
Revealed: Big tech's new datacentres will take water from the world's driest areas
Amazon, Microsoft and Google are operating datacentres that use vast amounts of water in some of the world's driest areas and are building many more, an investigation by SourceMaterial and the Guardian has found.
With Donald Trump pledging to support them, the three technology giants are planning hundreds of datacentres in the US and across the globe, with a potentially huge impact on populations already living with water scarcity.
'The question of water is going to become crucial,' said Lorena Jaume-Palasí, founder of the Ethical Tech Society. 'Resilience from a resource perspective is going to be very difficult for those communities.'
Efforts by Amazon, the world's largest online retailer, to mitigate its water use have sparked opposition from inside the company, SourceMaterial's investigation found, with one of its own sustainability experts warning that its plans are 'not ethical'.
In response to questions from SourceMaterial and the Guardian, spokespeople for Amazon and Google defended their developments, saying they always take water scarcity into account. Microsoft declined to provide a comment.
Datacentres, vast warehouses containing networked servers used for the remote storage and processing of data, as well as by information technology companies to train AI models such as ChatGPT, use water for cooling. SourceMaterial's analysis identified 38 active datacentres owned by the big three tech firms in parts of the world already facing water scarcity, as well as 24 more under development.
Datacentres' locations are often industry secrets. But by using local news reports and industry sources Baxtel and Data Center Map, SourceMaterial compiled a map of 632 datacentres – either active or under development – owned by Amazon, Microsoft and Google.
It shows that those companies' plans involve a 78% increase in the number of datacentres they own worldwide as cloud computing and AI cause a surge in the world's demand for storage, with construction planned in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
In parts of the world where water is plentiful, datacentres' high water usage is less problematic, but in 2023 Microsoft said that 42% of its water came from 'areas with water stress', while Google said 15% of its water consumption was in areas with 'high water scarcity'. Amazon did not report a figure.
Now these companies plan to expand their activities in some of the world's most arid regions, SourceMaterial and the Guardian's analysis found.
'It's no coincidence they are building in dry areas,' as datacentres have to be built inland, where low humidity reduces the risk of metal corrosion, while seawater also causes corrosion if used for cooling, Jaume-Palasí said.
Amazon's three proposed new datacentres in the Aragon region of northern Spain – each next to an existing Amazon datacentre – are licensed to use an estimated 755,720 cubic metres of water a year, roughly enough to irrigate 233 hectares (576 acres) of corn, one of the region's main crops.
In practice, the water usage will be even higher as that figure doesn't take into account water used to generate the electricity that will power the new installations, said Aaron Wemhoff, an energy efficiency specialist at Villanova University in Pennsylvania.
Between them, Amazon's new datacentres in the Aragon region are predicted to use more electricity than the entire region currently consumes. Meanwhile, Amazon in December asked the regional government for permission to increase water consumption at its three existing datacentres by 48%.
Opponents have accused the company of being undemocratic by trying to rush through its application over the Christmas period. More water is needed because 'climate change will lead to an increase in global temperatures and the frequency of extreme weather events, including heat waves', Amazon wrote in its application.
'They're using too much water. They're using too much energy,' said Aurora Gómez of the campaign group Tu Nube Seca Mi Río – Spanish for 'Your cloud is drying my river' – which has called for a moratorium on new datacentres in Spain due to water scarcity.
Spain has seen rising numbers of heat-related deaths in extreme weather events linked by scientists to the climate crisis. Last month, Aragon's government asked for EU aid to tackle its drought.
Farmer Chechu Sánchez said he's worried the datacentres will use up water he needs for his crops.
'These datacentres use water that comes from northern Aragon, where I am,' he said. 'They consume water – where do they take it from? They take it from you, of course.'
With 75% of the country already at risk of desertification, the combination of the climate crisis and datacentre expansion is 'bringing Spain to the verge of ecological collapse', Jaume-Palasí said.
Asked about the decision to approve more datacentres, a spokesperson for the Aragonese government said they wouldn't compromise the region's water resources because their impact is 'imperceptible'.
Amazon doesn't provide overall figures for the water its datacentres use worldwide. But it does claim that it will be 'water positive' by 2030, offsetting its consumption by providing water to communities and ecosystems in areas of scarcity elsewhere.
Amazon says it is currently offsetting 41% of its water usage in areas it deems unsustainable. But it's an approach that has already caused controversy inside the company.
'I raised the issue in all the right places that this is not ethical,' said Nathan Wangusi, a former water sustainability manager at Amazon. 'I disagreed quite a lot with that principle coming from a pure sustainability background.'
