logo
Nebraska Legislature advances proposal to weaken paid sick leave

Nebraska Legislature advances proposal to weaken paid sick leave

Yahoo14-05-2025

The Paid Sick Leave for Nebraskans group turned in more than 138,000 signatures from voters last year to reach the ballot. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — State lawmakers advanced a proposal Tuesday adding new restrictions to a paid sick leave law Nebraska voters approved last year and which has yet to be implemented, moving the proposed changes to the final round of debate.
The way the voter-approved law is written, businesses with fewer than 20 weekly employees would allow those employees to accrue up to five days' worth of paid sick leave a year, or up to seven days a year for larger businesses. An hour of leave could be earned for every 30 hours worked.
Employees, under the ballot measure law, can use paid sick leave for themselves or a family member for mental or physical illness, injury or a health condition or for a medical diagnosis or preventive medical care. Paid sick time also could be used during a public health emergency.
LB 415 would remove the current law's blanket sick leave requirements, letting employers offer no paid sick leave to young teens, ages 14 and 15, or to temporary, seasonal agricultural workers and workers at the state's smallest businesses, those with 10 or fewer employees.
Sponsoring State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln said the proposed legislation intends to clarify and make the ballot measure 'more feasible' and workable for businesses.
His bill would clarify that businesses that meet or exceed the new law would not need to change their existing leave policies, including accrual or carryover components. It also would clarify how leave can be requested and when employees could begin to accrue sick leave.
Worker advocates and union leaders have spoken out against the proposed changes as attempts to undermine the will of Nebraska voters throughout this session.
Tuesday's debate followed an underlying theme of the session in the officially nonpartisan but GOP-dominated statehouse of lawmakers pushing back against a handful of ballot measures passed by Nebraska voters. That push has left Democratic-aligned lawmakers in the role of defending what they call the 'will of the people.' The GOP has built a 33-member supermajority that sometimes makes the filibuster less effective.
'For as long as I can remember,' State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha said during the debate, 'Nebraska has been doing as well as it has because you had just enough Democrats to save us from ourselves.'
Other Republican lawmakers said that they were trying to protect small businesses that could not afford paid sick leave in its voter-approved form. State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte said he had received emails from small business owners in his district about the recent ballot initiatives.
'We do live in a capitalistic society, and we are competing for employees, but there are smaller businesses out there,' Jacobson said. 'In my district, they are being strapped. They can't continue to employ people if we're going to raise the minimum wage, have paid sick leave.'
Throughout the debate, lawmakers, some begrudgingly, approved an amendment that would have reduced the carve-outs to businesses with five workers instead of 10 employees, and add back in the ability to sue to enforce provisions requiring paid sick leave.
It was viewed as a compromise to get some lawmakers, including State Sen. Dave 'Woody' Wordekemper of Fremont and others, to vote for LB 415. As some Democratic-aligned lawmakers continued their filibuster of the proposal after the amendment's approval, Republicans stopped negotiating, reconsidered the amendment and voted it down.
Jacobson led the successful push to reconsider the amendment.
'When we cast votes here, we're not taking away what the voters said they wanted,' Jacobson said. 'We're making it so that it will work for small businesses and for their employers.'
Jacobson said during the debate that Republicans are willing to bringLB 415 back to select file to add an amendment that would bring some of the ability to sue back into the bill but that lowering the size of business required to pay sick leave to five is off the table.
Democrats speaking in opposition to the changes said more than 30,000 Nebraskans would lose paid sick leave, highlighting the political reality facing the majority.
Wordekemper said his continued support for the measure depends on the amendments proposed, if senators decide to bring LB 415 back to select file.
Wordekemper voted present on cloture for the bill this round, but the bill advanced with the support of State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln, a Democrat who voted for the bill and cloture. His vote is unlikely to affect the outcome. Ballard said after the vote that he has enough votes for passage during final reading despite the compromise amendment blowing up.
Voters adopted the paid sick leave ballot measure with nearly 75% of the vote in November, including majority support across all 49 legislative districts. The measure was heavily supported by Nebraska labor groups. The voter-approved paid sick leave law is set to go into effect on Oct. 1.
State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln said lawmakers should be ashamed, adding they just 'told 30,000 Nebraskans that they don't get the opportunity for paid sick leave.'
'You didn't like the way that people were talking after that was adopted. It sounds like perhaps you decided to gut it and strip it,' Dungan said. 'That's being vindictive.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million
GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million

