
As Indigenous communities consider banishment to address drug crime, a lawyer explains how it works
Social Sharing
As many N.W.T. communities grapple with an ongoing drug crisis, some are looking for new ways to address the issue and increase public safety.
One idea discussed last week at a public safety forum hosted by the Dene Nation in Yellowknife is for communities to banish people deemed responsible for problems.
Marc Gibson is a lawyer who practices in the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Ontario with a focus on Indigenous rights and constitutional law. He spoke with CBC's Trailbreaker host Hilary Bird on Friday about how banishment works and what rights communities and individuals hold.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
We have a number of different types of Indigenous communities here in the Northwest Territories, those with settled claims, and we have reserves. Can you walk us through how banishment works in Indigenous communities?
At its core it's basically the process of removing somebody from a community or from part of a community or from a certain situation. And there's a number of different ways that it can be done depending on what the community is trying to do.
If they're trying to remove non-members from the community, it can be done fairly easily actually, through a trespass law and through trespass enforcement. And if they're trying to remove members who have a right to be in the community, then it's a much more complicated process because the person has a legal right to be there.
Indigenous people have collective rights to the lands that they have, whether they're reserve lands or settlement lands. And so if the person being removed has a right to be there, then the community needs to go through due process in order to remove that person and make sure that they've had a chance to tell their side of the story and that they're making a reasoned decision.
So if it's a non-member, it's much easier to do. How do you go about doing that?
It's an authority that most First Nations have, regardless of whether they're an Indian Act First Nation or an Indigenous group that has a settlement agreement or a treaty with the government.
They usually have some kind of authority that allows them to control residency on reserve and issues relating to public safety and public health. And those are all powers that can be used to create banishment laws.
But they need the law itself, they need some kind of bylaw or law that allows them to exercise their authority to banish people. So it starts with passing a law that allows them to use the power they have in a specific way that's endorsed by their community members.
And then once that's set, how would they go about enforcing it?
It depends on the community, but usually it's through the police. It's important that if an Indigenous community is thinking of enacting a banishment law or removing people from the community in some way that they have thought about enforcement or else you're just going to end up with a law that people aren't going to respect and that's not going to help the situation.
If you're going to have the police enforce the law, it's important to work with the police as you're crafting the law, as you're drafting it, as you're developing it with your community members. And talk to them about how that should work, whether they have any concerns, and make sure that those are addressed in advance.
If you're going to use some other kind of enforcement mechanism, like a First Nation enforcement body, a bylaw enforcement body or something else, work that out ahead of time because you don't want to have a law that you don't have an enforcement mechanism in place for.
Sahtu Grand Chief Wilbert Kochon at the meeting this week told delegates that he believes that charter rights could be preventing communities from standing up to drug dealers. Are there limits to a community's power?
Yes, and certainly the Charter is an important limit.
I mentioned that there are collective rights to be on community lands, but there are also Charter rights. Individuals in Canada, including Indigenous people, all have Charter rights and that includes the right to security as a person, rights relating to equality. There's lots of rights that could be engaged, particularly under Section 7 of the Charter when you're starting to remove somebody from a place that they have a deep connection to, that they have a home, where they have their community.
And so absolutely, Charter rights are engaged and need to be considered. And that doesn't mean that the fact that an individual has Charter rights prevents them from being banished, but it means that the community has to consider that, has to balance those rights against the rights of the community, and has to provide procedural fairness that allows them to make a decision that the courts can uphold and that'll be seen as fair by their own community members.
What if someone owns property in a community? Can they be banished?
Certainly they could still be removed from the community, but the power to banish a person or to remove them isn't necessarily the same power that you would need to appropriate their property or to take their goods or to actually take the land if they own the land in some form. So that would need to be a separate mechanism and that's not a mechanism that I would say Indigenous communities have access to as easily.
Seizing someone's property is a much different game than removing them from the community under the powers that they have through either their treaties or the Indian Act.
I know it's an ancient practice, but we've been hearing about banishment with, particularly, Indigenous communities over the last little while. I'm thinking of what's happening in Haida Gwaii for instance. How common has banishment become these days?
It's certainly a tool that Indigenous communities are becoming aware of. And like you say, it's an ancient practice. I think a lot of Indigenous communities have practiced banishment going back millennia. And historically it was often the most serious form of punishment. It could be a death sentence. If you're in a remote location and you are cut off from the rest of your community members, you might not be able to survive. And so the roots of banishment go back a long way.
