logo
'I was at LA protests - cops swarmed as terrified families fought for rights'

'I was at LA protests - cops swarmed as terrified families fought for rights'

Daily Mirrora day ago

Donald Trump ordered the deployment of National Guard troops into Los Angeles following anti-ICE protests where people unhappy with the aggressive immigration policy have taken to the streets
Arriving in Los Angeles after nearly a week of anti-ICE demonstrations in the city, the National Guard being called in and President Donald Trump threatening to arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom, I had no idea what I was walking into.
Parking about two blocks away from Los Angeles City Hall, I made my way down Main Street to the now scattered protests near the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, where much of the weekend protests took place. On my way, I saw the vandalism scrawled over signage, buildings, and sidewalks throughout downtown - but I did not see rioting, I did not see looting. I saw people fighting for their rights.


Despite the pushed narrative, I saw a scared community on Tuesday. Afraid of having their families ripped apart, fearful of seeing their friends and neighbours taken away, and scared that this could only be the beginning. I saw what Americans have done since a group of colonists hurled tea into the Boston Harbor in 1773 to protest their government - use their rights.
To me, there's nothing more fundamentally American than the right to protest your government's actions. Engaging in protest honors the millions of lives sacrificed so that we may have the right to do so. As Abraham Lincoln said, "We here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain-that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom-and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Making my way past the Federal Building, I saw what appeared to be heavily armed National Guardsmen patrolling the entrance, with a handful of protesters lobbing insults and jeers at them as they stood stoic and at attention.
Large swaths of LAPD and California Highway Patrol officers lined the streets, blocking foot traffic to the Federal Detention Center, where many of the people swept up in Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids over the past several days were being held. As the day wore on, more and more heavily armed officers arrived on the scene, with some bystanders telling me they had already detained several people and set off canisters of tear gas and flash bangs, although I did not witness that myself.
The first demonstrator I spoke with told me he flew all the way from Wisconsin to attend the protest, saying these protests were history in the making and he couldn't watch from the sidelines.

"I booked a one-way ticket here, brought my camera, and here I am, just here supporting a lot of different stuff mainly, but the fact is the system of capitalism has failed us," said Liam, who did not wish to provide his last name. "I'm very passionate about my country, and people like to say I'm not patriotic, but I think the most patriotic thing you can do is realize your country's flaws and work to change them."
A theme of many left-leaning protests I've attended over the years has been everyone bringing their own cause into the demonstration, regardless of whether it is the main cause being highlighted, and that was no different on Tuesday.
Many used the demonstration to air out every grievance they had with the Trump administration, whether it be cuts to the federal government, immigration, or the war in Gaza.

For much of the day, I found myself bouncing back and forth between several scattered protests all over downtown, and the police, to their credit, were very much restrained from what I witnessed. Nearly everyone carried signs and engaged in traditional call-and-response chants such as "Who's streets? OUR STREETS" and "Show me what democracy looks like. THIS IS WHAT DEMOCRACY LOOKS LIKE."
One woman said she came out to set an example for her son that what the Trump administration is doing to immigrants is morally wrong.

"I don't agree with what ICE is doing; I don't agree with illegal search and seizures just because the Trump administration thinks this is okay-mobilizing the military for domestic reasons? When we're not even doing anything. Some bad actors are causing violence and throwing things at the cops, and I don't stand for that. I stand for peaceful protesting and utilizing my First Amendment right to disagree with what they're doing," said Danielle Kahl.
"It's not okay, and I don't agree with it, and I'm not gonna teach my kid that it's okay. I'm gonna teach my kid that he needs to see for himself what's going on with his own eyes and then decide for himself."
Not all those present were there to support the immigrant community; some seemingly were there to antagonize the protesters and elicit a response. One man continued screaming about how ICE was deporting child sex traffickers and, when confronted by protesters, quickly backed off and attempted to play the victim.

At one point, a man told a black woman arguing with the man to not even respond to his attempts to antagonize, to which the man replied to her, "Listen to your overseer," something that I, and many others, took as blatantly racist remarks, alluding to chattel slavery.
Even those who Trump's aggressive immigration policy may not directly affect turned out to support the Los Angeles community, saying they can't live their day-to-day lives knowing that innocent families are being torn apart.

"I just can't sit by anymore, act like nothing is happening, and just live my day-to-day life. Okay, criminals, he [Trump] ran on that, that's what he's gonna do. I'm not okay with the children; there are no children that are criminals; they're getting taken out of our schools; we should all be affected, we're all affected," said Scottie Taylor while holding a sign that read, "Jesus was never brutal."
"I'm a 50-year-old white woman; I've had friends that have had their husbands deported. But the main reason I'm here today is because I'm tired of them trying to distort the narrative, and I'm here because, again, I'm a 50-year-old white woman in the middle of downtown LA, and I feel safe. There's no need for 4,000 National Guard troops," Taylor added.

