Russia's forces aren't as strong as they claim, say captured Chinese fighters
Two Chinese citizens captured fighting against Ukraine said they were 'fed lies' by Russia and that Vladimir Putin's forces were not as strong as they claimed.
In an evening press conference organised by the Ukrainian security service, Wang Guanjung and Zhang Renbo said: 'All Russia fed us are lies. They're fake. Russia isn't as strong as they claim, and Ukraine isn't as backward as they say.'
The pair were handcuffed and wearing military fatigues as they addressed reporters at a briefing organised by Ukrinform, the Ukrainian national news agency.
They had been captured fighting for Russia in eastern Ukraine earlier this month.
President Zelensky initially demanded that Beijing explain why Chinese soldiers, as he referred to them, were fighting for Russia.
However, the pair stressed they were not fighting on behalf of China and had no links to Chinese state authorities. Instead, they were recruited as mercenaries through online advertisements, they said.
Mr Wang said he was recruited through a TikTok advert in China. He told reporters he then travelled via coaches and minibuses to Kazan in south-west Russia, before moving through Rostov-on-Don and finally entering eastern Ukraine's Donetsk region, where he enlisted in the army with Mr Zhang.
Mr Zhang told reporters he was in Russia as a tourist when he spotted the advert with the offer of two million roubles (£18,400) and decided to enlist.
The pair were both captured in Donetsk, with footage of their detention released on April 8.
Credit: X/@ZelenskyyUa
Both prisoners said they were taken captive immediately after arriving on the front line and had not killed any Ukrainian troops.
Mr Zelensky said last week that there were at least 155 Chinese nationals fighting for Russia in the war, a claim Beijing has dismissed as 'irresponsible'.
China denies significant numbers of its citizens are serving in the Russian armed forces, saying it advises nationals to 'avoid participating in military operations of any party' and is a 'staunch supporter' of peace in Ukraine.
Credit: @TGTM_Official
The only example so far of a foreign country deploying soldiers to help Russia in its war effort is North Korea. However, those troops have not been allowed to fight inside Ukrainian territory.
Asked about conditions inside the Russian camps, the prisoners described a lack of water and electricity.
Mr Wang recalled an instance when they worked until the early hours of the morning, only to be given 'a pinch of raw rice'.
His account is consistent with reported accounts from North Korean soldiers, who have complained of a lack of food in the Russian army.
Both told reporters that they were expecting to face punishment on their return to China, but said this had not dissuaded them from wanting to go home.
'I understand that punishment is possible and I am prepared for it, because it's clear that for participating in war and such actions, there can be consequences. Still, I want to return home to my family,' Mr Wang said.
'For those Chinese compatriots who wish to join the war against Ukraine, I just want to say… don't join this war,' he added.
The Ukrainian security service said both men had undergone initial interrogations and were being held as prisoners of war in Kyiv.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump took a fresh swipe at Mr Zelensky during a meeting with reporters in the Oval Office.
The US president claimed on Monday that the Ukrainian president had 'allowed' the war with Russia to begin, before questioning his competence and insisting Putin would never have invaded under his leadership.
'The mistake was letting the war happen. If Biden were competent, and if Zelensky were competent, and I don't know that he is sure that he is… he just kept asking for more and more, that war should have never been allowed to happen,' he said.
'You take a look at Putin. I'm not saying anybody's an angel. But I will tell you I went four years and it wasn't even a question, he would never.'
