logo
Pope Francis a voice of reason in an increasingly unreasonable world

Pope Francis a voice of reason in an increasingly unreasonable world

Arab News22-04-2025

https://arab.news/nk55b
It is no exaggeration to say that on Easter Monday the world united in feeling a great loss with the passing of Pope Francis. His followers had hardly digested his appearance among the faithful a day earlier, as if to reassure them that, despite his illness and frailty, he wanted to underline that he lived for them and to alleviate the suffering of all, especially the marginalized and the weak of all faiths.
There is a consensus that Pope Francis was a force for good despite being an outsider, as the first pope to hail from the Global South and the first non-European pope for more than 1,000 years. The lists of his firsts and his breaks with tradition are long. The most symbolic was his choice to live in a modest two-room papal guest house and never move into the official residence at the Vatican.
Though the Argentine pontiff was seen as progressive and fought to influence issues such as migration and the protection of the environment, he also fought for a more modern, less rigid Roman Catholic Church. Above all, Pope Francis brought an outsider's eye to the Vatican and the church, with a focus on justice, ecology and humanity. One hopes that the conclave will produce a like-minded successor, as the world is crying out for voices of reason amid today's ever-increasing social, economic and political discord.
But for all his 'political genius and charisma,' as described by his biographer, it did not serve him to, on the one hand, reform and modernize a church hierarchy that he viewed as remote and self-satisfied. Nor was he capable, on the other hand, of tilting the church's energies in favor of the marginalized, while challenging the power of the entrenched interests of its traditionalists, conservatives and liberals.
Pope Francis brought an outsider's eye to the Vatican and the church, with a focus on justice, ecology and humanity
Mohamed Chebaro
His famous words 'who am I to judge?' skirted the doctrinal debates, demonstrating an inkling to promote greater tolerance and understanding in a complex culture war that focused on the questions of sexuality, faith and marriage in a church that was struggling to hold on to its relevance. He sought to raise the tone of its moral voice beyond the controversial family and moral affairs of the modern world, preferring to debate the moral need to protect the environment and to heal the world of its addiction to consumption — a key driver of climate change.
His outspoken interventions in support of migrants won him a huge following the world over, as well as enemies and condemnation by none other than the Trump administration. For Pope Francis, climate change, migration, global poverty and conflicts were interconnected. He chose to repeatedly visit migration hot spots like Lampedusa in Italy and Lesbos in Greece to shed light on the global indifference to their plight and the efforts of governments to send them back.
He also regularly spoke of his distress at conflicts around the world, especially Ukraine and Gaza in recent times. But his pleas for peace fell on deaf ears, despite his clear pattern of choice of overseas trips, as he sought to make a difference to victims of wars recent and old. He chose to visit Jerusalem, Bosnia, Egypt, Iraq and South Sudan, to mention just a few, highlighting his fearlessness and reminding the world of the need to end suffering, regardless of the faith of the victims.
His outspoken interventions in support of migrants won him a huge following the world over, as well as enemies
Mohamed Chebaro
In an era when the postwar legacy of international human rights and the rule of law is waning, the death of Pope Francis means the loss of yet another voice of reason in a world that is increasingly light on reason. His vision and mission will be missed not just by Catholics around the world but by all humans, particularly those living in increasingly inward-looking, nationalist-dominated countries. Certain states are today dragging the social and political compass increasingly to the right, aided by a weaponized tech realm and regulation-light exercises of freedom of expression.
The world has changed from one that upheld, to a large extent, a respect for universal human rights to one led by the kind of populism and polarization that last rose to prominence in the 1930s. Pope Francis' voice of reason tried to prevent the slip toward identity politics and the weaponization of Christianity by the populist forces of the ultra-right in America, Europe and elsewhere. But it is still hoped that his messages of humility, inclusion and doing good will reverberate around the world and limit the damage of the culture wars that are threatening the planet and its people.
An ironic coincidence is that the pope's final public engagement before his death was a meeting with the Catholic US Vice President J.D. Vance, an advocate of 'America First' and US isolationism whose views on migration and the fueling of culture wars were criticized by the pope before he fell ill. It is hoped that some of the reasoning of the late pope will echo in Vance's mind and he will work to curb his views. Populism and polarization only make the rich richer and leave the poor poorer, which is contrary to the aspirations of all the poor voters of all religions who last year voted for Donald Trump in the hope of salvation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule
The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule

