Political parties in Taiwan recall dozens of MPs just one year after election
A controversial campaign to prematurely unseat dozens of opposition members of parliament has polarised Taiwan, triggering competing rallies and fierce debate over the future of its democracy.
Supporters say it's about breaking political deadlock.
Opponents say it's a dangerous power grab by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Tens of thousands of protesters gathered in central Taipei on April 26, just outside the Presidential Office building, to "stand up and fight the dictator".
The "dictator" in question was President Lai Ching-te of the DPP, who was democratically elected just over a year ago.
The rally marked the most high-profile response yet to a nationwide campaign targeting opposition MPs known as a recall.
"Disagreement is normal in a democracy," said Stacey Chen, a supporter of the opposition Taiwan People's Party.
So, exactly who is being targeted by the recall? What do voters think?
And where does it leave Taiwan in the face of threats from Beijing?
Taiwan is a self-governing island of 23 million people with a vibrant, if often polarised, democracy.
Its political system allows voters to remove their elected representatives before the end of their term through a legal process known as a recall.
"He absolutely does not qualify as [a dictator]," said Tang Ching-ping from National Chengchi University about Mr Lai.
But recalls are rare — and they've never been used on this scale before.
The current wave of recall motions began after the DPP lost its majority in parliament during the 2024 elections.
Although it held on to the presidency, it won just 51 out of 113 seats in the legislature — one seat short of its main rival, the Kuomintang, a party often accused by the DPP as being pro-Beijing.
The Taiwan People's Party won eight seats, and two independents hold the balance of power.
The Kuomintang and Taiwan People's Party have since formed a coalition, giving them control of parliament.
The DPP has accused them of blocking legislation, cutting budgets, and paralysing the government.
In January, the opposition coalition pushed through major funding cuts — slashing about 7 per cent of the annual budget and freezing billions more.
"Hostile China will be very pleased," Taiwan's Premier Cho Jung-tai warned at the time, suggesting the cuts could weaken the island's defences.
The stand-off triggered the launch of the Great Recall campaign.
Supporters say it's about protecting national security and democracy from an obstructionist opposition.
Critics say it's a dangerous attempt to silence dissent and tilt the political playing field.
To win back control of parliament, the DPP needs to remove at least six district-level opposition politicians and replace them with its own candidates.
But not all are vulnerable.
Taiwan's parliament includes two types of legislators: district representatives, who are elected by local voters, and "at-large" members, who are chosen based on party vote share. Only district MPs can be recalled.
It means that 13 Kuomintang legislators and all eight Taiwan People's Party legislators — who hold at-large seats — are safe.
So far, pro-DPP groups have filed recall motions against 34 Kuomintang politicians and one independent aligned with the Kuomintang.
The Kuomintang has denounced the effort as a "witch hunt" and an attempt by the DPP to establish one-party rule.
It has launched a counter-campaign targeting 15 DPP legislators.
Kuomintang chair Eric Chu has accused Mr Lai of launching "a cultural revolution in Taiwan", referencing the bloody purges in China under Mao Zedong.
He also threatened to initiate a recall motion against Mr Lai himself as soon as it becomes legally possible, on May 20 — one year after Mr Lai took office.
For his part, Mr Lai has rejected characterisations as a dictator.
"You can't only oppose the DPP but stay silent on the Chinese Communist Party," he said.
The Great Recall campaign has struck a nerve in Taiwanese society — not just in parliament, but on the streets, within families and online.
Pop-up booths where volunteers gather recall signatures have become flashpoints for political confrontation. Videos of heated arguments between strangers have gone viral on social media.
Some DPP supporters see the campaign as necessary for Taiwan's survival in the face of growing pressure from Beijing.
"We are facing an existential threat from China," said a DPP volunteer gathering signatures in Taipei.
But public opinion appears to be shifting.
A recent poll by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation found 59.3 per cent of respondents oppose the DPP's recall campaign, with 33.8 per cent in support.
Now, figures within the DPP are urging caution.