Questioned on whether he would accept an offer made by Mr Zelensky to buy 10 US-made Patriot air defence missile systems for $15 billion (£11.34 billion), he answered: 'When you start a war, you've got to know that you can win the war, right?'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, Chinese officials exchange barbs at Shanghai event over trade
By Casey Hall SHANGHAI (Reuters) -U.S. and Chinese officials traded barbs at a celebration held by a U.S. business chamber in Shanghai on Friday, as the chamber appealed to both countries to provide more certainty to American businesses operating in China. Scott Walker, consul general of U.S. consulate in Shanghai, told a gathering of U.S. businesses aimed at celebrating the 110th anniversary of the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) in Shanghai that the U.S.-China economic relationship had been unbalanced and non-reciprocal "for far too long." "We want an end to discriminatory actions and retaliation against U.S. companies in China," he said. In a speech that directly followed Walker's, Chen Jing, a Shanghai Communist Party official who is also the president of the Shanghai People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, countered Walker's view. "I believe the consul general's view is prejudiced, ungrounded and not aligning with the phone call of our heads of states last night," he said. The interaction reflects the continued strained relationship between both countries as the trade war continues to simmer. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke over a long anticipated call on Thursday, confronting weeks of brewing trade tensions and a battle over critical minerals. Trump later said they agreed to further talks. It came in the middle of a dispute between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over "rare earths" minerals that threatened to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration but the deal has not addressed broader concerns that strain the relationship and Trump has accused China of violating the agreement. Eric Zheng, president of AmCham Shanghai which counts over 1,000 companies among its membership, told reporters on the sidelines of the event that many companies had put their decision-making on pause due to the uncertainty. "People are looking for some more definitive, durable statements on both sides that enable businesses to feel more secure," he said. "Our number one ask from the two governments is to give us some certainty so that we can plan accordingly." Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump and Musk fell out because Trump just doesn't get principled people
There are limitations to President Trump's transactional view of the world. This is evident in his growing tension with Elon Musk, which risks creating political problems that threaten his agenda. Trump usually gets his way through a mix of flattery, favors and intimidation, but Musk is less inclined than most to respond to these techniques. Musk holds a lot of cards. His Tesla factories employ tens of thousands of American workers. His SpaceX rockets underpin our national aspirations in space. He is also the wealthiest person on the planet, and his wealth facilitates a natural tendency to speak out when his principles are challenged. That was illustrated in late 2023 when he invited advertisers to stay off his social media platform. It is possible to disagree with everything Musk does and still concede that the man is principled. This is why our less principled President is struggling to understand Musk's hostility to the tax and spending bill, the oddly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act, so named after an utterance by Trump. Musk carried out his work at the Department of Government Efficiency without humanity and with childish antics. But if his methods were wrong, his beliefs were real. His opposition to a spending bill that negates his work by increasing federal debt by more than $2 trillion is rooted in deeply held principles. His life would be easier and his businesses more secure if he had stayed quiet and joined other Republicans in supporting a bill they know leads our nation one step closer to fiscal ruin. Musk is different. He was willing to alienate himself from liberal consumers by taking up his position at DOGE and supporting Trump, but equally willing to alienate himself from MAGA consumers by opposing the Trump tax bill on principle. This type of principled stand is difficult for someone like Trump to understand, and I believe he is being honest when he says he can't understand Musk's opposition to the bill. In Trump's eyes, he offered Musk a favorable transaction: Publicly support my policies, and I will maintain your access and influence. Musk refused the deal because staying quiet meant violating his principles. This is foreign to Trump, who values public appearance and profit over principles. Musk isn't the only person President Trump is struggling to understand. Chinese president Xi Jinping is equally principled and believes what he says about the 21st century belonging to China. Xi is committed to erasing the last vestiges of China's subordination to the West. He is telling the truth when he discusses the belief that China should play a central role in the world and dominate Asia. The Chinese president is committed to taking control of Taiwan because its de facto independence represents a contemporary manifestation of an earlier and weaker time in Chinese history. American power can deter Xi from invading, but there is no deal imaginable that will cause him to change his mind about the inevitability of seizing Taiwan. Xi holds the principle too deeply to let it go, and here again Trump struggles to understand. Xi