But I think as communities are entering modern treaties and are, sort of, coming to terms with a lot of the powers and authorities that they have, and are reconnecting with their traditional authority, communities are looking at the tools that they have available to them. And banishment is a tool that I think a lot of communities are realizing can help with solving certain kinds of problems in certain situations.
And it's not a one-size-fits-all solution for all kinds of problems, but it's a tool that can help if you're trying to solve a certain kind of problem involving individuals in the community. Or in a certain location that the community would be safer or healthier if those people were removed.
Yeah, let's dive into that a little bit more. What are some of the other options Indigenous communities might have when dealing with this drug crisis and drug dealers in their community?
Removing the drug dealers themselves are sort of the low-hanging fruit. It can be effective to just remove the people who are causing the problems, especially if it's a remote community and access can be sort of easily controlled.
But often it's not that simple. And often there could be a non-Indigenous community right next door, and so it could be difficult to remove the person from the area entirely unless you're cooperating with your neighbours.
And even if you can remove the drug dealers or the wrongdoers or whoever it is that's causing the problem in the community, more people could pop up, and you're still not dealing with the entire problem, like a drug crisis, for example.
It's a very complex problem. It has lots of different causes. It has lots of different effects. And so things like social services, like child welfare, a lot of Indigenous communities control housing, and so they can achieve a lot of the beneficial effects of banishment just by removing people from housing or controlling their housing regulations.
You really need to look at it holistically. I know a lot of First Nations that are considering banishment, at the same time they're considering, how do we provide social supports to our citizens? How do we support children? How do we support the neighbours? And these are all important considerations because just removing the people who are there right now causing the problems doesn't necessarily remove, you know, the root cause of the problem, or any of its effects.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
23 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Acquiring U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets will cost Canada nearly 50% more than disclosed, Auditor-General finds
The cost of replacing Canada's aging warplanes with U.S.-made F-35 stealth strike fighters is expected to cost nearly 50 per cent more than the estimate Ottawa provided Canadians, a report from the federal Auditor-General says. These findings arrive as Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is weighing whether to scale back Ottawa's order for the F-35s and instead buy European-made fighter planes to reduce Canada's reliance on U.S. military equipment. The federal government, which finalized a deal to buy 88 F-35 Lightning fighters from Lockheed Martin in December, 2022, said the acquisition would cost about $19-billion. But Auditor-General Karen Hogan's office said Tuesday it found this figure was based on outdated information and that by 2024, estimated costs had increased to $27.7-billion. The warplane replacement program also faces significant risks that could jeopardize the introduction of a new fleet of fighters, the Auditor-General found. Construction of two new fighter squadron facilities in Cold Lake, Alta., and Bagotville, Que., to accommodate the F-35s is more than three years behind schedule and the Forces are facing a possible shortage of qualified pilots, the watchdog said Tuesday. Trimming F-35 order could antagonize Trump as security and trade talks get under way: analysts Inflation, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and heightened demand for munitions are three factors have driven up the cost of acquiring the F-35s, the Auditor-General found. The Department of National Defence 'was supposed to closely monitor inflation and foreign currency exchange rates because of the potential impact but did not always do so,' it said. The Office of the Auditor-General said even the updated $27-billion-plus price tag for the F-35s does not include essential Forces infrastructure upgrades and advanced weapons that would add at least another $5.5-billion to the total cost of acquiring the fighters. Opinion: The solution to Canada's F-35 fighter jet dilemma? Buy both American and European aircraft Canada's current fighter aircraft fleet of CF-18s is reaching the end of its service life and must be replaced in a timely manner to meet operational commitments such as the defence of Canada and North America, the Auditor-General's office noted. CF-18s are the primary Canadian aircraft assigned to the bilateral North American Aerospace Defense Command and are supposed to be on continuous alert to respond to potential aerial threats to the safety of North America, it said. The CF-188 Hornet first entered service in the 1980s. The operating life of the Hornets has been extended through a refurbishment initiative known as the Hornet Extension Program, or HEP. CF-18s are supposed to be gradually withdrawn from service between 2025 and 2032 and replaced with F-35s. David McGuinty, the Minister of National Defence, said in a statement he takes the auditor general's findings seriously. He committed to updating Canadians regularly on acquisition projects and blamed the huge cost increases on 'external economic conditions driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, including global supply chain disruptions, workforce shortages, and increased inflation and foreign exchange rates.' The minister did not comment on the ongoing review in his department of whether to reduce the F-35 order. Shortly after Mr. Carney took office in March, he said Ottawa would weigh trimming its F-35 purchase plans to buy an alternative aircraft that would be more cost-effective and could deliver additional industrial benefits domestically instead of sending more dollars to the U.S.