Former president Chen Shui-bian — the first DPP leader known for his strong advocacy of Taiwanese sovereignty and a clear break from China — warned against using recalls to punish political opponents.
"Respecting different opinions and listening to minority voices is the true essence of democracy," Mr Chen said.
"You can't label someone an agent of some entity just because they hold a different view."
Ms Chen, a supporter of the opposition Taiwan People's Party who attended the April 26 rally, said: "I'm 43 years old, born and raised here, and I've never seen the country this divided in my entire life.
"There was never this idea that 'If you don't support the DPP, you are a CCP collaborator.'"
That fear of being labelled pro-Beijing — even for holding moderate or dissenting views — is a recurring theme.
Deer Lee, in his 20s, said he avoids political discussions with friends, many of whom support the DPP.
"If your views are even slightly different, you get sidelined," he said.
Others believe the DPP is using the recall campaign as a political weapon, not a democratic safeguard.
"If it's about recalling a single unfit legislator, I think that's something we can discuss rationally," said university student Eric Hsu.
Professor Tang said the mass recall campaign was eating away at something deeper than party politics.
"Taiwanese society has always been grounded in trust and strong social bonds," he said.
"But this campaign is being driven by resentment, not accountability — and that's not good for democracy."
In the first stage, the campaign must gather signatures from at least 1 per cent of the voters in a politician's district.
If successful, a second stage requires support from 10 per cent of eligible voters.
A recall voting process is then facilitated.
For it to pass, the number of votes in favour must both exceed those against and make up more than 25 per cent of the total electorate.
This makes recalls difficult to pull off — but not impossible, especially with strong party machinery behind them.
Taiwan's growing domestic divide is unfolding at a time of deepening geopolitical tension.
China, which claims Taiwan as one of its provinces and has not ruled out using force to take it, has ramped up its military pressure.
Live-fire drills and other military exercises by the People's Liberation Army around Taiwan are now routine.
In early April, Beijing staged another round of drills, simulating attacks on Taiwan's ports and energy facilities.
Around the same time, Chinese state media released propaganda cartoons portraying Mr Lai as a parasite being grilled over flames.
The drills drew condemnation from both the ruling DPP and the opposition Kuomintang.
But the Kuomintang also used the moment to urge the Lai administration to tone down its rhetoric.
Adding to the unease was a surprise move from Taiwan's closest ally, the United States.
The Trump administration in April announced a 32 per cent tariff on some Taiwanese goods — a decision that stunned the island.
The tariff was suspended shortly afterwards, pending trade talks, but it left many questioning how reliable Taiwan's partners really are.
The opposition seized on the moment, accusing the DPP of jeopardising Taiwan's "silicon shield" — a term referring to Taiwan's dominance in semiconductor manufacturing, which many believe acts as a strategic buffer against Chinese aggression.
That argument was sharpened after Taiwan's chip giant, TSMC, announced a $US100 billion investment in American factories.
At the April 26 rally, senior Kuomintang figure Han Kuo-yu summed up the sense of pressure from all sides.
"Three swords are hanging over the people of Taiwan," he said — referring to the US tariff threat, China's military drills, and the domestic turmoil caused by the recall campaign.
So far, Mr Lai has not publicly commented on the recall drives launched by either camp and has instead called for national unity in the face of rising external threats.
