Republican strategist on warning signs coming out of Florida election results
CNN political commentator Shermichael Singleton says that a tight Republican victory in the Florida House Special elections might not be the win Republicans are looking for.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court agrees to hear appeal from New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear from a faith-based pregnancy center in New Jersey challenging a state investigation into whether it misled people into thinking its services included referrals for abortion. The justices agreed to consider an appeal from First Choice Women's Resource Centers, which wants to block a 2023 subpoena from Democratic New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin seeking information about donors, advertisements and medical personnel. It has not yet been served. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case nearly three years after overturning abortion as a nationwide right. Since then, most Republican-controlled states have started enforcing new bans or restrictions, and most Democrat-dominated ones have sought to protect abortion access. Attorneys for First Choice Women's Resource Centers had described the organization as a 'faith-based, pro-life pregnancy center.' Pregnancy centers generally try to steer women facing an unwanted pregnancy away from choosing an abortion. The group challenged the subpoena in federal court, but a judge found that the case wasn't yet far enough along to weigh in. An appeals court agreed. First Choice Women's Resource Centers appealed to the Supreme Court, saying the push for donor information had chilled its First Amendment rights. 'State attorneys general on both sides of the political aisle have been accused of misusing this authority to issue demands against their ideological and political opponents," its lawyers wrote. 'Even if these accusations turn out to be false, it is important that a federal forum exists for suits challenging those investigative demands.' Meanwhile, Platkin has sought to enforce the subpoena in state court, but the judge there has so far refused the state's push to require the group to turn over documents and told the two sides to negotiate instead. The state had asked the justices to pass on the case, saying it doesn't present the kind of significant lower-court controversy that requires the justices to step in. 'The decision below is correct and does not have the impacts petitioner alleges,' state attorneys wrote. The attorney general's office did not immediately return a message seeking comment. The court will hear arguments in the case in the fall. ___ Associated Press writer Mike Catalini in Trenton, N.J., contributed to this story. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Proposed Land Sale Pits Senate Republicans Against Key Constituency
The so-called Big Beautiful Bill suddenly turned ugly for America's 60 million hunters and anglers after Utah Senator Mike Lee proposed selling up to three million acres of federal land in the West. Sportsmen and women are traditionally among the most reliable Republican voters, but the nation's hunters and anglers are drawing a line in the public sand with the proposed disposal of federal ground through the reconciliation process. 'I fear some members of Congress are taking the continued support of sportsmen for granted,' says Jeff Crane, President and CEO of the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation (CSF). "For sportsmen, selling millions of acres of our federal lands in a fast-tracked budget reconciliation effort is unacceptable." CSF is a bi-partisan Washington, D.C.-based organization that advocates for sportsmen's interests on Capitol Hill and in statehouses across the country with the support of the largest caucus of the U.S. Congress—some 250 members in all. In addition, CSF has sporting caucuses in all 50 states with more than 2,500 members of state legislators and 25 governors. When it comes to advising members of Congress on sporting, conservation and public lands issues, few groups carry more weight on the Hill. 'For many hunters and anglers,' says Crane, 'America's federal lands are the bedrock of our access to our outdoor sporting traditions. For tens of millions of sportsmen and women, it is this network of federal public lands where deep connections to fish, wildlife and the outdoors are born and where families forge lifetime memories.' It's also where conservation ethics are born, the kind Theodore Roosevelt memorialized in his many speeches and writings as he inspired the framework for America's environmental ethos. 'Land is the only thing in the world that amounts to anything,' he wrote. 'For it's the only thing in this world that lasts. It's the only thing worth working for, worth fighting for…'. Sportsmen have long embraced Roosevelt's words, for when a similar measure to sell federal lands was raised in the house version of the bill, it quickly created a storm of opposition among sportsmen's groups and was ultimately pulled thanks, in part, to CSF's opposition. That the measure was even proposed, however, has given many sportsmen pause regarding their historic support of Republicans. To many of the nation's outdoorsmen and women, disposing of federal land is seen as something akin to pawning a family heirloom to pay a bank overdraft. If you're perceived—rightly or wrongly--as someone standing between sportsmen and the ground where some of their greatest memories have been made, you can count on living in infamy in that community. It's the kind of perceived betrayal that causes some voters to switch party affiliations. You need not be a political wonk to understand that when a constituency feels their voice is ignored or marginalized by those they've supported, they are ripe to be assimilated by the opposition. Democrats who watched legions of union voters embrace Trump with his message of bringing jobs back to America witnessed this phenomenon firsthand. He attracted dramatically higher union support than previous Republican presidential candidates. Many pollsters credit Trump's message to labor as key to his victory in swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin—coincidentally, all states with high numbers of hunters and anglers. 