Microsoft and Google have also pledged to become 'water positive' by 2030 through water offsetting, as well as finding ways to use water more efficiently.
Water offsetting can't work in the same way as carbon offsetting, where a tonne of pollutants removed from the atmosphere can cancel out a tonne emitted elsewhere, said Wemhoff, the Villanova University specialist. Improving access to water in one area does nothing to help the community that has lost access to it far away.
'Carbon is a global problem – water is more localised,' he said.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
Amazon should pursue water accessibility projects 'because it's the right thing to do', not to offset the company's usage and make claims about being 'water positive', Wangusi said.
In March, Amazon announced that it would use AI to help farmers in Aragon use water more efficiently.
But that is 'a deliberate strategy of obfuscation' that distracts from the company's request to raise water consumption, said Gómez, the campaigner.
Amazon said its approach shouldn't be described as offsetting because the projects are in communities where the company operates.
'We know that water is a precious resource, and we're committed to doing our part to help solve this challenge,' said Harry Staight, an Amazon spokesperson. 'It's important to remember many of our facilities do not require the ongoing use of water to cool operations.'
Amazon is by far the biggest owner of datacentres in the world by dint of its Amazon Web Services cloud division, but Google and Microsoft are catching up.
In the US, which boasts the largest number of datacentres in the world, Google is the most likely to build in dry areas, SourceMaterial's data shows. It has seven active datacentres in parts of the US facing water scarcity and is building six more.
'We have to be very, very protective around the growth of large water users,' said Jenn Duff, a council member in Mesa, Arizona, a fast-growing datacentre hub. In January, Meta, the owner of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, opened a $1bn datacentre in the city, and Google is developing two more.
The surrounding Maricopa county, where Microsoft also has two active datacentres, is facing 'extreme drought', according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In June 2023, Arizona state officials revoked construction permits for some new homes there due to a lack of groundwater.
Drought has not halted Google's plans for a second Mesa datacentre, while its first centre has a permit to use 5.5m cubic metres of water a year – about the same quantity used by 23,000 ordinary Arizonans.
'Is the increase in tax revenue and the relatively paltry number of jobs worth the water?' said Kathryn Sorensen, an Arizona State University professor and a former director of Mesa's water department. 'It is incumbent on city councils to think very carefully and examine the trade-offs.'
Google said it won't use the full amount of water in its Mesa permit as it plans to use an air cooling system.
'Cooling systems are a hyperlocal decision – informed by our data-driven strategy called 'climate-conscious cooling' that balances the availability of carbon-free energy and responsibly sourced water to minimise climate impact both today and in the future,' said Google spokesperson Chris Mussett.
In January at the White House, Trump announced 'Project Stargate', which he called 'the largest AI infrastructure project in history'.
Starting in Texas, the $500bn joint venture between OpenAI, the American software company Oracle, Japan-based SoftBank and Emirati investment firm MGX will finance datacentres across the US.
The day before the Stargate announcement, Trump's inauguration date, the Chinese company DeepSeek launched its own AI model, claiming it had used far less computing power – and therefore less water – than its western rivals.
More recently, Bloomberg has reported that Microsoft is pulling back on some of its plans for new datacentres around the world. Microsoft has also published plans for a 'zero water' datacentre, and Google has said it will incorporate air cooling to reduce water use – though it isn't yet clear how its systems will work
'I'll believe it when I see it,' said Jaume-Palasí. 'Most datacentres right now are going from air cooling to water cooling because liquid is more efficient when you try to cool down high-density racks, which are the ones that are mostly being used for AI.'
And while the Trump administration has pledged to fast-track new energy projects to power these new datacentres, it has so far said nothing about the water they could use up.
'Neither people nor data can live without water,' said Gómez. 'But human life is essential and data isn't.'
The locations of the datacentres were compiled using local news reports and industry sources Baxtel and Data Center Map. Of the 632 datacentres analysed, we were unable to determine the 'active' or 'developing' status for 16. Areas with water scarcity were defined as places where water is 10 times as scarce as the world's average, according to a metric developed by academics for the United Nations.
