FDA recalled 10 items so far in May. Look for these items in your house
Tomatoes, snack mix, baked beans and a brand of tattoo ink were among the several food and drug items recalled by the Food and Drug Administration this month.
If you're not aware of what's currently being recalled for May, here is what you need to know.
Fresh & Ready Foods, Fresh Take Crave Away, City Point Market Fresh Food to Go ready-to-eat sandwiches and snack items: Recalled for potential listeria monocytogenes contamination.
New Grain Gluten Free Bakery breads, bagels, cookies and croutons: Recalled for undeclared eggs, soy, and milk.
Organic traditions Organic Jumbo Pumpkin Seeds: Recalled for potential foodborne illness - salmonella.
Sacred Tattoo Ink Sacred Tattoo Ink, Raven Black; CI# 77266; Lot#: RB0624; Best Before: June 28 2027, Sacred Tattoo Ink, Sunny Daze; CI# 21095; Lot#: SD1124; Best Before: Nov 1 2027: Tattoo inks that are contaminated with bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Endurance Boost dietary supplement for male performance and energy: Recalled for undeclared Propoxyphenylsildenafil, Sildenafil.
New England Village Snacks 19th Hole Snack Mix: Recalled for undeclared almonds and sesame.
President Brand licorice plum: Potential or undeclared allergen – sulfites, unapproved color – Amaranth (E123).
Yellowstone baked beans: Recalled for potential or undeclared allergen - soy.
Ray & Mascari Inc. tomatoes: Recalled for potential foodborne Illness - salmonella.
H&C Farms Label tomatoes: Recalled for potential foodborne Illness - salmonella.
It's good to be aware if you recently purchased a recalled product. There are steps to follow if you do have these products in your home. According to FoodSafety.gov, here is what you should do.
Don't panic: The majority of food recalls are not directly linked to an outbreak of foodborne illness. Instead, many recalls are initiated due to the potential risk of contamination in the food product. In such cases, food manufacturers often issue a recall as a preventive measure to safeguard consumers.
Don't eat the food or consume the drug: To ensure your safety, refrain from consuming any recalled food products. Always prioritize caution over convenience. Additionally, please refrain from donating the recalled food to food banks or providing it to your pets, as they are also susceptible to food poisoning.
Don't open the food: To prevent foodborne illnesses, refrain from opening and inspecting food. Bacteria and viruses responsible for such illnesses are invisible, odorless, and tasteless. If you do handle the product, ensure you thoroughly cleanse your hands with warm water and soap for 20 seconds afterward.
Check the recall notice to find out what to do with the food: Upon a food product recall by a manufacturer, specific instructions are provided regarding the product's handling. These instructions generally entail one of the following actions: Return the product to the original store of purchase for a refund. Safely dispose of the product to prevent consumption by humans or animals, particularly if the product has been opened.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: FDA recalls 10 items so far in May, including tomatoes, baked beans
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
FDA meeting gives window into gene therapy field's angst
This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter. Anyone looking for evidence of genetic medicine's enormous promise need only read of KJ Muldoon. The 10-month-old infant headed home from a Philadelphia hospital this week, dressed in a celebratory cap and gown, after his life-threatening disease was successfully treated with a bespoke CRISPR therapy. While baby KJ is not cured, the treatment has stabilized his disease, a rare liver condition known as CSP1 deficiency, to such extent he's able to resume eating a normal diet. Doctors, who hurriedly designed and constructed KJ's custom therapy in a matter of months, have backed off supportive medications and hope he'll no longer need a liver transplant. 'Each year, 10 million babies are born with one of about 10,000 known rare genetic diseases, many of which are, in principle, now treatable with genetic medicines,' David Liu, a pioneering CRISPR scientist whose laboratory helped in KJ's treatment, said at a meeting hosted by the Food and Drug Administration Thursday. 'The opportunity created by this perfect storm moment in scientific, medical, regulatory and manufacturing innovation is to provide on-demand genetic treatments like KJ's at scale.' Yet Liu and 22 other gene therapy experts and advocates who attended Thursday's roundtable didn't travel to the regulator's headquarters in White Oak, Maryland to extol the field's advances. By and large, they came to warn of a crisis. There are now dozens of approved cell and gene therapies in the U.S., some of which offer near-curative potential for serious diseases like spinal muscular atrophy, sickle cell disease and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the sector that's produced these therapies is struggling. Investors have soured on genetic medicine as developers struggle to prove they can profitably sell the complex and often hugely expensive treatments. Biotechnology companies are cutting research, laying off staff and, in some cases, shutting down. Large pharmaceutical firms are no longer willing to bet billions of dollars they can surmount the regulatory and reimbursement hurdles that stand in the way of many of these therapies. And academic labs, still bursting with promising new ideas for technologies like CRISPR, now fear their projects will wither on the vine. 'We estimate that over 100 rare disease gene therapy products that had reached clinical stage have been discontinued since 2023 — not because of treatment failure, but because of the risk of market failure,' said Terence Flotte, dean of the University of Massachusetts' T.H. Chan School of Medicine and president of the American Society of Cell and Gene Therapy. 'The scientific advances that we have witnessed are just nothing short of spectacular. It's not hyperbole,' said Crystal Mackall, a professor at Stanford University and founding director of the cancer cell therapy center there. 'Despite this unconditional scientific success, the field is really struggling to deliver these therapies to all patients who can benefit.' Their warnings found a receptive audience in FDA leadership. Commissioner Martin Makary and top official Vinay Prasad, who leads the office that oversees cell and gene therapies, were sympathetic to experts' arguments and pledged to help. 'We are going to continue the successes of the FDA in facilitating the regulatory process for these conditions and these products,' said Makary. 'We're also going to try to improve by creating more efficiencies.' Prasad, who in the past has criticized the FDA's accelerated approval of a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, showed support for flexible trial designs and endpoints when appropriate for the disease or treatment. He also noted the agency accepts that cell and gene therapies don't always comes with transformative potential. 'We understand that progress is not always made in a single leap,' he added. 