Recall votes could begin as soon as late August.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
North Korea rights capsized warship after failed launch
North Korea has righted a capsized destroyer and moored it at a pier in the north-eastern port of Chongjin, as it continues to repair the new warship. Leader Kim Jong Un has described the vessel as a significant asset in his nuclear-armed military. The report by North Korean state media aligned with South Korean military assessments and recent commercial satellite images. North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency said experts would closely examine the ship's hull before beginning the next phase of restoration, which will take place at a dry dock at the neighbouring port of Rajin and is expected to last seven to 10 days. Satellite images taken by Planet Labs PBC on Thursday and analysed by The Associated Press show the stricken destroyer upright and floating. It was not immediately clear from the image how much damage had been done to the vessel, which had been in the water for days after the failed launch. However, the ship did not appear to be noticeably listing, meaning Pyongyang is likely able to send it onward to the other port to inspect the vessel's electronics. Jo Chun Ryong, a senior official from the ruling Workers' Party, told the agency that the "perfect restoration of the destroyer" would be completed "without fail" before a major party congress in late June, a deadline set by Mr Kim. Experts say it remains unclear how severely the 5,000-tonne-class destroyer was damaged during a botched launching ceremony in late May, which triggered a furious response from Mr Kim, who called the failure a "criminal act caused by absolute carelessness, irresponsibility, and unscientific empiricism". North Korean law enforcement authorities have detained at least four officials over the incident, including the vice director of the Workers' Party's munitions industry department, according to state media. The North's main military committee said those responsible would be held accountable for their "unpardonable criminal act." Lee Sung Joon, spokesperson for South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters on Thursday that the South's military assessed that the North Koreans righted the ship earlier this week and were likely conducting drainage operations while examining the damage. "The nature and duration of the repair process will vary, depending on internal repairs, additional work or whether the incident affected the keel," Mr Lee said, referring to the ship's structural backbone. "This could also affect how the ship is used going forward." The damaged warship was North Korea's second known destroyer and seen as a crucial asset toward Kim's goal of modernising its naval forces. It was in the same class as the country's first destroyer unveiled in April, which experts assessed as the North's largest and most advanced warship to date. Mr Kim lavishly praised that ship, which was launched in the western port of Nampo, saying it advances his goal of expanding the military's operations range and nuclear strike capabilities. State media described that ship as designed to handle various weapons systems, including anti-air and anti-ship weapons as well as nuclear-capable ballistic and cruise missiles. Mr Kim also supervised test-firings of missiles from the destroyer afterward, and state media said the ship was expected to enter active duty early next year. While North Korea's naval forces are widely seen as far inferior to those of its rivals, analysts say a destroyer equipped with modern missile and radar systems could still boost the North's offensive and defensive capabilities. South Korean officials and experts say the North's destroyer was likely built with Russian assistance as the two countries' military cooperation have intensified amid Russian President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. Mr Kim's government has supplied Russia with thousands of troops and large shipments of military equipment, including artillery and ballistic missiles, to support its war fighting. Washington and Seoul have expressed concern that, in return, Mr Kim may seek Russian technology transfers that could enhance the threat posed by his nuclear-armed military. Mr Kim met with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang on Wednesday in the latest sign of the countries' deepening ties. Mr Kim has framed his arms build-up as a response to perceived threats from the United States and South Korea, which have been expanded joint military exercises in reaction to the North's advancing nuclear program. Mr Kim said the acquisition of a nuclear-powered submarine would be his next big step in strengthening the North Korean navy.


SBS Australia
20 hours ago
- SBS Australia
DOH concerned about the surge of HIV cases among Filipino youth
HIV cases in the Philippines have increased to 500% among Filipino youths aged 15-25 years old. On the third and final reading, the proposed 200 peso daily minimum wage hike has passed with 172 in favor, no opposition and one abstained. Senator Ronald dela Rosa has filed a resolution to junk the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. Indigenous leaders from Australia and the Philippines have met for the Indigenous Resource Governance Summit in the Philippines. SBS Filipino 06/06/2025 08:10 📢 Where to Catch SBS Filipino

ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Visa refusal sparks fresh concerns Solomon Islands may block Taipei from Pacific forum