WASHINGTON – They snapped. They stared off into space. They zipped into Senate elevators and smiled as the doors closed with them safely inside. This is how nearly a dozen Senate Republicans reacted Wednesday when asked the simplest question: Do you plan to attend President Donald Trump's military parade in D.C. on Saturday, and are you comfortable with its estimated $45 million price tag? HuffPost is committed to fearlessly covering the Trump administration. and become a member today. 'I won't be here in town, but I wish I was,' lamented Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.). Asked about the tens of millions of dollars the event is going to cost taxpayers, Fischer walked into a nearby Senate elevator and gazed into nothingness as the doors closed. At least the Nebraska senator spoke. Sen. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) clocked in at eight seconds of silence in response to HuffPost asking the same question. With a big grin, Budd slipped into another elevator and stood there, waiting for the doors to close. 'Nope,' Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) said, fidgeting on his phone, when asked if he planned to attend. He let out a big sigh when asked about the parade's price tag, and started talking about unrelated legislation. 'I'm focused on the trillions right now, which is the reconciliation bill,' Young said. 'So I think my constituents would assess that my priorities are appropriate.' Asked if that means he is comfortable with how much Trump's military event will cost taxpayers, he snapped: 'I answered the question.' When HuffPost pointed out he didn't actually answer the question, Young interrupted, 'I answered the question I wanted to answer!' Alrighty then, sir! Saturday's parade is being billed as a celebration of the Army's 250th anniversary, but it's also timed with Trump's 79th birthday. The event will feature thousands of soldiers, 150 military vehicles and more than 50 aircraft being rolled around the streets of D.C. Millions of people nationwide will be protesting Trump at the same time as his parade, in response to his harsh crackdown on immigration enforcement and his decision to deploy the U.S. military to Los Angeles to respond to unrest there. The 'No Kings Day' protests are happening in all 50 states and in more than 1,500 cities, though not in D.C. An obvious reason Senate Republicans don't want to talk about the cost of this parade is that they've been on a tear about slashing so-called government waste since Trump took office, and a massive military parade for the president isn't exactly essential. 'I might be,' Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said of attending the parade. As for its costs? 'Uh, I have not looked into the price.' But GOP senators also don't want to say anything that will anger the president, even if deep down, they're not happy about spending tens of millions of dollars on something that the second-highest-ranking U.S. general told Trump in his first term is 'what dictators do.' So they seem to be opting for going silent or fleeing the scene. 'I am committed in Boise,' Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) said of his plans for Saturday. 'I appreciate the Army and the fact that they're 250 years old.' As for the cost of the military parade, he just walked away, saying, 'That's all you're going to get.' Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) dismissed any conversation at all about it, saying she doesn't 'do hallway interviews.' (Most conversations with the press happen in Senate hallways.) 'No comment,' said Tom Cotton (R-Ark.). 'No comment.' To be sure, a few Republicans said they were fine with the costs to put on the event. 'Listen, the Army has done a lot for us,' said Sen. Markwayne Mullen (R-Okla.). 'The idea that we get to celebrate their 250th birthday, I think they deserve to have a good celebration.' He won't be there, though. 'It is my 28th wedding anniversary,' he said. 'I choose marriage.' Sen. Jim Justice ( said he's very supportive of 'a celebration of our president's birthday,' and the costs of the parade don't bother him because he wants it to look impressive to people in other countries. 'I mean, if you go out there with, you know, two jeeps and an M-16, you know, how does the world perceive that?' Justice said. 'Come on now, this is America, you know?… If we're going to do it, let's put on a big show.' Out of 14 GOP senators, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was the only one HuffPost talked to who criticized holding the parade. It's not just because of its hefty costs, he said, but also because he doesn't think 'the symbolism of tanks and missiles' represents what the United States is all about. 'If you ask me about a military parade, all the images that come to mind, the first images, are of the Soviet Union and North Korea,' he said.

