North West water supplier's profit doubles as it hikes customer bills
The company's more than seven million customers across the North West are seeing their water bills rise by an average of 32% over the next five years.
But the biggest annual rise came in April this year, when bills surged by an average of £86 for a typical household.
The increase is designed to fund £13.7 billion of upgrades to its pipes and sewers, after the company was accused of illegally pumping raw sewage into Lake Windermere in recent years.
But for the year ending March 31, as it geared up to charge customers more, United Utilities' pre-tax profits also more than doubled to £355 million.
And it said on Thursday that it will increase its dividend payout to investors by 4.2% to 34.6p.
Chief executive Louise Beardmore said: 'We have delivered another strong set of results for customers, communities and the environment in the North West.'
She pointed to the company cutting sewage spills per storm overflow by a quarter last year.
The company was recently accused of failing to report more than 100 million litres of untreated sewage that it illegally dumped into Windermere over a three-year period.
Ms Beardmore told MPs in February that United Utilities' record on spills and flooding 'isn't good enough'.
She took home a pay packet of £1.4 million last year, made up of a base salary worth £690,000, plus benefits, bonuses and long-term share awards.
The UK's privatised water companies have faced growing public outrage over the extent of pollution, rising bills, high dividends, and executive pay and bonuses.
The results come after a survey revealed households' trust in water companies has fallen to a new low amid the crisis.
Fewer households – 53%, down 2% on last year to another all-time low – believe the amount water companies charge is fair, according to the Consumer Council for Water's (CCW) annual Water Matters study.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 days ago
- The Independent
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that water companies would be 'extremely foolish' to increase salaries to try and get around a bonus ban. Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.
ITV News
6 days ago
- ITV News
United Utilities banned from awarding bonuses to executives under new Ofwat rules
Water supplier United Utilities has been barred from awarding bonuses to its most senior executives after the introduction of new regulations aimed at holding water companies accountable for their performance. The new rules, which came into force on Friday 6 June under the Water (Special Measures) Act, mean United Utilities cannot offer financial bonuses to its chief executive or chief financial officer. The measures apply to companies that fail to meet environmental or consumer standards, fall short on financial resilience, or are convicted of a criminal offence. Regulator Ofwat has been given new powers to recover any bonus payments made in breach of the ban. The restrictions are not permanent, and United Utilities may be able to resume performance-related rewards in 2025/26, provided it complies with the new conditions. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has revealed that over the past decade, more than £112 million in bonuses and incentives have been paid out by UK water companies. Ministers say this is no longer acceptable where companies have failed to meet key standards. Commenting on the new measures, Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: ' Water company bosses, like anyone else, should only get bonuses if they've performed well, certainly not if they've failed to tackle water pollution. 'Undeserved bonuses will now be banned as part of the Government's plan to clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.' Campaign group River Action has welcomed the ban, but warned against companies attempting to bypass it by increasing base pay. Chief executive James Wallace said: 'We won't end pollution for profit until water companies are refinanced and governed for public benefit. Any attempt to inflate base pay as a workaround must be stamped out.'
Times
6 days ago
- Times
Bosses at six UK water companies face ban on bonuses
Bosses at six water firms including Thames Water will be banned from receiving bonuses this year because of serious environmental pollution and other failings. It is the first time water chiefs have been banned from receiving such financial incentives, which are worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. The scale of incentives paid to water leaders, totalling more than £112 million over the last decade, stoked public anger as sewage spills hit record levels. Labour's manifesto promised to ban them for water companies that missed standards. Senior executives at Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities, and Southern Water will now be barred from receiving bonuses for the 2024 to 2025 financial year. The move was made possible by a law passed in February, the first step in the government's reforms of the sector. Louise Beardmore, CEO of United Utilities, which caused more raw sewage spills than any other water firm in 2024, will be blocked from taking her bonus, which was £440,000 last year. Thames Water CEO Chris Weston, who recently defended taking his £195,000 bonus last year, will also miss his. Leaders of three companies escaped the ban, as they avoided serious shortcomings on environmental, financial and customer performance. Those include the sector's highest paid leader — Liv Garfield, the Severn Trent CEO, who earned £3.2 million last year including a £584,000 bonus. Susan Davy, CEO at South West Water, will also be able to take hers, despite the outbreak of a parasite in Devon that caused drinking water contamination in May 2024. Caroline Voaden, the Lib Dem MP for South Devon, said: 'It's hard to think of a company more deserving to have its boss's bonuses banned than South West Water. The company's absence is baffling and throws the validity of the entire policy into doubt.' Liv Garfield, the Severn Trent CEO, last year defended her multimillion-pound pay package and claimed that Severn Trent had made 'massive progress on river quality' DAVE BENETT/GETTY IMAGES FOR VEUVE CLICQUOT Heidi Mottram, the Northumbrian Water CEO who took a £234,000 bonus last year, will also be eligible to take one. Her company was fined £15.6 million this week by Ofwat for excessive sewage spills. There are fears that bosses' salaries will simply be raised to compensate for any missed bonuses. 'Any attempt to inflate base pay as a workaround must be stamped out,' said James Wallace, CEO of the charity River Action. A government source vowed to take more action in future if companies tried a workaround. Were a banned company to flout the ban when company reports are published this summer, regulator Ofwat has powers to claw back the money. Thames Water was hit by a ban because it was responsible for seven of the most serious pollution incidents last year — category one — from the Chilterns to London. It also failed to clear the bar on financial stability, because its credit rating was downgraded to an unacceptable level in April 2024. Southern Water, Anglian Water, United Utilities, and Yorkshire Water were all banned for a single category one pollution incident. Yorkshire also failed on consumer standards, while Wessex Water failed because of a criminal conviction after sewage killed thousands of fish. GETTY However, the CEO of Wessex will be able to take a bonus, as will the chief financial officer at Anglian, because of when they were appointed. The ban is time-limited. If the nine utilities perform satisfactorily this year, bosses will be eligible to take them next year. Two years ago, some chief executives voluntarily waived their bonuses in the face of public anger over environmental failures. The Times's Clean it Up campaign has been calling for stronger regulation to help Britain's rivers and seas. Steve Reed, the environment secretary, said: 'I applaud The Times for shining a light on the payment of unfair bonuses to water bosses. We promised to take action — and this historic ban comes into force today.' The bans come days after Thames Water's rescue creditor pulled out, increasing the risk of the debt-saddled company collapsing into nationalisation. A government-appointed commission said this week the water industry was suffering 'deep-rooted' issues that would require wide-ranging regulatory reforms to solve. driest springs on record. Reservoirs in England were 77 per cent full at the end of May, compared with 85 per cent at the end of May 2022, a year which saw widespread drought. The average for the end of May is 93 per cent. Drought has been officially declared in the northwest. The northeast, Yorkshire and east and west Midlands are classed as in 'prolonged dry weather', the final stage before drought. Youlgrave Waterworks, a tiny water firm which serves 500 homes in Derbyshire, has introduced a hosepipe ban, with other companies keeping them under review. In a sign of the escalating risk of restrictions on water use, the drought group will now meet monthly.