cannot capitulate to American demands on either trade or Taiwan without resurrecting in his own mind the idea of a weak and subordinate China. This is one important reason among several why he hasn't acquiesced to American demands on trade and seems to be preparing for a prolonged standoff — something that probably wasn't part of Trump's initial plan. Xi's principles make it difficult for our transactional president to understand the man and predict his actions. Russian President Vladimir Putin is another example of someone Trump fundamentally fails to understand. Putin acts immorally but is still more principled than he is transactional. Trump's offer to reintegrate Russia into the world economy and deepen American economic ties with Russian companies might have worked to end the war in Ukraine if Putin were as transactional as Trump. Our president offered Putin an objectively good deal — an escape from relative isolation and a chance to increase Russia's national wealth and the personal wealth of its president and closest collaborators. But Putin is being honest when he says Ukraine should be part of Russia. He has so far been unwilling to accept Trump's generous offers because they don't comport with his principled belief. Like Xi, Putin refuses to accept even the appearance of Russian subordination to the West. His principled stand means Trump's transactional offers are unlikely to succeed. American interests are better served by forcing Putin's hand — by weaking Russia's economy and hurting it militarily by supporting Ukraine's resistance. Trump cannot easily see this because he doesn't understand how the Russian president sees the world. Putin is not primarily transactional — he pursues his principles until sufficient counterforce is applied. This is a different way of engaging with the world than Trump's dealmaking. It requires an American approach to Russia that Trump has so far failed to understand and embrace. Trump believes everyone has a price and will eventually make a deal. He has been successful because he has often been proven right in this. Consider, for example, the Republicans in Congress who sacrificed their principles to safeguard their reelections by supporting a fiscally irresponsible bill. Their actions once again affirmed Trump's instinct that everyone has a price. But not everyone is so transactional as that. Men like Musk, Xi and Putin see the world through a principled lens. As good as he is at dominating transactional people, Trump struggles to understand and then anticipate and control the actions of people who are primarily guided by principle. This has political consequences for Trump himself and geopolitical consequences for our nation. Until Trump better understands the motivations of principled people, our country will continue offering deals to people who are entirely uninterested. Trump is also risking his legacy and agenda by antagonizes potential critics like Musk by miscalculating their reactions when his actions violate their principles. One of Trump's most redeeming qualities is his honest desire for peace, but his transactional approach to America's adversaries will never create the stability he seeks. Just as he should have anticipated Musk's opposition to the spending bill, he should have anticipated Xi's intransigence on trade and Putin's desire to continue his war. The understanding that some people act on principle is a blind spot for our transactional president, and this makes it difficult for him to understand the principled parts of the world. Colin Pascal is a retired Army lieutenant colonel and a graduate student in the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
The cost of losing Indiana's international students
Indiana's nearly 30,000 international students contributed around $1 billion to the Hoosier economy during the 2023-24 school year. Why it matters: The Trump administration is halting student visa interviews and revoking visas for Chinese students amid a political pressure campaign against colleges and universities and a broader immigration crackdown. A big drop in international students could hurt college town economies, some of which are already struggling due to lower enrollment. The big picture: The student visa pause comes as the Trump administration has been criticizing U.S. colleges and universities for failing to crack down on what it describes as heightened antisemitism as students protest Israel's actions in Gaza. The State Department is considering broader vetting of student visa applicants' social media posts. The revocation of Chinese students' visas in particular is tied to concerns that their government is using them "to steal intellectual property on Beijing's behalf," a State Department official told Axios' Marc Caputo. By the numbers: Of the more than 1 million international students studying in the U.S. during the 2023-24 school year, about 12.5% were doing so at schools in California, 12.1% in New York and 8% in Texas. Massachusetts (7.3%) and Illinois (5.5%) round out the top five, per data from NAFSA, an international education nonprofit. Zoom in: Purdue led the state with approximately 12,000 international students, followed by IU Bloomington with 6,000. The latest: A federal judge recently extended a temporary order blocking the Trump administration from revoking Harvard University's ability to host international students. After Columbia University, Harvard became the administration's main target, with ongoing battles over federal grants, student visas and more. The other side: Detractors argue that making it harder for international students to come study in the U.S. harms the country's global image, and risks missing out on key talent in hot fields like artificial intelligence.