As more heavily armed police officers made their way downtown to contend with several groups of protesters blocking the 101 Freeway, something done during many protests in the city, I thought things might be winding down for the day. I decided to make my way back to the entrance of the Federal Building, where the same 15 or so National Guardsmen were guarding the door.
As I photographed them, I noticed what appeared to be the commanding officers bark out several orders, and the troops stepped forward. Looking up from my camera, I saw two of the largest groups of protesters I'd seen that day, converging in front of the building and marching uptown towards LA Live and Crypto.cm arena.
This was the main event of the day, and tired and sunburned as I was, I ran to the front of the pack and followed them as they marched through the greater Los Angeles area, all the way up to the 110 Freeway entrance and back down to City Hall.

Thousands of people flooded the streets with many cars tailing behind them, honking their horns in support, hanging out the window waving Mexican and American flags, and chanting "ICE OUT OF LA" as they made their way down the street. And when I say down the street, I mean they were in the middle of the street, blocking traffic with little police presence around them.
However, drivers didn't seem annoyed by them; they honked their horns in support and leaned out the window to yell encouraging messages. As I approached the front of the protest, a man tapped me on the shoulder to show me something on his phone. A news alert said that Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass had imposed an 8 p.m. curfew for downtown LA. I thanked him and continued following the protestors.
This was when I saw with my own eyes blatant vandalism taking place, with some people jumping out of their cars to spray the side of highway onramps and buildings, some with completely irrelevant messages, making clear they were likely just opportunists, taking advantage of the situation. One of the people even accosted me to snap a photo of him spraying the graffiti, which struck me as odd, as many protesters throughout the day covered their faces when I pointed my camera at them, not wanting to be seen at the protest.
As my legs grew tired and my resolve weakened, I checked the time on my phone, which told me it was 7:30 pm, which was my signal to wrap it up as I did not want to be caught outside past the imposed curfew. Thirsty and tired, I found salvation at a local 7/11, where I refueled with a Mountain Dew. I called an Uber to take me back to my car and called it a night. Sitting in my Uber recounting the day's events to my driver Angel, we both look on in shock as several military vehicles carrying what I can only assume to be National Guard troops; I wondered whether what I saw that day warranted a full-blown military response.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South African president to brave second meeting with Trump following Oval Office mauling
South African president to brave second meeting with Trump following Oval Office mauling

Telegraph

time12 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

South African president to brave second meeting with Trump following Oval Office mauling

Cyril Ramaphosa has said he will meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit next week, less than a month after the South African president was ambushed in the Oval Office. Mr Ramaphosa said his main aim was to reset relations with the White House during the summit in Canada. 'I am going there to have bilaterals with the chancellor of Germany, the prime minister of Canada and, of course, I will also be meeting President Trump, who we met at the White House,' he told reporters in Pretoria. He had the merest hint of a smile before addressing one of the reporters directly and breaking into laughter: 'You were there when they started dimming the lights...' Once the lights were dimmed, that White House meeting became a video screening about violent crime in South Africa, with the president holding aloft a sheaf of news cuttings about the persecution of white farmers in Mr Ramaphosa's country. The Trump administration has welcomed families of Afrikaner farmers to the US as refugees. And Mr Trump used the visit of his South African counterpart to make the case that they were the victims of racist violence. 'We have many people that feel they're being persecuted, and they're coming to the United States,' he said. 'So we take from many ... locations, if we feel there's persecution or genocide going on.' He screened a video showing rows of opposition leaders making incendiary speeches and rows of white crosses which Mr Trump claimed were the graves of murdered white South Africans. He also brandished printouts of news stories describing violence and murder in South Africa, although some eagle eyed observers noticed that a picture supposedly showing a burial site was actually from a report about women being killed in the Democratic Republic of Congo. However, Mr Ramaphosa told reporters the meeting had been a success and that he wanted to use his trip to Canada to discuss trade relations. 'It's important for us to reposition ourselves in the turbulent geopolitical architecture,' he said. World leaders from the world's most developed economies are due to begin arriving in Alberta on Sunday. Mr Trump and his trade policies will cast a long shadow over the two days of meetings. Mr Ramaphosa is due to host world leaders at the G20 later in the year and has invited the American president to attend. 'We are going to use it as a platform to begin to consolidate what we want to achieve in November, when the G20 leaders' summit takes place here,' he said. 'I am hoping that when we meet with the various other leaders of various countries who are part of the G7, we will be able to interact meaningfully with them.'

