Odisha forms panel to give special attention to Kotia gram panchayat in Koraput
Bhubaneswar, The Odisha government has formed a 16-member committee to give special attention to Kotia gram panchayat in Koraput district and to frame an administrative mechanism for addressing the issues faced by the people there, an official notification said.
The 16 member special committee headed by Revenue and Disaster Management minister Suresh Pujari was formed after approval of Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi on Thursday.
The Kotia cluster of villages located on the state's border with Andhra Pradesh are important for the government as the neighbouring state also makes claim over the area and the dispute continued since 1968. Though the Supreme Court in 2006 directed both the states to maintain the status quo, tensions over governance and development interventions persist in the region.
"It was decided to give special attention to Kotia group of villages under Pottangi Block of Koraput district and to frame an administrative mechanism in order to address the issues faced by the people through a robust mechanism so that the various departments presently providing different services through their agencies independently to the people could come under one umbrella," the official notification said.
It said that all the schemes implemented by different departments could be done through a single agency headed by a special officer with an independent office for holistic development of Kotia gram panchayat for a lasting solution.
"Besides, there is also a need to propagate/strengthen Odia language, culture, literature, tradition, festivals in the bordering areas in order to create affiliation under 'Odia Ashmita'," it said.
The panel has been mandated to recommend to the chief minister on the issues of Kotia group of villages. It will also define the special agency structure, hierarchical and funding patterns and convergence of various schemes.
The proposed special agency to be headed by a senior officer will operate with an independent office. The aim is to bring all departmental services—currently functioning independently—under one umbrella for effective and coordinated service delivery to the residents of Kotia, an official said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Samalochana thinkers meet held
Rajamahendravaram: Senior advocate of the Supreme Court P Sridhar shared profound insights on the theme 'Dharma – Constitution – Challenges'. The event brought together intellectuals to explore India's ethical and constitutional foundations. In a compelling address at the 'Samalochana' thinkers meet, held at Cherukuri Veeraju Kalyana Mandapam in Rajamahendravaram, Sridhar reflected on the deep spiritual meaning of Dharma and Satya, asking whether the two are synonymous or distinct. Drawing from personal experience, he recalled how the death of his father in 2011 led him into the world of Ithihasas like the Ramayana and Mahabharata. Guided by mentors such as Justice Narasimha and the legendary advocate K Parasaran, he discovered how ancient scriptures remain relevant to constitutional and ethical discourse. He highlighted the teachings of Bheeshma from the Mahabharata and noted that Dharma involves non-violence, truth, charity, and control over anger. He questioned society's tendency to accept the words of the powerful as Dharma, sidelining the voices of the righteous but powerless. Through the story of Prahlada and Virochana, he illustrated the inescapable duty of responsibility in any profession. He argued that Dharma requires action in thought (manasa), word (vachasa), and deed (karmena). Sridhar explored the distinction between Dharma and Satya, quoting Bheeshma's 11 attributes of truth like impartiality, compassion, and dignity, and asserted 'Satya is that which furthers Dharma.' He mentioned an episode from Karna Parva, where Krishna equates Para Ninda (criticizing others) with murder and Atma Stuti (self-praise) with suicide, offering a powerful reflection on ethical speech and inner discipline. In today's society, while many people actively speak about their rights, there is a growing need to pay greater attention to responsibilities, said renowned advocate Chintapenta Prabhakar. He attended this gathering as the chief guest. He said that parents must instil a sense of social responsibility and patriotism in their children from an early age. 'It is not enough to merely educate children academically. They must also be taught to become responsible citizens who contribute to the betterment of society,' he remarked. Stressing the significance of Dharma, Prabhakar stated that every Indian must understand and uphold it. He added, 'Our ancient texts place great importance on Dharma. These principles are timeless and relevant even in modern life. It is our responsibility to pass this wisdom on to the next generation.' Samalochana Rajamahendravaram chapter president Matta Reddy and secretary Sanat Kumar Janapati also spoke at this meeting.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
High Courts Reluctant to Hire Retired Judges Despite Supreme Court Approval to Address Criminal Case Backlog, ET LegalWorld
Despite the Supreme Court clearing the idea nearly five months ago, the high courts seem not to be keen on appointing ad-hoc judges to tackle pending criminal cases, details available with the government showed. According to people aware of the procedure to appoint Supreme Court and high court judges, none of the high court collegiums have so far recommended names of retired judges to be appointed as ad-hoc judges. There are 25 high courts in the country. Till June 11, no high court collegiums sent any such proposal to the Union Law Ministry. Considering a backlog of over 18 lakh criminal cases, the Supreme Court on January 30 allowed the high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges, not exceeding 10 per cent of the court's total sanctioned strength. Advt Advt Article 224A of the Constitution allows the appointment of retired judges as ad-hoc judges in high courts to help deal with to the laid down procedure, the respective high court collegiums send recommendations or names of candidates to be appointed as HC judges to the Department of Justice in the law department then adds inputs and details of the candidates before forwarding the same to the Supreme Court SC Collegium then takes a final call and recommends to the government to appoint the selected persons as president signs the 'warrant of appointment' of the newly-appointed procedure to appoint ad-hoc judges will be the same except that the president will not sign the warrant of appointment. But the assent of the president will be sought for appointing ad-hoc in one case, there is no precedence of appointing retired judges as ad-hoc HC judges, officials had earlier pointed a judgement dated April 20, 2021, on the appointment of ad-hoc judges in the high courts, the top court imposed certain later a special Supreme