, according to Bloomberg consensus estimates. This made it the worst quarter for deliveries in almost three years. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell (AJB.L), said that given the fall in Tesla's (TSLA) European sales "came against a backdrop of a meaningful increase in European electric vehicle sales more broadly, it suggests the brand damage caused by Elon Musk's political interventions may be lasting". Earlier this week, we asked Yahoo Finance UK readers if they believed that Tesla (TSLA) sales in Europe could recover amid the backlash against Musk. We received 309 votes, with 18% of respondents believing that sales could recover, while 75% disagreed and 7% were undecided on the matter. Read more: What's behind the surge in AI-related lawsuits? UK 'bargain' stocks that have outperformed the market long-term Odds of more Bank of England interest rate cuts fall as food inflation risesSign in to access your portfolio

Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Court hems in Florida minors who want abortions without their parents' knowledge
A Florida appeals court took an unusual legal step when it earlier this month struck down as unconstitutional a law allowing minors to get abortions without parental consent. Florida youth have for decades been able to petition a judge for permission to have an abortion without their parents' knowledge. This May, a pregnant 17-year-old initiated one of those cases. When a lower court judge denied her the waiver for an abortion, she appealed. The Fifth District Court of Appeal took up the appeal. But instead of focusing solely on the teen's case, the court used it to weigh major constitutional questions — a move that one judge acknowledged is rare. The court's decision effectively stops most minors from being able to have abortions unless their parent gives consent, further restricting Florida's already limited pathways to abortion and setting up a possible question for the Florida Supreme Court. The move was celebrated by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier and other conservatives. But abortion access advocates have decried it, saying the court went into the case with an outcome in mind and found its way to it. 'Judicial overreach doesn't even begin to describe it,' said Amy Myrick, senior counsel of U.S. litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights. Inviting in the AG Before the appeals court judges got all the details about the teen's case, they drafted an order asking her lawyers to answer four legal questions. The questions had nothing to do with the minor's specific circumstances but were more broadly about the judicial waiver process itself, including whether the parents of minors got due process. Then, in a move that some observers said was unusual, the court invited Florida's Republican Attorney General James Uthmeier to weigh in on the legal questions the judges raised. Uthmeier joined the case as an opponent and argued that the judicial waiver process violates parents' rights. (Usually, in the judicial waiver process, the minor makes the petition and the judge decides if the girl is 'sufficiently mature' to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy. There are normally no other outside parties involved besides the minor's lawyers.) 'When you're reaching out to do a whole bunch of stuff you don't need to do to resolve a case, it's usually because you're trying to get a big legal conclusion about it,' said Mary Ziegler, a reproductive law expert at UC Davis School of Law. Mat Staver, the chairman of the conservative anti-abortion group Liberty Counsel, said it wasn't unusual for the courts to give notice to the attorney general when a constitutional provision is being questioned, and said it was 'very appropriate' for the appeals court to do so. Uthmeier last year, while he was still Gov. Ron DeSantis' chief of staff, was the chairperson of a political committee that opposed a proposed amendment to protect abortion rights in Florida. That amendment ultimately failed in November's election. Uthmeier has also pushed against the idea of minors getting abortions without parental consent. A few months before weighing in on the Florida case, Uthmeier filed a brief encouraging the U.S. Supreme Court to reevaluate what rights minors have and what rights their parents have when it comes to abortion, arguing that there was a common law tradition of parents having rights over their children. Florida's bypass process has been used less frequently after the six-week abortion ban went into effect last year. In 2024, courts saw 130 petitions filed across the state, most of which were granted. The courts A judge on the Fifth District Court of Appeal acknowledged that the court's decision to weigh in on the constitutionality of the law, rather than resolve it more simply, was unusual. The court also said that it was possibly the 'first and only' time it would be able to address the question, 'which has thus far evaded review despite being posed in an untold number of prior cases.' In a concurring opinion in the recent Fifth District case, Judge John MacIver said the court thought it was appropriate to address the constitutional questions because parents whose kids have abortions without their knowledge would not be able to challenge the law themselves since, 'by design,' the law blocks those parents from being informed. The justices' actions were primed by a move last year by the First District Court of Appeal. That court said it couldn't review abortion waiver cases because there was no party opposing the minor. 'The only opportunity for a defense of those fundamental rights came about here because the Attorney General of Florida was invited to brief as amicus and instead sought intervention,' MacIver said. Of the three judges in the Fifth District who heard the case, two were appointed by DeSantis — MacIver and Jordan Pratt, who authored the decision and used to work at a conservative religious liberty law firm that has represented anti-abortion parties. Pratt this week was nominated by President Donald Trump to a federal judgeship. The third justice, Brian Lambert, was appointed by former Gov. Rick Scott. No judge dissented. What about teens now? After the court's ruling, there are limited circumstances where minors can still use the waiver process, such as if they are the victim of child abuse, said Elizabeth Ling, an attorney with the abortion access group If/When/How. 'For the vast majority of people who are under 18 in the state of Florida, the judicial bypass or the judicial waiver process is no longer an option,' Ling said. With the ruling in place, pregnant minors in Florida's foster system find themselves in uncharted territory. Florida law prohibits the Department of Children and Families from ever authorizing an abortion — meaning that foster kids have no other option but to use the judicial waiver process if they want to terminate their pregnancy. Ling said that because the ruling leaves the avenue only for victims of child abuse, it could create a split process for foster kids. Youth who are in the system because of abuse could access the waiver process, but foster youth who are in the system for other reasons may not be able to. Ling said research shows that young people largely involve a parent with news of their pregnancy, and said when people seek otherwise, they 'have thought very deeply and carefully' about it. She said young people are now 'being forced to choose between either having the abortion or their safety and their wellness.' Florida Supreme Court The appeals court said it anticipated future Florida Supreme Court review of the question of whether the judicial waiver law complies with a parent's due process rights. If the Florida high court does hear the case, earlier precedent could mean it sides with people trying to dismantle the judicial waiver process. Last year, the Florida Supreme Court said the state constitution doesn't guarantee a right to an abortion. Ziegler said if the judicial waiver case does move to the Florida Supreme Court, it could be a way for anti-abortion advocates to argue about fetus' rights in their briefing in the hopes that justices would seize on it and include it in a ruling. If the court determines that fetuses have more rights, it could lead to further restrictions on abortion. 'They want to get on the Florida Supreme Court on personhood,' Ziegler said. Of the seven state Supreme Court justices, five have been appointed by DeSantis. Some have known anti-abortion views. Staver, the chairman of the conservative anti-abortion group Liberty Counsel, said the recent case striking down judicial waivers was 'perhaps the first step' in the direction of looking at a right to life for fetuses in the Florida Constitution — as well as affirming parental rights more broadly.