The Solomon Islands government blocked a group of Taiwanese officials from entering the Pacific country earlier this year, stirring fresh concerns in Taipei that it might be locked out of a key regional meeting in Honiara later this year. Solomon Islands will host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September, and signalled last year that it might break with a long running precedent and refuse visas to Taiwanese officials who want to meet with their three remaining Pacific diplomatic allies on the sidelines. Both Australian and Pacific officials insist that the Solomon Islands government has given them private assurances this year that it will not take that step. But the ABC has been told that when a small group of officials from Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied to enter Solomon Islands in March — largely to begin planning the logistics for its PIF delegation — their visa applications were rejected. Australian government sources have said Solomon Islands has since reassured them again that Taiwan's representatives will not be blocked in September, but that this directive was still "working its way through the system", suggesting the decision was an error. A spokesperson from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was "working closely" with Solomon Islands on preparations for the leaders meeting, "as we do with every host". "There has been no change to arrangements regarding Taiwan's engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, which have been in place since agreed by leaders in 1992," they said. "The (meeting) is an opportunity for all Forum members to come together to ensure our region is well placed to pursue our shared interests, deepen regional cooperation and strengthen PIF unity." One Pacific island government source also told the ABC that the Forum Secretariat and Pacific leaders were confident Taiwan would be able to participate in the Honiara meeting without any issues. But the March incident has still stirred anxiety in Taipei, which has been fighting a losing battle with Beijing to maintain diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and which fears China is succeeding in its efforts to marginalise it in the region. Solomon Islands has cut off all official contact with Taiwan in the wake of its decision to switch diplomatic ties to Beijing in 2019, and last year threw its weight behind China's declaration that it will "reunify" the self-ruled island with the mainland. Solomon Islands last year also backed Beijing's push to strip Taiwan of its status as a development partner for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF). That frustrated leaders from the three Pacific nations which retain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, with Palau's President Surangel Whipps even warning that if Taiwan is locked out it could ignite a dispute like the "PIF split" which plunged the organisation into chaos in 2021. Mr Whipps said earlier this week that he had heard Taiwan was having "some difficulty gaining access" to the meeting, and stressed that it was critical Palau be able to hold meetings with its diplomatic partner in Honiara. Solomon Islands has not yet explained why the Taiwanese officials were refused visas in March. The Director of Immigration in Solomon Islands, Chris Akosawa, pointed out that Solomon Islands has recently tightened entry restrictions on Taiwan passport holders, but referred the ABC to the Solomon Islands Foreign Ministry for comment. The ABC sent questions to the Foreign Ministry, but didn't receive a response. So far, Solomon Islands has not given any public assurances that Taiwan will be able to attend the leaders meeting. In May, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele issued a forceful statement reaffirming his government's commitment to the One China Policy and ordering officials "not to engage in any official capacity with representatives or entities associated with 'Taiwan', China". "This includes official visits, communications, commitments, or participation in events involving 'Taiwan', China," he said. On Monday Mr Manele also declined to say whether his government had made a final decision on Taiwan's participation, although he said he was "working very closely with the Forum Secretariat in terms of these arrangements". "We are fully aware of that situation. So we are looking into that, it's a regional meeting and of course countries also have their national interest as well," he said. A second Pacific island government source said Mr Manele's acknowledgement that the PIF leaders meeting is a "regional" gathering was a good sign that "commonsense would prevail" and that Solomon Islands wouldn't upset the status quo. Invitations to PIF leaders and dialogue partners are expected to be issued shortly. Analysts warn that if Taiwan is excluded it would undermine the authority of the PIF Secretariat and set a dangerous precedent which could undermine Pacific unity and see further splintering — particularly with Palau due to host the leaders meeting next year. A third Pacific government source said it also was not clear if the United States would attend the meeting as a dialogue partner if Taiwan was excluded. A spokesperson for Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to comment on its officials being denied entry but pointed to a 1992 communique endorsed by all PIF leaders which specifically says Taiwan should be able to hold a meeting with Pacific nations "at the same venue as the Forum". "Taiwan will continue to broaden collaboration with the PIF, diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and other like-minded countries, especially in such areas as climate change, food security, clean energy, and talent cultivation, jointly making contributions to the peace, stability, development, and prosperity of the Pacific region." Blake Johnson from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said while it wasn't yet clear what Solomon Islands would do, it "may be more willing to upset the status quo than people expect". He also said excluding Taiwan from the meeting "certainly could cause fractures within the PIF". "Without the PIF and other regional institutions functioning properly, some Pacific nations will find it more difficult to access support from and participate in valuable initiatives from policing to climate change adaptation funding."