So what's there to high-five about now, Ms Reeves? Critics blast Chancellor's tax and spend plans - as it emerges the economy SHRANK by 0.03 per cent
So what's there to high-five about now, Ms Reeves? Critics blast Chancellor's tax and spend plans - as it emerges the economy SHRANK by 0.03 per cent

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

So what's there to high-five about now, Ms Reeves? Critics blast Chancellor's tax and spend plans - as it emerges the economy SHRANK by 0.03 per cent

Rachel Reeves ' plan to renew the British economy was left in tatters yesterday after figures revealed it was slamming into reverse. The Office for National Statistics said gross domestic product shrank by 0.3 per cent in April – the worst monthly performance for a year and a half. It came less than 24 hours after the Chancellor declared that only Labour could fix Britain as she set out the Government's spending plans. Yesterday she admitted that the latest numbers were 'clearly disappointing'. Yet much of the blame for the slump was laid squarely at her own door – with firms pointing to the impact of Ms Reeves' £25billion raid on employer national insurance. Donald Trump 's tariff wars and the end of a stamp duty holiday also took their toll. It added to the growing sense of disenchantment with Labour's handling of the economy as firms also face higher business rates and a raft of new workers' rights. The figures will knock the wind out of the Chancellor's sails after the UK had appeared to enjoy a much brighter start to the year, with GDP growing by 0.7 per cent in the first quarter – the fastest pace among the G7 group of advanced economies. Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said: 'It's bad news that growth has fallen but when you introduce a £25billion jobs tax, hike business rates, drive investors overseas and spawn hundreds of pages of red tape, lower growth is precisely what you get. 'You can't tax and spend your way to growth. The quicker this socialist Government wakes up to that, the better.' Separate figures today from the Recruitment and Employment Confederation showed the number of those seeking jobs has seen the biggest increase in four and a half years, as redundancies surge and work opportunities shrink. And evidence mounted that entrepreneurs are becoming fed up with Labour's anti-business policies, as a survey from accountancy firm S&W showed 39 per cent were considering moving their companies abroad because a lack of support. It came as Tesco, Britain's biggest supermarket, said costs being piled on to it by the Government were resulting in higher prices for consumers. 'There are definitely continued inflationary pressures on the market,' said chief executive Ken Murphy. 'I think you've got to look at things like the impact of all the new taxation and regulatory costs on the industry.' The downturn in April was the worst since October 2023 and bigger than the 0.1 per cent contraction expected by economists. The figures covered a period when President Trump introduced his 'Liberation Day' tariffs that caused a wave of market turbulence and upended decades of global trading arrangements. They showed a £2billion slump in UK goods exports to the US, the biggest fall on records going back to 1997. There was also a big drop in output from the car industry – one of the sectors worst affected by tariffs. And the end of the stamp duty holiday took its toll as a surge in market activity at the start of the year, as buyers rushed to beat the deadline, screeched to a halt. The deteriorating picture will only add to fears that the Chancellor will raise taxes again this autumn. It follows figures earlier this week showing the economy has lost more than a quarter of a million jobs since her last Budget. Suren Thiru, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, said: 'These figures suggest that the UK's economic fortunes took a notable nosedive in 'Awful April'. 'April's decline is probably the start of a more sobering period for the UK economy with the damage from spiralling costs and intensifying global uncertainty set to slow growth sharply this quarter. Weaker growth makes generating the revenue Government needs to support its sizable spending plans more difficult, increasing the chances of further tax rises in the autumn Budget.'

Americans split on Trump's use of military in immigration protests, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Americans split on Trump's use of military in immigration protests, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Americans split on Trump's use of military in immigration protests, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's decision to activate the military to respond to protests against his crackdown on migrants, with about half supportive of the move, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Thursday. Some 48% of respondents in the two-day poll agreed with a statement that the president should "deploy the military to bring order to the streets" when protests turn violent, while 41% disagreed. Views on the matter split sharply along partisan lines, with members of Trump's Republican Party overwhelmingly backing the idea of calling in troops while Democrats were firmly opposed. At the same time, just 35% of respondents said they approved of Trump's response to the protests in Los Angeles, which has included sending National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to the city and also threatening to arrest Democratic officials, including the governor of California. Some 50% of people in the poll said they disapproved of Trump's response. Trump has argued the military deployment in Los Angeles was needed due to protests there following a series of immigration raids in the city. Some of the demonstrations in Los Angeles have turned violent - leaving burned out cars on city streets - and 46% of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said protesters opposing Trump's immigration policies had gone too far, compared to 38% who disagreed with that view. The protests have spread to other U.S. cities including New York, Chicago, Washington and San Antonio, Texas - all of which have large immigrant populations and tend to vote for Democrats rather than Republicans. Trump campaigned and won last year's election on a promise to increase deportations of undocumented immigrants and Reuters/Ipsos polls have shown that his support on immigration policy has been consistently higher than on other matters, such as his stewardship of the U.S. economy. The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which surveyed 1,136 Americans nationwide and has a margin of error of about 3 percentage points, showed wide support for increased deportations. Some 52% of respondents - including one in five Democrats and nine in 10 Republicans - backed ramping up deportations of people in the country illegally. Still, 49% of people in the poll said Trump had gone too far with his arrests of immigrants, compared to 40% who said he had not done so. The most heated protests have taken place in Los Angeles County, where one in three residents are immigrants and about half of people born abroad are naturalized U.S. citizens, according to U.S. Census estimates. Nationwide, Americans took a generally dim view of Trump's threats to arrest Democratic officials like California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. Just 35% of respondents said Trump should order arrests of state and local officials who try to stop federal immigration enforcement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store