Additional reporting by Eleanor Gunn
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
No more leprechaun economics: Ireland's tax swindle is finally ending
Donald Trump has sent Ireland to the naughty step. Once the altar boy of American commerce, Dublin now finds itself blacklisted alongside China, Germany and Vietnam, each a prime candidate for tariffs and sanctions. The offence? Running a surplus with the United States. On the face of it, the complaint seems petty. One country sells more than it buys. So what? But Ireland's problem, like the others on Trump's list, is that its surplus rests on a creed that has fallen out of favour. As offshoring hollowed out Middle America, the old Clinton mantra 'It's the economy, stupid' has begun to sound rather less clever than it once did. That, at least, is the mood in Trump's Washington. And judging by his campaign-trail fixation with the word tariff, many Americans agree: a reckoning is overdue. Ireland offers a particularly inviting target. Its surplus owes less to tangible exports than to tax gymnastics. A pill is made in Ireland for 50 cents, sold to a sister company (also in Ireland) for €10, and then shipped to the global market at the same price. The profit is booked in Dublin, while tax collectors elsewhere are left out of pocket. The trick doesn't stop there. Intellectual property is shifted to Irish subsidiaries, global sales are routed through Irish entities, and profits vanish into low or no-tax jurisdictions. Together, these sleights of hand form what we're invited to call the Irish economic miracle – a miracle that, by one estimate, deprives other countries of nearly $20 billion a year in tax revenue. The question being asked in Washington is: who benefits? Ireland, clearly. One in every eight euros of its tax revenue now comes from US firms. That's a fivefold increase since 2010, driven by Ireland's famously 'competitive' tax regime. It accounts for a large slice of a €150 billion bilateral surplus. When Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin visited the Oval Office in March, Trump put it plainly: 'We do have a massive deficit with Ireland, because Ireland was very smart. They took our pharmaceutical companies away.' It's hard to argue with the logic. Ireland has been undeniably clever at attracting American capital. Spending it is another matter. Much of the money sits on Irish books without generating the economic activity one might expect. The state's coffers may be overflowing, but the windfall is narrowly concentrated. Public spending, as ever, has been handled with something shy of brilliance. From roads and hospitals to housing and energy, the services most visible to the public have seen little improvement, despite years of surging revenues. Meanwhile, resources have been channelled into more headline-friendly ventures: a €350,000 bike shed outside parliament; a vast new hospital project already among Europe's most expensive; and billions annually to accommodate asylum applicants – most of whom, the government has conceded, are economic migrants. The miracle, it seems, left little room for prudence. As every lottery winner learns, easy money tends to breed excess. But with full coffers, Ireland could afford to paper over the cracks. Meanwhile, American tech and pharma giants have flourished. Apple, Microsoft, Pfizer and others have routed billions through Ireland, to the delight of shareholders and pension funds. If Trump moves to close loopholes or impose tariffs, these are the interests he'll have to console ahead of the midterms. The losers, predictably, are the American workers left behind by the long, slow flight of industry and tax revenue. Worse off still are the countries quietly drained by Ireland's magic act. The sums involved are vast. The structures that move them are so complex they can feel impossibly abstract. But the consequences are not. According to modelling by the Universities of St Andrews and Leicester, this tax loss has deprived more than 100,000 children of school attendance and some 1.1 million people of access to basic sanitation. Quibble with the methods if you like, but the core truth is hard to deny: when profits are rerouted, people are short-changed. Not that Dublin seems overly troubled. Only last month, Ireland's Taoiseach declared: 'Ireland earns its living from an open and fair approach to world trade.' The most pious nations often turn out to be the most artful. Ireland rarely misses a chance to sermonise on Gaza, climate justice, or whichever cause currently allows it to cast itself as Europe's moral compass. But as La Rochefoucauld noted, hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue. And by that measure, Ireland has paid handsomely.


