The Department of Education approved a grant to help students with disabilities into adulthood. Then Trump came along
Educators, researchers and employees at the Department of Education say that the Trump administration's slashing of federal bureaucracies and workforces has significantly weakened special education enforcement and killed programs meant to help students with disabilities.
Last week, Tamara Linkow, the senior director of the American Institutes for Research's education evaluation studies program, told The Independent that she learned that the federal government canceled funding for Charting my Path for Future Success. The program was meant to help students with disabilities learn about programs to transition to adulthood.
'It consists of two different support programs for students at the end of high school to help them identify to set goals, plan their goals, and take action towards their goals for life after high school,' Linkow told The Independent. Linkow said that the program had just started working with instructors across 13 different school districts across the country that hired about 60 different special educators this semester.
Trump campaigned explicitly on slashing the U.S. Department of Education. He nominated former WWE executive Linda McMahon to serve as his secretary of Education. As late as last week, he said that he wanted the department 'shuttered immediately.' Efforts to slash the Department of Education have begun in earnest.
The study began in 2019. Catherine Fowler – a professor at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte and director at the National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative – said she had been working on the program from the beginning and had worked as a district liaison during the last spring and early summer, identifying districts to participate in the program.
'And so just as everything was really getting started, there would be three semesters of intervention, and that's where we would really learn what was effective and how to how to do this in schools and do it well, and then be able to track students after high school and see what the long term outcomes are,' she told The Independent.
Students with disabilities have their rights enforced through the Department of Education under laws such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which stipulates that any entity that received federal dollars cannot discriminate against people with disabilities.
Students with disabilities have '504 meetings' to outline the accommodations for students with disabilities, as well as 'individualized education plans,' which provide instruction for students with disabilities.
'The instructors had just started working with students,' Linkow said. 'They were about a month and a half in depending upon the district, working with their students, and they had to stop overnight.'
The program was funded as part of a $45 million grant entitled 'Evaluation of Transition Supports for Youth with Disabilities,' which was meant to evaluate the best programs for students with disabilities based on 'strengthening students' goal setting, planning, and self-advocacy skills and helping them apply these self-determination skills to their transition objectives,' according to the grant's website.
'This project was so powerful because it was both getting students access to services, getting school districts access to trained instructors to deliver effective services, and we were going to learn a lot about effective services as well so that we could inform the future of what schools and teachers are doing,' Karrie Shogren, a professor of special education at the University of Kansas, said.
At the Canyon Schools District in Utah, the program served 88 students in 11th grade at five high schools.
'The whole point, right, obviously, is to sort of study what works best in preparing students for life after high school,' Kirsten Stewart, the director of communications for the district, told The Independent.
In response, the district sent an email informing families that students would continue to receive supports they received before starting Charting My Path and it would not affect other services students receive from the district or other agencies.
'What I can say is that we, whenever possible, our practices to absorb staff cuts through resignments, and we have several current job openings in special education,' she said.
Numerous federal bureaucracies such onto the chopping block under the guise of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Ironically, Shogren, the University of Kansas professor, told The Independent, the program would have evaluated the most effective ways to help students with disabilities transition into adulthood.
'This was going to be a chance to figure out what is the most efficient way to support schools, teachers, students, to implement things that are going to lead to the outcomes we want for all students with disabilities, to have jobs, to have careers, to transition effectively into adulthood,' she said.
The Department of Education did not respond immediately for requests for comment.
Linkow said that school districts are hopefully coming close to learning what they will do without the money.
'So districts are having to make a decision, very tough decision, whether they need to let the instructors go, or whether some districts are not,' she said. Some districts will need to find out if there is a way to keep educators on staff despite the money being pulled.
Linkow said she has no idea why this contract was pulled. 'This contract, like all others, was terminated for convenience,' she said. 'And this program, as I'm sure you saw it, was developed to be effective for students of all types of disabilities, so ADHD, dyslexia, autism, all the way to non-verbal and physically handicapped students.'
Shogren said as a researcher, she is no longer able to conduct her work.
'All of the supports that were going into schools as well were stopped as a part of this, you know,' she said. 'So I think the question now is, how do we continue to support students, teachers in schools to provide these transition services?'
Fowler said cutting off the program means much of the work will not see any results.
'So on the bottom line there's money that won't be spent, but there's definitely a lot of money that has already been spent, and there won't be any outcomes from that,' she said. 'That is where it doesn't seem to match, you know, the goal of efficiency and the goal of saving money. That doesn't seem like a cost savings to me.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director
The Smithsonian Institution asserted its independence Monday evening in a statement that could be read as a rejection of President Trump's late-May firing of National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet. The Smithsonian's statement said the organization's secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch, "has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." The statement suggested that all personnel decisions will be made by Bunch, not Trump. The announcement came after a much-anticipated Board of Regents meeting to discuss the fate of Sajet. The Washington Post had reported that Sajet quietly continued to show up for work each day after Trump's social media post, which said he was firing Sajet for being 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI.' The Smithsonian's statement Monday did not explicitly state that Sajet would remain in her position, and the institution did not respond to a Times question on that subject. But the text of the statement is clear in its intent, beginning: "In 1846, the Smithsonian was established by Congress as an independent entity." It continues: "Throughout its history, the Smithsonian has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary. The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution." The Smithsonian's move comes shortly after the White House proposed a 12% reduction in funding to the Smithsonian in the 2026 budget — including the elimination of funding for the National Museum of the American Latino, which is in the development stages and aims to open on or near the National Mall; and the Anacostia Community Museum, which opened in 1967 and honors Black culture. The Smithsonian became a target for Trump beginning March 27, when he issued an executive order titled "Restoring truth and sanity to American history." That order demanded an end to federal funding for exhibitions and programs based on racial themes that 'divide Americans.' "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology," the order read. It also instructed Vice President JD Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian's 21 museums and the National Zoo in Washington. The order followed Trump's ongoing attempts to reshape federal cultural institutions, including his February takeover of the Kennedy Center. One major difference between the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian: The Kennedy Center's board is appointed by the president, but the Smithsonian's board consists of officials representing all three branches of government. Vance is on the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, as is Chief Justice John G. Roberts. "Since its inception, the Smithsonian has set out to be a nonpartisan institution," the statement Monday read. "As the nation's museum, the Smithsonian must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans. The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes." Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