'We will consider incremental steps forward, because those add up.' The assembled experts came with lists of possible solutions. Carl June, a famed immunologist and cell therapy researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, called for the U.S. to borrow from the two-tier regulatory system used in China, which allows for medical institutions to more rapidly start first-in-human trials under the supervision of local review boards. Don Kohn, a University of California, Los Angeles scientist who has developed gene therapies, asked the FDA to reduce the requirements for 'comparability' testing when companies transition production from academic to commercial settings. Others emphasized the importance of regulatory awards, like the priority review vouchers granted by the FDA to developers of certain therapies, who often sell them for needed capital. And many called for the agency to share more feedback and lessons learned from the applications they receive from industry. Behind all of their suggestions was a consistent concern: If regulators don't help solve the field's problems, the U.S. risks losing its leadership in developing the kinds of treatments that can cure diseases. 'If we don't adapt, the next generation of treatments will emerge abroad,' said June. 'The future of medicine with cell and gene therapy is at stake.' Their message seemed to be heard by Makary and Prasad, who noted that many of the issues raised are on their radar at FDA. Prasad, for instance, noted that they hope to redact and make available more internal documents to aid developers' understanding of what the FDA is looking for. 'This is not a horse and pony show to say we did this,' added Makary. 'This is an honest listening session.' Recommended Reading A bespoke CRISPR therapy suggests a blueprint for treating 'N-of-1' diseases
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alzheimer's blood test can accurately pick up early symptoms
A new blood test for Alzheimer's disease can accurately detect people with early symptoms, research suggests. Experts from the Mayo Clinic in the US have provided further evidence that blood tests can work to accurately diagnose dementia, by examining two proteins in blood plasma. These proteins – amyloid beta 42/40 and p-tau217 – are associated with amyloid plaque build-up, which is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Researchers found the blood test was highly accurate, with 95% sensitivity, which means it was 95% accurate in picking up people with memory problems, with very few cases missed. It was also 82% for specificity, which means it was also highly accurate in ruling out people without dementia. The study was carried out on more than 500 people in an outpatient memory clinic, meaning it is real-world data. The blood test has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration regulator in the US. Dr Gregg Day, who led the study in the Alzheimer's and Dementia journal, said the test was as good as more invasive tests currently in use. 'Our study found that blood testing affirmed the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity,' he said. 'When performed in the outpatient clinical setting, this is similar to the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of the disease and is much more convenient and cost-effective.' Overall, researchers found that p-tau217 levels were higher in patients with Alzheimer's disease versus those without the disease. Dr Day said the next steps in the research were to evaluate blood-based testing in more diverse patient populations and people with early Alzheimer's who show no cognitive symptoms. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director for research and innovation at the Alzheimer's Society in the UK, said the results 'suggest this test is very accurate' and could be used alongside other tests and observations from a trained health professional. "This study shows how blood tests are making diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease quicker, easier and more accessible than ever before in a real-world setting," he added. "While focused on Alzheimer's disease, the test was evaluated in people with other types of dementias too, showing that it may help with differentiate causes of cognitive decline – though more research in diverse groups of individuals and in community-based setting is still needed."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Blue states call on FDA to expand abortion pill access
Attorneys general of New York, California, New Jersey and Massachusetts are asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to expand access to the abortion pill and remove some 'unnecessary' drug restrictions that have been in place for more than two decades. The joint petition, filed Thursday, comes days after FDA Commissioner Marty Makary committed to reviewing the abortion drug amid pressure from Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and some Republican lawmakers. The FDA first approved of the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for an abortion in 2000. Unlike surgical abortions, medication abortions do not need to take place in a clinical setting, and patients are able to take the pills at home. Most abortions in the U.S. are now medication abortions, according to data from the reproductive health and rights group Guttmacher Institute. In 2023, 63 percent of all abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions. The safety of mifepristone has come under increased scrutiny by some Republican lawmakers, citing a flawed study claiming the rate of adverse health events that occur among patients is far higher than previously reported. More than 100 scientific studies have been conducted looking at the safety and efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol; all of them have found that the drugs are a safe way to terminate a pregnancy. 'Given Mifepristone's 25-year safety record, there is simply no scientific or medical reason to subject it to such extraordinary restrictions,' New York Attorney General Letitia James said. 'The FDA must follow the science and lift these unnecessary barriers that put patients at risk and push providers out of care.' Mifepristone's use is subject to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program under the FDA. The attorneys general argue three requirements under the REMS program for the drug should be removed since they pose a burden to patients and health care systems. The first is related to prescriber certification. As part of the REMS program, health care providers who prescribe mifepristone are required to add their names to national and abortion provider lists, which the attorneys general say raise 'serious safety and legal concerns.' The second has to do with patient agreement forms. All patients who want mifepristone — even those using the drug to treat a miscarriage — are required to sign a document stating they are using the drug to end a pregnancy. The third requirement mentioned in the petition is connected to pharmacy certification. As part of mifepristone's REMS program, pharmacies that carry the drug are subject to tracking, shipping and reporting requirements, which the attorneys general argue may 'dissuade' some from carrying the drug. The FDA has yet to reply to a request for comment from The Hill about the petition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