Saudi Gazette

time7 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule

DELHI — In the mid-1970s, under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's imposition of the state of emergency, India entered a period where civil liberties were suspended and much of the political opposition was jailed. Behind this authoritarian curtain, her Congress party government quietly began reimagining the country — not as a democracy rooted in checks and balances, but as a centralized state governed by command and control, historian Srinath Raghavan reveals in his new book. In Indira Gandhi and the Years That Transformed India, Prof Raghavan shows how Gandhi's top bureaucrats and party loyalists began pushing for a presidential system — one that would centralize executive power, sideline an "obstructionist" judiciary and reduce parliament to a symbolic chorus. Inspired in part by Charles de Gaulle's France, the push for a stronger presidency in India reflected a clear ambition to move beyond the constraints of parliamentary democracy — even if it never fully materialized. It all began, writes Prof Raghavan, in September 1975, when BK Nehru, a seasoned diplomat and a close aide of Gandhi, wrote a letter hailing the Emergency as a "tour de force of immense courage and power produced by popular support" and urged Gandhi to seize the moment. Parliamentary democracy had "not been able to provide the answer to our needs", Nehru wrote. In this system, the executive was continuously dependent on the support of an elected legislature "which is looking for popularity and stops any unpleasant measure". What India needed, Nehru said, was a directly elected president — freed from parliamentary dependence and capable of taking "tough, unpleasant and unpopular decisions" in the national interest, Prof Raghavan writes. The model he pointed to was de Gaulle's France — concentrating power in a strong presidency. Nehru imagined a single, seven-year presidential term, proportional representation in Parliament and state legislatures, a judiciary with curtailed powers and a press reined in by strict libel laws. He even proposed stripping fundamental rights — right to equality or freedom of speech, for example — of their justiciability. Nehru urged Indira Gandhi to "make these fundamental changes in the Constitution now when you have a two-thirds majority". His ideas were "received with rapture" by the prime minister's secretary PN Dhar. Gandhi then gave Nehru approval to discuss these ideas with her party leaders but said "very clearly and emphatically" that he should not convey the impression that they had the stamp of her approval. Prof Raghavan writes that the ideas met with enthusiastic support from senior Congress leaders like Jagjivan Ram and foreign minister Swaran Singh. The chief minister of Haryana state was blunt: "Get rid of this election nonsense. If you ask me just make our sister [Indira Gandhi] President for life and there's no need to do anything else". M Karunanidhi of Tamil Nadu – one of two non-Congress chief ministers consulted — was unimpressed. When Nehru reported back to Gandhi, she remained non-committal, Prof Raghavan writes. She instructed her closest aides to explore the proposals further. What emerged was a document titled "A Fresh Look at Our Constitution: Some suggestions", drafted in secrecy and circulated among trusted advisors. It proposed a president with powers greater than even their American counterpart, including control over judicial appointments and legislation. A new "Superior Council of Judiciary", chaired by the president, would interpret "laws and the Constitution" — effectively neutering the Supreme Court. Gandhi sent this document to Dhar, who recognized it "twisted the Constitution in an ambiguously authoritarian direction". Congress president DK Barooah tested the waters by publicly calling for a "thorough re-examination" of the Constitution at the party's 1975 annual session. The idea never fully crystallized into a formal proposal. But its shadow loomed over the Forty-second Amendment Act, passed in 1976, which expanded Parliament's powers, limited judicial review and further centralized executive authority. The amendment made striking down laws harder by requiring supermajorities of five or seven judges, and aimed to dilute the Constitution's 'basic structure doctrine' that limited parliament's power. It also handed the federal government sweeping authority to deploy armed forces in states, declare region-specific Emergencies, and extend the President's Rule — direct federal rule — from six months to a year. It also put election disputes out of the judiciary's reach. This was not yet a presidential system, but it carried its genetic imprint — a powerful executive, marginalized judiciary and weakened checks and balances. The Statesman newspaper warned that "by one sure stroke, the amendment tilts the constitutional balance in favor of the parliament." Meanwhile, Gandhi's loyalists were going all in. Defense Minister Bansi Lal urged "lifelong power" for her as prime minister, while Congress members in the northern states of Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh unanimously called for a new constituent assembly in October 1976. "The prime minister was taken aback. She decided to snub these moves and hasten the passage of the amendment bill in the parliament," writes Prof Raghavan. By December 1976, the bill had been passed by both houses of parliament and ratified by 13 state legislatures and signed into law by the president. After Gandhi's shock defeat in 1977, the short-lived Janata Party — a patchwork of anti-Gandhi forces — moved quickly to undo the damage. Through the Forty-third and Forty-fourth Amendments, it rolled back key parts of the Forty Second, scrapping authoritarian provisions and restoring democratic checks and balances. Gandhi was swept back to power in January 1980, after the Janata Party government collapsed due to internal divisions and leadership struggles. Curiously, two years later, prominent voices in the party again mooted the idea of a presidential system. In 1982, with President Sanjiva Reddy's term ending, Gandhi seriously considered stepping down as prime minister to become president of India. Her principal secretary later revealed she was "very serious" about the move. She was tired of carrying the Congress party on her back and saw the presidency as a way to deliver a "shock treatment to her party, thereby giving it a new stimulus". Ultimately, she backed down. Instead, she elevated Zail Singh, her loyal home minister, to the presidency. Despite serious flirtation, India never made the leap to a presidential system. Did Gandhi, a deeply tactical politician, hold herself back ? Or was there no national appetite for radical change and India's parliamentary system proved sticky? There was a hint of presidential drift in the early 1970s, as India's parliamentary democracy — especially after 1967 — grew more competitive and unstable, marked by fragile coalitions, according to Prof Raghavan. Around this time, voices began suggesting that a presidential system might suit India better. The Emergency became the moment when these ideas crystallized into serious political thinking. "The aim was to reshape the system in ways that immediately strengthened her hold on power. There was no grand long-term design — most of the lasting consequences of her [Gandhi's] rule were likely unintended," Prof Raghavan told the BBC. "During the Emergency, her primary goal was short-term: to shield her office from any challenge. The Forty Second Amendment was crafted to ensure that even the judiciary couldn't stand in her way." The itch for a presidential system within the Congress never quite faded. As late as April 1984, senior minister Vasant Sathe launched a nationwide debate advocating a shift to presidential governance — even while in power. But six months later, Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in Delhi, and with her, the conversation abruptly died. India stayed a parliamentary democracy. — BBC