Worker who leaked plans to build golf courses in Florida parks files whistleblower suit
Worker who leaked plans to build golf courses in Florida parks files whistleblower suit

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Worker who leaked plans to build golf courses in Florida parks files whistleblower suit

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — A former worker who leaked information about plans by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration to build golf courses and hotels in Florida state parks has filed a whistleblower lawsuit. James Gaddis alleges that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection retaliated against him for sharing details of the proposals, which caused bipartisan outrage and sparked protests. Ultimately the plans were scuttled. A spokesperson for the department declined to comment, saying the agency does not do so with pending litigation. Gaddis, who was a consultant in DEP's Office of Park Planning, says he was directed to draw up 'secret maps' to build golf courses, hotels and pickleball courts in nine parks. Park staffers were ordered not to talk to any colleagues about the proposals, which in Gaddis' view amounted to destroying 'globally significant' environments. The experience felt like 'mapping out a future crime scene,' according to the lawsuit, which was filed in Leon County. Gaddis copied documents onto a flash drive and shared it with an unnamed intermediary, the lawsuit says, and the next day the Tampa Bay Times wrote about the plans. Gaddis says he was called into a meeting by a supervisor and asked if he shared the documents, which he admitted to. He was put on administrative leave and later fired, and the suit says that amounted to disparate treatment and retaliation. The complaint seeks damages of at least $100,000. The Republican-dominated state Legislature has since passed a bill banning development in state parks, and DeSantis signed it into law. Gaddis started an online fundraiser to help cover expenses, with an initial goal of $10,000. As of June 11, it had brought in more than $258,000. ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback
Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback

Hamilton Spectator

time43 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A bill to let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit cleared the North Carolina legislature on Wednesday, however the path to joining the majority of U.S. states with similar laws remains uncertain. The GOP-backed legislation faces a likely veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, as well as pushback from a handful of Republicans who voted against the legislation in the state House. House Speaker Destin Hall acknowledged those concerns after Wednesday's vote. 'I would imagine that — math being math — that it's probably a low percentage relative to other bills,' Hall told reporters. If the bill becomes law, North Carolina would become the 30th state in the country to legalize permitless carrying of a concealed handgun, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. North Carolina would also be one of the last states in the Southeast to implement that legislation. The legislation allows for eligible people with valid identification over the age of 18 to carry a concealed handgun. More than half of states with permitless concealed carry set their age limit at 21 and older, while the rest have the legal carrying age at 18, according to the NCSL. Currently, a person must be 21 and older to obtain a concealed handgun permit in North Carolina. To qualify, an applicant must pass a firearms safety training course and not 'suffer from a physical or mental infirmity that prevents the safe handling of a handgun,' according to state law. Approving permitless concealed carry has been a goal of gun-rights activists in North Carolina for years, with House Republicans historically supportive of the idea. Some see it as the next step after Republican lawmakers successfully eliminated the permit system that required sheriffs to conduct character evaluations and criminal history checks for pistol applicants in 2023. Conservative advocates for the bill say it would strengthen Second Amendment rights for North Carolinians. Republican lawmakers also disputed that the bill would make the state more dangerous, as 'law-abiding citizens' would be the only people that would benefit from the permit elimination, not criminals, Republican Rep. Brian Echevarria said. 'Rights to keep and bear arms are constitutionally inseparable,' Echevarria said. 'If a person cannot own a firearm, they cannot bear a firearm.' The bill's passage tees up one of the first opportunities for a likely veto from Stein if he stays aligned with his fellow Democrats in the legislature. Stein has a more powerful veto stamp than his predecessor Roy Cooper , after Republicans lost their House supermajority last year that allowed them to override vetoes and enact their legislative agenda with relative ease. Now, House Republicans would need to count on a Democrat to join in their override efforts. Reaching that goal seems especially daunting, considering all of the present House Democrats — and two Republicans — voted against the bill. The governor's office didn't respond to a request for comment on the legislation, but House Deputy Democratic Leader Cynthia Ball said in a committee Tuesday that Stein was opposed to it. Several Democratic legislators said it would make communities unsafe by loosening who can carry a concealed handgun without training. Democrats also raised issue with the age limit set in the bill, saying it would put guns in the hands of young people who aren't yet mature enough to have one. 'Do you not remember when you were 18? We are prone and so susceptible to peer pressure, we are hotheaded, we are emotional,' Democratic Rep. Tracy Clark said on the House floor after retelling her personal experience of losing two friends in college to gun violence. Those seeking a permit for their concealed handgun — such as for the purpose of traveling with a firearm to a state that requires a permit — would still be able to do so. The bill also heightens the felony punishment for those who assault law enforcement officers or first responders with a firearm. A separate bill that makes gun safety courses available at North Carolina community colleges for people 18 and up passed in a near-unanimous House vote directly after the concealed carry permit repeal legislation was approved. ___ Associated Press writer Gary D. Robertson in Raleigh contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store