CBC
23 minutes ago
- CBC
Whitehorse RCMP looking for witnesses after Para cyclist injured in highway collision
RCMP in Whitehorse are looking for any witnesses to an apparent hit-and-run collision on the Alaska Highway late Saturday evening that left a Para cyclist seriously injured. Darryl Tait, a well-known local athlete and accessibility advocate, was training for the upcoming Canada Summer Games on his hand-cycle when the collision happened. He told CBC News that he was riding southbound on the highway when he was hit from behind by a passing vehicle. "I'm in stable condition right now. Right now, my left arm is paralyzed and I can't use it, and I have a couple of broken ribs, and broken L2 vertebrae," he said on Monday afternoon, from the hospital in Whitehorse. "I'm in pretty good shape considering what just happened." The incident happened just before 10 p.m. on Saturday, near the Philmar RV Centre. Tait said he had started his training ride late that day because of the strong winds earlier in the day. He said he was riding along the highway when he started to get a bad feeling. "I started to feel like, this kind of feels off, like, this is a little sketchy ... Like, I'm super low to the ground with these cars going by, and I'm on the shoulder," he recalled. He figures he travelled about another 50 metres or so when he was suddenly "smoked" from behind. "I just had this big thud from behind, and I blacked out for a moment. I couldn't hear anything, I couldn't see anything." The next thing he remembers is skidding down the road as a vehicle drove off down the highway. He says he didn't see any brake lights from the vehicle as he slid sideways off the road and toward the ditch. Lying on the ground, unable to move one of his arms, Tait tried to call 911 but his earbuds had been knocked out and his phone wasn't responding. He used his one working arm to flag down some passing motorists who stopped and called for help. He said RCMP and an ambulance arrived quickly and he was taken to the Whitehorse hospital. Speaking on Monday, Tait said his one arm was still not working properly. He'd had an MRI earlier and was still waiting to hear whether his arm could be repaired. "I can wiggle my fingers and I can like, shrug my shoulder, but I don't have any flexion or extension in my bicep. I can kind of move my wrist a little bit. But initially ... there was no movement at all," he said. "I will try to get this arm back or I'll be spinning doughnuts in my manual chair, for sure." In 2009, Tait was involved in a snowmobile crash that left him paralyzed from the chest down. He was displaying snowmobile jumps at an event in the U.S. when a backflip went awry and the machine landed on him. He suffered severe injuries including a severed spinal cord. He was close to death. After that accident, Tait vowed to remain active and became an accomplished para-athlete and an outspoken advocate for people with disabilities or mobility challenges. Speaking on Monday, he said the weekend collision was "definitely scary," but that he was drawing on the support of many people to help him get through. "I'm alive, I'm here with my family," he said, his voice breaking with emotion. "You know, I got a lot of things that are going for me, the friends and family and community support — that keeps me strong," he said.


CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Man knocked out in random beating at The Forks Market in Winnipeg
Winnipeg police have released a photo of a man wanted in connection with a random assault at The Forks that left another man unconscious. Around 11:15 p.m. on June 6, a 30-year-old man was inside The Forks Market when he was assaulted and knocked to the ground, then beaten even after he lost consciousness, police said in a news release on Tuesday. The attacker took an item from the victim before walking away. The victim was sent to hospital by ambulance in stable condition. Police believe the attacker later threw the stolen item at a woman walking a dog near the river path. Investigators are hoping to locate and speak to the woman, as she may have information that could help them. The attacker was last seen in the area of Bonnycastle Park, near Assiniboine Avenue and Garry Street. He is described as 25-35 years old with a medium to heavy build. He was wearing a black T-shirt, black pants, a black New York Yankees baseball cap and black shoes. Anyone with information about that man or anyone who was at The Forks and may have witnessed the assault is asked to call the police service's major crimes unit at 204-986-6219.