Mongolia PM resigns after son's luxury holiday stirs public fury
Mongolia PM resigns after son's luxury holiday stirs public fury

Saudi Gazette

time6 days ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Mongolia PM resigns after son's luxury holiday stirs public fury

ULAANBATAAR — Mongolia's prime minister has resigned after social media photos of his son's lavish lifestyle sparked an anti-corruption investigation and weeks of mass protests. Luvsannamsrain Oyun-Erdene, who has denied wrongdoing, lost a confidence vote in parliament on Tuesday. The viral photos purport to show Oyun-Erdene's son and the son's girlfriend flaunting a black Dior shoulder bag and several shopping bags while on their engagement holiday. Protesters questioned how Oyun-Erdene's family could afford such luxurious living. Local media reported that the country's anti-corruption body had been looking into their finances. The photo of the Dior bag, reportedly posted by the girlfriend, had the caption: "Happy birthday to me". Another photo purportedly showed the couple kissing in a swimming pool. The images have been shared on social media and published by local Tuesday's confidence vote, 44 of the 88 lawmakers who took part in the secret ballot voted for Oyun-Erdene, while 38 others voted against him. He needed the support of at least 64 of parliament's 126 members."It was an honor to serve my country and people in times of difficulties, including pandemics, wars, and tariffs," he said after the of protesters, many of them young people, had been taking to the streets for two weeks before the vote, demanding Oyun-Erdene's has rejected allegations of corruption, accusing critics of launching a smear campaign against to Transparency International, Mongolia has seen worsening corruption since Oyun-Erdene came into power. Last year, it was ranked 114th out of 180 countries in terms of government transparency.A former communist state sandwiched between Russia and China, Mongolia has been transitioning to democracy since the fall of the Soviet Union in the early is a persistent problem. Last year, US prosecutors sought to forfeit former Mongolian PM Sukhbaatar Batbold's two New York apartments that he allegedly bought using stolen mining who served from 2012 to 2015, denied recent years, Mongolia has sought to build closer ties with the West, counting the United States and European countries as part of its "third neighbor" foreign policy. — BBC

Irish Politician Describes Israel's Military Campaign in Gaza as ‘Barbaric'
Irish Politician Describes Israel's Military Campaign in Gaza as ‘Barbaric'

Leaders

time31-05-2025

  • Leaders

Irish Politician Describes Israel's Military Campaign in Gaza as ‘Barbaric'

A video went viral on social media showing Irish Politician Barry Andrews condemning Israel's war in Gaza and describing Netanyahu's campaign as 'barbaric'. Andrews noted that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that his war in Gaza was a battle against barbarism. However, the civilized world has concluded that Israel is the one who conducted a campaign of barbarism, acceding to Andrews. 'A majority of European countries have finally concluded that it is barbaric to use starvation as a weapon of war,' Andrews added. He also described the statement of Bezalel Smotrich, Israeli Minister of Finance, regarding ethnic cleansing in Gaza as 'barbaric'. @palestinegaza11357 ♬ son original – palestinegaza11357 Meanwhile, Andrews called 'Gideon's Chariots' operation as 'barbaric' and blatant violation of the international humanitarian law. 'But we cannot just focus on access for aid, we also have to make sure that violence has to come to an end,' he added. What hostage has ever been released as a result of a military action? And today we read that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) fired warning shots at French diplomats and others visiting the West Bank,' he said. 'If this is the way European diplomats are treated, imagine how Palestinians are treated in the West Bank,' the politician said. At the end of his speech, Andrews said that it was unavoidable to conclude that it was the IDF that was conducting a barbaric campaign. Since the beginning of Hamas-Israel War in Gaza in 2023, the Israeli strikes have killed more than 53,500 Palestinians and wounded more than 118,000, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Related Topics: Arab Ministers Condemn Israel's Ban on West Bank Visit Israel Plans to Build Jewish Israeli State in West Bank France May Toughen Stance on Israel Over Gaza Aid Blockage Short link : Post Views: 1

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store