'In the West, more than 70 percent of sportsmen say they rely on federal lands to participate in our cherished pastimes,' says Crane, 'and the concept of losing access to this ground is considered un-American.' For Senator Lee who heads up the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, however, these federal lands represent a partial solution to both the budget deficit and the affordable housing crisis. In a taped statement, Lee noted that some 70 percent of his home state of Utah is owned by the federal government, 'That's not serving the Americans who actually live here,' he said. Instead, he says, he wants to expand housing, support local development and get Washington out of the way of communities looking to grow while at the same time helping reduce budget deficits. Monitor sportsmen's chat rooms, podcasts, influencers and industry media that have become a force in recent years—counting avid hunter Joe Rogan's media empire among them—and few are buying what the Republican senators are selling. Not surprisingly, sportsmen are skeptical that a Congress that hasn't balanced a budget in a quarter century is going to suddenly sell land assets to solve the deficit problem. Furthermore, Lee's home state of Utah has among the highest per capita numbers of sportsmen. In 2024, nearly 800,000 residents and non-residents purchased hunting and fishing licenses with a total population of 3.5 million people. Given the significant pushback by hunters and anglers to the initial land sale effort in the House, other Republicans—like Montana Senator Steve Daines—are opposing Lee's new land sale effort in the Senate. While Utah is blessed with stunning landscapes and tremendous natural resources (home to five national parks), understanding how the sale of millions of acres of federal lands might be part of a solution to the affordable housing crisis in that state is seen as a head-scratcher by many. Salt Lake City, for instance, only encompasses 70,000 acres, and the state is feverishly working to solve one of the West's most challenging environmental crises as Great Salt Lake is drying up. A significant expansion of homes in the area will only exacerbate the water shortage that is plaguing the region. Ultimately for Crane and CSF, however, there may be a rationale for the sale or swap of some federal lands, but the budget reconciliation process is not where any transaction should be sanctioned. Instead, CSF cautioned, any disposal or sale of federal lands should follow the long-established protocols of both the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Lands Transaction Facilitation Act. These measures are in place to, among other things, allow for public input and transparency. In a statement released Friday, CSF shared their reasons for their opposition to the Senate language, writing, in part, 'Unfortunately, the Senate public lands language guts the public's voice in determining how their lands are managed, or which lands are sold. An arbitrary, undefined, percentage-based target is the opposite of a thoughtful and transparent process. As written, the Senate language omits critical detail to determine what specific lands would actually be disposed of, regardless of whether they are underutilized or highly valuable, and instead essentially gives carte blanche authority to determine which lands would be sold.' While 3 million acres is a pittance when compared to the national total of 245 million acres of Bureau of Land Management land and nearly 200 million acres of national forest property, sportsmen worry that such a sale in the reconciliation process, which only requires a simple majority—rather than a 60 percent majority under FLPMA--represents a dangerous precedent. Once the land is sold in this manner, what's to stop this from happening to ever more federal ground most ask? When the land is transferred, there's realistically no mechanism to ever get it back. For Republicans, the larger political question is what becomes of their relationship with their core voting block of 60 million sportsmen? Can they afford to alienate them as the midterm election cycle gets underway—especially in key states where a public land sale will be anathema to the camo coalition? For now, American sportsmen have turned their attention to Senate Majority Leader John Thune who hunters know as one of their own and who represents their best hope of stripping the land sale provision from the bill. Even if the sale language is struck, however, after weeks of a national media barrage against the measure and those who proposed it, Republicans must wonder what political price they will pay with heretofore loyal supporters. The question will be: Was it worth it?
New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
Business Lobbyists Scramble to Kill $100 Billion ‘Revenge Tax'
Business lobbyists are working to kill a measure in the Republican tax policy legislation that would punish companies based in countries that try to collect new taxes from American firms. The push comes as Senate Republicans are preparing to unveil their domestic policy bill on Monday, which will ultimately need to be passed and merged with the legislation that the House passed last month. That bill imposes a so-called revenge tax on foreign companies that try to enforce the terms of a 2021 global minimum tax agreement or impose digital services taxes on American technology companies. The legislation would substantially increase the tax bills for many foreign companies that operate in the United States, raising more than $100 billion over a decade. Critics argue that the provision would chill foreign investment at a time when the Trump administration is trying to attract international money. 'I think the president has been pretty unequivocal on where he stands on wanting more investment into the U.S. from international companies,' said Jonathan Samford, chief executive of the Global Business Alliance, which lobbies on behalf of international businesses in the U.S. Mr. Samford added that the measure 'directly contradicts the president's investment vision.' The legislation is poised to reignite international tax and trade wars that have been on hiatus as policymakers around the world grapple with how to overhaul the global tax system. It has also stoked anxiety among Wall Street investors and is expected to be a topic of discussion as leaders of the Group of 7 countries gather in Canada this week for a summit. Since taking office, President Trump has made clear that he wants nothing to do with a 2021 deal brokered by the Biden administration that aimed to rewrite the rules of how the world's largest companies would be taxed around the globe. That deal, which was agreed to by the G7, created a new global minimum tax rate of at least 15 percent that companies would have to pay, regardless of their headquarter location. The aim was to prevent countries from lowering their tax rates as a way to attract multinational corporations, creating a 'race to the bottom' in taxation that left nations with fiscal shortfalls. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