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
US President Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk, and warned that his former ally and campaign benefactor could face 'serious consequences' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Advertisement Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. Advertisement 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Advertisement Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Trump's spending plans appeared to cause the rift initially (AP) Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. Advertisement In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. Advertisement The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE All the ways that Trump blocked Elon Musk's agenda and Cabinet picks despite spending MAGA millions
President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk shared a delicate political dance in the 130 days that the president's one-time 'first buddy' who professed to love him 'as much as a straight man can love another man.' It appeared to be the beginning of a beautiful friendship that sparked fascination as the world's richest man enjoyed the company of the world's soon-to-be inaugurated world's most powerful man. After Trump won the presidential election with historic margins, Musk was among the euphoric crowd that gathered at Mar-a-lago and began plotting the future of the administration. The eclectic billionaire was gleeful as a he hung around Mar-a-lago with his son 'Little X,' even renting one of the cottages at the club and appeared with the president frequently throughout the holidays. Trump was grateful for Musk's support and allowed him to attend meetings where they discussed cabinet nominees. He sat on calls with foreign leaders, attended personal meetings and even helped vet potential candidates. Musk's presence and unfamiliarity with politics frustrated some of the president's staffers as he tried to insert his preferred choices ahead of other potential candidates, according to reports. But Trump appreciated having Musk around, as they celebrated his election victory. 'Elon won't go home. I can't get rid of him. Until I don't like him,' Trump told Republicans during a speech after the election. Just weeks after the election, Musk openly solicited social media reaction for Trump's choice for Secretary of Treasury describing Scott Bessent as a 'business-as-usual' candidate and said that Howard Lutnick would 'actually enact change.' 'Business-as-usual is driving America bankrupt, so we need change one way or another,' he wrote. Musk was personally closer with Lutnick, but Trump ultimately chose Bessent, despite lobbying from Musk. Trump ultimately directed Musk to the DOGE effort, as the billionaire famously claimed he could save the federal government up to $2 trillion dollars. But putting Musk in charge of government cuts was a headache for cabinet members as Musk tried to control their agencies. 'Rubio never liked him, but a lot of them did not like him,' a person familiar with the dynamics of the president's cabinet told the Daily Mail. The State Department dismissed the claim. 'Nobody has time for silly gossip. Secretary Rubio is completely focused on carrying out the President's agenda on behalf of the American people,' a senior State Department official told the Daily Mail. Bessent clashed with Musk after he convinced Trump to drop Musk's choice as acting Internal Revenue Service commissioner for a nominee of his own choosing. Details of the disagreement leaked into the media, as both men reportedly shouted at each other as reports described the scene as 'quite loud.' A March incident with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Musk was also reported, as the New York Times reported he was 'incensed' after Musk said he had fired 'nobody' in his agency. The pair debated in front of the president, but Trump conceded that secretaries would be in charge of firing employees in their agencies. Transportation secretary Sean Duffy also debated with Musk, complaining he was trying to fire his air traffic controllers at a time of multiple plane crashes in the. United States. Trump remained patient with Elon despite criticisms behind the scenes about his efforts, and publicly supported him in front of the press. 'Is anybody unhappy with Elon? If you are, we will throw him out of here,' Trump said after a cabinet meeting in February. Trump's cabinet members laughed but nobody voiced any dissent from Musk's presence in the meeting. Elon's efforts to insert himself into major government policy and infrastructure deals were also frustrated. Musk's dream, a person familiar told the Daily Mail, was to implement his xAI throughout the entire federal government in an effort to both make the government more efficient, but to also make his AI stronger with the federal government's data. But Trump continued to work with other major tech billionaires on the AI issue, even some of Musk's enemies. In February, Trump sidestepped Musk to announce a major AI infrastructure deal branded as Stargate with OpenAI's Sam Altman, Musk's former business partner and current nemesis. After Trump appeared with Altman to announce the $500,000 billion project, Musk was left fuming on social media asserting 'they actually don't have the money.' Elon also tried to block the Stargate investment partnership in the United Arab Emirates after learning his xAI company would be excluded. Despite Musk's protests, the deal was announced when Trump visited the UAE. Musk was also opposed to Trump's Big Beautiful Bill after learning included a ten-year ban on state regulations, a provision sought by Altman to boost the development of AI, according to a source. Musk was also thwarted when he tried to convince Duffy and Republican lawmakers to use his Starlink satellite internet system to modernize and replace the current FAA air traffic control system. Although Musk claimed he had no interest in saving government subsidies for electric cars, the Republican Big Beautiful Bill passed in the House of Representatives included provisions to repeal tax credits for the purchase of electric cars, as administration officials posited it might be why he was upset by the bill. The most crippling blow in the Trump/Musk relationship happened after details leaked to the New York Times in March that the Pentagon set up a briefing for Musk that would include plans for any war that could break out with China. Behind the scenes, Trump reacted quickly. 'What the f**k is Elon doing there? Make sure he doesn't go,' he said, according to Axios. He later insisted on social media that 'China will not even be mentioned or discussed' in the briefing with Musk. 'Once that leaked, it really had a dramatic transformation on Trump's opinion of him,' it was really a big turning point,' a person familiar with the administration told the Daily Mail. Trump remained patient with Musk although support for him started to fray within the administration as they waited for his 130 day period as a special advisor to the president. Even after Musk voiced concerns with the Republican bill making its way through the House of Representatives, Trump wanted to make sure they were leaving on good terms. Together they defended Musk's efforts to slash government waste, fraud, and abuse even as the billionaire appeared wistful as he prepared to leave the White House. Trump even gave Musk an elaborate golden key to the White House, as a sign he valued his service. When reporters asked if Musk would remain an informal advisor to Trump, the billionaire replied, 'I mean, yeah, I expect to remain a friend and an advisor, and certainly if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at the President's service.' Six days later, he erupted on social media, marking another chapter in the long history of frustrated business and political leaders failing to work together.