Court bench comprising then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justices B R Gavai (incumbent CJI) and Surya Kant relaxed certain conditions and kept some in verdict, which was authored by former chief justice S A Bobde, directed retired high court judges to be appointed as ad-hoc ones for a period of two to three years to clear the one condition said that ad-hoc judges cannot be appointed if a high court was working with 80 per cent of its sanctioned strength, the other said ad-hoc judges could sit separately on benches to deal with the conditions, the court said the requirement that vacancies should not be more than 20 per cent of the sanctioned strength for the time being shall be kept in bench also said each high court should keep the appointment to two to five ad-hoc judges and not exceed 10 per cent of the total sanctioned strength."The ad-hoc judges will sit in a bench presided over by a sitting judge of the high court and decide pending criminal appeals," the apex court's order rarely used Article 224A of the Constitution deals with the appointment of ad-hoc judges in high courts."The chief justice of a high court for any state may at any time, with the previous consent of the president, request any person who has held the office of a judge of that court or of any other high court to sit and act as a judge of the high court for that state," it says. Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETLegalWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETLegalWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Mind the Gap: Maternity leave is a constitutional right. Now let's talk about paternity leave
In a landmark ruling that will have far-reaching implications, the country's top court has asserted that maternity leave is a constitutional right, regardless of the number of a children a woman might have. Under the law, which was last amended in 2017, women are entitled to 26 weeks of paid time off for up to two children. Now, Supreme Court justices Abhay Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan have ruled, 'Right to life also includes the right to health. Right to live with human dignity and the right to privacy are now acknowledged facets of Article 21.' The two-judge bench was hearing a case brought to it by a government school teacher in Tamil Nadu. The teacher had had two children from a previous marriage. Following a divorce, custody of the children went to her husband. When she remarried and had a third child, her request for maternity leave for denied. A Madras high court division bench noted she already had two surviving children and, so, was entitled to only 12 weeks and not 26 weeks of paid leave. Even though the woman had not taken maternity leave for her first two kids who were born before she entered government service, the high court ruled that in light of the state's two-child norm, maternity benefits could not be given for a third child. The Supreme Court ruling overturning that narrow view is a relief not just to her but to mothers throughout the country. In 1961 when India first legally mandated maternity benefits, women were entitled to 12 weeks of paid time off. In 2017, this was increased to 26 weeks. Moreover, offices with more than 10 employees were required to provide for creche facilities. Some saw these as 'sops' to women. There were dire warnings that the expanded leave would lead to a hiring freeze of women by employers particularly in small and medium-sized companies. Research by TeamLease, a human resource service company, estimated that 2.6% of jobs could potentially be lost across sectors. These findings were backed by academic research. A paper published by Maitreyi Bordia Das and Ieva Zumbyte for the World Bank in 2017, the year the amended maternity benefits were passed, found that 'having a young child in the home depresses mothers' employment'. The big noise around maternity benefits masks the minuscule number of women who are entitled to it. In India, just 6% of women are employed in the formal sector. According to IndiaSpend, 94% work in the informal sector– farming, small scale manufacturing, construction—and are not eligible for paid time off. Yet, even in the formal sector, most women experience what economists call the 'motherhood penalty'. Globally, mums with children below the age of five have the lowest employment rate (47.6%) compared to dads with kids of the same age (87.9%) and women with no children at all (54.4%), according to a 2018 study of 90 countries by the International Labour Organisation. Women, in other words, pay a disproportionate price for having children and it's a realization that is being felt around the world. Earlier this week, the United Nations Population Fund said the world was witnessing an 'unprecedented decline in fertility rates'. A report that surveyed 14,000 people in 14 countries found that while most want two or more children, fertility rates are falling because many felt unable to create the families they want. In India, now the world's most populous nation with 1.46 billion people, fertility rates are also coming down, even though total numbers will hit 1.7 billion in about 40 years before they fall. In 17 states, fertility rates are already below replacement level of two births per woman with the five southern states leading the charge. In anticipation of the delimitation exercise that will redraw electoral boundaries to reflect the population, the chief ministers of both Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh have publicly appealed to women to produce more babies. It might not be out of place to begin talking about paternity leave – not the token 10 days or two weeks but at par with maternity leave. Paternity leave would serve several outcomes. It would mark a significant step towards gender parity. It would make it easier for mothers to remain in the workforce (good for GDP too). And it would help new dads bond better with their babies. When Dubai-based Junaid Khan had his first daughter he requested his construction firm for time off, even if it was with reduced pay. At the time when his wife got pregnant he was working on a project in Sikkim and figured he would rather be home with her once the baby arrived. 'For every parent, these are moments that will never come back,' he explained. For Bengaluru-based Prasun Bajoria it helped that he ran his own business and, so, could take 75 days off when his wife had their first baby. 'It's not easy on the mother,' he said. 'I wanted to be at home for her.' While Prasun said he became adept at a host of skills from bath-time to changing diapers, Khan took on the job of making sure the house was well stocked with formula and diapers and anything else his wife might need. Both men said their wives are pregnant again and both intend to take time off, again. After all, if it takes a village to raise a child, why is it that only mothers bear the cost? [Dear readers, is paternity leave feasible? Tell me what you think at:
